General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

What do goal-pace 400's do?

Started by Kaz Kylheku · · Last activity · 7 posts · 544 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 July 2004
Last activity
5 July 2004
Original author
Kaz Kylheku
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
544
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I started doing these recently. I run 400, then jog 400,
    twelve repetitions.

    Last night I was shooting for a 6:40 target pace, but did
    most of them faster, at 6:30 to 6:35 pace. The 10th one at
    6:00 pace. I used a countdown timer set to 1:40 to try to
    hit the pace; but it always went off after I passed the
    finish, except for one time when it beeped dead on.

    I warmed up for a mile and warmed down for another mile
    afterward, so 8 miles total.

    These repeats feel good. They are about the pace of VO2Max
    800's for me, but the distance being cut in half makes them
    very easy, so you can crank out repeat after repeat, each
    one as fast as the previous, with lots left in you to do it
    substantially faster if you want to.

    I felt nicely burned afterward and had trouble sleeping
    through the night.

    Subjectively, I definitely feel that the workout is
    beneficial, but how? The repeats are too slow to have the
    benefit of hard 400 sprints (anaerobic pathways, power,
    coordination). The recoveries are too long for lactate
    buildup, and the distance is too short for VO2Max.

    Is it just a way to maintain some intensity when tapering
    before a race? Does it somehow help that you are spending
    time at the race pace without racing it all at once?

    What are the documented benefits of this type of workout,
    and it is useful to do it regularly, or does it fit into
    specific training phases, like when a race is approaching?

  2. Kaz Kylheku said:

    I started doing these recently. I run 400, then jog 400,
    twelve repetitions.


    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    Subjectively, I definitely feel that the workout is
    beneficial, but how? The repeats are too slow to have the
    benefit of hard 400 sprints (anaerobic pathways, power,
    coordination). The recoveries are too long for lactate
    buildup, and the distance is too short for VO2Max.

    Those recoveries are very long for this sort of workout. Use
    200m recoveries instead. If you do the reps slowly and
    maintain a good pace on the recoveries, it's like a variable
    pace tempo run, perform it in a more conventional manner and
    it's more like a VO2 max workout.

    One could use long rests for maintenance work, but I don't
    see much point to this (better to just do the same workout
    at a slower pace)

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi pegasus.rutgers.edu~elflord

  3. (Kaz Kylheku) said:

    and the distance is too short for VO2Max.

    I'm not sure I understand this. My favourite VO2Max
    workout is 10-15 x 30" at vVO2max/30" at 50% vVO2max (or
    200m/100m repeats).

    If I do 400s at vVO2max, the recovery is only 45 seconds
    jogging. Where do the 400/400s come from?

  4. "Kaz Kylheku" <[email hidden]> wrote...

    Quoted message said:

    Subjectively, I definitely feel that the workout is
    beneficial, but how? The repeats are too slow to have the
    benefit of hard 400 sprints (anaerobic pathways, power,
    coordination). The recoveries are too long for lactate
    buildup, and the distance is too short for VO2Max.

    My take on them is that they are a mildly productive form
    of speedwork. Maybe not optimal according to the received
    wisdom, but much better than cruising 8 minute miles
    every day.

    I think there's a huge amount of micro-exact fussiness about
    types of interval workouts. I made my biggest marathon
    improvement when I did 4 or 5 20 x 220 w/220jog recovery
    workouts a few weeks before a marathon. This was my first
    foray into speedwork, and my time dropped from 2:52 to 2:44
    in 7 weeks.

    I don't think you'll find that particular workout in any
    marathon training program!

    I did gravitate into a more conventional program of
    intervals and short races, and that got me down below 2:40,
    and 33:35 10k over the next year or so.

    But I *never* ran any kind of intervals other than full
    recovery ones, and I got down to the 2:30's. Maybe I could
    have run 2:30 if I had---who knows?

    Quoted message said:

    Is it just a way to maintain some intensity when tapering
    before a race? Does it somehow help that you are spending
    time at the race pace without racing it all at once?

