General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

wild water

Started by Jon Reynolds · · Last activity · 33 posts · 765 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 August 2004
Last activity
17 August 2004
Original author
Jon Reynolds
Posts
33
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
765
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 33
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi all,

    This is my first port here on URW...been readin it quite a bit now.

    I enjoy getting out and walkin and I have my summer hols coming up
    which will include a couple of days in a campsite in gower for the
    benefit of my son. then a wild camp in brecon and then a trip to
    snowdon. havent been to snowdon before and i am really looking forward
    to that. i am from swansea btw so gower and brecon are where i try to
    get to most of the time.

    One thing i read about a lot is that you always aim to camp near
    water...apart from cleaning do you rely on this water as a drinking
    supply? i thought this would be bad not knowing the state of the
    water...when i have camped before i have always taken a load of water
    with me.

    any helpful thoughts with regards to water supplies in the wild would
    be great...esp if it means cutting out carrying lots of it with me.

    Thanks very much

    Jon

  2. On 11 Aug 2004 04:58:41 -0700, [email hidden] (Jon

    Reynolds) said:

    Hi all,

    This is my first port here on URW...been readin it quite a bit now.

    I enjoy getting out and walkin and I have my summer hols coming up
    which will include a couple of days in a campsite in gower for the
    benefit of my son. then a wild camp in brecon and then a trip to
    snowdon. havent been to snowdon before and i am really looking forward
    to that. i am from swansea btw so gower and brecon are where i try to
    get to most of the time.

    One thing i read about a lot is that you always aim to camp near
    water...apart from cleaning do you rely on this water as a drinking
    supply? i thought this would be bad not knowing the state of the
    water...when i have camped before i have always taken a load of water
    with me.

    any helpful thoughts with regards to water supplies in the wild would
    be great...esp if it means cutting out carrying lots of it with me.

    As a general guide, I'd consider it safe to drink water from small
    streams or springs above 2000 feet so long as there's no evidence of
    human pollution, and from streams and small rivers below 2000 feet if
    the water is boiled, filtered or iodine tablets are added. (Note:
    iodine use should be minimised).

    If drinking straight from a stream I'd recommend the following:
    1. Walk upstream a little, away from any paths.
    2. Look out for evidence of livestock and avoid places where sheep or
    cattle have been drinking, peeing, pooing.
    3. Take your water at the fastest flowing point - not from pools.
    4. Don't worry if the water has a brown tinge.

    Most people in this group will probably say that the above advice is
    overkill, but I'd say that they are easy and reasonable precautions to
    minimise the already slight risk of problems.

  3. C L Imber said:

    As a general guide, I'd consider it safe to drink water from small
    streams or springs above 2000 feet so long as there's no evidence of
    human pollution, and from streams and small rivers below 2000 feet if
    the water is boiled, filtered or iodine tablets are added. (Note:
    iodine use should be minimised).

    A lot of this will depend on where you are. A lot of my wild camping is
    done from a sea kayak which puts the camps at a lot lower than 2000',
    but there are plenty of places where that's no problem in itself,
    especially on the W. coast of Scotland. For "under 2000'" I would say
    replace that with "has not passed through an area where agricultural
    runoff or other pollution is likely".
    Further note that boiling and iodine is for killing things: it won't get
    rid of existing toxins, 'cause toxins aren't alive.

    Quoted message said:

    If drinking straight from a stream I'd recommend the following:
    1. Walk upstream a little, away from any paths.

    Since the water is coming down it's been upstream of the path anyway:
    I've never felt the need to do this if I think the stream is basically okay.

    Quoted message said:

    2. Look out for evidence of livestock and avoid places where sheep or
    cattle have been drinking, peeing, pooing.

    That'll be, errrrr, "UK wild land", then. It shouldn't particularly be
    a problem: if animals are drinking the water it's because it's clean.
    Fish inhabit a lot of perfectly safe streams and they're peeing and
    pooing regularly. Safe water can still have quite an ecosystem going on.

    Quoted message said:

    3. Take your water at the fastest flowing point - not from pools.

    Not actually an issue as long as you're not in a recirculating backwater
    IME. It won't hurt to go for the fast bits but you needn't be religous
    about it if the whole lot is basically moving downstream.

    Quoted message said:

    Most people in this group will probably say that the above advice is
    overkill, but I'd say that they are easy and reasonable precautions to
    minimise the already slight risk of problems.

