What you hosers don't seem to understand about LWS



x1134x wrote:
> I am not rockstar, I just signed up for this account to put in my $0.02
> because you guys are totally trashing a decent product at a decent
> price based on anecdotes and probably made up BS.



You are way funny!

> Oh, and I'll drive my MOTORIZED (both our bikes are mechanized) bike
> anywhere I damn well please and do not give a flying **** about your
> opinion that i am destroying your trail.



The last time I checked, motorcycles are ridden, not driven. As far as
riding your motorcycles anywhere you please, please go ride them on
some singletrack in a National Park.

> but if you had a walgoose set up perfectly
> the difference would be the shifters aren't QUITE as smooth or as
> quiet, and the frame is SLIGHTLY lighter. That's it. I just want to
> put down on this forum that in the opinion of someone who bikes alot
> (admittedly more honda than pedaling) they are the same if you have
> any amount of mechanical inclination. The difference is the setup A
> moron from walmart assembled it.



You're hilarious, in a warped sense.

JD
 
"x1134x" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> I met gary turner at bandimere speedway in denver in '96 and had dinner
> with the guy, i also bought a 640 dollar GT bike from him. the "NEXT"
> brand bike we bought two years ago is everybit as good. They make them
> for relatively the same price, Gary just makes alot more profit by
> fooling you into thinking your bike is a mercedes.


I usually lurk here, so if this is a troll, I finally got hooked.....

Did your buddy Gary mention he and Richard Long had sold the majority share
of GT in 1993, and that it went public in 1995? My guess is that both of
those transactions helped a lot in financing his race hobby, not the
fantastic margin he wasn't making on the bikes. FWIW, the brand has
subsequently been through several ownership changes and is currently owned
by Pacific Bicycles, a division of Dorel Industries. Pacific also labels its
bicycle shaped objects as Schwinns, Murrays, Roadmasters and Mongooses. (Or
is the plural Mongeese?)

While high quality bicycles appear expensive compared to motorcycles it is
due to economies of scale in the 2 industries. Your assertion that bicycle
enthusiasts are being tricked into buying the equivalent of your NEXT BSO
for 10 times the price shows total ignorance of the market and the products.
If you want to share your opinions, please go do your homework and bring
back an informed opinion. The current ones are way overpriced.

Dave Dowler
 
small change wrote:
> x1134x wrote:
> >
> > And i don't want to trust my welfare to a bicycle! I can just imagine
> > you driving your wife to the hospital to deliver the baby riding on
> > your handlebars!

>
>
> huh, they do this in third world countries all the time.



I'm definitely sensing some kind of redneck myopic rage in this one.
Maybe he/she/it owns stock in wallyworld?

JD
 
I have a friend at work who recently bought a bike at Wal-mart. I
recommended he spend another $50 or so and buy a decent bike, but he
thought it looked nice, and after all a bike is a bike, right? A few days
later he complained that it it didn't just shift right. All I could do was
shrug. They decided to return it, and had to call in a manager and argue a
bit because they didn't want to allow the return since it'd been ridden.

That's a pretty common story, of course. The other common story is the
guys who take these junky bikes out on a trail, and have major breakdowns
like frames cracking and teeth breaking off the gears. After they make the
long walk pushing a 40-pound bike back to the trailhead, they find the
repairs cost as much as the bike did, and they've spent more than if
they'd have just bought a decent bike. They can't get warranty coverage
because the manufacturer will consider it mis-use - some of these bikes
even have a disclaimer against off-road use!

Some of these owners started out arguing as this troll does, that a
Wally-world bike was fine, but they get a little humble after these
experiences. I'm not going to argue that Wal-mart bikes "aren't bikes";
that's a bit elitist. They equate to those cheap tools made of soft metal
that you buy in sets on the dollar table - they still "are" tools, but
they'll only continue to work as long as you ask very, very little of
them.

--
-BB-
To e-mail me, unmunge my address
 
BB wrote:
> I have a friend at work who recently bought a bike at Wal-mart. I
> recommended he spend another $50 or so and buy a decent bike, but he
> thought it looked nice, and after all a bike is a bike, right?



