Re: Mark Probert Still lying

Jan said:

Mark Probert is once again lying.

Jan

Lying? You're accusing someone of LYING, again?
Why don't you ever PROVE your accusations?
Is it because they're FALSE accusations?

Like this one:

To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]

Instead of responding to what you say, Jan is trying to discredit
you by making insinuations about who you are or what your
motives may be.

Soon, she may accuse you of being on the payroll of the
pharmaceutical companies, etc. That's the way Jan works.

That would be ANOTHER LIE from Mark Thorson. I have NEVER accused

anyone of

Quoted message said:

any such thing.

So do prove your claim Mark!!!!!

You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!!

----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills -----

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com

Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly
comes from paid shill Mark Probert.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com

Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com

As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com

As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact
he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Jan Drew Still lying
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 12:36 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Jan said:

Mark Probert is once again lying.

Jan

Lying?

YES lying, just like you do and did and had to make a retraction.

I answered your post, it went to alt. test instead of MHA which further shows
you insane tactics.

http://tinyurl.com/39u2g

I suggest you get a grip.

Jan

Jan said:

YES lying, just like you do and did and had to make a retraction.

You persist in acusing me of LYING,
but you have not shown EVEN ONE example of
a statement I made which is false, much less a LIE.

Why don't you post an example, Jan? Then everybody
could see for themselves what one of these statements
looks like, and decide for themselves whether or not
it was a LIE. Why don't you want people to do that, Jan?
Why do you want to prevent people from reaching their
own conclusions about whether anything I said was a LIE?

Is it because any example you could choose would
OBVIOUSLY NOT be a false statement? And then,
people would see it was not me who makes LIES.

Do you need help seeing what a LIE looks like, Jan?

Here is an example:

To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]

Instead of responding to what you say, Jan is trying to discredit
you by making insinuations about who you are or what your
motives may be.

Soon, she may accuse you of being on the payroll of the
pharmaceutical companies, etc. That's the way Jan works.

That would be ANOTHER LIE from Mark Thorson. I have NEVER accused

anyone of

Quoted message said:

any such thing.

So do prove your claim Mark!!!!!

You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!!

----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills -----

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com

Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly
comes from paid shill Mark Probert.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com

Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com

As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com

As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact
he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people.

<< You persist in acusing me of LYING,
but you have not shown EVEN ONE example of
a statement I made which is false, much less a LIE. >>

So, Thorson, if we took all of your postings in usenet newsgroups present and
past, and send them all to
Cell Tech, what do you suppose their response would be? Would they be able to
prove that you had lied? Or not?

If yes, Jan hasn't lied. If no, Jan has lied. Can we stop this Cell Tech
issue once and for all?

"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan Drew Still lying
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 1:10 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Jan said:

YES lying, just like you do and did and had to make a retraction.

You persist in acusing me of LYING,
but you have not shown EVEN ONE example of
a statement I made which is false, much less a LIE.

Oh knock it off, as you know better, unless ytou have lost it completely.

From: Jan ([email hidden])
Subject: Mark Thorson The Accuser And Liar
View: Complete Thread (2 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2004-04-10 15:39:19 PST

http://www.celltech.com/resources/info_central/response.asp

Does Super Blue Green Algae contain Anatoxin-a?(posted 6-19-01)

One individual was responsible for a great deal of miscommunication regarding
anatoxin-a, information which is still accessible on many Internet sites. Cell
Tech sued Mark Thorson for posting defamatory statements about Cell Tech, its
products and its personnel to various Internet or Usenet news groups. Cell
Tech's lawsuit against Mr. Thorson has now been settled. As part of the
settlement agreement, Mr. Thorson has posted the Retraction Statement that
appears below. Although he did retract the allegations that he had been widely
circulating, we all know that one cannot, with a single correct statement, undo
all the harm done by many mis-statements that continue to circulate.

The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to various
newsgroups:

Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer

During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and
other newsgroups a file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I now
retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer.

The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,
produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized as
addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin
because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users. I
have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that would
disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super Blue
Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a
Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.

Mis-state

to state incorrectly : give a false account of

False

intentionally untrue

lie

untrue with intent to deceive

That's as clear as a bell.

Furthermore your lastest ranblings were answered truthfully, except you sent my
post to alt test rather than here, that also proves your dishonesty.

