General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Wind chill

Started by Tony · · Last activity · 49 posts · 1,009 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 January 2005
Last activity
29 January 2005
Original author
Tony
Posts
49
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,009
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 49
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "The wind chill temperature is the temperature that it feels like outside to
    people and animals. Wind chill is based on the rate of heat loss from
    exposed skin caused by combined effects of wind and cold".

    Wind chill is a SKIN heat loss effect, so for runners planning to run in
    shorts, and for facial covering in extreme conditions it comes into play.
    Otherwise, when wearing a shell, gloves and a hat, it's effect is usually
    minor and largely irrelevant.

    http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/wind-chill.html
    New wind chill formula
    F: T(wc) = 35.74 + 0.6215t - 35.75(v^0.16) + 0.4275t(v^0.16)
    C: T(wc) = 0.045(5.27V**0.5 + 10.45 - 0.28V)(T - 33) + 33
    old wind chill
    F: T(wc) = 0.0817(3.71V**0.5 + 5.81 -0.25V)(T-91.4) + 91.4

    -Tony

  2. "Tony" <qtrader2@(remove)hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1MeKd.615$y51.331@trndny07...

    Quoted message said:


    http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/wind-chill.html
    New wind chill formula
    F: T(wc) = 35.74 + 0.6215t - 35.75(v^0.16) + 0.4275t(v^0.16)
    C: T(wc) = 0.045(5.27V**0.5 + 10.45 - 0.28V)(T - 33) + 33
    old wind chill
    F: T(wc) = 0.0817(3.71V**0.5 + 5.81 -0.25V)(T-91.4) + 91.4

    Will I have to memorize these for the final test?

    What races do you have scheduled for the year???

    -Doug

  3. Leafing through rec.running, I read a message from qtrader2@(remove)
    hotmail.com of 27 Jan 2005:

    Quoted message said:

    F: T(wc) = 35.74 + 0.6215t - 35.75(v^0.16) + 0.4275t(v^0.16)
    C: T(wc) = 0.045(5.27V**0.5 + 10.45 - 0.28V)(T - 33) + 33
    old wind chill
    F: T(wc) = 0.0817(3.71V**0.5 + 5.81 -0.25V)(T-91.4) + 91.4

    Thanks for posting that. Time to update the spreadsheet formula.

    Phil M.


  4. Quoted message said:

    http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/wind-chill.html
    New wind chill formula
    F: T(wc) = 35.74 + 0.6215t - 35.75(v^0.16) + 0.4275t(v^0.16)
    C: T(wc) = 0.045(5.27V**0.5 + 10.45 - 0.28V)(T - 33) + 33
    old wind chill
    F: T(wc) = 0.0817(3.71V**0.5 + 5.81 -0.25V)(T-91.4) + 91.4


    You mean there is somebody here that did not already have
    that committed to memory?

  5. Leafing through rec.running, I read a message from [email hidden] of 27
    Jan 2005:

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/wind-chill.html
    New wind chill formula
    F: T(wc) = 35.74 + 0.6215t - 35.75(v^0.16) + 0.4275t(v^0.16)
    C: T(wc) = 0.045(5.27V**0.5 + 10.45 - 0.28V)(T - 33) + 33
    old wind chill
    F: T(wc) = 0.0817(3.71V**0.5 + 5.81 -0.25V)(T-91.4) + 91.4


    You mean there is somebody here that did not already have
    that committed to memory?

    I did, but it was the old formula. You know, this one:

    Heat index(HI), or apparent temperature(AI)= -42.379 + 2.04901523(Tf) +
    10.14333127(RH) - 0.22475541(Tf)(RH) - 6.83783x10**(-3)*(Tf**(2)) -
    5.481717x10**(-2)*(RH**(2)) + 1.22874x10**(-3)*(Tf**(2))*(RH) + 8.5282x10**
    (-4)*(Tf)*(RH**(2)) - 1.99x10**(-6)*(Tf**(2))*(RH**(2))

    Phil M.

  6. Doug Freese said:


    "Tony" <qtrader2@(remove)hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1MeKd.615$y51.331@trndny07...

    Quoted message said:


    http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/wind-chill.html
    New wind chill formula
    F: T(wc) = 35.74 + 0.6215t - 35.75(v^0.16) + 0.4275t(v^0.16)
    C: T(wc) = 0.045(5.27V**0.5 + 10.45 - 0.28V)(T - 33) + 33
    old wind chill
    F: T(wc) = 0.0817(3.71V**0.5 + 5.81 -0.25V)(T-91.4) + 91.4

    Will I have to memorize these for the final test?

