WHO AM I !

You are Spammer -- hopefully, Hotmail-less.

HTH

Quoted message said:

HI:
This is Will. Glad to meet you.
I am from GuangZhou china.i am a shoes seller and wholesaleer.
I am work for www.aoov.com
There are some of our hot sell shoes in the inclosure.
You can visit our website too .You can chooose all you like on my
website. My webiste is :

WWW.AOOV.COM

Stat insulting people and we'll know you are Bill Sornson.

[email hidden] wrote:

NICE USER NAME! LOL

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

HI:
This is Will. Glad to meet you.
I am from GuangZhou china.i am a shoes seller and wholesaleer.
I am work for www.aoov.com
There are some of our hot sell shoes in the inclosure.
You can visit our website too .You can chooose all you like on my
website. My webiste is :

WWW.AOOV.COM

Quoted message said:

Stat insulting people and we'll know you are Bill Sornson.

One little hateful line and you can't even get THAT right.

BTW, way to leave all the Spammer's message intact. You compulsively
over-snip /regular/ posts to hide and/or change meaning or just out of sheer
stupidity, but a blatant SPAM message you re-post in full. BRILLIANT!

Poor flailor... ROTFL

Bill Sornson said:

[email hidden] wrote:

NICE USER NAME! LOL

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

HI:
This is Will. Glad to meet you.
I am from GuangZhou china.i am a shoes seller and wholesaleer.
I am work for www.aoov.com
There are some of our hot sell shoes in the inclosure.
You can visit our website too .You can chooose all you like on my
website. My webiste is :

WWW.AOOV.COM

Quoted message said:

Stat insulting people and we'll know you are Bill Sornson.

One little hateful line and you can't even get THAT right.

BTW, way to leave all the Spammer's message intact. You compulsively
over-snip /regular/ posts to hide and/or change meaning or just out of sheer
stupidity, but a blatant SPAM message you re-post in full. BRILLIANT!

Poor flailor... ROTFL

Hook, line and sinker.

Poor Sorni.

E.P.

Ed Pirrero said:

Bill Sornson said:

[email hidden] wrote:

NICE USER NAME! LOL

Quoted message said:

On 1 Sep 2006 08:49:22 -0700, [email hidden] wrote:

> HI:
> This is Will. Glad to meet you.
> I am from GuangZhou china.i am a shoes seller and wholesaleer.
> I am work for www.aoov.com
> There are some of our hot sell shoes in the inclosure.
> You can visit our website too .You can chooose all you like on my
> website. My webiste is :
>
>
> WWW.AOOV.COM

Quoted message said:

Stat insulting people and we'll know you are Bill Sornson.

One little hateful line and you can't even get THAT right.

BTW, way to leave all the Spammer's message intact. You compulsively
over-snip /regular/ posts to hide and/or change meaning or just out
of sheer stupidity, but a blatant SPAM message you re-post in full.
BRILLIANT!

Poor flailor... ROTFL

Quoted message said:

Hook, line and sinker.

Poor Sorni.

You're right, Ed. I should just let totally unprovoked attacks go without
comment -- especially when they're stupid and nonsensical like this one was.
(At least he spelled my name right.)

I'll try taking a page out of YOUR book: we all know how good you are at
letting things go and not ALWAYS insisting on getting the last word.

{You can put it right here.}

Thanks for that very helpful and insightful post.

Your pal, Bill S.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

HI:
This is Will. Glad to meet you.
I am from GuangZhou china.i am a shoes seller and wholesaleer.
I am work for www.aoov.com
There are some of our hot sell shoes in the inclosure.
You can visit our website too .You can chooose all you like on my
website. My webiste is :

WWW.AOOV.COM

Stat insulting people and we'll know you are Bill Sornson.

Stop trolling and crossposting and we won't know you are jtaylor.

Bill Sornson said:

Ed Pirrero said:

Bill Sornson said:

[email hidden] wrote:

NICE USER NAME! LOL

> On 1 Sep 2006 08:49:22 -0700, [email hidden] wrote:
>
>> HI:
>> This is Will. Glad to meet you.
>> I am from GuangZhou china.i am a shoes seller and wholesaleer.
>> I am work for www.aoov.com
>> There are some of our hot sell shoes in the inclosure.
>> You can visit our website too .You can chooose all you like on my
>> website. My webiste is :
>>
>>
>> WWW.AOOV.COM

> Stat insulting people and we'll know you are Bill Sornson.

One little hateful line and you can't even get THAT right.

BTW, way to leave all the Spammer's message intact. You compulsively
over-snip /regular/ posts to hide and/or change meaning or just out
of sheer stupidity, but a blatant SPAM message you re-post in full.
BRILLIANT!

