E
Ed Pirrero
Guest
troutboy wrote:
> G.T. wrote:
> > This is alt.mountain-bike, not alt.rails-to-trails-bike, nor
> > alt.paved-bike-path-bike. I mean, really. You wanna ride gravel roads
> > or paved bike paths go hang out in rec.bicycles.soc. Don't bore us here.
> >
> > Greg
>
> Donning asbestos suit myself...
>
> Quite true. But geesh folks, it was the guys first post. Surely it
> did not require someone reaming him a new a**hole to let him know most
> people would really not be interested in hearing about some rail-trail
> info.
>
> From my perspective Ed seems like a reasonable guy who likes to bike
> with his family and they don't happen to enjoy technical (or even easy)
> singletrack yet.
Actually, that's not quite true. I love to ride N.Idaho singletrack
that is narrow, full of roots, rocks and switchbacks, and has plenty of
exposure. But that would scare my wife, who is not a fan of heights,
and whose skill with a bike is not up to singletrack. Yet. Nor can
either of my kids do those sorts of things. Yet.
I doubt that ANY MTBer started riding bikes (any kind of bikes) on
technical singletrack. And I doubt seriously that anybody here had a
first ride that contained Ponderosa pine cone-filled trail descent that
was like trying to ride on big ball bearings.
I'll bet that Greg and Pete both first rode bikes with training wheels
on the sidewalk. Moved from there to riding bikes on the road, then
moved to off-road riding. Just like most folks. Well, a step away
from the neighborhood into the mountains might be a rail-to-trails
route, or a decent logging road. (some of the logging roads around
here would kick a flatlander's ass.) Dropping a newbie - or a scaredy
bike rider, or a kid) onto sweet singletrack is a dumb thing to do if
they aren't up to it. Especially if you would really like them to get
to enjoy MTBing. Real MTBing.
The HW is nice, scenic ride that is no-stress and family-friendly. I
don't think the trail is quite good enough for road bikes, but cross
bikes would do OK.
And for the folks who can't stand the mention of non-technical MTBing
in a.m-b - try and grasp the meaning of "alt" in alt.mountain-bike.
E.P.
> G.T. wrote:
> > This is alt.mountain-bike, not alt.rails-to-trails-bike, nor
> > alt.paved-bike-path-bike. I mean, really. You wanna ride gravel roads
> > or paved bike paths go hang out in rec.bicycles.soc. Don't bore us here.
> >
> > Greg
>
> Donning asbestos suit myself...
>
> Quite true. But geesh folks, it was the guys first post. Surely it
> did not require someone reaming him a new a**hole to let him know most
> people would really not be interested in hearing about some rail-trail
> info.
>
> From my perspective Ed seems like a reasonable guy who likes to bike
> with his family and they don't happen to enjoy technical (or even easy)
> singletrack yet.
Actually, that's not quite true. I love to ride N.Idaho singletrack
that is narrow, full of roots, rocks and switchbacks, and has plenty of
exposure. But that would scare my wife, who is not a fan of heights,
and whose skill with a bike is not up to singletrack. Yet. Nor can
either of my kids do those sorts of things. Yet.
I doubt that ANY MTBer started riding bikes (any kind of bikes) on
technical singletrack. And I doubt seriously that anybody here had a
first ride that contained Ponderosa pine cone-filled trail descent that
was like trying to ride on big ball bearings.
I'll bet that Greg and Pete both first rode bikes with training wheels
on the sidewalk. Moved from there to riding bikes on the road, then
moved to off-road riding. Just like most folks. Well, a step away
from the neighborhood into the mountains might be a rail-to-trails
route, or a decent logging road. (some of the logging roads around
here would kick a flatlander's ass.) Dropping a newbie - or a scaredy
bike rider, or a kid) onto sweet singletrack is a dumb thing to do if
they aren't up to it. Especially if you would really like them to get
to enjoy MTBing. Real MTBing.
The HW is nice, scenic ride that is no-stress and family-friendly. I
don't think the trail is quite good enough for road bikes, but cross
bikes would do OK.
And for the folks who can't stand the mention of non-technical MTBing
in a.m-b - try and grasp the meaning of "alt" in alt.mountain-bike.
E.P.