    Naw. Just go to

    http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lsx/vortex/newwindchill.htm

    Your tax dollars at work...

    Quoted message said:

    What races do you have scheduled for the year???

    -Doug

  7. Quoted message said:

    Wind chill is a SKIN heat loss effect, so for runners planning to run


    in
    shorts, and for facial covering in extreme conditions it comes into
    play.
    ____

    Wrong. The assumption you're making is that the "covering" or gear
    runners wear perfectly negates wind in shielding skin from wind.
    You're also assuming all gear is equal in it's ability to negate the
    effects of wind. Mitts-Gloves, headgear, Jackets, Tights, socks, and
    even shoes _matter_. They can wildly vary in their ability to negate
    the effects of wind on skin.

    Quoted message said:

    Otherwise, when wearing a shell, gloves and a hat, it's effect is


    usually
    minor and largely irrelevant.

    Total and complete BS and spoken like someone who does not know what
    he's talking about. Where do you live Tony? Seriously...what kind
    of windchill do you personally deal wth day in, day out? I would
    really like to know that. Can you translate your "text book" dialog &
    posting to some real world experience for us?

    I got up and ran this morning and it was 9F, with the windchill it was
    -3F. I did another light run just tonight, same frigging thing, 13F
    and due to higher winds, it was still -2F W/C. The W/C kicked my ass.
    These were 4 mile weenie runs. What was your run like today Tony?

    What humors me about your posting Tony when dispensing advise and
    wisdom as you seem to be doing.....and with what you're saying....how
    do you omit advising moistening the face with vasoline and the lips
    with petroleum jelly vasoline prior to heading out into that extreme
    cold wind chill run? Oh...I forgot....your worldly knowledge states
    the W/C is "minor and largely irrelevant". Folks...-3F W/C hitting
    your face is such a [censored]...I wear running glasses simply to shield
    and protect my friggen eyeballs and allow them to remain open and not
    have to squint while runnng (I have glasses with changeable lenses for
    day/night/twight, etc.).

    Your text book content is cute, but you it does not cover all the
    bases. Ya wanna see a totally F'ed up pix?...and some runners in a
    race last week in 8F?

    http://www.nyrrc.org/race/2005/photosa50122.html

    I'm the F'ed up looking black guy doing a Ray Charels impression. Yes,
    those are not only gore-tex mitts but insultated gore-tex mitts!
    That's how much of a weather weenie I am (as Doug never fails to remind
    me).

    Please Tony...I just gotta know after your posting...share with us some
    of your real world experience in extreme W/C running? Don't tell me
    you too raced in Ontario, Canada last Saturday in -23F? Good
    grief...it's an epidemic!

  8. LMAO -- lance that definition isn't MINE its from the damn NWS website -
    wind chill is SKIN heat loss.

    [email hidden] wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Wind chill is a SKIN heat loss effect, so for runners planning to run


    in
    shorts, and for facial covering in extreme conditions it comes into
    play.
    ____

    Wrong. The assumption you're making is that the "covering" or gear
    runners wear perfectly negates wind in shielding skin from wind.
    You're also assuming all gear is equal in it's ability to negate the
    effects of wind. Mitts-Gloves, headgear, Jackets, Tights, socks, and
    even shoes _matter_. They can wildly vary in their ability to negate
    the effects of wind on skin.

    Quoted message said:

    Otherwise, when wearing a shell, gloves and a hat, it's effect is


    usually
    minor and largely irrelevant.

    Total and complete BS and spoken like someone who does not know what
    he's talking about. Where do you live Tony? Seriously...what kind
    of windchill do you personally deal wth day in, day out? I would
    really like to know that. Can you translate your "text book" dialog &
    posting to some real world experience for us?

    Rockland county New York, just a bit colder than NYC, but I've lived in
    Maine and upstate NY, and have skied in northern vermont in nasty
    conditions.

    Quoted message said:

    I got up and ran this morning and it was 9F, with the windchill it was
    -3F. I did another light run just tonight, same frigging thing, 13F
    and due to higher winds, it was still -2F W/C. The W/C kicked my ass.
    These were 4 mile weenie runs. What was your run like today Tony?

    Actually, just about to go out right now 9pm about 7f, wind 15mph...

    Quoted message said:

    What humors me about your posting Tony when dispensing advise and
    wisdom as you seem to be doing.....and with what you're saying....how
    do you omit advising moistening the face with vasoline and the lips
    with petroleum jelly vasoline prior to heading out into that extreme
    cold wind chill run? Oh...I forgot....your worldly knowledge states
    the W/C is "minor and largely irrelevant". Folks...-3F W/C hitting
    your face is such a [censored]...I wear running glasses simply to shield
    and protect my friggen eyeballs and allow them to remain open and not
    have to squint while runnng (I have glasses with changeable lenses for
    day/night/twight, etc.).

