Re: Mark Probert Still lying

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Jan)
Date: 4/20/2004 1:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

yep..as I said..she got away with it...

Quoted message said:

That is your opinion.

no...that was the legal name for what transpired...she got away with it..

Quoted message said:

Do prove she is in Mexico.

ahhhh...those pics recently published..with her name on the door?? her
websites proclaiming she is practicing in Mexico

? >>Hulda having too few brain cells??

Quoted message said:

Now more of your ethics are showing.

ethics?? wrong word Jannyster....

Quoted message said:

My neighbor looks very
well, thank you.

who cares about your "neighbor"....was wondering what YOUR definition of grunge
was...if the pics of the area surrounding Huldaquack's clinic is nOT what you
would call grunge....

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

having been to the area countless times...it is GRUNGE to the max...

Most likely another lie.

sorry pooo....have been there manyyyyy times...a relatively short drive
actually...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

As a matter of fact, I have been in Huld';s home in the past, and saw her

Quoted message said:

every
week day for several years.

Quoted message said:

I believe that was in Indiana??

Yes.

and so you have NOT been in her "home" in Mexico then??? which is what was
being discussed..before you lost the train..

Quoted message said:

Yes, the cause of going to Mexico is well known.

ahhhh...thought you said..see above...that she wasn't there?? you just
provided your own proof of your LIES Janster

Quoted message said:

Now do prove she is in Mexico.

Jan

count up about three paragraphs...you say "the cause of going to Mexico..etc
etc"

or did ya forget already

hawki.....

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (MCS Is NOT Real)
Date: 4/20/2004 8:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Hawki63)
Date: 4/19/2004 10:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

>Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
>From: [email hidden] (Jan)
>Date: 4/19/2004 9:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]>

>hawki poo baby, that was tried. I sat through the trial.
>

yep..as I said..she got away with it...

That is your opinion.

Its also our opinion that her son is a blithering idiot who can't even swat
flies

This thread is about Mark Probert still lying.

Furthemore, you don't know her son, so as usual you are blowing smoke.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying & Calling Names
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/20/2004 1:27 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

This thread isn't about pond scum.

It is about your claim:

Hulda is hiding out in Mexico, since she is subject to legal process in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

California and the other 49 states.

You've been asked to prove that claim. Evidently you can't, making up things is
lying.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/20/2004 1:53 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

What is she doing in Mexico NOW?

I have no idea where she is now, do you??? Please do prove she is in

Mexico.

Quoted message said:

Good point

Well, I am still waiting for your proof, got any??

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Then do prove your claim she is subject to legal process in California and
the

Quoted message said:

other 49 states.

Quoted message said:

Everyone is subject to legal process, within the rules, of all of the
states, while in the US. Who knows who has been trying to find her to serve
her with legal papers

You made the claim she was hiding out in Mexico, now it's up to you to prove
it.

Quoted message said:

Can you prove no one is trying to serve her? I cannot.

Stupid question.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

can she post proof?

Quoted message said:

>
> I'll overlook that; showing your stupidity.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Of course you wil overlook that, as you cannot prove that she is not

hiding

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

out in Mexico.

Quoted message said:

You made the claim YOU prove it.

Quoted message said:

I see. her clinic is there.

Sorry that's not proof she is hiding out in Mexico.

<snip irrevelant belittling>

Quoted message said:

Why is she hiding out in Mexico where the laws are lax?

Quoted message said:

I don't know that she is, if you do, please post your proof.

Quoted message said:

Do you have proof she is in the US?

Sorry this is a diversion, you made a claim, not either prove it or shut up.

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Hmmm??? Why

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

won't she open a clinic in the USA?

Because of lying people like yourself.

Quoted message said:

Nope

Yep

Quoted message said:

Now do post proof of your claims.

See above.

LOLOLOL. No where have you posted proof of you claim and you even tried the
trick of using David Wright saying *if* she is in Mexico as proof.

You are busted again, with added pathetic weaseling.

You should quit while you are behind.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/20/2004 2:14 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan Drew Still lying

Nope, title of this thread is Mark Probert still lying.

I cannot be *still* lying since I have not started.

That would be another lie.

You lied right here and you can't back up your claims as usual.