The lure of the Shiny Bike! "It's really shiny, so it must be good!"

All of my siblings and I were given a Schwinn Sting-Ray (purchased at a
LBS) on our 8th birthdays and we beat the living hell out of those
bikes. Those bikes were virtually bombproof, even for a "toy". Some
of the neighborhood kids were given department store bikes, which
looked really "cool", but the department store bicycles never lasted
more than a few months under the conditions we all put our bicycles
through. Sure the Schwinns cost more, but it was worth it because we
got to ride more and never had to borrow another bike if we wanted to
ride. Calling a POS throw-away bicycle a "bicycle shaped toy" is not
elitist, it's fact. In fact, it's just another sign of how wasteful
our society is in that almost everything is "disposable". "When it
breaks, I'll just buy another and I don't care how soon that one breaks
either..." Sometimes it's no wonder the third world has so much
contempt for the USA.

JD
 

> our society is in that almost everything is "disposable". "When it
> breaks, I'll just buy another and I don't care how soon that one
> breaks either..." Sometimes it's no wonder the third world has so
> much contempt for the USA.


Naah, they're the ones who make the McBikes for Wallyworld.
 
Like most others, I have no idea what you're arguing by this time. It's
clear you're a troll, just not sure what bridge you live under.

Enjoy all those gas-guzzling toys. Since you have "stuff", it's obvious that
you win. My consolation is that your dependency on a throttle instead of
your body will likely get you dead long before the "sierra club" member you
refer to.

Hope you don't have kids. It's their air, water and future you're burning
up right now...


"x1134x" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Funny how someone who smokes pot has a 40,000 dollar truck, 15,000
> dollar jeep, two motorbikes, a GT bike and a NEXT "walgoose" on top of
> my house, yet a sierra club member fresh - air legislating non-smoker
> uses a bicycle to get to work!
>
 
On 23 Aug 2005 09:11:44 -0700, JD wrote:

> Calling a POS throw-away bicycle a "bicycle shaped toy" is not
> elitist, it's fact.


Fact? As proven by what? Its a bicycle. Just a really crappy bicycle.
Everytime somebody calls it a "bicycle-shaped toy" just sounds like they
think they're too good to ride that bicycle, and diverts from the point:

"Buy the best tools you can afford. They require less tune-up, are easier
to maintain, and are easier to use."

This is from about.com's woodworking page, "A Hand Tools List for the
Beginner". Saws and hammers are far less high-tech than modern bicycles,
but even with simple things the same philosophy rings true. In fact, you
could just substitute "bike" for "tools" and you'd have some very good
advice.

> In fact, it's just another sign of how wasteful
> our society is in that almost everything is "disposable". "When it
> breaks, I'll just buy another and I don't care how soon that one breaks
> either..." Sometimes it's no wonder the third world has so much
> contempt for the USA.


The sad thing is, if discount stores would drop the cheapo suspension they
could probably sell a decent bike for that price.

--
-BB-
To e-mail me, unmunge my address
 

> Funny how someone who smokes pot has a 40,000 dollar truck, 15,000
> dollar jeep, two motorbikes, a GT bike and a NEXT "walgoose" on top of
> my house,


damn you must have a small ****....no one gives a **** what you have
asshole...
 

> Funny how someone who smokes pot has a 40,000 dollar truck, 15,000
> dollar jeep, two motorbikes, a GT bike and a NEXT "walgoose" on top of
> my house,


I suppose the top of the trailer IS the best place to show off your "bike"..
;)
 
BB wrote:
> On 23 Aug 2005 09:11:44 -0700, JD wrote:
>
> > Calling a POS throw-away bicycle a "bicycle shaped toy" is not
> > elitist, it's fact.

>
> Fact? As proven by what? Its a bicycle. Just a really crappy bicycle.
> Everytime somebody calls it a "bicycle-shaped toy" just sounds like they
> think they're too good to ride that bicycle, and diverts from the point:



Proven by being in the TOY DEPARTMENT of the big box stores. I'm not
too good to ride one of those, but am too smart. Even the chuntaros
down here are wising-up and buying good used bicycles instead of
throw-away toys.