Poor flailor... ROTFL

Quoted message said:

Hook, line and sinker.

Poor Sorni.

You're right, Ed. I should just let totally unprovoked attacks go without
comment -- especially when they're stupid and nonsensical like this one was.
(At least he spelled my name right.)

When they are blatantly obvious trolls, yes, you should.

Quoted message said:

I'll try taking a page out of YOUR book: we all know how good you are at
letting things go and not ALWAYS insisting on getting the last word.

ROTFL! Yeah, no irony there, Sorni.

Sheesh. At least you are completely and totally predictable in your
adolescent responses to anyone who dares invoke the name of the
all-powerful Sorni, or who makes any political comment that has the
barest whiff of criticism for the current administration or their
slack-jawed apologists/propagandists.

I've seen pictures purportedly of you - I can hardly believe that
someone who posts like an eighteen-year-old can actually look 50-ish.

But hey, whip yourself into a tizzy over this post. I can't wait.

E.P.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

HI:
This is Will. Glad to meet you.
I am from GuangZhou china.i am a shoes seller and wholesaleer.
I am work for www.aoov.com
There are some of our hot sell shoes in the inclosure.
You can visit our website too .You can chooose all you like on my
website. My webiste is :

WWW.AOOV.COM

Stat insulting people and we'll know you are Bill Sornson.

Who's doing the insulting here?

Ron

Ed Pirrero wrote (told ya he would!):

Quoted message said:

But hey, whip yourself into a tizzy over this post. I can't wait.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html

RonSonic said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

HI:
This is Will. Glad to meet you.
I am from GuangZhou china.i am a shoes seller and wholesaleer.
I am work for www.aoov.com
There are some of our hot sell shoes in the inclosure.
You can visit our website too .You can chooose all you like on my
website. My webiste is :

WWW.AOOV.COM

Stat insulting people and we'll know you are Bill Sornson.

Who's doing the insulting here?

Hypocrisy is hardly new to Mr. Flailor.

Bill Sornson said:

Ed Pirrero wrote (told ya he would!):

Quoted message said:

But hey, whip yourself into a tizzy over this post. I can't wait.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html

Damn, does that finally nail the lid on that stupid mess. Joe Wilson's
accusations are proven false and there was no attempt to harm his wife's career
at CIA. At least nothing willful on the part of anyone in the Bush
administration.

What a stupid petty mess of lies and hysteria and the worst sort of gotcha
politics from people who hate Bush so bad they hurt themselves.

I will say that it is to the WaPo's credit that they published this concise
summary that contradicts much of their previous calls for investigation and
prosecution.

Ron

What is your evidence that I was a swindler?

Because I was Chinese? !

I am Sorry, I am Chinese businessmen, but I am not Chinese swindler
If you think I was a swindler, you can delete the report, a protest,
but your loss
If you think that I am not a swindler, we will be good friends, thank
you !

Truth fears not the flames of slander and injustice.

will

RonSonic said:

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:30:58 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html

Quoted message said:

Damn, does that finally nail the lid on that stupid mess. Joe Wilson's
accusations are proven false and there was no attempt to harm his
wife's career at CIA. At least nothing willful on the part of anyone
in the Bush administration.

Damage's done, however. Days and days on end with front page stories and
lead features on cable "news" shows have convinced something like 70% of
people that the WH engaged in "dirty tricks" and unethical behavior. Now
that the truth is known, SILENCE! (Except, of course, on "Countdown", where
Krazy Keith still managed to find someone blaming Rove and Cheney and Libby
et al.)

Quoted message said:

What a stupid petty mess of lies and hysteria and the worst sort of
gotcha politics from people who hate Bush so bad they hurt themselves.

Except they /won't/ be hurt because the media protects its own. Meanwhile,
more than a few lives and careers were seriously damaged, Libby foremost
amongst 'em.

Quoted message said:

I will say that it is to the WaPo's credit that they published this
concise summary that contradicts much of their previous calls for
investigation and prosecution.

Agreed...although I'd have like to see them MENTION themselves among those
who used/abused the story so much. Sorta sounded like they were talking
about "others" a bit too much to me.

Bill Sornson said:

RonSonic said:

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:30:58 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html

Quoted message said:

Damn, does that finally nail the lid on that stupid mess. Joe Wilson's
accusations are proven false and there was no attempt to harm his
wife's career at CIA. At least nothing willful on the part of anyone
in the Bush administration.

Damage's done, however. Days and days on end with front page stories and
lead features on cable "news" shows have convinced something like 70% of
people that the WH engaged in "dirty tricks" and unethical behavior. Now
that the truth is known, SILENCE! (Except, of course, on "Countdown", where
Krazy Keith still managed to find someone blaming Rove and Cheney and Libby
et al.)

