New Pix

P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

On Wed, 14 May 2003 12:24:59 -0400, Dave W <[email hidden]> wrote:

|On Wed, 14 May 2003 08:55:36 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n
|<[email hidden]> wrote:
|
|>On Wed, 14 May 2003 13:04:50 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|>
|>
|>
|>|> |Only to you - it was a few photographs FFS, not a complete, comprehensive |and exhaustive
|>|> expression of the inner workings of a persons being, |heheheheh.......
|>|>
|>|> Nah, the phenomenom isn't limited to just Starcommander Blubberpusses photos, it's actually
|>|> quite common, hence my comment.
|>|
|>|Your above statement doesn't follow - Maybe you should leave alone it now |Pete, you 'appear' to
|>be mentally exhausted.
|>
|>The fact that you can't follow the big bouncing ball isn't surprising, although it is amusing.
|>
|>Google might help you fill in the blanks. Maybe. It's a big stretch, but maybe.
|
|See Shaun. He's still the same Elitist MTB rider. Typical Pete F |response. NA, he's not mentally
exhausted (great analogy though!)
|
|He's mentally challenged. And hates it when he's challenged, hence the |usual response.

I hope Shaun put on a body condom before he read that or at least that you're HIV negative.

Aww, c'mon PETEY, given Shauns usual snappy reparte', wouldn't you guess he has it on
everytime he posts.

Quoted message said:

If he did, at least it will be easier for him to clean up your mess.

hahahaha, good one PETEY, nice attempt at deflection. But the fact remains...You're a tool, fool

Dave W said:

P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

Dave W said:

|>The bike shot on the torn up trail was to illustrate how chopped up it was and to note that it
|>didn't matter. It wasn't leaning, it wasn't taken as a "look at my generic bikre" picture, I
|>didn't have a laundry list of the lameass components that I hand selected.
|
|still a generic bike leaning against the post shot

Ok, where's the post? Was the purpose to "show off," as others have put it, my bike or was the
purpose to give a reference for the depth of the trail damage?

Doesn't matter what the post was about, the picture was of your generic bike, against a
generic post

LOL. Where's the post in the picture? That dope is causing more short term memory problems than it
usually does, eh?

in a cattle driven field. The

Quoted message said:

caption isn't the point. The picture is.

Uh huh...I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you can't understand the difference, given your
mental challenges and drug-addled state.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Where did I claim that stoner?

I was wondering when you would trot out that ol' tired response. You didn't have to say a word.
It's self evident.

Ah, more projection on your part. Talk about classic.

Quoted message said:

Do you see a pattern here? You are

Quoted message said:

trotting out the same things that you've whined about to various folks because you apparently feel
dreadfully inadequate when people don't find your post humping act "funny."

Not at all. I don't see it as whining. Just stating my piece, without all the "where did I say
that" [censored] that you inanely throw out when you are at a loss...

Quoted message said:

Everyone is oput to get you apparently.

It's not about me Petey my boy, it's about you and your child like statements towards Mr. Binch,
and his posting of something he is proud of. Nothing more than that, Quit trying to make it out I'm
the one who did something wrong here. It isn't working toward your advantage.

...and you don't see that as whining. Simply amazing.

So, using your newly developed criteria, as long as someone posts a picture of something that makes
them proud, nobody should comment on
it.

Brilliant!

Maybe when someone posts some kiddie [censored] that they're really proud of you can be around to try to
stick up for them.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

when in fact your reeking up the AM-B. If this reply is |you "Kicking my mangy ass of your leg"
then you lose, because the fact |remains. YOU ARE AN ELITIST HYPOCRITE! And I'm still going to
point |it out to you.

LOL. You continue to drown in your ignorance.

Am I? From your standpoint, I guess I would try and make it look that way as well. But then I'm not
the one slagging on people for posting a link to picks of their mountain bikes in this, a mountain
bike related newsgroup, am I?

Lame pics are lame pics. Why do you think that folsk shouldn't be able to express their opinions
about them?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Maybe it's time for another toke already? That'll make you feel better about yourself until the
buzz wears off, again.

HAHAHA, same ol' tired response PETEY Boy! You should look for some better retorts. These are about
as tired as you are.....

The truth is always funny Dave. Have another toke and maybe you'll see
iu.