Open mouth, insert foot.

Jan

Jan said:

That would be another lie.

You lied right here and you can't back up your claims as usual.

Open mouth, insert foot.

Jan

You'd be a reliable source for information about LYING, right?

Eh, Jan?

To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]

Instead of responding to what you say, Jan is trying to discredit
you by making insinuations about who you are or what your
motives may be.

Soon, she may accuse you of being on the payroll of the
pharmaceutical companies, etc. That's the way Jan works.

That would be ANOTHER LIE from Mark Thorson. I have NEVER accused

anyone of

Quoted message said:

any such thing.

So do prove your claim Mark!!!!!

You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!!

----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills -----

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com

Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly
comes from paid shill Mark Probert.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com

Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com

As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com

As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact
he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people.

Jan the Accuser said:

This thread is about Mark Probert still lying.

Jan

Lying? In what sense are you using the word "lying"?

Do you mean the same thing as when you used it
on this occasion:

To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]

Instead of responding to what you say, Jan is trying to discredit
you by making insinuations about who you are or what your
motives may be.

Soon, she may accuse you of being on the payroll of the
pharmaceutical companies, etc. That's the way Jan works.

That would be ANOTHER LIE from Mark Thorson. I have NEVER accused

anyone of

Quoted message said:

any such thing.

So do prove your claim Mark!!!!!

You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!!

----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills -----

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com

Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly
comes from paid shill Mark Probert.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com

Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com

As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com

As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact
he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people.

Jan the Accuser said:

This thread is about Mark Probert still lying.

Jan

Oh? You mean we can't talk about this?

To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]

Instead of responding to what you say, Jan is trying to discredit
you by making insinuations about who you are or what your
motives may be.

Soon, she may accuse you of being on the payroll of the
pharmaceutical companies, etc. That's the way Jan works.

That would be ANOTHER LIE from Mark Thorson. I have NEVER accused

anyone of

Quoted message said:

any such thing.

So do prove your claim Mark!!!!!

You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!!

----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills -----

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com

Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly
comes from paid shill Mark Probert.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com

Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com

As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com

As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact
he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: JAN DREW Still lying
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 4/20/2004 9:41 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Jan the Accuser said:

This thread is about Mark Probert still lying.

Jan

Lying? In what sense are you using the word "lying"?

http://www.celltech.com/resources/info_central/response.asp

Does Super Blue Green Algae contain Anatoxin-a?(posted 6-19-01)
One individual was responsible for a great deal of miscommunication regarding
anatoxin-a, information which is still accessible on many Internet sites. Cell
Tech sued Mark Thorson for posting defamatory statements about Cell Tech, its
products and its personnel to various Internet or Usenet news groups. Cell
Tech's lawsuit against Mr. Thorson has now been settled. As part of the
settlement agreement, Mr. Thorson has posted the Retraction Statement that
appears below. Although he did retract the allegations that he had been widely
circulating, we all know that one cannot, with a single correct statement, undo
all the harm done by many mis-statements that continue to circulate.

The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to various
newsgroups:

Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer

During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and
other newsgroups a file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I now
retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer.

The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake,
produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized as
addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin
because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users. I
have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that would
disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super Blue
Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a
Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: JAN DREW Still lying
From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
Date: 4/20/2004 9:44 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Jan the Accuser said:

This thread is about Mark Probert still lying.

Jan

Mark Thoron overlooks his lie because he also is a liar and sends posts to alt
test rather than here which is totally dishonesty.

March 9th.

http://tinyurl.com/39bym

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/20/2004 2:14 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

>From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t

>Subject: Re: Jan Drew Still lying

Nope, title of this thread is Mark Probert still lying.

I cannot be *still* lying since I have not started.

That would be another lie.

Of course, that is impossible, as I pointed out. Your favorite tactic to
discredit those people who take your behavior to task is to find some
trumped up way to call them a liar. Your tactics are transparent.

Quoted message said:

You lied right here and you can't back up your claims as usual.

Hogwash. All of my claims can be backed up in the archives. Just look them
up.

Quoted message said:

Open mouth, insert foot.

At your age, you better stop doing that or you will throw yout your back.

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/20/2004 1:53 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

What is she doing in Mexico NOW?

