Re: Mark Probert Still lying

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 18, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/18/2004 7:22 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

>Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
>From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
>Date: 4/17/2004 7:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>
>Jan wrote:
>
>> >From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
>> >I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
>> >Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
>> >Only Jan has done that.
>>
>> WRONG.
>
>Do you have anything to post which contradicts what I said?

Yes, my post did just that.

>Cell Tech has not alleged that I lied in any of my previous

statements.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

They said mis-statement.

to state incorrectly : give a false account of

That's the same thing as lying, and each time you post you did not lie,

you lie

Quoted message said:

again.

The, by that standard Hulda Clark is LIAR. However, you will not admit

that

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

she is, since your fingers would fall off.

Diversion, this thread is about Mark still lying.

Definition of Diversion (JanSpeak version):

I do not want to deal with a fact that has been pointed out to me.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Then show more dishonesty sending my truthful post to alt test.

Quoted message said:

The End.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Jan

No remarks noted.

Correct. I chose not to comment on that. Note that I do not do it.

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

But that post did not include an ORIGINAL statement
made by me which is a LIE.

Don't start as I don't need any original.

Of course not. You just make a FALSE accusation
of LYING, and when asked for an example of one
of these LIES, you loudly claim to have killfiled
the person asking for evidence.

That's called being a despicable liar. You make
accusations, but you NEVER back them up.

Quoted message said:

What I posted shows your misstatments, and your use of the word *deliberate*
and the fact you had no basis for the accusations you made.

Then it should be easy for you to find one of these lies.
Just do a Google search using that as a keyword.

But of course, you've already done that, and you KNOW
that none of my statements using that word are lies.

You KNOW your accusation against me is FALSE.

That's what makes you a LIAR.

Quoted message said:

Repeated drivel snipped , plus the fact my honest reply went to alt test
instead of here is all one needs to know.

Give it up.

Jan

You'd love that. You'd love to be able to get away
with your vile lies, without backing them up.

Well, the world doesn't work that way.

Your lies will follow you around like a shadow.

"Mark Thorson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

DEBBEE1023 said:

<< I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
Only Jan has done that. >>

So, Thorson, if I take your latest post, and send it to Cell Tech, they
will be able to confirm you did not lie? If this is true, then can this

be

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

settled once and for all?

What did they say the previous time you did this?

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20020625021917.16378.00000791%40mb-fz.aol.com

I wonder if Debbee can find the answer under her rock.

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

However Cell Tech might be interested in knowing Ted is still calling it

pond

Quoted message said:

scum.

http://www.bestfish.com/pondscum.html

From http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/p1/pondscum.asp

pond scum
Related: Microscopic Organisms

accumulation of floating green algae on the surface of stagnant or slowly
moving waters, such as ponds and reservoirs. One of the commonest forms is
Spirogyra.

From http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861738020/pond_scum.html

pond scum

noun

floating freshwater algae: green freshwater algae that form a layer on the
surface of stagnant water

-----------

Feel free, Fascist, to report me for calling it pond scum.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 18, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/19/2004 5:11 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 18, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/18/2004 7:19 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> >Subject: Re: UPDATE Re: "Hulda Clark is a dangerous quack"
> >From: "mdd" [email hidden]
> >Date: 4/17/2004 12:28 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <[email hidden]>
> >
> >
> >"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 17, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
> >[email hidden]> wrote in message
> >news:[email hidden]...
>
> > Hulda is hiding out in Mexico, since she is subject to legal process

in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >> California and the other 49 states.
>
> Hulda isn't hiding anywhere, she has an address and phone number,

drivers

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> license, well as tax returns from the IRS.

Question:

How does jan know these things

Because I sat in court when the vultures were after her, their main point

was

Quoted message said:

she was hiding. Evidence was provided showing all of the above.

That was a few years ago

Quoted message said:

What is she doing in Mexico NOW?

I have no idea where she is now, do you??? Please do prove she is in Mexico.
Then do prove your claim she is subject to legal process in California and the
other 49 states.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

can she post proof?

I'll overlook that; showing your stupidity.

Quoted message said:

Of course you wil overlook that, as you cannot prove that she is not hiding
out in Mexico.

You made the claim YOU prove it.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

BTW, note how she does not undersatand the concept of hiding out in

Mexico,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

whefre the laws are lax, the the authorities can be bribed.

B I N G O!!!!

Quoted message said:

Yes, BINGO. That is the exact point.

Correct. You seem to know about bribing authorities.

As in a raid to close a clinic.

Quoted message said:

Careful you re telling on yourself and your ilk.

Nope

So you say.

Quoted message said:

Why is she hiding out in Mexico where the laws are lax?

I don't know that she is, if you do, please post your proof.

Quoted message said:

Hmmm??? Why
won't she open a clinic in the USA?