P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

Dave W said:

P e t e F a g e r l i n said:

On Wed, 14 May 2003 12:21:22 -0400, Dave W <[email hidden]> wrote:

>
|>The bike shot on the torn up trail was to illustrate how chopped up it was and to note that it
|>didn't matter. It wasn't leaning, it wasn't taken as a "look at my generic bikre" picture, I
|>didn't have a laundry list of the lameass components that I hand selected.
|
|still a generic bike leaning against the post shot

Ok, where's the post? Was the purpose to "show off," as others have put it, my bike or was the
purpose to give a reference for the depth of the trail damage?

Doesn't matter what the post was about, the picture was of your generic bike, against a
generic post

LOL. Where's the post in the picture? That dope is causing more short term memory problems than it
usually does, eh?

Post, sign, giant turd, it doesn't matter. Not an important part of the point. Doofii

Quoted message said:

in a cattle driven field. The

Quoted message said:

caption isn't the point. The picture is.

Uh huh...I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you can't understand the difference, given your
mental challenges and drug-addled state.

Understand the difference in what? wtf are you talking about man?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Where did I claim that stoner?

I was wondering when you would trot out that ol' tired response. You didn't have to say a word.
It's self evident.

Ah, more projection on your part. Talk about classic.

Projection? you mean like you PROJECTING your tired ol' [censored] against others. I see
what you mean.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

It's not about me Petey my boy, it's about you and your child like statements towards Mr. Binch,
and his posting of something he is proud of. Nothing more than that, Quit trying to make it out
I'm the one who did something wrong here. It isn't working toward your advantage.

...and you don't see that as whining. Simply amazing.

Not at all. It's actually quite fun to point out some of the hypocritical b.s that you (and others)
PROJECT here.

Quoted message said:

So, using your newly developed criteria, as long as someone posts a picture of something that makes
them proud, nobody should comment on
it.

Brilliant!

Where did I say that stoner?

Quoted message said:

Maybe when someone posts some kiddie [censored] that they're really proud of you can be around to try to
stick up for them.

Are you for real?, do you really think that's a good analogy PETEY? I think you've been spending too
much times in the binary groups. You should give them a rest. What else do you use that handy
camcarder for?

But then I'm not the one slagging on people for posting a

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

link to picks of their mountain bikes in this, a mountain bike related newsgroup, am I?

Lame pics are lame pics. Why do you think that folsk shouldn't be able to express their opinions
about them?

Where did I say that? post your opinions away! But don't for one minute think people will respect
your opinion when you resort your typical name calling, elitist posturing.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

HAHAHA, same ol' tired response PETEY Boy! You should look for some better retorts. These are
about as tired as you are.....

The truth is always funny Dave.

That's one of the most preposterious things I've seen written before. the TRUTH is seldom
funny dumbass!

Have another toke and maybe you'll see

Quoted message said:

it.

maybe you should share some of your stash with me! after that last statement it's obvious, you have
the primo [censored]!!

Dave (certainly explains ALOT!)

P e t e F a g e r l i n <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Wed, 14 May 2003 13:04:50 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote:

|> |Only to you - it was a few photographs FFS, not a complete,

comprehensive

Quoted message said:

|> |and exhaustive expression of the inner workings of a persons being, |heheheheh.......
|>
|> Nah, the phenomenom isn't limited to just Starcommander Blubberpusses photos, it's actually
|> quite common, hence my comment.
|
|Your above statement doesn't follow - Maybe you should leave alone it now |Pete, you 'appear' to
be mentally exhausted.

The fact that you can't follow the big bouncing ball isn't surprising,

You are projecting - I don't need to follow the 'ball', it's right here at my feet, same way it has
been since my first post to this thread - you haven't even picked up the damned 'ball' yet!
Heheheheh.....

I just love the way you bandy the word 'fact' about - you saying it doesn't make it so. I know the
'facts' of where I'm at, what I'm capable of, and what I can or cannot follow - anything from you
relating to that is merely supposition on your part, heheheh...

Quoted message said:

although it is amusing.

Google might help you fill in the blanks. Maybe. It's a big stretch, but maybe.

Gee, I didn't even need to be awake and get out of bed to have you tangled in your own nonsense and
grasping at straws - if only I'd know that earlier, I could have had a lie in, heheheheh........

Your 'formula' isn't working here - you are actually dealing with someone who has a mind and uses it
(more than reasonably well), not some silly, ignorant and lost stoner.