    Yea of course you gotta put stuff on yur face or wear a mask when it's
    windy - cover the skin - but if most of you is covered, wind chill is
    largely negated.

    Quoted message said:

    Your text book content is cute, but you it does not cover all the
    bases. Ya wanna see a totally F'ed up pix?...and some runners in a
    race last week in 8F?

    http://www.nyrrc.org/race/2005/photosa50122.html

    I'm the F'ed up looking black guy doing a Ray Charels impression. Yes,
    those are not only gore-tex mitts but insultated gore-tex mitts!
    That's how much of a weather weenie I am (as Doug never fails to remind
    me).

    Please Tony...I just gotta know after your posting...share with us some
    of your real world experience in extreme W/C running? Don't tell me
    you too raced in Ontario, Canada last Saturday in -23F? Good
    grief...it's an epidemic!

    This year nothing that bad, Sunday's run was 10f with wind of 30mph for a WC
    of about -10, and yea I felt it on my face - but my point is you don't need
    a lot of extra layering, just skin coverage and most WC is largely negated.

    -Tony

  9. Tom Phillips wrote in message <[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Doug Freese said:


    "Tony" <qtrader2@(remove)hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1MeKd.615$y51.331@trndny07...

    Quoted message said:


    http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/wind-chill.html
    New wind chill formula
    F: T(wc) = 35.74 + 0.6215t - 35.75(v^0.16) + 0.4275t(v^0.16)
    C: T(wc) = 0.045(5.27V**0.5 + 10.45 - 0.28V)(T - 33) + 33
    old wind chill
    F: T(wc) = 0.0817(3.71V**0.5 + 5.81 -0.25V)(T-91.4) + 91.4

    Will I have to memorize these for the final test?

    Naw. Just go to

    http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lsx/vortex/newwindchill.htm

    Better link, thanks

    -T

    Quoted message said:

    Your tax dollars at work...

    Quoted message said:

    What races do you have scheduled for the year???

    -Doug

  10. My apologies. I'll have my crow medium-well thank you. For a minute
    there Tony thought you were one of these southern weenies like Phil,
    etc.....speaking out of school. (hey Phil, no offense)

  11. Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Wind chill is a SKIN heat loss effect, so for runners planning to run


    in
    shorts, and for facial covering in extreme conditions it comes into
    play.
    ____

    Wrong. The assumption you're making is that the "covering" or gear
    runners wear perfectly negates wind in shielding skin from wind.
    You're also assuming all gear is equal in it's ability to negate the
    effects of wind. Mitts-Gloves, headgear, Jackets, Tights, socks, and
    even shoes _matter_. They can wildly vary in their ability to negate
    the effects of wind on skin.

    Well this is true. But an _effective_ wind shell
    will do this and in fact any clothing will lessen
    wind chill. Even fleece, which is about the crappiest
    wind barrier I know...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Otherwise, when wearing a shell, gloves and a hat, it's effect is


    usually
    minor and largely irrelevant.

    Total and complete BS and spoken like someone who does not know what
    he's talking about.

    It's irrelvant on it's direct effects on the skin
    (i.e., skin temperature.) Other wind factors remain.

    Just ask anyone who's climbed Everest...

    Quoted message said:

    Where do you live Tony? Seriously...what kind
    of windchill do you personally deal wth day in, day out? I would
    really like to know that. Can you translate your "text book" dialog &
    posting to some real world experience for us?

    I got up and ran this morning and it was 9F, with the windchill it was
    -3F. I did another light run just tonight, same frigging thing, 13F
    and due to higher winds, it was still -2F W/C. The W/C kicked my ass.
    These were 4 mile weenie runs. What was your run like today Tony?

    What humors me about your posting Tony when dispensing advise

    Adviss? Don;t think so. Opinion maybe..

    Quoted message said:

    and
    wisdom as you seem to be doing.....and with what you're saying....how
    do you omit advising moistening the face with vasoline and the lips
    with petroleum jelly vasoline prior to heading out into that extreme
    cold wind chill run? Oh...I forgot....your worldly knowledge states
    the W/C is "minor and largely irrelevant". Folks...-3F W/C hitting
    your face is such a [censored]...

    Yeah? so wear a face mask.

    snip..