Because of lying people like yourself.

Now do post proof of your claims.

Jan

http://users.mrbean.net.au/~wlast/cancerpersecution.html

http://www.overthrow.com/creator/wmb/credo12.asp

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/19/2004 5:30 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

And, you did not understand my point.

That's a famous line of yours.

As a matter of fact it is so easy to see through you, it is pathetic.

<snip>

Quoted message said:

The warning

Quoted message said:

didn't work, they had the right to do what they did.

Do you have a copy of the warning? (I looked a while back, but never found
it.)

Learn to do a search, I found it, took 15 seconds.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/19/2004 5:32 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 18, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/18/2004 7:22 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> >Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
> >From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
> >Date: 4/17/2004 7:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: <[email hidden]>
> >
> >Jan wrote:
> >
> >> >From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
> >> >I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
> >> >Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
> >> >Only Jan has done that.
> >>
> >> WRONG.
> >
> >Do you have anything to post which contradicts what I said?
>
> Yes, my post did just that.
>
> >Cell Tech has not alleged that I lied in any of my previous

statements.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>
> They said mis-statement.
>
> to state incorrectly : give a false account of
>
> That's the same thing as lying, and each time you post you did not lie,
you lie
> again.

The, by that standard Hulda Clark is LIAR. However, you will not admit

that

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

she is, since your fingers would fall off.

Diversion, this thread is about Mark still lying.

Definition of Diversion (JanSpeak version):

It was YOUR diversion.

Quoted message said:

I do not want to deal with a fact that has been pointed out to me.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Then show more dishonesty sending my truthful post to alt test.
>
> The End.
>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Jan

No remarks noted.

Correct. I chose not to comment on that. Note that I do not do it.

Correct, we wouldn't want you to break *gang* rules and say one of it's member
is dishonest or it was a cheap shot.

Thanks to Eric, he was man enough to say so.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Jan)
Date: 4/19/2004 5:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Hmmm??? Why
won't she open a clinic in the USA?

Because of lying people like yourself.

nahhhh...Janny poo

It is because in the US she could/would/should be prosecuted for "practicing
medicine without a license"

which she was before

she just got away with it...

If I personally knew she WAS operating her scams in this country...I would
PERSONALLY call the authorities...

count on it..

ever been to Tijuana??

ain't pretty Janster...no one would choose to practice there if they didn't
have to ....

perhaps you need to look at the pics again of Ms Clark's grungy clinic

hawki.....

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Hawki63)
Date: 4/19/2004 5:44 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Jan)
Date: 4/19/2004 5:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Hmmm??? Why
won't she open a clinic in the USA?

Because of lying people like yourself.

nahhhh...Janny poo

Yes, lying hawki who can't post the e-mail claimed.

Quoted message said:

It is because in the US she could/would/should be prosecuted for "practicing
medicine without a license"

hawki poo baby, that was tried. I sat through the trial.

It was a farce.

Quoted message said:

which she was before

she just got away with it...

See above. The new prosecutor who was trying to make a name for himself, did
just that, except it wasn't the name he had planned.

Quoted message said:

If I personally knew she WAS operating her scams in this country...I would
PERSONALLY call the authorities...

What else is new?

Quoted message said:

count on it..

Quoted message said:

ver been to Tijuana??

ain't pretty Janster...no one would choose to practice there if they didn't
have to ....

Correct, organized medicine is the cause.

Quoted message said:

perhaps you need to look at the pics again of Ms Clark's grungy clinic

I have seen them, they are not grungy.

As a matter of fact, I have been in Huld';s home in the past, and saw her every
week day for several years.

So stick to something you know.

And stop lying and getting caught.

Jan

Quoted message said:

From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan Drew Still lying

Nope, title of this thread is Mark Probert still lying.

Answer

YES

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan Drew Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/19/2004 1:34 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

However Cell Tech might be interested in knowing Ted is still calling it

pond

Quoted message said:

scum.

<Childish posting of the meaning of pond scum snipped>

I repeat:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

However Cell Tech might be interested in knowing Ted is still calling it

pond

Quoted message said:

scum.

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Fascist

Calling names is childish.

Jan

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

However Cell Tech might be interested in knowing Ted is still calling

it

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

pond

Quoted message said:

scum.

<Childish posting of the meaning of pond scum snipped>

I repeat:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

However Cell Tech might be interested in knowing Ted is still calling

it

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

pond

Quoted message said:

scum.

Uh, Jannypooscum, Cell Tech might be interested in your lying too.
Any more of your bad publicity, I'm sure they can do without.

Anyone see a poster named Ted call Cell Tech pond scum, please
raise your hand.

Quoted message said:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Fascist

Calling names is childish.

hahahahah...that's another keeper.

I repeat:
Uh, Jannypooscum, Cell Tech might be interested in your lying too.
Any more of your bad publicity, I'm sure they can do without.