Shaun aRe

P e t e F a g e r l i n <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Wed, 14 May 2003 12:24:59 -0400, Dave W <[email hidden]> wrote:

|On Wed, 14 May 2003 08:55:36 -0700, P e t e F a g e r l i n
|<[email hidden]> wrote:
|
|>On Wed, 14 May 2003 13:04:50 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|>
|>
|>
|>|> |Only to you - it was a few photographs FFS, not a complete,

comprehensive

Quoted message said:

|>|> |and exhaustive expression of the inner workings of a persons being, |heheheheh.......
|>|>
|>|> Nah, the phenomenom isn't limited to just Starcommander Blubberpusses photos, it's actually
|>|> quite common, hence my comment.
|>|
|>|Your above statement doesn't follow - Maybe you should leave alone it

now

Quoted message said:

|>|Pete, you 'appear' to be mentally exhausted.
|>
|>The fact that you can't follow the big bouncing ball isn't surprising, although it is amusing.
|>
|>Google might help you fill in the blanks. Maybe. It's a big stretch, but maybe.
|
|See Shaun. He's still the same Elitist MTB rider. Typical Pete F |response. NA, he's not mentally
exhausted (great analogy though!)
|
|He's mentally challenged. And hates it when he's challenged, hence the |usual response.

I hope Shaun put on a body condom before he read that or at least that you're HIV negative.

If he did, at least it will be easier for him to clean up your mess.

Heheheheheh...........don't do that ya _bastard_, heheheheh.....oh [censored]..............!

Shaun aRe - Oh bollocks, I gotz the giggles now....heheheh...........

On Thu, 15 May 2003 11:17:54 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote:

|> |> Nah, the phenomenom isn't limited to just Starcommander Blubberpusses photos, it's actually
|> |> quite common, hence my comment.

Bounce.

|> |
|> |Your above statement doesn't follow - Maybe you should leave alone it now |Pete, you 'appear' to
|> be mentally exhausted.

Bounce.

|>
|> Google might help you fill in the blanks. Maybe. It's a big stretch, but maybe.

Bounce.

It's not limited to Commander Bluberpuss. See Google for many more examples.

Bounce.

On Thu, 15 May 2003 01:56:56 -0400, Dave W <[email hidden]> wrote:

|>>Doesn't matter what the post was about, the picture was of your generic bike, against a
|>>generic post
|>
|>LOL. Where's the post in the picture? That dope is causing more short term memory problems than it
|>usually does, eh?
|
|Post, sign, giant turd, it doesn't matter. Not an important part of |the point. Doofii

It illustrates your idocy perfectly.

|>
|>in a cattle driven field. The
|>>caption isn't the point. The picture is.
|>
|>Uh huh...I guess I shouldn't be surprised that you can't understand the difference, given your
|>mental challenges and drug-addled state.
|
|Understand the difference in what? wtf are you talking about man?

LOL. Yet more proof of your mental challenges and drug-addled state.

|>>>Where did I claim that stoner?
|>>
|>>I was wondering when you would trot out that ol' tired response. You didn't have to say a word.
|>>It's self evident.
|>
|>Ah, more projection on your part. Talk about classic.
|
|Projection? you mean like you PROJECTING your tired ol' [censored] |against others. I see
what you mean.

See above. More proof.
|
|>>It's not about me Petey my boy, it's about you and your child like statements towards Mr. Binch,
|>>and his posting of something he is proud of. Nothing more than that, Quit trying to make it out
|>>I'm the one who did something wrong here. It isn't working toward your advantage.
|>
|>...and you don't see that as whining. Simply amazing.
|
|Not at all. It's actually quite fun to point out some of the |hypocritical b.s that you (and
others) PROJECT here.

Hypocritical huh? Hilarious! The whole "elitist" thing is pretty damn funny I have to say.

How does elitism jive with "It's not about the ride, it's about the ride"? Take a few huge tokes and
ponder that one goofball.

|>So, using your newly developed criteria, as long as someone posts a picture of something that
|>makes them proud, nobody should comment on
|>it.
|>
|>Brilliant!
|
|Where did I say that stoner?

