Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

what is the difference between cranksets/chainrings

Started by Dennis Vaughn · · Last activity · 15 posts · 1,200 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
31 October 2003
Last activity
7 November 2003
Original author
Dennis Vaughn
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,200
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am looking to upgrade from a 7spd cassette to a 9spd cassette. I know that I will have to change
    the rear derailleur (really?), and chain. Why would I have to change the crankset, ie, chainrings
    and bottom bracket? Is there a tooth spacing issue with the chainrings between 7spd and 9 spd? Do I
    have to change the bottom bracket? Is there a square tapered crankset for my bottom bracket or is it
    better to go to the splined bracket and cranks? Is there any advantage between the splined bottom
    bracket and square tapered bottom bracket? Thanks, Dennis

  2. Quoth Dennis Vaughn:

    Quoted message said:

    I am looking to upgrade from a 7spd cassette to a 9spd cassette. I know that I will have to change
    the rear derailleur (really?),

    No, not if your present derailer is in decent shape. Derailers don't care how many speeds.

    Quoted message said:

    and chain. Why would I have to change the crankset, ie, chainrings and bottom bracket?

    You don't.

    There is a lot of confusion about the compatibility of narrow 9-speed chains with older cranksets.
    Shimano says you should replace the inner chainring(s) with specially designated 9-speed ones, but
    then they're all too eager to sell you stuff, whether you need it or not.

    Shimano is also concerned about clueless users. The worst-case scenario is that you will be riding
    along with the bike in its highest gear (large front, small rear) and then for some bizarre reason
    shift down in front before downshifting in the back. (There is no shift pattern in which it is
    reasonable to shift in this sequence.) If you _do_ shift this way, there's a small chance that the
    chain might "skate" over the edges of the teeth for maybe half a turn.

    In practice this "problem" almost never materializes. Many, many cyclists are using 9-speed chains
    with older cranksets and having no problems whatever.

    My advice is to go ahead and upgrade your drivetrain, but leave the crankset alone until you've
    tried it out with the new chain. Most likely, you don't need to do anything to it.

    Sheldon "Save Your Money" Brown +------------------------------------------------------------+
    | What are politicians going to tell people when the | Constitution is gone and we still have a
    | drug problem? | -- William Simpson, A.C.L.U. |
    +------------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton,
    Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 harriscyclery.comharriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts
    shipped Worldwide captainbike.comcaptainbike.com sheldonbrown.comsheldonbrown.com

  3. Dennis Vaughn said:

    I am looking to upgrade from a 7spd cassette to a 9spd cassette. I know that I will have to change
    the rear derailleur (really?), and chain. Why would I have to change the crankset, ie, chainrings
    and bottom bracket? Is there a tooth spacing issue with the chainrings between 7spd and 9 spd? Do I
    have to change the bottom bracket? Is there a square tapered crankset for my bottom bracket or is
    it better to go to the splined bracket and cranks? Is there any advantage between the splined
    bottom bracket and square tapered bottom bracket? Thanks, Dennis

    You need shifters to shift the narrower spacing between cogs, unless you have friction shifting.

    You need a hub body that will permit you to mount the longer cassette. You could put 8 of 9 cogs on
    your 7sp hub.

    Assuming you are a ShimaNO person, that's all you need.

  4. vaughden-<< I am looking to upgrade from a 7spd cassette to a 9spd cassette. I know that I will have
    to change the rear derailleur (really?), and chain. >><BR><BR>

    Yes for the chain, not so for the rear der if it isn't toasted, generally.

    vaughn<< Why would I have to change the crankset, ie, chainrings and bottom bracket?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    You generally wouldn't. Stay away from shimano spline. You shouldn't have to change anything but
    your shifters, rear hub, cogset and chain.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  5. (Peter Chisholm) said:

    vaughden-<< I am looking to upgrade from a 7spd cassette to a 9spd cassette. I know that I will
    have to change the rear derailleur (really?), and chain. >><BR><BR>

    Yes for the chain, not so for the rear der if it isn't toasted, generally.

    vaughn<< Why would I have to change the crankset, ie, chainrings and bottom bracket?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    You generally wouldn't. Stay away from shimano spline. You shouldn't have to change anything but
    your shifters, rear hub, cogset and chain.

    Not necessarily the rear hub. I upgraded an old Shimano 105 pre-hyperglide 7-speed hub to 8/9 speeds
    by just replacing the freehub body. You have to remove the axle and use a (IIRC) 10mm allen wrench
    to pull the old body. I've read that replacing the rear axle with one 4mm longer is optional, but
    since I had one laying around, I did. You then have to re-dish the wheel 2mm to the right.

    This may sound like a lot of work, but to me it's easier than replacing a hub, and cheaper too.

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

  6. I had wondered about what was needed. Thanks Dennis "John Everett"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    (Peter Chisholm) said:

    vaughden-<< I am looking to upgrade from a 7spd cassette to a 9spd


    cassette. I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    know that I will have to change the rear derailleur (really?), and chain.
    <BR><BR>

    Yes for the chain, not so for the rear der if it isn't toasted,


    generally.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    vaughn<< Why would I have to change the crankset, ie, chainrings and bottom bracket?

