New Pix

Nelson Binch said:

| > No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's self-evident.

It's self-evident that some people cannot comprehend the concept of focusing on the bike **AND**
the ride.

Quoted message said:

It's also a whole big pile of "my way/attitude/etc. is right, yours is wrong."

Where did I write that blubberpuss?

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:38 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|
| >| > No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's
self-evident.
| >
| >It's self-evident that some people cannot comprehend the concept of
focusing
| >on the bike **AND** the ride.
|
| >It's also a whole big pile of "my way/attitude/etc. is right, yours is wrong."
|
| Where did I write that blubberpuss?

Where did I say you did felchmeister?

---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 -
Release Date: 5/6/2003

Nelson Binch said:

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:38 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|
| >| > No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's
self-evident.
| >
| >It's self-evident that some people cannot comprehend the concept of
focusing
| >on the bike **AND** the ride.
|
| >It's also a whole big pile of "my way/attitude/etc. is right, yours is wrong."
|
| Where did I write that blubberpuss?

Where did I say you did felchmeister?

The part right after "It's also" Starcommander. Try again.

Nelson Binch said:

| Where did I write that blubberpuss?

Where did I say you did felchmeister?

Fight! Fight! Fight! Teacher's coming!

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

Nelson Binch said:

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:38 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|
| >| > No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's
self-evident.
| >
| >It's self-evident that some people cannot comprehend the concept of
focusing
| >on the bike **AND** the ride.
|
| >It's also a whole big pile of "my way/attitude/etc. is right, yours is wrong."
|
| Where did I write that blubberpuss?

Where did I say you did felchmeister?

The part right after "It's also" Starcommander. Try again.

Nelson, i get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain that he cannot comprehend there are
other ways than his, then ignore him. it's not worth it.

IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all rubbish.
--
~Travis

travis57 at megalink dot net megalink.net~farmersOpen ↗

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:44:04 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|
| >"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| >"]news:[email hidden]...
| >| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:38 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| >|
| >| >| > No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's
| >self-evident.
| >| >
| >| >It's self-evident that some people cannot comprehend the concept of
| >focusing
| >| >on the bike **AND** the ride.
| >|
| >| >It's also a whole big pile of "my way/attitude/etc. is right, yours is wrong."
| >|
| >| Where did I write that blubberpuss?
| >
| >Where did I say you did felchmeister?
|
| The part right after "It's also" Starcommander. Try again.

You are the one identifying yourself. Seems it does apply mainly to you. Thanks for
pointing that out.

---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 -
Release Date: 5/6/2003

Nelson Binch said:

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:44:04 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|
| >"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| >"]news:[email hidden]...
| >| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:38 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| >|
| >| >| > No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's
| >self-evident.
| >| >
| >| >It's self-evident that some people cannot comprehend the concept of
| >focusing
| >| >on the bike **AND** the ride.
| >|
| >| >It's also a whole big pile of "my way/attitude/etc. is right, yours is wrong."
| >|
| >| Where did I write that blubberpuss?
| >
| >Where did I say you did felchmeister?
|
| The part right after "It's also" Starcommander. Try again.

You are the one identifying yourself. Seems it does apply mainly to you. Thanks for pointing
that out.

Pointing out your idiocy? No problem, Starcommander blubberpuss.

p.s. As long as you're borrowing that camera get some nifty pics of grass growing and paint drying,
to add to your collection.

"Technician" wrote

| Nelson, I get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain that he cannot comprehend there
| are other ways than his, then ignore him. it's not worth it.
|
| IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all rubbish.

Yep. He reveals his true nature when his attacks are composed mainly of making fun of my weight or
my other hobbies.

---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 -
Release Date: 5/6/2003

Nelson Binch said:

"Technician" wrote

| Nelson, I get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain that he cannot comprehend there
| are other ways than his, then ignore him. it's not worth it.
|
| IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all rubbish.