March 9th.

http://tinyurl.com/39bym

Jan

DEBBEE1023 said:

So, Thorson, if we took all of your postings in usenet newsgroups
present and past, and send them all to
Cell Tech, what do you suppose their response would be?
Would they be able to prove that you had lied? Or not?

I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
Only Jan has done that.

Quoted message said:

If yes, Jan hasn't lied. If no, Jan has lied.
Can we stop this Cell Tech issue once and for all?

Sure. All Jan has to do is post an example of a statement
I made about Cell Tech which is a false statement.
She doesn't have to prove it was a LIE, merely show
an example of a FALSE statement that I made.
That will do. Then I will apologize to her for
disputing her allegation that I lied.

That's all Jan has to do -- show an example of one
of these false statements that I made.

Why do you suppose she won't do that?

Jan the Accuser said:

Oh knock it off, as you know better, unless ytou have lost it completely.

But the retraction does not say any of my statements were false,
much less a LIE. If you think one of the statements referred to
by the retraction is a LIE, then why don't you post that statement?

Why don't you post an ORIGINAL STATEMENT made by me
which is a LIE?

Why don't you do that, Jan?

You know what an ORIGINAL STATEMENT which is a LIE
looks like, don't you Jan? Do I need to show you an example?

To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]

Instead of responding to what you say, Jan is trying to discredit
you by making insinuations about who you are or what your
motives may be.

Soon, she may accuse you of being on the payroll of the
pharmaceutical companies, etc. That's the way Jan works.

That would be ANOTHER LIE from Mark Thorson. I have NEVER accused

anyone of

Quoted message said:

any such thing.

So do prove your claim Mark!!!!!

You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!!

----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills -----

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com

Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly
comes from paid shill Mark Probert.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com

Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com

As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com

As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact
he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan Drew Still lying
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 5:10 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

DEBBEE1023 said:

So, Thorson, if we took all of your postings in usenet newsgroups
present and past, and send them all to
Cell Tech, what do you suppose their response would be?
Would they be able to prove that you had lied? Or not?

I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
Only Jan has done that.

WRONG.

From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Mark Thorson Is Deceitful.
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2004-04-07 05:06:13 PST

Mark,

You are a Liar and that is that. Now Shut Up because you have been going on
and on for nearly two years now. Do something charitable and make yourself
feel well Mr Deceitful.

Cheers, Rod

Search Result 2
From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Mark Thorson Deserves a Medal
View: Complete Thread (14 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2004-04-02 02:56:15 PST

Mark I think you are a deceitful person as well as a Liar.

Cheers, Rod

From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: ElectroJan
View: Complete Thread (2 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2002-11-22 05:54:06 PST

MARK THORSON IS A LIAR
MARK THORSEN SHOOTS HIS MOUTH OFF AND GETS LEGAL THREATS.
MARK THORSEN HAS TO WITHDRAW HIS STATEMENTS TO AVOID PAYING LIBEL AMOUNTS.
MARK THORSEN HAS NOT LEARNT TO "SHUT HIS OPEN SOUTH"
IN SHORT MARK THORSEN IS A "NET FREAK".
MARK THORSEN ALSO DOES NOT POST TO THIS NEWSGROUP BUT RATHER ALT, TEST.
WHAT A [censored]>>>>>>>
Happy Days, Rod

Search Result 4
From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Mercury Amalgams- Thorson's Retractions
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2002-12-04 04:49:23 PST

BEWARE!!
Mark Thorson makes libellous statements and then retracts same when faced
with law suits.Being a slow learner he will always do this until he converts
to Falun Dafa.
Cheers, Rod.

From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Jan's hatred for Jews
View: Complete Thread (103 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2004-02-08 05:50:12 PST

Hmmm ,
me thinks it is not a hatred of Jews but rather exposing some people that
hide behind the Jew brand.
Of course Mark Thorson has a hatred himself and that is why he wrote this
type of crapola.

Cheers, Rod.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan Drew Still lying
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 5:14 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Jan said:

Oh knock it off, as you know better, unless ytou have lost it completely.

But the retraction does not say any of my statements were false,
much less a LIE.

If you are looking for those exact words, Cell Tech was very kind to you.