Quoted message said:

What a stupid petty mess of lies and hysteria and the worst sort of
gotcha politics from people who hate Bush so bad they hurt themselves.

Except they /won't/ be hurt because the media protects its own. Meanwhile,
more than a few lives and careers were seriously damaged, Libby foremost
amongst 'em.

Quoted message said:

I will say that it is to the WaPo's credit that they published this
concise summary that contradicts much of their previous calls for
investigation and prosecution.

Agreed...although I'd have like to see them MENTION themselves among those
who used/abused the story so much. Sorta sounded like they were talking
about "others" a bit too much to me.

Best quote in the story:

"Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the
end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. "

R Brickston said:

Bill Sornson said:

RonSonic said:

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:30:58 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]>
wrote:

Quoted message said:

> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html

Quoted message said:

Damn, does that finally nail the lid on that stupid mess. Joe
Wilson's accusations are proven false and there was no attempt to
harm his wife's career at CIA. At least nothing willful on the part
of anyone in the Bush administration.

Damage's done, however. Days and days on end with front page
stories and lead features on cable "news" shows have convinced
something like 70% of people that the WH engaged in "dirty tricks"
and unethical behavior. Now that the truth is known, SILENCE!
(Except, of course, on "Countdown", where Krazy Keith still managed
to find someone blaming Rove and Cheney and Libby et al.)

Quoted message said:

What a stupid petty mess of lies and hysteria and the worst sort of
gotcha politics from people who hate Bush so bad they hurt
themselves.

Except they /won't/ be hurt because the media protects its own.
Meanwhile, more than a few lives and careers were seriously damaged,
Libby foremost amongst 'em.

Quoted message said:

I will say that it is to the WaPo's credit that they published this
concise summary that contradicts much of their previous calls for
investigation and prosecution.

Agreed...although I'd have like to see them MENTION themselves among
those who used/abused the story so much. Sorta sounded like they
were talking about "others" a bit too much to me.

Best quote in the story:

"Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the
end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. "

The next lines aren't bad, either:

"Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming --
falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi
uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior
administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those
officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired
ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would
point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false
charges by claiming that President Bush's closest aides had engaged in an
illegal conspiracy. It's unfortunate that so many people took him
seriously."

Again, I only object to the Post's /tone/ -- as if it weren't right up there
with those who played the story to the hilt.

Bill Sornson said:

R Brickston said:

Bill Sornson said:

RonSonic wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:30:58 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]>
> wrote:

>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html

> Damn, does that finally nail the lid on that stupid mess. Joe
> Wilson's accusations are proven false and there was no attempt to
> harm his wife's career at CIA. At least nothing willful on the part
> of anyone in the Bush administration.

Damage's done, however. Days and days on end with front page
stories and lead features on cable "news" shows have convinced
something like 70% of people that the WH engaged in "dirty tricks"
and unethical behavior. Now that the truth is known, SILENCE!
(Except, of course, on "Countdown", where Krazy Keith still managed
to find someone blaming Rove and Cheney and Libby et al.)

> What a stupid petty mess of lies and hysteria and the worst sort of
> gotcha politics from people who hate Bush so bad they hurt
> themselves.

Except they /won't/ be hurt because the media protects its own.
Meanwhile, more than a few lives and careers were seriously damaged,
Libby foremost amongst 'em.

> I will say that it is to the WaPo's credit that they published this
> concise summary that contradicts much of their previous calls for
> investigation and prosecution.

Agreed...although I'd have like to see them MENTION themselves among
those who used/abused the story so much. Sorta sounded like they
were talking about "others" a bit too much to me.

Best quote in the story:

"Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the
end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. "

The next lines aren't bad, either:

"Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming --
falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi
uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior
administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those
officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired
ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would
point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false
charges by claiming that President Bush's closest aides had engaged in an
illegal conspiracy. It's unfortunate that so many people took him
seriously."

Again, I only object to the Post's /tone/ -- as if it weren't right up there
with those who played the story to the hilt.

Here's two versions of the story, by the same reportesrs are written:

Now:

The disclosures about Armitage, gleaned from interviews with
colleagues, friends and lawyers directly involved in the case,
underscore one of the ironies of the Plame investigation: that the
initial leak, seized on by administration critics as evidence of how
far the White House was willing to go to smear an opponent, came from
a man who had no apparent intention of harming anyone.