Yep. He reveals his true nature when his attacks are composed mainly of making fun of my weight or
my other hobbies.

LOL!

Youn reap what you sew Starcommander Blubberpuss.

You and that other fruitloop are like two peas in a pod. You're in great company!

Maybe you can spend some time with the incredibly impressionable child and fill his head with some
cycling myths, as is apparently your want...

Nelson Binch said:

"Technician" wrote

Quoted message said:

Nelson, I get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain that he cannot comprehend there
are other ways than his, then ignore him. it's not worth it.

IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all rubbish.

Yep. He reveals his true nature when his attacks are composed mainly of making fun of my weight or
my other hobbies.

you do collect dolls, right?

penny s <ducking

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

Nelson Binch said:

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:44:04 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|
| >"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| >"]news:[email hidden]...
| >| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:38 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| >|
| >| >| > No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's
| >self-evident.
| >| >
| >| >It's self-evident that some people cannot comprehend the concept of
| >focusing
| >| >on the bike **AND** the ride.
| >|
| >| >It's also a whole big pile of "my way/attitude/etc. is right, yours is wrong."
| >|
| >| Where did I write that blubberpuss?
| >
| >Where did I say you did felchmeister?
|
| The part right after "It's also" Starcommander. Try again.

You are the one identifying yourself. Seems it does apply mainly to you. Thanks for pointing
that out.

Pointing out your idiocy? No problem, Starcommander blubberpuss.

p.s. As long as you're borrowing that camera get some nifty pics of grass growing and paint
drying, to add to your collection.

I do say, Pete is becoming a troll.
--
~Travis

travis57 at megalink dot net megalink.net~farmersOpen ↗

"Penny S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
| Nelson Binch wrote:
| > "Technician" wrote
| >
| >> Nelson, I get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain that he cannot comprehend there
| >> are other ways than his, then ignore him. it's not worth it.
| >>
| >> IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all rubbish.
| >
| > Yep. He reveals his true nature when his attacks are composed mainly of making fun of my weight
| > or my other hobbies.
|
| you do collect dolls, right?

****ACTION FIGURES!!!!!****

<throws foam rubber bricks at Penny>

---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 -
Release Date: 5/6/2003

"Technician" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
| > On Mon, 12 May 2003 16:16:22 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| >
| > >"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| > >"]news:[email hidden]...
| > >| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:44:04 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| > >|
| > >| >"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| > >| >"]news:[email hidden]...
| > >| >| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:38 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| > >| >|
| > >| >| >| > No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's
| > >| >self-evident.
| > >| >| >
| > >| >| >It's self-evident that some people cannot comprehend the concept
of
| > >| >focusing
| > >| >| >on the bike **AND** the ride.
| > >| >|
| > >| >| >It's also a whole big pile of "my way/attitude/etc. is right,
yours is
| > >| >| >wrong."
| > >| >|
| > >| >| Where did I write that blubberpuss?
| > >| >
| > >| >Where did I say you did felchmeister?
| > >|
| > >| The part right after "It's also" Starcommander. Try again.
| > >
| > >You are the one identifying yourself. Seems it does apply mainly to
you.
| > >Thanks for pointing that out.
| >
| > Pointing out your idiocy? No problem, Starcommander blubberpuss.
| >
| > p.s. As long as you're borrowing that camera get some nifty pics of grass growing and paint
| > drying, to add to your collection.
| >
| >
|
| I do say, Pete is becoming a troll.

Becoming?

---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 -
Release Date: 5/6/2003

Nelson Binch said:

"Penny S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Nelson Binch said:

"Technician" wrote

> Nelson, I get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain that he cannot comprehend there
> are other ways than his, then ignore him. it's not worth it.
>
> IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all rubbish.

Yep. He reveals his true nature when his attacks are composed mainly of making fun of my weight
or my other hobbies.

you do collect dolls, right?

****ACTION FIGURES!!!!!****

<throws foam rubber bricks at Penny>

hee hee....