Anyone see a poster named Ted call Cell Tech pond scum, please
raise your hand.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Jan)
Date: 4/19/2004 9:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

hawki poo baby, that was tried. I sat through the trial.

yep..as I said..she got away with it....THAT time...double jeopardy does not
apply here...

hmmm...wonder WHY she is in Mexico then?? enjoy the food..

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

If I personally knew she WAS operating her scams in this country...I would
PERSONALLY call the authorities...

Quoted message said:

What else is new?

sorry....part of my ethics is to report ANY instances of sub optimal
"care"....as in...liver flukes..cancer cures,,etc...

Quoted message said:

Correct, organized medicine is the cause.

for what?? Hulda having too few brain cells??

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

perhaps you need to look at the pics again of Ms Clark's grungy clinic

I have seen them, they are not grungy.

Wow...if that is NOT your defintion of grunge...wonder what YOUR neighborhood
looks like!!!

having been to the area countless times...it is GRUNGE to the max...

Quoted message said:

As a matter of fact, I have been in Huld';s home in the past, and saw her
every
week day for several years.

I believe that was in Indiana?? the clinic is in Tijuana...HELLLLOOOO...

Quoted message said:

So stick to something you know.

which is about everything you don't.....back to sandbox 101 (or is a GED
required for that course??)

hawki.....

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Hawki63)
Date: 4/19/2004 10:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Jan)
Date: 4/19/2004 9:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

hawki poo baby, that was tried. I sat through the trial.

yep..as I said..she got away with it...

That is your opinion.

Quoted message said:

THAT time...double jeopardy does not
apply here...

Quoted message said:

hmmm...wonder WHY she is in Mexico then?? enjoy the food..

Do prove she is in Mexico.

Quoted message said:

If I personally knew she WAS operating her scams in this country...I would

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

PERSONALLY call the authorities...

What else is new?

Quoted message said:

sorry....part of my ethics is to report ANY instances of sub optimal
"care"....as in...liver flukes..cancer cures,,etc...

We have already seen your ethics.

Lying.

Quoted message said:

Correct, organized medicine is the cause.

Quoted message said:

for what??

I posted it,

Quoted message said:

Hulda having too few brain cells??

Now more of your ethics are showing.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

perhaps you need to look at the pics again of Ms Clark's grungy clinic

I have seen them, they are not grungy.

Quoted message said:

Wow...if that is NOT your defintion of grunge...wonder what YOUR neighborhood

looks like!!!

Sure you do, All you are interested in is insulting. My neighbor looks very
well, thank you.

Quoted message said:

having been to the area countless times...it is GRUNGE to the max...

Most likely another lie.

Quoted message said:

As a matter of fact, I have been in Huld';s home in the past, and saw her

Quoted message said:

every
week day for several years.

Quoted message said:

I believe that was in Indiana??

Yes.

Quoted message said:

the clinic is in Tijuana...HELLLLOOOO...

Yes, the cause of going to Mexico is well known.

Quoted message said:

So stick to something you know.

<snip belittling and [censored]>

Now do prove she is in Mexico.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Hawki63)
Date: 4/19/2004 10:55 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: [email hidden] (Jan)
Date: 4/19/2004 9:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

hawki poo baby, that was tried. I sat through the trial.

yep..as I said..she got away with it...

That is your opinion.

Its also our opinion that her son is a blithering idiot who can't even swat
flies. Watch as this comment burns Jan's ass!

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan Drew Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/19/2004 1:34 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

However Cell Tech might be interested in knowing Ted is still calling

it

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

pond

Quoted message said:

scum.

<Childish posting of the meaning of pond scum snipped>

Childish? Are you that resistant to learning anything? Algae is POND SCUM.
Period. It comes in two types, creamy and crunchy (where they leave in the
indigenous all natural fauna).

Calling it pond scum is an accurate statement.

Quoted message said:

I repeat:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

However Cell Tech might be interested in knowing Ted is still calling

it

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

pond

Quoted message said:

scum.

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Fascist

Calling names is childish.

Like M A R L A? WhenYOU stop, I stop.

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/19/2004 5:32 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

>Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
>From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 18, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
>[email hidden]
>Date: 4/18/2004 7:22 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>
>
>"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> >Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
>> >From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
>> >Date: 4/17/2004 7:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
>> >Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>> >
>> >Jan wrote:
>> >
>> >> >From: Mark Thorson [email hidden]
>> >> >I didn't lie, therefore they cannot.
>> >> >Nor has Cell Tech ever contended that I lied.
>> >> >Only Jan has done that.
>> >>
>> >> WRONG.
>> >
>> >Do you have anything to post which contradicts what I said?
>>
>> Yes, my post did just that.
>>
>> >Cell Tech has not alleged that I lied in any of my previous

statements.