JD
 
I watch Craigslist locally for the occassional bike part.

My favorite ads are the ones like "Great Red Mountain bike for sale". I
love it when the color supercedes the model, year, size or other details for
a bike. Of course, most of these are size "26".



"JD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> The lure of the Shiny Bike! "It's really shiny, so it must be good!"
>
 
A few points about why I'm still RIGHT:

>I have a friend at work who recently bought a bike at Wal-mart. I
>recommended he spend another $50 or so and buy a decent bike, but he
>thought it looked nice, and after all a bike is a bike, right? A few days
>later he complained that it it didn't just shift right. All I could do was
>shrug. They decided to return it, and had to call in a manager and argue a
>bit because they didn't want to allow the return since it'd been ridden.


LMFAO! All you could do was shrug huh? When I got our NEXT bike from
Wal-Mart, and got it home, it didn't shift right either, but I could do
a little more than "shrug!" In fact i turned the bike over, had a look
at the deraileurs and presto! I could understand how it works! I could
adjust it! I could adjust it the way it should have been but wasn't
because a WAL-MART EMPLOYEE assembled the damn thing. I found out the
bike didnt' shift right before ever riding it because I checked out
every part of assembly before i took it out. Now if you want to pay
someone a couple hundred bucks extra on a bike just to have to not work
on it, GO TO LBS and get ripped off on service, If you have mechanical
aptitude (and can do more than shrug), You could make a walgoose shift
correctly without a problem.

>While high quality bicycles appear expensive compared to motorcycles it is
>due to economies of scale in the 2 industries. Your assertion that bicycle
>enthusiasts are being tricked into buying the equivalent of your NEXT BSO
>for 10 times the price shows total ignorance of the market and the products.
>If you want to share your opinions, please go do your homework and bring
>back an informed opinion. The current ones are way overpriced.


Bicycling and Motorcycling merge when it comes to mountain biking.
Many trails that are pedaled are easily negotiated with a motorcycle as
well, and vise-versa.

My asserstion is NOT that bicycle enthusiasts are being tricked, it is
that bicycle NEOPHYTES are being tricked. Bicycle enthusiasts already
know what's what with the world of bicycles, they don't come into
forums asking questions like: "I'm thinking of getting a bike from
walmart, but my friend said i should fork out a crapload more bucks and
buy a 'real' mountain bike, what should I do?"

Blindly sending everyone to LBS to get the hard sale on a pricey bike
shows YOUR total ignorance of the market and the products. Lets take a
look at that market shall we:
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/31898/story.htm

"Americans purchased more bicycles than new cars and trucks combined in
the past year -- and all without employee discounts or zero-percent
financing. "

"Our sales have almost tripled in the last couple of years," said Bob
Ippolito, executive vice president at Pacific Bicycle, the largest
bicycle distributor in the United States."

"Unlike high-end specialty bicycles, which represent a small portion of
sales, it is the hybrid road bikes sold at Wal-Mart Stores, Kmart and
Target Corp. that made up the majority of the 19 million bicycles sold
last year, and are often the choice for leisure and noncompetitive
riding."

So again to sum it up AGAIN, the best advice to neophytes asking on
this forum is that they must know what they want to use the bike for,
and they must know if they have any mechanical aptitude at all. If
they have no mechanical aptitude, I myself would recommend staying away
from wal mart, toys r us, target, etc for buying a bike, they will hate
it, not because the bike is bad, but because it was assembled by a $5
per hour employee, and will be way out of adjustment for them, may not
shift right etc. They will need to purchase the mechanical skills of
others who have them, and skills are not available at those stores, the
best place to look for that kind of know-how is: NEXT DOOR! if your
neighbor has a toolbox, and they like you, THEY are probably smart
enough to setup a bicycle for you, IT IS NOT HARD! you just have to
know how to use a few tools! But alas, if your neigbor is an A-hole,
then your best bet is to go to LBS for your bike.

Assuming the neophyte HAS mechanical aptitude, then the USE/PURPOSE
factor comes in: If they are going to ride it around town on paved
trails and such for exercise, then it's a $99 dollar exercise bike from
walmart for the neophyte! take a few minutes to learn about their bike,
set it up properly THEMSELVES, and bam! have fun. . . .