    If you're unhappy about sheep living in basically the same place that
    will rule out a /lot/ of safe water supply.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  4. Peter Clinch said:
    Quoted message said:

    If drinking straight from a stream I'd recommend the following:
    1. Walk upstream a little, away from any paths.

    Since the water is coming down it's been upstream of the path anyway:
    I've never felt the need to do this if I think the stream is basically okay.

    People tend to pee close to paths - and, believe it or not, some think
    that a stream is the best place to have a pee.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    2. Look out for evidence of livestock and avoid places where sheep or
    cattle have been drinking, peeing, pooing.

    That'll be, errrrr, "UK wild land", then. It shouldn't particularly be
    a problem: if animals are drinking the water it's because it's clean.
    Fish inhabit a lot of perfectly safe streams and they're peeing and
    pooing regularly. Safe water can still have quite an ecosystem going on.

    I don't include fish as livestock.

    I wouldn't feel happy taking water close downstream from where there
    is evidence of recent *livestock* activity.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    3. Take your water at the fastest flowing point - not from pools.

    Not actually an issue as long as you're not in a recirculating backwater
    IME. It won't hurt to go for the fast bits but you needn't be religous
    about it if the whole lot is basically moving downstream.

    But a fair precaution where there is a choice?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Most people in this group will probably say that the above advice is
    overkill, but I'd say that they are easy and reasonable precautions to
    minimise the already slight risk of problems.

    If you're unhappy about sheep living in basically the same place that
    will rule out a /lot/ of safe water supply.

    I'm not unhappy about it. I'd just prefer to minimise the already
    slight risk.

  5. C L Imber said:

    People tend to pee close to paths - and, believe it or not, some think
    that a stream is the best place to have a pee.

    Hm? That's something I've never understood. It happens in towns too.
    Some people seem to think that the best place to have a wee (or worse)
    is in a phone box or a bus shelter.

    I've seen some incredible[1] turds on the steps up to Moorfields
    Station in Liverpool. The station staff disinfect the steps every
    morning.

    Judith
    [1] When I say "incredible" I don't really mean it. I mean, it's only
    incredible that someone has chosen there as a toilet when there are
    hundreds of side streets and alleys.

  6. C L Imber said:

    People tend to pee close to paths - and, believe it or not, some think
    that a stream is the best place to have a pee.

    But if they do it'll be washed immediately downstream of where you are,
    so not a problem.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't include fish as livestock.

    I wouldn't feel happy taking water close downstream from where there
    is evidence of recent *livestock* activity.

    Again, this takes in a great deal of UK upland areas. There are sheep
    just about everywhere, or the few areas there aren't there's entirely
    likely to be deer. They don't make for dangerous water supply though.

    Quoted message said:

    But a fair precaution where there is a choice?

    All other things being equal it won't hurt, but if I have to wade out
    into a deep section to get to a fast bit I'm not going to bother!

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not unhappy about it.

    But you said, and I quote, "I wouldn't feel happy", which sounds like
    you're unhappy about it to me!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  7. C L Imber said:

    People tend to pee close to paths - and, believe it or not, some think
    that a stream is the best place to have a pee.

    But if they do it'll be washed immediately downstream of where you are,
    so not a problem.

    Quoted message said:

    I don't include fish as livestock.

    I wouldn't feel happy taking water close downstream from where there
    is evidence of recent *livestock* activity.

    Again, this takes in a great deal of UK upland areas. There are sheep
    just about everywhere, or the few areas there aren't there's entirely
    likely to be deer. They don't make for dangerous water supply though.

    Quoted message said:

    But a fair precaution where there is a choice?

    All other things being equal it won't hurt, but if I have to wade out
    into a deep section to get to a fast bit I'm not going to bother!

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not unhappy about it.

    But you said, and I quote, "I wouldn't feel happy", which sounds like
    you're unhappy about it to me!

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  8. Peter Clinch said:


    C L Imber said:

    People tend to pee close to paths - and, believe it or not, some think
    that a stream is the best place to have a pee.

    But if they do it'll be washed immediately downstream of where you are,
    so not a problem.

    Or perhaps it may have splashed all over the bank and onto the
    surrounding vegetation so as to gradually drip/leach into the stream...
    I'd always collect water from at least a few metres upstream of a path
    crossing.

    Rhys

  9. Peter Clinch said:
    C L Imber said:

    People tend to pee close to paths - and, believe it or not, some think
    that a stream is the best place to have a pee.