Quoted message said:

>>
>> They said mis-statement.
>>
>> to state incorrectly : give a false account of
>>
>> That's the same thing as lying, and each time you post you did not

lie,

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>you lie
>> again.
>
>The, by that standard Hulda Clark is LIAR. However, you will not admit

that

Quoted message said:

>she is, since your fingers would fall off.

Diversion, this thread is about Mark still lying.

Definition of Diversion (JanSpeak version):

It was YOUR diversion.

No, it was YOUR diversion. I was expanding on an idea and providing an
example. Obviously, you did not understand that example, or, you understood
it, and realized that you were logically bound.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I do not want to deal with a fact that has been pointed out to me.

Quoted message said:

>Then show more dishonesty sending my truthful post to alt test.
>>
>> The End.
>>

Quoted message said:

>> Jan

No remarks noted.

Correct. I chose not to comment on that. Note that I do not do it.

Correct, we wouldn't want you to break *gang* rules and say one of it's

member

Quoted message said:

is dishonest or it was a cheap shot.

Jan, when YOU routinely criticize the abuse by Debbee and the
woman-whose-name-I-will-not-type, then things may change. Until then, the
Truth Squad (those whom you call the gang) sticks to gether.

Quoted message said:

Thanks to Eric, he was man enough to say so.

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/19/2004 5:30 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

And, you did not understand my point.

That's a famous line of yours.

As a matter of fact it is so easy to see through you, it is pathetic.

Hardly. you have yet to understand the simplest of concepts.

Quoted message said:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

The warning

Quoted message said:

didn't work, they had the right to do what they did.

Do you have a copy of the warning? (I looked a while back, but never

found

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

it.)

Learn to do a search, I found it, took 15 seconds.

IOW, you do not have a copy.

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 18, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
[email hidden]
Date: 4/19/2004 5:11 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

>Subject: Re: Mark Probert Still lying
>From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 18, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
>[email hidden]
>Date: 4/18/2004 7:19 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>
>
>"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> >Subject: Re: UPDATE Re: "Hulda Clark is a dangerous quack"
>> >From: "mdd" [email hidden]
>> >Date: 4/17/2004 12:28 PM Pacific Standard Time
>> >Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>> >
>> >
>> >"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 17, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
>> >[email hidden]> wrote in message
>> >news:[email hidden]...
>>
>> > Hulda is hiding out in Mexico, since she is subject to legal

process

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

in

Quoted message said:

>> >> California and the other 49 states.
>>
>> Hulda isn't hiding anywhere, she has an address and phone number,

drivers

Quoted message said:

>> license, well as tax returns from the IRS.
>
>Question:
>
>How does jan know these things

Because I sat in court when the vultures were after her, their main

point

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

was

Quoted message said:

she was hiding. Evidence was provided showing all of the above.

That was a few years ago

Quoted message said:

What is she doing in Mexico NOW?

I have no idea where she is now, do you??? Please do prove she is in

Mexico.

Good point. Peter photographed an undertaker's car parked near her clinic.
Maybe she has gone "underground." Why did she cancel her appearance in
Canada? Afraid of being served?

Quoted message said:

Then do prove your claim she is subject to legal process in California and

the

Quoted message said:

other 49 states.

Everyone is subject to legal process, within the rules, of all of the
states, while in the US. Who knows who has been trying to find her to serve
her with legal papers? Can you prove no one is trying to serve her? I
cannot.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

can she post proof?

I'll overlook that; showing your stupidity.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Of course you wil overlook that, as you cannot prove that she is not

hiding

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

out in Mexico.

You made the claim YOU prove it.

I see. her clinic is there. If I were paying her hefty bucks, I would expect
tosee her at the clinic. I doubt she strays far from the cash machine.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

BTW, note how she does not undersatand the concept of hiding out in

Mexico,

Quoted message said:

>whefre the laws are lax, the the authorities can be bribed.

B I N G O!!!!

Quoted message said:

Yes, BINGO. That is the exact point.

Correct. You seem to know about bribing authorities.

Corruption in Mexico is well known.

Quoted message said:

As in a raid to close a clinic.

Yes, and it re-opened again. Strange that.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Careful you re telling on yourself and your ilk.

Nope

So you say.

Of course I say.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Why is she hiding out in Mexico where the laws are lax?

I don't know that she is, if you do, please post your proof.

Do you have proof she is in the US? She cancelled her last appearnace
outside of Mexico.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Hmmm??? Why
won't she open a clinic in the USA?

Because of lying people like yourself.

Nope. Because she knows she cannot get away with her scam and got lucky the
last time.

Quoted message said:

Now do post proof of your claims.

See above.

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 19, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Jan Drew Still lying

Nope, title of this thread is Mark Probert still lying.

I cannot be *still* lying since I have not started.