I have no idea where she is now, do you??? Please do prove she is in

Mexico.

Quoted message said:

Good point

Well, I am still waiting for your proof, got any??

The only evidence is that she is in Mexico. Her clinic is there. Does she
have a clinic in the US? Nope.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Then do prove your claim she is subject to legal process in California

and

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

the

Quoted message said:

other 49 states.

Quoted message said:

Everyone is subject to legal process, within the rules, of all of the
states, while in the US. Who knows who has been trying to find her to

serve

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

her with legal papers

You made the claim she was hiding out in Mexico, now it's up to you to

prove

Quoted message said:

it.

She cannot be served with legal papers from any US jurisdiction while in
Mexico. Her clinic is there. Why should I assume that she is not there
ripping off the poor desperate people she takes advantage of? Thus, she is
hiding out there.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Can you prove no one is trying to serve her? I cannot.

Stupid question.

IOW, you cannot prove that.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

can she post proof?
>>
>> I'll overlook that; showing your stupidity.

Quoted message said:

>Of course you wil overlook that, as you cannot prove that she is not

hiding

Quoted message said:

>out in Mexico.

Quoted message said:

You made the claim YOU prove it.

Quoted message said:

I see. her clinic is there.

Sorry that's not proof she is hiding out in Mexico.

Are you ASSuming that she is not running her clinic? Why would people go
there and pay the bigs bucks if they were not getting that personal
treatment...errr...fleecing?

Quoted message said:

<snip irrevelant belittling>

Quoted message said:

Why is she hiding out in Mexico where the laws are lax?

Quoted message said:

I don't know that she is, if you do, please post your proof.

Quoted message said:

Do you have proof she is in the US?

Sorry this is a diversion, you made a claim, not either prove it or shut

up.

I will NEVER shut up and, you have a f***** nerve saying that to anyone.

Quoted message said:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Hmmm??? Why

Quoted message said:

>won't she open a clinic in the USA?

Because of lying people like yourself.

Quoted message said:

Nope

Yep

Nope.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Now do post proof of your claims.

See above.

LOLOLOL. No where have you posted proof of you claim and you even tried

the

Quoted message said:

trick of using David Wright saying *if* she is in Mexico as proof.

See above.

Quoted message said:

You are busted again, with added pathetic weaseling.

You should quit while you are behind.

You are a behind.

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying & Calling Names
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/20/2004 1:27 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

This thread isn't about pond scum.

It is about your claim:

Hulda is hiding out in Mexico, since she is subject to legal process in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

California and the other 49 states.

You've been asked to prove that claim. Evidently you can't, making up

things is

Quoted message said:

lying.

Incorrect. YOU made a claim and I was responding to it:

Quoted message said:

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

However Cell Tech might be interested in knowing Ted is still calling it

pond

Quoted message said:

scum.

<Childish posting of the meaning of pond scum snipped>

See how you snipped?

So Jan, why don't you post an example of an ORIGINAL
statement I made about Cell Tech or their algae which
was false?

Even Cell Tech did not accuse me of making any false
statements, nor does the retraction say any of my statements
were false.

You persist in making this accusation against me,
but you have not shown EVEN ONE example of
a statement I made which is false, much less a LIE.

Why don't you post an example, Jan? Then everybody
could see for themselves what one of these statements
looks like, and decide for themselves whether or not
it was a LIE. Why don't you want people to do that, Jan?
Why do you want to prevent people from reaching their
own conclusions about whether anything I said was a LIE?

Is it because any example you could choose would
OBVIOUSLY NOT be a false statement? And then,
people would see it was not me who makes LIES.

Do you need help seeing what a LIE looks like, Jan?

Here is an example:

To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]

Instead of responding to what you say, Jan is trying to discredit
you by making insinuations about who you are or what your
motives may be.

Soon, she may accuse you of being on the payroll of the
pharmaceutical companies, etc. That's the way Jan works.

That would be ANOTHER LIE from Mark Thorson. I have NEVER accused

anyone of

Quoted message said:

any such thing.

So do prove your claim Mark!!!!!

You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!!

----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills -----

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com

Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly
comes from paid shill Mark Probert.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com

Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com

As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com

As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact
he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people.