Then:

The Wilson smear was a thuggish act. Bush and his crew abused and
misused intelligence to make their case for war. Now there is evidence
Bushies used classified information and put the nation's
counter-proliferation efforts at risk merely to settle a score. It is
a sign that with this gang politics trumps national security.

http://www.slate.com/id/2148555/

(Excerpts from one of my favorite writers, the not so left,
Christopher Hitchens)

R Brickston said:

Bill Sornson said:

R Brickston said:

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 04:25:51 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]>
wrote:

> RonSonic wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:30:58 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]>
>> wrote:
>
>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html
>
>> Damn, does that finally nail the lid on that stupid mess. Joe
>> Wilson's accusations are proven false and there was no attempt to
>> harm his wife's career at CIA. At least nothing willful on the
>> part of anyone in the Bush administration.
>
> Damage's done, however. Days and days on end with front page
> stories and lead features on cable "news" shows have convinced
> something like 70% of people that the WH engaged in "dirty tricks"
> and unethical behavior. Now that the truth is known, SILENCE!
> (Except, of course, on "Countdown", where Krazy Keith still managed
> to find someone blaming Rove and Cheney and Libby et al.)
>
>> What a stupid petty mess of lies and hysteria and the worst sort
>> of gotcha politics from people who hate Bush so bad they hurt
>> themselves.
>
> Except they /won't/ be hurt because the media protects its own.
> Meanwhile, more than a few lives and careers were seriously
> damaged, Libby foremost amongst 'em.
>
>> I will say that it is to the WaPo's credit that they published
>> this concise summary that contradicts much of their previous
>> calls for investigation and prosecution.
>
> Agreed...although I'd have like to see them MENTION themselves
> among those who used/abused the story so much. Sorta sounded like
> they were talking about "others" a bit too much to me.
>

Best quote in the story:

"Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for
the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. "

The next lines aren't bad, either:

"Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming --
falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi
uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to
senior administration officials. He ought to have expected that both
those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a
retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that
the answer would point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from
himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush's
closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. It's unfortunate
that so many people took him seriously."

Again, I only object to the Post's /tone/ -- as if it weren't right
up there with those who played the story to the hilt.

Here's two versions of the story, by the same reportesrs are written:

Now:

The disclosures about Armitage, gleaned from interviews with
colleagues, friends and lawyers directly involved in the case,
underscore one of the ironies of the Plame investigation: that the
initial leak, seized on by administration critics as evidence of how
far the White House was willing to go to smear an opponent, came from
a man who had no apparent intention of harming anyone.

Then:

The Wilson smear was a thuggish act. Bush and his crew abused and
misused intelligence to make their case for war. Now there is evidence
Bushies used classified information and put the nation's
counter-proliferation efforts at risk merely to settle a score. It is
a sign that with this gang politics trumps national security.

http://www.slate.com/id/2148555/

(Excerpts from one of my favorite writers, the not so left,
Christopher Hitchens)

Caught a bit of him tonight on PMSNBC -- brilliant and brutally funny as
usual. He made a great point: why would the WH leak something to Novak, a
known opponent to the war?

Don't hold your breath waiting for retractions much less apologies from the
NYT (41, D'oh Boy, E.P., Trainwreck, etc.)...

RonSonic said:

Bill Sornson said:

Ed Pirrero wrote (told ya he would!):

Quoted message said:

But hey, whip yourself into a tizzy over this post. I can't wait.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html

Damn, does that finally nail the lid on that stupid mess. Joe Wilson's
accusations are proven false and there was no attempt to harm his wife's career
at CIA. At least nothing willful on the part of anyone in the Bush
administration.

What a stupid petty mess of lies and hysteria and the worst sort of gotcha
politics from people who hate Bush so bad they hurt themselves.

I will say that it is to the WaPo's credit that they published this concise
summary that contradicts much of their previous calls for investigation and
prosecution.

Ron

The link leads to an editorial, not a news story.

Life is Good!
Jeff

On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:11:25 GMT, Jeff Starr <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

RonSonic said:

Bill Sornson said:

Ed Pirrero wrote (told ya he would!):

> But hey, whip yourself into a tizzy over this post. I can't wait.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460.html

Damn, does that finally nail the lid on that stupid mess. Joe Wilson's
accusations are proven false and there was no attempt to harm his wife's career
at CIA. At least nothing willful on the part of anyone in the Bush
administration.

What a stupid petty mess of lies and hysteria and the worst sort of gotcha
politics from people who hate Bush so bad they hurt themselves.

I will say that it is to the WaPo's credit that they published this concise
summary that contradicts much of their previous calls for investigation and
prosecution.

Ron

The link leads to an editorial, not a news story.

Are you surprised? Remember, this is Bill Sornson, the fellow for
whom personal opinion trumps fact.