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

"Penny S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| Nelson Binch wrote:
| > "Technician" wrote
| >
| >> Nelson, I get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain that he cannot comprehend
| >> there are other ways than his, then ignore him. it's not worth it.
| >>
| >> IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all
| >> rubbish.
| >
| > Yep. He reveals his true nature when his attacks are composed mainly of making fun of my
| > weight or my other hobbies.
|
| you do collect dolls, right?

****ACTION FIGURES!!!!!****

<throws foam rubber bricks at Penny>

How come figures like G.I.Joe are considered action figures, and yet Barbies, though essentially are
the same thing (with more must line), are called dolls?

<ducks behind Penny>
--
~Travis

travis57 at megalink dot net megalink.net~farmersOpen ↗

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

"Technician" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
| > On Mon, 12 May 2003 16:16:22 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| >
| > >"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| > >"]news:[email hidden]...
| > >| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:44:04 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| > >|
| > >| >"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| > >| >"]news:[email hidden]...
| > >| >| On Mon, 12 May 2003 15:31:38 -0400, "Nelson Binch" <[email hidden]> wrote:
| > >| >|
| > >| >| >| > No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's
| > >| >self-evident.
| > >| >| >
| > >| >| >It's self-evident that some people cannot comprehend the concept
of
| > >| >focusing
| > >| >| >on the bike **AND** the ride.
| > >| >|
| > >| >| >It's also a whole big pile of "my way/attitude/etc. is right,
yours is
| > >| >| >wrong."
| > >| >|
| > >| >| Where did I write that blubberpuss?
| > >| >
| > >| >Where did I say you did felchmeister?
| > >|
| > >| The part right after "It's also" Starcommander. Try again.
| > >
| > >You are the one identifying yourself. Seems it does apply mainly to
you.
| > >Thanks for pointing that out.
| >
| > Pointing out your idiocy? No problem, Starcommander blubberpuss.
| >
| > p.s. As long as you're borrowing that camera get some nifty pics of grass growing and paint
| > drying, to add to your collection.
| >
| >
|
| I do say, Pete is becoming a troll.

Becoming?

Oh, so you want to argue semantics now do you? ;-)
--
~Travis

travis57 at megalink dot net megalink.net~farmersOpen ↗

"Technician" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
| > "Penny S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| > "]news:[email hidden]...
| > | Nelson Binch wrote:
| > | > "Technician" wrote
| > | >
| > | >> Nelson, I get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain
that
| > | >> he cannot comprehend there are other ways than his, then ignore
him.
| > | >> it's not worth it.
| > | >>
| > | >> IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all
| > | >> rubbish.
| > | >
| > | > Yep. He reveals his true nature when his attacks are composed
mainly
| > | > of making fun of my weight or my other hobbies.
| > |
| > | you do collect dolls, right?
| >
| > ****ACTION FIGURES!!!!!****
| >
| > <throws foam rubber bricks at Penny>
| >
|
| How come figures like G.I.Joe are considered action figures, and yet Barbies, though essentially
| are the same thing (with more must line), are called dolls?
|
| <ducks behind Penny>

Yer not a lady, so I've got some real bricks handy :-)

It's just so we don't *have* to call them "dolls"

---
__o _`\(,_ Cycling is life, (_)/ (_) all the rest, just details. Nelson Binch =^o.o^=
intergalax.comintergalax.comOpen ↗

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.comOpen ↗). Version: 6.0.478 / Virus Database: 275 -
Release Date: 5/6/2003

Technician said:

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

"Penny S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Nelson Binch wrote:
> "Technician" wrote
>
>> Nelson, I get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain that he cannot comprehend
>> there are other ways than his, then ignore him. it's not worth it.
>>
>> IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all rubbish.
>
> Yep. He reveals his true nature when his attacks are composed mainly of making fun of my weight
> or my other hobbies.

you do collect dolls, right?