    Quoted message said:

    ><BR><BR>

    You generally wouldn't. Stay away from shimano spline. You shouldn't have


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    change anything but your shifters, rear hub, cogset and chain.

    Not necessarily the rear hub. I upgraded an old Shimano 105 pre-hyperglide 7-speed hub to 8/9
    speeds by just replacing the freehub body. You have to remove the axle and use a (IIRC) 10mm
    allen wrench to pull the old body. I've read that replacing the rear axle with one 4mm longer is
    optional, but since I had one laying around, I did. You then have to re-dish the wheel 2mm to
    the right.

    This may sound like a lot of work, but to me it's easier than replacing a hub, and cheaper too.

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

  7. It sounds like someone is trying to sell a lot of stuff for no reason at all. Maybe folks are
    gullable. I did not think that it was necessary to purchase a bunch of stuff. The reason I asked
    about this is the bike I have has downtube shifters (SIS/Friction) and wondered about the
    changeover. I had planned on getting the Brifters (I think that's what they call them now) and
    upgrading the rear cassette on a new wheelset.

    "John Everett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    (Peter Chisholm) said:

    vaughden-<< I am looking to upgrade from a 7spd cassette to a 9spd


    cassette. I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    know that I will have to change the rear derailleur (really?), and chain.
    <BR><BR>

    Yes for the chain, not so for the rear der if it isn't toasted,


    generally.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    vaughn<< Why would I have to change the crankset, ie, chainrings and bottom bracket?

    Quoted message said:

    ><BR><BR>

    You generally wouldn't. Stay away from shimano spline. You shouldn't have


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    change anything but your shifters, rear hub, cogset and chain.

    Not necessarily the rear hub. I upgraded an old Shimano 105 pre-hyperglide 7-speed hub to 8/9
    speeds by just replacing the freehub body. You have to remove the axle and use a (IIRC) 10mm
    allen wrench to pull the old body. I've read that replacing the rear axle with one 4mm longer is
    optional, but since I had one laying around, I did. You then have to re-dish the wheel 2mm to
    the right.

    This may sound like a lot of work, but to me it's easier than replacing a hub, and cheaper too.

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

  8. "Dennis Vaughn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I am looking to upgrade from a 7spd cassette to a 9spd cassette. I know that I will have to change
    the rear derailleur (really?), and chain.

    Don't forget the new rear wheel or hub. 8 & 9 speed cassettes won't fit on a 7 speed freehub. Dave

  9. Quoted message said:

    vaughden-<< I am looking to upgrade from a 7spd cassette to a 9spd cassette. I know that I will
    have to change the rear derailleur (really?), and chain. >><BR><BR>

    (PC)> Yes for the chain, not so for the rear der if it isn't toasted, generally.

    Quoted message said:

    vaughn<< Why would I have to change the crankset, ie, chainrings and bottom bracket?

    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:

    You generally wouldn't. Stay away from shimano spline. You shouldn't have to change anything but
    your shifters, rear hub, cogset and chain.

    yellowjersey.orgergokit.html

    Sort of like this, add a couple hundred dollars if you want to buy into the Shimano system instead
    of just normal Ergo.

    Nine speed crank? Not necessary. As an example, you can even do that with thity year old French
    equipment. We do an amazingly large number of these:
    yellowjersey.orgPEUGERGO.JPG

    --
    Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  10. Quoted message said:

    Stay away from shimano spline.

    why do you say that peter? personally, i think it's a significant improvement on the square taper
    and /definitely/ better than isis.

    jb

  11. On 01 Nov 2003 14:47:16 GMT, [email hidden] ("Quidquid bonum tibi est, tibi bonus est." - (P.

    Chisholm)) said:

    Jim-<< why do you say that peter? personally, i think it's a significant improvement on the square
    taper and /definitely/ better than isis >><BR><BR>

    The big thinkers will say the design is not superior to ISIS, but mostly because shimano is
    abandoning this design. XTR and XT are mostly gone, DA is for 2004 followed by ultegra in 2005. It
    would be a shame to have to change your crank because the BB is worn out.

    Is there no other solution you can offer for a worn crankbearing than crank replacement?

    Quoted message said:

    As for superior to square taper, hardly. Spline(Octalink) solves no problem, answers no question
    other than taking aftermarket cranks and BBs outta the market by big 'S'.

    Your sloganeering aside, the splined crank joint does offer some advantages over the old tapered
    spindles. It has been discussed here often. Further, Shimano made their eight-spline design an open
    source for other manufacturers to use, which has given rise to Octalink crank models from FSA,
    Ritchey, Sugino (there may be others). How do you interpret that as "taking aftermarket cranks out
    of the market"?
    -------------------------------
    John Dacey Business Cycles, Miami, Florida Now in our twenty-first year. Our catalog of track
    equipment: eighth year online. businesscycles.combusinesscycles.com

  12. Quoted message said:

    The big thinkers will say the design is not superior to ISIS,

    i'd like to see the rationale for this. octalink uses a taper for snug creak-free fit and lateral
    load, with splines to transmit torque. isis completely ignores the former and goes madly overkill on
    the latter. for these reasons, imo, isis is /not/ a significant improvement on taper.

    i believe octalink was genuine innovation being much more out-of-torque tolerant [let's face it,
    that /is/ a common problem] and making the best possible use of the available space to provide a
    diameter-maximized, light, stiff axle with highly optimized roller bearings - something that taper
    bb's needed in my opinion.