So Jan, why don't you post an example of an ORIGINAL
statement I made about Cell Tech or their algae which
was false?

Even Cell Tech did not accuse me of making any false
statements, nor does the retraction say any of my statements
were false.

You persist in making this accusation against me,
but you have not shown EVEN ONE example of
a statement I made which is false, much less a LIE.

Why don't you post an example, Jan? Then everybody
could see for themselves what one of these statements
looks like, and decide for themselves whether or not
it was a LIE. Why don't you want people to do that, Jan?
Why do you want to prevent people from reaching their
own conclusions about whether anything I said was a LIE?

Is it because any example you could choose would
OBVIOUSLY NOT be a false statement? And then,
people would see it was not me who makes LIES.

Do you need help seeing what a LIE looks like, Jan?

Here is an example:

To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]

Instead of responding to what you say, Jan is trying to discredit
you by making insinuations about who you are or what your
motives may be.

Soon, she may accuse you of being on the payroll of the
pharmaceutical companies, etc. That's the way Jan works.

That would be ANOTHER LIE from Mark Thorson. I have NEVER accused

anyone of

Quoted message said:

any such thing.

So do prove your claim Mark!!!!!

You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!!

----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills -----

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com

Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly
comes from paid shill Mark Probert.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com

Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com

As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife.

Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew:
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com

As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact
he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (MCS Is NOT Real)
Date: 4/20/2004 8:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

>Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
>From: [email hidden] (Hawki63)
>Date: 4/19/2004 10:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>
>>Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
>>From: [email hidden] (Jan)
>>Date: 4/19/2004 9:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>
>>hawki poo baby, that was tried. I sat through the trial.
>>
>
>yep..as I said..she got away with it...

That is your opinion.

Its also our opinion that her son is a blithering idiot who can't even swat
flies

This thread is about Mark Probert still lying.

Furthemore, you don't know her son, so as usual you are blowing smoke.

As opposed to Jan who both knew him and blew him.

Quoted message said:

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (MCS Is NOT Real)
Date: 4/21/2004 8:15 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (MCS Is NOT Real)
Date: 4/20/2004 8:50 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

>>Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
>>From: [email hidden] (Hawki63)
>>Date: 4/19/2004 10:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>>
>>>Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
>>>From: [email hidden] (Jan)
>>>Date: 4/19/2004 9:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time
>>>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>>
>>>hawki poo baby, that was tried. I sat through the trial.
>>>
>>
>>yep..as I said..she got away with it...
>
>That is your opinion.
>

Its also our opinion that her son is a blithering idiot who can't even swat
flies

This thread is about Mark Probert still lying.

Furthemore, you don't know her son, so as usual you are blowing smoke.

As opposed to Jan who both knew him and blew him.

Quoted message said:

Jan

Andrew/Ilsa is just one of life's failures.His sole purpose in life is to serve
to remind decent folk what decent really means.I guess you could say that his
role creates comfort for many people so that they can read what comes up from
the bottom of the cesspool.It is a tough job Andrew has taken on but he
certainly is imminently qualified to wade up to his neck in the wastage of his
own life.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

As opposed to Jan who both knew him and blew him.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (MCS Is NOT Real)
Date: 4/21/2004 11:28 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Despciable no life Andrew Kingoff wrote:

As opposed to Jan who both knew him and blew him.

Andrew/Ilsa is just one of life's failures.His sole purpose in life is to serve
to remind decent folk what decent really means.I guess you could say that his
role creates comfort for many people so that they can read what comes up from
the bottom of the cesspool.It is a tough job Andrew has taken on but he
certainly is imminently qualified to wade up to his neck in the wastage of his
own life.

Quoted message said:

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Hulda is hiding out in Mexico, since she is subject to legal process in
> California and the other 49 states.

Hulda isn't hiding anywhere, she has an address and phone number, drivers
license, well as tax returns from the IRS.

Using an internet search program, I tried to find Hulda's address and phone
number in the United States. The program I used searches every online
database and this was the result:

People Search (exact last name):
'clark, hulda'
0 found

UNSUCCESSFUL SEARCH

Unable to locate any listings that match your search criteria.

So, Jan is either lying, or mistaken.

(Please repost this, as she is now 'killfiling' me again.