Otherwise do read what they said. It means the same thing.

http://www.celltech.com/resources/info_central/response.asp

Does Super Blue Green Algae contain Anatoxin-a?(posted 6-19-01)

One individual was responsible for a great deal of miscommunication regarding
anatoxin-a, information which is still accessible on many Internet sites. Cell
Tech sued Mark Thorson for posting defamatory statements about Cell Tech, its
products and its personnel to various Internet or Usenet news groups. Cell
Tech's lawsuit against Mr. Thorson has now been settled. As part of the
settlement agreement, Mr. Thorson has posted the Retraction Statement that
appears below. Although he did retract the allegations that he had been widely
circulating, we all know that one cannot, with a single correct statement, undo
all the harm done by many mis-statements that continue to circulate.

The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to various
newsgroups:

Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer

During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and
other newsgroups a file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I now
retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer.

The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,
produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized as
addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin
because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users. I
have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that would
disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super Blue
Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a
Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.

Mis-state

to state incorrectly : give a false account of

False

intentionally untrue

lie

untrue with intent to deceive

Then you proved yourself to be dishonest AGAIN by sending my truthful post to
alt. test, and not here, as you didn't want the readers to see my truthful
response.

Squawk all you want, the facts can't be changed, furthermore every statement I
made which you keep posting is the truth.

March 9th.

http://tinyurl.com/39bym

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
Only Jan has done that.

WRONG.

Do you have anything to post which contradicts what I said?
Cell Tech has not alleged that I lied in any of my previous statements.
How does reposting snippets from the anonymous "Rod" persona
back up your FALSE accusation against me?

Are you just plain demented, or what?

Quoted message said:

From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Mark Thorson Is Deceitful.
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2004-04-07 05:06:13 PST

Mark,

You are a Liar and that is that. Now Shut Up because you have been going on
and on for nearly two years now. Do something charitable and make yourself
feel well Mr Deceitful.

Cheers, Rod

Search Result 2
From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Mark Thorson Deserves a Medal
View: Complete Thread (14 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2004-04-02 02:56:15 PST

Mark I think you are a deceitful person as well as a Liar.

Cheers, Rod

From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: ElectroJan
View: Complete Thread (2 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2002-11-22 05:54:06 PST

MARK THORSON IS A LIAR
MARK THORSEN SHOOTS HIS MOUTH OFF AND GETS LEGAL THREATS.
MARK THORSEN HAS TO WITHDRAW HIS STATEMENTS TO AVOID PAYING LIBEL AMOUNTS.
MARK THORSEN HAS NOT LEARNT TO "SHUT HIS OPEN SOUTH"
IN SHORT MARK THORSEN IS A "NET FREAK".
MARK THORSEN ALSO DOES NOT POST TO THIS NEWSGROUP BUT RATHER ALT, TEST.
WHAT A [censored]>>>>>>>
Happy Days, Rod

Search Result 4
From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Mercury Amalgams- Thorson's Retractions
This is the only article in this thread
View: Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2002-12-04 04:49:23 PST

BEWARE!!
Mark Thorson makes libellous statements and then retracts same when faced
with law suits.Being a slow learner he will always do this until he converts
to Falun Dafa.
Cheers, Rod.

From: Rod ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Jan's hatred for Jews
View: Complete Thread (103 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2004-02-08 05:50:12 PST

Hmmm ,
me thinks it is not a hatred of Jews but rather exposing some people that
hide behind the Jew brand.
Of course Mark Thorson has a hatred himself and that is why he wrote this
type of crapola.

Cheers, Rod.

<< I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
Only Jan has done that. >>

So, Thorson, if I take your latest post, and send it to Cell Tech, they will be
able to confirm you did not lie? If this is true, then can this be settled
once and for all?

"If you're gonna walk on thin ice, you may as well dance." (Jessie Winchester).

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 7:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
Only Jan has done that.

WRONG.

Do you have anything to post which contradicts what I said?

Yes, my post did just that.

Quoted message said:

Cell Tech has not alleged that I lied in any of my previous statements.

They said mis-statement.

to state incorrectly : give a false account of

That's the same thing as lying, and each time you post you did not lie, you lie
again. Then show more dishonesty sending my truthful post to alt test.

The End.

Jan

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 7:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Jan said:

>From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
>I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
>Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
>Only Jan has done that.

WRONG.

Do you have anything to post which contradicts what I said?

Yes, my post did just that.

Quoted message said:

Cell Tech has not alleged that I lied in any of my previous statements.