If they are going to ride it for serious MOUNTAIN BIKING, then walmart
bikes are not up to the task due to the increased stresses placed on
the bike in these condiditons, and the bike manufacturer's even warn
you of this. You will need to purchase a "high-end specialty bicycle".
And since they've gotten to this part of the purchasing question,
x1134x chime's in with:

"If you're into getting outdoors on serious trails, and are planning on
dropping big bucks on a BICYCLE, have you considered that you could buy
a dirt bike with that money? A bike that has a MOTOR on it? A bike that
would blow the most expensive of mountain bikes off the road like a
dried leaf? IMHO its more fun. . . .

I think the majority of the 19 million bicycle buying americans agree
with me.
 
You could also buy a walgoose AND a motorcycle for the price of some
mountain bikes!
 
>> Blindly sending everyone to LBS to get the hard sale on a pricey bike
>> shows YOUR total ignorance of the market and the products.


>I never recommended him to spend "a couple hundred bucks more", I
>recommended a bike that was $50 more (as I said, but you ignored). If you
>have to make up stuff to prove your point, then perhaps you have none.


the only reply directed toward you, BB was the shrug comment. The
"Blindly sending . . ." comment was directed toward Dave Dowler.

>And while cars can go faster than runners, it doesn't make driving a
>similar sport to running.


Cars are used to get places, and move stuff, running is done for
exercise, or to get away from a stray dog. Both mountain bikes and
dirtbikes are for riding on trails and having fun with (and exercise),
they are TOYS.

But if you had a choice between $2000 running shoes and a good used
car, which are you going to buy? the better bet would be the car,
you'll go further.

>So, what kind of motorcycle can you get for the
>$220 that I recommended that fellow spend?


Check your local classifieds, even for that price you can get a smaller
dirtbike. What were you recommending? a used GIANT?
Go to your LBS, and they won't recommend you spend 220, they'll try to
talk you into their $400+ bikes, and you could get a NICE dirtbike for
that.

THis bike sold for $250:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Othe...iewItemQQcategoryZ6719QQitemZ4572936425QQrdZ1
 
On 4 Sep 2005 18:36:10 -0700, x1134x wrote:

> Cars are used to get places, and move stuff, running is done for
> exercise, or to get away from a stray dog. Both mountain bikes and
> dirtbikes are for riding on trails and having fun with (and exercise),
> they are TOYS.


Funny how dirt biking never shows up on the list when listing kilocalories
per hour.

--
-BB-
To e-mail me, unmunge my address
 
Despite logic and reason, x1134x still wrote:
> A few points about why I'm still RIGHT:
>

<snip>

Please take this to the appropriate newsgroup.
Something like alt.****-bike or rec.motor-heads.

This one is for mountain biking.
 
The majority of this forum should be posters who ride wal-mart or kmart
bikes, because the majority of people who buy mountain bikes buy them
from those stores. Perhaps you should rename this group to
alt.snotty-mountainbikers.
or

alt.don'tposthereunlessyoupaidtoomuchforyourbike.

or alt.ifenginesSCAREyou.rideabicycle

or judging from the gas-related threads here:
alt.cantaffordagallonof.gas
 
x1134x wrote:
> The majority of this forum should be posters who ride wal-mart or kmart
> bikes, because the majority of people who buy mountain bikes buy them
> from those stores. Perhaps you should rename this group to
> alt.snotty-mountainbikers.
> or
>
> alt.don'tposthereunlessyoupaidtoomuchforyourbike.
>
> or alt.ifenginesSCAREyou.rideabicycle
>
> or judging from the gas-related threads here:
> alt.cantaffordagallonof.gas
>


Your news headline tomorrow will read...


Would be mountain niker dies when broken Wal-Mart bicycle frame impails
heart.

I have some gasoline I'll sell you for .99 a gallon. It's watered down
about, but should get you car a few miles down the road. Are you
interested?


--
o-o-o-o Ride-A-Lot o-o-o-o
www.schnauzers.ws