    Quoted message said:

    but mostly because shimano is abandoning this design. XTR and XT are mostly gone

    true. i recently bought a couple of spare bb's for this reason. i /like/ my d/a & xt cranks, and
    don't see any need to upgrade this time around.

    and for the record, if campy used octalink [or their own similar version], i'd get rid on my d/a
    crank the same day it came out. /i/ use
    d/a /because/ of octalink!

    Quoted message said:

    DA is for 2004 followed by ultegra in 2005. It would be a shame to have to change your crank
    because the BB is worn out. As for superior to square taper, hardly. Spline(Octalink) solves no
    problem, answers no question other than taking aftermarket cranks and BBs outta the market by
    big 'S'.

    i can see the "big 'S'" thing being an issue, and i guess that's where isis came from. alec
    issigonis, creator of the original mini euro-car, once said: "the camel is a horse designed by
    committee". isis is a camel.

    jb

  13. You know, sometimes it is something else to see where an original post goes. I had no idea that it
    could be really a debate on what bottom bracket is better. My question was if anyone still made a
    good tapered bottom bracket for my roadbike. I was looking into possible drivetrain problems with my
    bike and I thought it may have been the bottom bracket, and turned out being the chain and rear
    sprocket assy. I was also looking at upgrading to a 8 or 9 spd gearing and wondered if I would need
    to purchase a new crank and bottom bracket assy. because my bike has the tapered bb. The bike that
    I'm currently asking the question about is a Schwinn Paramount oversized road bike. Here's some info
    on the bike. I can't find any info about this bike on the net other than it was made in Japan when
    Schwinn was going through a turnover with the paramount now named Waterford.cycles.

    Specs:
    53.5 cm (21"😉 c/c I think it is steel (chromoly whatever it is called now) RX-100 Shimano group
    Brakes, shifters, hubs, cranks, front and rear der. all designated A550 Pedals are shimano PD1056
    Seat tube has PGD Light alloy stamped on it Saddle is Vetta (underneath it says Selle Italia my
    guess is it was made in 1991) Wheels are Araya 700C
    S/N found on bottom bracket shell 2B0140 I have no idea what it means. I would guess maybe 1992,
    January, 140th frame off the line. I can't find anything that explains this S/N. Waterford,
    Schwinn.....nothing. Any help would be appreciated. Dennis "Qui si parla Campagnolo"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    UCE-<< The big thinkers will say the design is not superior to ISIS,

    i'd like to see the rationale for this. octalink uses a taper for snug creak-free fit and lateral
    load, with splines to transmit torque

    Quoted message said:

    <BR><BR>

    Jobst? Over to you....

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  14. Dennis Vaughn said:

    You know, sometimes it is something else to see where an original post goes. I had no idea that it
    could be really a debate on what bottom bracket is better. My question was if anyone still made a
    good tapered bottom bracket for my roadbike.

    Yes, lots of 'em. Shimano is the best value, under $30.

    Quoted message said:

    I was looking into possible drivetrain problems with my bike and I thought it may have been the
    bottom bracket, and turned out being the chain and rear sprocket assy. I was also looking at
    upgrading to a 8 or 9 spd gearing and wondered if I would need to purchase a new crank and bottom
    bracket assy. because my bike has the tapered bb.

    No, you don't. Your RX-100 crank will work fine with any modern equipment.

    See: sheldonbrown.combbsize.html

    Quoted message said:

    Here's some info on the bike. I can't find any info about this bike on the net other than it was
    made in Japan when Schwinn was going through a turnover with the paramount now named
    Waterford.cycles.

    Specs: RX-100 Shimano group Brakes, shifters, hubs, cranks, front and rear der. all
    designated A550

    Sheldon "UN-73" Brown +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea | -- massive, difficult to redirect,
    | awe-inspiring, entertaining, | and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement when you |
    | least expect it. --Gene Spafford, 1992 |
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton,
    Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 harriscyclery.comharriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts
    shipped Worldwide captainbike.comcaptainbike.com sheldonbrown.comsheldonbrown.com

  15. Sheldon Brown said:
    Dennis Vaughn said:

    You know, sometimes it is something else to see where an original post goes. I had no idea that
    it could be really a debate on what bottom bracket is better. My question was if anyone still
    made a good tapered bottom bracket for my roadbike.

    Yes, lots of 'em. Shimano is the best value, under $30.

    Absolutely. Shimano bottom brackets are one of the best bargains in cycling. Reliable, smooth,
    and cheap.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. _`\(,_ | That is easy. All
    you have to do is tell them they are being (_)/ (_) | attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for
    lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any <country. --
    Hermann Goering

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.