    But if they do it'll be washed immediately downstream of where you are,
    so not a problem.

    And what of that little puddle gradually seeping into the water from
    the immediate bank?

    I'm not saying it's any worse than swimming pool water, indeed, it's
    probably 100 times better - but I wouldn't drink swimming pool water
    out of choice either.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't include fish as livestock.

    I wouldn't feel happy taking water close downstream from where there
    is evidence of recent *livestock* activity.

    Again, this takes in a great deal of UK upland areas. There are sheep
    just about everywhere, or the few areas there aren't there's entirely
    likely to be deer. They don't make for dangerous water supply though.

    I'm not concerned about sheep grazing some distance away - but if I
    see sheep in or close by the water supply, or evidence of recent
    livestock activity such as stools on the immediate bank, I'd advise
    taking water from another place or further upstream.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    But a fair precaution where there is a choice?

    All other things being equal it won't hurt, but if I have to wade out
    into a deep section to get to a fast bit I'm not going to bother!

    === Quote ===

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Most people in this group will probably say that the above advice is
    overkill, but I'd say that they are easy and reasonable precautions to
    minimise the already slight risk of problems.

    If you're unhappy about sheep living in basically the same place that
    will rule out a /lot/ of safe water supply.

    I'm not unhappy about it. I'd just prefer to minimise the already
    slight risk.

    === End quote ===

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm not unhappy about it.

    But you said, and I quote, "I wouldn't feel happy", which sounds like
    you're unhappy about it to me!

    Where?

  10. * The air of uk.rec.walking was filled with the delicate perfume
    * of violets, as C L Imber <[email hidden]> descended on a shaft
    * of golden sunlight, and announced:

    Quoted message said:

    As a general guide, I'd consider it safe to drink water from small
    streams or springs above 2000 feet so long as there's no evidence of
    human pollution, and from streams and small rivers below 2000 feet if
    the water is boiled, filtered or iodine tablets are added. (Note:
    iodine use should be minimised).

    Pretty much what I do. I'd also add that if I see _any_ human activity
    upstream of where I am, I won't take the water as I can't trust what others
    might be doing in or near it! I consider altitude to be the best guide - the
    higher I go the more confident I am of the water.

    Regards: Jim Ford

  11. On 11 Aug 2004 18:35:38 GMT, Jim Ford <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    | * The air of uk.rec.walking was filled with the delicate perfume
    | * of violets, as C L Imber <[email hidden]> descended on a shaft
    | * of golden sunlight, and announced:
    |
    | > As a general guide, I'd consider it safe to drink water from small
    | > streams or springs above 2000 feet so long as there's no evidence of
    | > human pollution, and from streams and small rivers below 2000 feet if
    | > the water is boiled, filtered or iodine tablets are added. (Note:
    | > iodine use should be minimised).
    |
    | Pretty much what I do. I'd also add that if I see _any_ human activity
    | upstream of where I am, I won't take the water as I can't trust what others
    | might be doing in or near it! I consider altitude to be the best guide - the
    | higher I go the more confident I am of the water.

    Remember the sheep!

    --
    Dave F

  12. Judith <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I've seen some incredible[1] turds on the steps up to Moorfields
    Station in Liverpool.

    I'm amazed nobody has nicked them during the night

    Darren
    (upsetting everyone from Merseyside)

  13. "Darren G" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Judith <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I've seen some incredible[1] turds on the steps up to Moorfields
    Station in Liverpool.

    I'm amazed nobody has nicked them during the night

    LOL

  14. Thanks for all the speedy replies!

    with regards to the use of iodine and boiling water which only kills
    living things in it...is there anything to do to for the toxins, if
    any, present?

    but basically you lot are sayin that its pretty safe to use the water
    for boiling things like cups of tea, rice etc...washing
    up...personally i think id rather have a bottle of water brought with
    me to drink directly...but carrying enough to do cooking and cleaning
    is difficult.

    (ps...how do u lot get a signature at the end of your message...like
    about removing spam from ur email addy etc...or do u just type it in
    everytime....

    and also how did u change ur email addresses to include NOSPAM
    etc??....)

    CHEERS

    Jon R

  15. C L Imber said:

    And what of that little puddle gradually seeping into the water from
    the immediate bank?