****ACTION FIGURES!!!!!****

<throws foam rubber bricks at Penny>

How come figures like G.I.Joe are considered action figures, and yet Barbies, though essentially
are the same thing (with more must line), are called dolls?

<ducks behind Penny>

I call barbies stupid so I'm not the one to ask.

penny

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

"Technician" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
| In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
| > "Penny S." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
| > "]news:[email hidden]...
| > | Nelson Binch wrote:
| > | > "Technician" wrote
| > | >
| > | >> Nelson, I get your point, and agree with it. if Pete is so vain
that
| > | >> he cannot comprehend there are other ways than his, then ignore
him.
| > | >> it's not worth it.
| > | >>
| > | >> IMO, the only thing Pete seems to do right is make ride videos, beyond that, it's all
| > | >> rubbish.
| > | >
| > | > Yep. He reveals his true nature when his attacks are composed
mainly
| > | > of making fun of my weight or my other hobbies.
| > |
| > | you do collect dolls, right?
| >
| > ****ACTION FIGURES!!!!!****
| >
| > <throws foam rubber bricks at Penny>
| >
|
| How come figures like G.I.Joe are considered action figures, and yet Barbies, though essentially
| are the same thing (with more must line), are called dolls?
|
| <ducks behind Penny>

Yer not a lady, so I've got some real bricks handy :-)

It's just so we don't *have* to call them "dolls"

he he
--
~Travis

travis57 at megalink dot net megalink.net~farmersOpen ↗

P e t e F a g e r l i n <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Mon, 12 May 2003 10:12:49 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote:

|
|P e t e F a g e r l i n <[email hidden]> wrote in message
|"]news:[email hidden]...
|> On Fri, 9 May 2003 10:47:18 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer" <[email hidden]> wrote:
|>
|>
|> |>You don't understand it, because you are a '[censored]'.
|> |
|> |"No, I don't understand it because it's not about the ride, it's about
|> |the ride, IMO."
|> |
|> |That's as maybe, but a lot of people are proud of their tools of the
|trade -
|> |I see nothing wrong with that.
|>
|> Where did I claim it was "wrong"?
|
|Where did I claim that you claimed it was wrong?

See above. The bit with "see nothing wrong" in response to my comment about "I don't understand."

Are you claiming that was inadvertent?

No, it was a statement of fact.

Quoted message said:

|> I merely wrote that I don''t get the fascination that people have with posting mundane pictures
|> of mundane bikes leaning against the couch, followed by a laundry list of the parts.
|
|I merely wrote 'I see nothing wrong with that'. - No point wasting your

time

Quoted message said:

|trying and play that tired 'where did I say that?' card with me.

ROTFL whiner.

Whiner? Heheheheheh - kiss my scrawny [censored], heheheheh......

I just find it hilarious, that in every a.m-b disagreement you get involved in, you trot out the
same tired old 'tools' of circular, flawed reasoning, and no real argument. It's just useless
semantics.

Quoted message said:

|> So because it's a tool for your main hobby it's important/cool/interesting to post pictures of
|> mundane bikes leaning against inanimate objects, not being used?
|
|Something wrong with a bit of pride Pete?

As noted before, I don't understand taking pride in a generic bike leaning against (insert
object here).

It's about the ride, not the ride, again.

It's about what it's about for you, for me, individually. Each to their own, and all that.

Quoted message said:

|Why does it make somone more concerned about their bike(s) than the

riding,

Quoted message said:

|just because they have taken and posted pictures of their bikes 'static'? |That's almost like
saying John G is more concerned with the bottles than

the

Quoted message said:

|beer, because he posted a picture of beer, in bottles, in the fridge, not |being drunk.

No, it's focusing on the bike rather than the ride. It's self-evident.

Only to you - it was a few photographs FFS, not a complete, comprehensive and exhaustive expression
of the inner workings of a persons being, heheheheh.......

Shaun aRe - gonna go look for some different fun now - this is just getting silly ',;~}~