They said mis-statement.

to state incorrectly : give a false account of

Jan says that she believes that Hulda Clark does not have the cure for
all illnesses. Therefore Jan believes that Hulda Clark's assertion is
incorrect.

And by Jan's own criterium Hulda Clark lied since she gave a false
account.

But in Hulda's case Jan says that Hulda is simply mistaken. With Mark
she says that he lied. And Jan has the audacity to accuse others of
being selective. Sad that.

Aloha,

Rich

-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

They said mis-statement.

to state incorrectly : give a false account of

That's the same thing as lying, and each time you post you did not
lie, you lie again. Then show more dishonesty sending my truthful post
to alt test.

No, a misstatement is *not* the same thing as a lie. Lies are a
*proper subset* of misstatements; specifically, they're misstatements made
by someone who *knows* that he's making a misstatement yet does so with the
*intention* to deceive others, usually in order to gain some sort of
advantage for himself, an advantage he couldn't gain if he told the truth.
Most misstatements are simply honest mistakes.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: Eric Bohlman [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 10:49 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

They said mis-statement.

to state incorrectly : give a false account of

That's the same thing as lying, and each time you post you did not
lie, you lie again. Then show more dishonesty sending my truthful post
to alt test.

No, a misstatement is *not* the same thing as a lie. Lies are a
*proper subset* of misstatements; specifically, they're misstatements made
by someone who *knows* that he's making a misstatement yet does so with the
*intention* to deceive others

That's exactly what Mark did. Read in the archives, he was told and told and
warned over and over.

Quoted message said:

usually in order to gain some sort of
advantage for himself, an advantage he couldn't gain if he told the truth.
Most misstatements are simply honest mistakes.

See above.

Merriam Webster

misstate

: to state incorrectly : give a false account of

Jan

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: UPDATE Re: "Hulda Clark is a dangerous quack"
From: "mdd" [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 12:28 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 17, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hulda is hiding out in Mexico, since she is subject to legal process in

Quoted message said:

California and the other 49 states.

Hulda isn't hiding anywhere, she has an address and phone number, drivers
license, well as tax returns from the IRS.

Question:

How does jan know these things and can she post proof?

BTW, note how she does not undersatand the concept of hiding out in Mexico,
whefre the laws are lax, the the authorities can be bribed.

Sad to report, but "DEBBEE1023" <[email hidden]> slithered out
from under her rock and wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

<< You persist in acusing me of LYING,
but you have not shown EVEN ONE example of
a statement I made which is false, much less a LIE. >>

So, Thorson, if we took all of your postings in usenet newsgroups present

and

Quoted message said:

past, and send them all to
Cell Tech, what do you suppose their response would be? Would they be

able to

Quoted message said:

prove that you had lied? Or not?

See the fascist mindset? Report him to the authorities! Turn him in! Report
him!

Quoted message said:

If yes, Jan hasn't lied. If no, Jan has lied. Can we stop this Cell Tech
issue once and for all?

Yes, by Jan posting the words that she considers to be a lie.

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 7:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Jan said:

>From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
>I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
>Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
>Only Jan has done that.

WRONG.

Do you have anything to post which contradicts what I said?

Yes, my post did just that.

Quoted message said:

Cell Tech has not alleged that I lied in any of my previous statements.

They said mis-statement.

to state incorrectly : give a false account of

That's the same thing as lying, and each time you post you did not lie,

you lie

Quoted message said:

again.

The, by that standard Hulda Clark is LIAR. However, you will not admit that
she is, since your fingers would fall off.

Then show more dishonesty sending my truthful post to alt test.

Quoted message said:

The End.

Jan

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: Eric Bohlman [email hidden]
Date: 4/17/2004 10:49 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

They said mis-statement.

to state incorrectly : give a false account of

That's the same thing as lying, and each time you post you did not
lie, you lie again. Then show more dishonesty sending my truthful post
to alt test.

No, a misstatement is *not* the same thing as a lie. Lies are a
*proper subset* of misstatements; specifically, they're misstatements

made

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

by someone who *knows* that he's making a misstatement yet does so with

the

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

*intention* to deceive others

That's exactly what Mark did. Read in the archives, he was told and told

and

Quoted message said:

warned over and over.

He may have been told, etc. but, he has the right to not beleive what he is
being told until he is given proof. When he was given the proof, he did the
honorable thing. However, since you have no honor, you cannot understand
that.