Anyone had any experience of these? On my tourer/commuter, I use overshoes in the rain which do me fine.
They aren't very practical off road though, so I was thinking about waterproof socks. Wouldn't these make your feet a bit boil-in-the-bag? In summer I just accepted wet (and wrinkly!) feet, but I don't fancy that in winter.
Anyone had any experience of these? On my tourer/commuter, I use overshoes in the rain which do me fine.
They aren't very practical off road though, so I was thinking about waterproof socks. Wouldn't these make your feet a bit boil-in-the-bag? In summer I just accepted wet (and wrinkly!) feet, but I don't fancy that in winter.
I had a pair of "porelle drys" or somesuch name. They kept water out briefly during a heavy shower until water ran down my legs and into the socks - filling them up to the brim. My feet then stayed wet for the rest of the day even though everything else had dried out. The socks took hours to dry on the line. Completely hopeless and much worse than wool pile socks which I normally wear in winter - they get wet but warmish, and dry out fairly quickly.
"Paul Boyd" <usenet.dont.work@plusnet> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Anyone had any experience of these? On my tourer/commuter, I use overshoes in the rain which do me fine.
They aren't very practical off road though, so I was thinking about waterproof socks. Wouldn't these make your feet a bit boil-in-the-bag? In summer I just accepted wet (and wrinkly!) feet, but I don't fancy that in winter.
I had a pair of "porelle drys" or somesuch name. They kept water out briefly during a heavy shower until water ran down my legs and into the socks - filling them up to the brim. My feet then stayed wet for the rest of the day even though everything else had dried out. The socks took hours to dry on the line. Completely hopeless and much worse than wool pile socks which I normally wear in winter - they get wet but warmish, and dry out fairly quickly.
Well, that's fairly unambiguous! I think I'll just dig out my walking socks. I hadn't thought of waterproof socks filling up that way!
"Paul Boyd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On 17/10/2006 17:09, normanwisdom said,
Quoted message said:
I had a pair of "porelle drys" or somesuch name. They kept water out briefly during a heavy shower until water ran down my legs and into the socks - filling them up to the brim. My feet then stayed wet for the rest of the day even though everything else had dried out. The socks took hours to dry on the line. Completely hopeless and much worse than wool pile socks which I normally wear in winter - they get wet but warmish, and dry out fairly quickly.
Well, that's fairly unambiguous! I think I'll just dig out my walking socks. I hadn't thought of waterproof socks filling up that way!
Lots of MTB people use sealskins (sealskinz?). My wife says they're quite good - warmer than the woollen equivalent. So I think that they work for some people, but not others.
"Clive George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Paul Boyd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On 17/10/2006 17:09, normanwisdom said,
Quoted message said:
I had a pair of "porelle drys" or somesuch name. They kept water out briefly during a heavy shower until water ran down my legs and into the socks - filling them up to the brim. My feet then stayed wet for the rest of the day even though everything else had dried out. The socks took hours to dry on the line. Completely hopeless and much worse than wool pile socks which I normally wear in winter - they get wet but warmish, and dry out fairly quickly.
Well, that's fairly unambiguous! I think I'll just dig out my walking socks. I hadn't thought of waterproof socks filling up that way!
Lots of MTB people use sealskins (sealskinz?). My wife says they're quite good - warmer than the woollen equivalent. So I think that they work for some people, but not others.
cheers, clive
I've got an old pair of short Porelles and a newer pair of Sealskinz (who bought Porelle I think). I'm very happy with both of them and wouldn't be without them. I've suffered from cold feet for years, tried everything and these beasties are the nearest thing I've found to a solution. The short ones have filled up on rare occasions when it has been VERY wet, but never had a problem with the long ones which terminate just below the knee and have a grippy top. They wash OK and do take longer than normal socks to dry, but you can speed up the process by turning them inside out after the initial side has dried.
Mark McNeill said the following on 17/10/2006 23:31:
Quoted message said:
Seconded. During the summer [which by this criterion is still going on] they're my default footwear, when I'm not at work [and often when I am].
Therein lies the rub - I tend to be either cycling to/from work, or cycling off-road. ATM, the former at 7:15am or 6pm is not suitable for sandals, and the latter is, er, not suitable for sandals at any time.
Besides, I can't wear sandals because I haven't got a beard :-)
"Paul Boyd" <usenet.dont.work@plusnet> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Mark McNeill said the following on 17/10/2006 23:31:
Quoted message said:
Seconded. During the summer [which by this criterion is still going on] they're my default footwear, when I'm not at work [and often when I am].
Therein lies the rub - I tend to be either cycling to/from work, or cycling off-road. ATM, the former at 7:15am or 6pm is not suitable for sandals, and the latter is, er, not suitable for sandals at any time.
Besides, I can't wear sandals because I haven't got a beard :-)
I don't have a beard and I am known to wear sandals on occasion. Albeit not the Shimano ones :-)
Therein lies the rub - I tend to be either cycling to/from work, or cycling off-road. ATM, the former at 7:15am or 6pm is not suitable for sandals, and the latter is, er, not suitable for sandals at any time.
I wear sandals off road - even the technical stuff
Quoted message said:
Besides, I can't wear sandals because I haven't got a beard :-)
You can if you wear socks with them ;-)
-- Tony
"Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory." - Leonardo da Vinci
In summer, why not just wear sandals (and no socks, of course)?
Can you get SPD sandals? (No, don't answer that - you probably can!!!!)
Shimano SD-65s
Quoted message said:
Sandals aren't "me" :-)
You don't like increased comfort levels then?
But of course they're not so good in winter, which seemed to be the point, and if the route involves lots of rocks off-road probably a Bad Idea.
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
Yup - the original question was regarding riding off-road in winter ;-)
So, back to that...
IME waterproof socks (I have some old Porelles and some newer Sealskinz, which are the Mk2 Porelles) work well if the water is coming up from the terrain, but if it's coming from the sky in great amounts too then water will wick down into them as described elsewhere. But if it's from puddles, burns etc. then they're pretty good. Sealskinz now come in a choice of weights, have good quality merino wool inners and are lighter and stretchier than the original Porelles and IMHO rather better.
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/