"Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:"Technician" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
| > Finally got some fresh pix of some of my rides up on the site,
including
Quoted message said:| > finally a pic of my Tandem.
| >
| > intergalax.commybikes.htmlOpen ↗
| >
| >
| >
|
| Just a passing thought on the tandem. I'm sure there is a reason not to, but i would think the
| power to the drive-train would be smoother if one of the crank sets was rotated 90 degrees. that
| way, as one rider is nearing the end of their power stroke, the other is starting theirs.
I actually tried that once, but the main problem is starting. It's far easier to start when both
or your crank arms are forward on your "up foot" side.
---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275
- Release Date: 5/6/2003
On that note, have you tried setting the cranks so their 180 deg. out of phase, that is, when one
rider's right foot is at 3:00, the other rider's right foot is at 9:00? This way when you start, one
rider's right leg is at stance while it's the other rider's right leg at stance. Hence, the bike is
supported on both sides. 🙂
--
- Zilla (Remove XSPAM)