    I do easy 400's when I taper, and find that it is the best
    method I've used (and I've tried many tapering methods): My
    legs feel rested and quick on race day. Got this from a Phd
    in Exercise Phys, who is also a coach...

    5 days before the race, I do 5 x 400m @ 5k pace, full
    recovery. 4 days before, I do 4 x 400, and so on down to two
    days before. 10 to 15 minute warmup/ warmdown each day.

    This gives me enough speed to control my anxiety and energy
    while tapering, yet they are easy enough so that I feel
    refreshed, not tired.

    -- Dan

    and it is

    Quoted message said:

    useful to do it regularly, or does it fit into specific
    training phases, like when a race is approaching?

  5. If your recovery time is the same as the run time, then
    you are doing a VO2max workout. Maybe not in the first
    couple, but they become more and more aerobic with each
    successive one.

    If you are giving yourself more recovery then it is
    more gray.

    "Kaz Kylheku" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I started doing these recently. I run 400, then jog 400,
    twelve repetitions.

    Last night I was shooting for a 6:40 target pace, but did
    most of them faster, at 6:30 to 6:35 pace. The 10th one at
    6:00 pace. I used a countdown timer set to 1:40 to try to
    hit the pace; but it always went off after I passed the
    finish, except for one time when it beeped dead on.

    I warmed up for a mile and warmed down for another mile
    afterward, so 8 miles total.

    These repeats feel good. They are about the pace of VO2Max
    800's for me, but the distance being cut in half makes
    them very easy, so you can crank out repeat after repeat,
    each one as fast as the previous, with lots left in you to
    do it substantially faster if you want to.

    I felt nicely burned afterward and had trouble sleeping
    through the night.

    Subjectively, I definitely feel that the workout is
    beneficial, but how? The repeats are too slow to have the
    benefit of hard 400 sprints (anaerobic pathways, power,
    coordination). The recoveries are too long for lactate
    buildup, and the distance is too short for VO2Max.

    Is it just a way to maintain some intensity when tapering
    before a race? Does it somehow help that you are spending
    time at the race pace without racing it all at once?

    What are the documented benefits of this type of workout,
    and it is useful to do it regularly, or does it fit into
    specific training phases, like when a race is approaching?

  6. "steve common" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    (Kaz Kylheku) said:

    and the distance is too short for VO2Max.

    I'm not sure I understand this. My favourite VO2Max
    workout is 10-15 x 30" at vVO2max/30" at 50% vVO2max (or
    200m/100m repeats).

    If I do 400s at vVO2max, the recovery is only 45 seconds
    jogging. Where do the 400/400s come from?

    I see you're still thinking too much. I warned you where
    that would lead. Don't you believe me?

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subjectively, I definitely feel that the workout is
    beneficial, but


    how? The repeats are too slow to have the benefit of hard
    400 sprints (anaerobic pathways, power, coordination). The
    recoveries are too long for lactate buildup, and the
    distance is too short for VO2Max.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is it just a way to maintain some intensity when tapering
    before a


    race? Does it somehow help that you are spending time at the
    race pace without racing it all at once?

    I find such a workout is a good way to lead into more
    intensive interval/VO2Max training by getting the legs and
    support system accustomed to running at race pace, running
    them as repetitions (ample rest) vs. intervals (rest period
    less than running time). You can then progress to a more
    rigorus 400 program, although I have found it more effective
    to move up to 800, 1200 and 1600 intervals in preparation
    for 5K racing. You need to strictly limit rest to get VO2Max
    results out of 400s, but it gets less critical at longer
    distances because of the amount of time you are running at
    pace. It is also easier to keep from speeding up too much
    and sliding into more anaerobic speedwork which is not what
    you are aiming for and increases the physical stress level.

    400 repetitions can, as you suggest, provide some relatively
    easy race pace maintenance during racing season. So you just
    need to figure out what you are trying to accomplish

    Paul.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.