    As with the sheep poo etc., in a running stream it will immediately
    become so dilute as to be unnoticeable, either by taste or by health
    effects. Unless you've been sterilizing your personal environment to
    excessive lengths you can actually take reasonably impure stuffs, or any
    kid that ever got a mouthful of dirt on a rugby pitch would be rushed to
    hospital.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not saying it's any worse than swimming pool water, indeed, it's
    probably 100 times better - but I wouldn't drink swimming pool water
    out of choice either.

    It's full of toxic chemicals and tastes disgusting.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not concerned about sheep grazing some distance away - but if I
    see sheep in or close by the water supply, or evidence of recent
    livestock activity such as stools on the immediate bank, I'd advise
    taking water from another place or further upstream.

    Again, this simply rules out very large tracts of UK upland where sheep
    graze widely, and there is no problem drinking the water.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    But you said, and I quote, "I wouldn't feel happy", which sounds like
    you're unhappy about it to me!

    Quoted message said:

    Where?

    The next message up the thread, where I cut and pasted that quote.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  16. Jon Reynolds said:

    with regards to the use of iodine and boiling water which only kills
    living things in it...is there anything to do to for the toxins, if
    any, present?

    Depending on how big the molecule is, filters may well remove them.
    They'll get most things, but serious ones are moderately expensive.

    Quoted message said:

    up...personally i think id rather have a bottle of water brought with
    me to drink directly...

    Your prerogative, but rather than a bottle of water which has come from
    a mountain spring, been bottled up and transported at some expense and
    then sold back to you, why not just drink it direct from the source?

    Quoted message said:

    (ps...how do u lot get a signature at the end of your message...like
    about removing spam from ur email addy etc...or do u just type it in
    everytime....

    and also how did u change ur email addresses to include NOSPAM
    etc??....)

    This will depend on what mailing program you're using.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  17. Peter Clinch said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    But you said, and I quote, "I wouldn't feel happy", which sounds like
    you're unhappy about it to me!

    Quoted message said:

    Where?

    The next message up the thread, where I cut and pasted that quote.

    Quoted out of context.

    I wouldn't feel happy drinking directly from a stream where there is
    livestock close by - ie in the water upstream or very close by on wet
    banks.

    Below about 2000 feet there is a greater risk of other contaminants,
    so I would normally boil, filter or add an iodine tablet.

    And, yes, quite possibly it does rule out large amounts of perfectly
    safe water - but so what? I always carry iodine tablets, and if I'm
    out overnight I have a stove so can boil water. I won't go thirsty
    and I'm unlikely to suffer from a liver flute.

  18. C L Imber said:

    Quoted out of context.

    I wouldn't feel happy drinking directly from a stream where there is
    livestock close by - ie in the water upstream or very close by on wet
    banks.

    Well, you just said it again, and I quoted the whole context. I do feel
    happy doing this, been doing it for years, so have lots of people I know.

    Quoted message said:

    Below about 2000 feet there is a greater risk of other contaminants,
    so I would normally boil, filter or add an iodine tablet.

    As I said, this depends a great deal on the geography. There are 3000'
    bits of the Lakes where there's a lot more contamination potential than
    bits of the Scottish coast at 0'.

    Quoted message said:

    And, yes, quite possibly it does rule out large amounts of perfectly
    safe water - but so what?

    So you're making life more difficult for yourself than necessary.

    Quoted message said:

    I always carry iodine tablets, and if I'm
    out overnight I have a stove so can boil water. I won't go thirsty
    and I'm unlikely to suffer from a liver flute.

    I think you mean fluke. It's very common for folks to drink out of
    places you're not happy with, yet liver flukes are not appearing in the
    sort of numbers that there's a big worry about them. Or, in other
    words, I'm not likely to pick them up either.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  19. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    with regards to the use of iodine and boiling water which only kills
    living things in it...is there anything to do to for the toxins, if
    any, present?

    I pipe them through my liver, which is pretty good at detoxing
    reaonably good natural water sources, before permitting them into my


    etc etc.

    What are these toxins that are referred to? How much of a danger are they
    to health? I'm guessing traces of metals and only if you drink lots for a
    long time?

  20. Mark Thompson said:

    What are these toxins that are referred to?

    Agrochemical runoff is a good possibility.

    Quoted message said:

    How much of a danger are they
    to health?

    Enough to cause you to be rather unpleasantly ill, at a guess. I'm not
    /sure/, but nor do I particularly want to find out. But I don't have to
    for typical streams in the hills as they're clean for drinking IME.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.