    Quoted message said:

    Please Tony...I just gotta know after your posting...share with us some
    of your real world experience in extreme W/C running?

    lc, you wouldn't know real cold is it
    frostbit you in the butt ;-)

  12. Tony said:


    Tom Phillips wrote in message <[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Doug Freese said:


    "Tony" <qtrader2@(remove)hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:1MeKd.615$y51.331@trndny07...
    >
    > http://www.mountwashington.org/weather/wind-chill.html
    > New wind chill formula
    > F: T(wc) = 35.74 + 0.6215t - 35.75(v^0.16) + 0.4275t(v^0.16)
    > C: T(wc) = 0.045(5.27V**0.5 + 10.45 - 0.28V)(T - 33) + 33
    > old wind chill
    > F: T(wc) = 0.0817(3.71V**0.5 + 5.81 -0.25V)(T-91.4) + 91.4

    Will I have to memorize these for the final test?

    Naw. Just go to

    http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lsx/vortex/newwindchill.htm

    Better link, thanks

    -T

    Pretty much the same info. But treatment for frostbite
    is in opposition to my medical reference however.
    _Immediate_ thawing is recommended for saving as
    much tissue as possible, not "SLOWLY re-warmed."

    This might entail warming supoerficial frostbite
    againts warmer skin or immersion in 110F water
    if deep frostbite.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Your tax dollars at work...

    Quoted message said:

    What races do you have scheduled for the year???

    -Doug

  13. Speaking of largely irrelevant...


  14. Quoted message said:

    http://www.nyrrc.org/race/2005/photosa50122.html

    I assume the lady in the top left photo later died of exposure.

    Surf

  15. Tom Phillips wrote in message <[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Naw. Just go to

    http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lsx/vortex/newwindchill.htm

    Better link, thanks

    -T

    Pretty much the same info. But treatment for frostbite
    is in opposition to my medical reference however.
    _Immediate_ thawing is recommended for saving as
    much tissue as possible, not "SLOWLY re-warmed."

    This might entail warming supoerficial frostbite
    againts warmer skin or immersion in 110F water
    if deep frostbite.

    Interesting, I'll remember that. Maybe a microwave on defrost would do the
    trick 🙂

    -T

  16. Doug Freese wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    ......
    What races do you have scheduled for the year???

    Right now I'm shooting for the escarpment and the Vermont 50 miler. If I've
    lost the holiday weight by March, I might do the Hat run.

    -T

  17. [email hidden] wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    My apologies. I'll have my crow medium-well thank you. For a minute
    there Tony thought you were one of these southern weenies like Phil,
    etc.....speaking out of school. (hey Phil, no offense)

    Actually sounds like Phil kicked butt doing a 14 mile trail run in 20's f
    with 15-20mph winds last Sunday. To me runs longer than an hour in the cold
    are much harder.

    -T

  18. Tom Phillips said:

    Pretty much the same info. But treatment for frostbite
    is in opposition to my medical reference however.
    _Immediate_ thawing is recommended for saving as
    much tissue as possible, not "SLOWLY re-warmed."

    Quoted message said:

    This might entail warming supoerficial frostbite
    againts warmer skin or immersion in 110F water
    if deep frostbite.

    Well, thawing *is* a slow (15-30min) method even when done immediately
    and shouldn´t be rushed by applying any more heat or hotter water than
    that.

    But it´s true the above advice is badly formulated and can be
    misinterpreted.

    Anders

  19. Quoted message said:

    http://www.nyrrc.org/race/2005/photosa50122.html
    I'm the F'ed up looking black guy doing a Ray Charels impression.

    With considerable success, it must be said:-)

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, those are not only gore-tex mitts but insultated gore-tex mitts!

    They´re not only overkill, but making your hands the best-protected
    part of your body is probably quite counterproductive: it could well be
    you´re making yourself more uncomfortable and it is certain you´re
    losing the best method to fine-adjust your body temperature.

    Besides, it is your hands that are the fastest to adapt to the cold.
    With the amount of exposure you´d get during your runs, your hand
    temperature would increase at a rate of 1°C per week which is more
    than enough to make a big difference in how comfortable you´d be. (And
    you won´t need to run bare-fisted to achieve this...)

    Quoted message said:

    That's how much of a weather weenie I am (as Doug never fails to


    remind

    Quoted message said:

    me).

    "In the destructive element, immerse yourself.":-)

    Anders

  20. Quoted message said:

    "The wind chill temperature is the temperature that it feels like outside to
    people and animals. Wind chill is based on the rate of heat loss from
    exposed skin caused by combined effects of wind and cold".

    Wow! This guys nearly as smart as "Rick the idiot".

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.