"Right here:

"|>>It's not about me Petey my boy, it's about you and your child like
|>>statements towards Mr. Binch, and his posting of something he is proud of. Nothing more
|>>than that."

p.s. not a stoner. More projection huh?

|>Maybe when someone posts some kiddie [censored] that they're really proud of you can be around to try to
|>stick up for them.
|
|Are you for real?, do you really think that's a good analogy PETEY?

That's an analogy that is bound to resonate even with incredibly simple minded fols like yourself.

| But then I'm not the one slagging on people for posting a
|>>link to picks of their mountain bikes in this, a mountain bike related newsgroup, am I?
|>
|>Lame pics are lame pics. Why do you think that folsk shouldn't be able to express their opinions
|>about them?
|
|Where did I say that? post your opinions away! But don't for one |minute think people will respect
your opinion when you resort your |typical name calling, elitist posturing.

LOL. "elitist posturing"?

"It's not about the ride, it's about the ride."

Time for a few more tokes whiner.
|
|>>HAHAHA, same ol' tired response PETEY Boy! You should look for some better retorts. These are
|>>about as tired as you are.....
|>
|>The truth is always funny Dave.
|
|That's one of the most preposterious things I've seen written before. |the TRUTH is seldom
funny dumbass!

Check your herb supply. Maybe you got some bad stuff.

|
|Have another toke and maybe you'll see
|>it.

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" sed

| It's not limited to Commander Bluberpuss. See Google for many more examples.

That's Starcommander Blubberpuss to you Felchmeister.

---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.481 / Virus Database: 277 -
Release Date: 5/13/2003

On Thu, 15 May 2003 13:47:22 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:

|
|"P e t e F a g e r l i n" sed
|
|| It's not limited to Commander Bluberpuss. See Google for many more examples.
|
|That's Starcommander Blubberpuss to you Felchmeister.

Shouldn't you be dressing your dolls up like Marilyn Monroe and taking pics of them stuck in your
gut rolls right about now?

Or is that only on the weekends?

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" sed

| It's not limited to Commander Bluberpuss. See Google for many more examples.

That's Starcommander Blubberpuss to you Felchmeister.

Just couldn't ignore it could you. Just couldn't leave well enough alone. ;-)
--
~Travis

travis57 at megalink dot net megalink.net~farmersOpen ↗

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| On Thu, 15 May 2003 13:47:22 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|
| |
| |"P e t e F a g e r l i n" sed
| |
| || It's not limited to Commander Bluberpuss. See Google for many more examples.
| |
| |That's Starcommander Blubberpuss to you Felchmeister.
|
| Shouldn't you be dressing your dolls up like Marilyn Monroe and taking pics of them stuck in your
| gut rolls right about now?
|
| Or is that only on the weekends?
|

My oh my what a perverse imagination you have there Petey.

---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.481 / Virus Database: 277 -
Release Date: 5/13/2003

On Thu, 15 May 2003 14:07:02 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:

|"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
|"]news:[email hidden]...
|| On Thu, 15 May 2003 13:47:22 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
||
|| |
|| |"P e t e F a g e r l i n" sed
|| |
|| || It's not limited to Commander Bluberpuss. See Google for many more examples.
|| |
|| |That's Starcommander Blubberpuss to you Felchmeister.
||
|| Shouldn't you be dressing your dolls up like Marilyn Monroe and taking pics of them stuck in your
|| gut rolls right about now?
||
|| Or is that only on the weekends?
||
|
|My oh my what a perverse imagination you have there Petey.

My bad. It's your spaceship model as the lunar flag impression pics that you should be busy
with, right?

P e t e F a g e r l i n <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 15 May 2003 11:17:54 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote:

|> |> Nah, the phenomenom isn't limited to just Starcommander

Blubberpusses

Quoted message said:

|> |> photos, it's actually quite common, hence my comment.

Bounce.

|> |
|> |Your above statement doesn't follow - Maybe you should leave alone it

now

Quoted message said:

|> |Pete, you 'appear' to be mentally exhausted.

Bounce.

|>
|> Google might help you fill in the blanks. Maybe. It's a big stretch, but maybe.

Bounce.

It's not limited to Commander Bluberpuss. See Google for many more examples.

Bounce.

Is that the sound of your singular brain cell 'bouncing' around your skull there oh silly one?

Shaun aRe - You never had the ball - saying 'bounce' over and over doesn't magically mean you do or
did, it just makes you appear kind of, well, childish or retarded really, heheheheh.....