Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Vehicle Question

Started by HardwareLust · · Last activity · 43 posts · 2,239 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 April 2004
Last activity
23 April 2004
Original author
HardwareLust
Posts
43
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,239
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–43 of 43
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article said:
    Ryan Cousineau said:
    Quoted message said:

    Yep, GM has the worst designers on the planet. Top 3 ugliest motor vehicles
    of the last decade, Aztek, Avalanche, and any Cadillac.

    Quoted message said:

    And as for the Cadillacs, I understand that the "Art & Science" design
    theory is not for everyone, but the newest cars from them are very, very
    interesting.

    You want ugly? I'll give you ugly. These look much worse in real life
    than any picture can do justice:

    http://www.cadillac.com/cadillacjsp/models/gallery.jsp?model=escalade

    Yeah but the EXT is the real babboon's ass, it "blows" the Escalade
    away in my humble opinion.

  2. dvt said:

    The Nissan underwent significant changes for 2004, so the prior models
    may be slightly cheaper. The new one is quite a bit larger.

    Yes, indeed. That's the one. I think that's about the best looking minivan
    I've ever seen. Some friends of ours just bought the new Maxima, and if the
    van is anything like the new Maxima, it's going to be quite a vehicle.

    Quoted message said:

    For a low-price minivan, you might try the Mazda MPV. It's slightly
    smaller than the new Nissan or any recent Honda. It also has a little
    less power (200 HP vs 220, I think). And I don't think you'll fit 4
    people and 4 bikes *inside* the vehicle. Maybe 4 people plus 2-3 bikes
    would fit. But it is thousands of US$ less expensive, at least around
    here.

    Yeah, I'm beginning to think 4 bikes + 4 adults inside is just too much to
    hope for without buying a Suburban or something similar sized, which is
    exactly what I want to get away from. I'm starting to think a station wagon
    of some sort would be better in the end...lower roof height = easier putting
    bikes on top.

    I'm surprised no one other than me has mentioned the VW Eurovan. It used to
    be in the "old days" when my older brother was a roadie (back in the day
    with toeclips and sew-up's and posters of Eddy in the garage) that the VW
    van was pretty much the standard vehicle for lots of starving roadie's and
    hippies. I guess things have changed. I was thinking one of those
    Eurovan's with pop-top (not the camper, just the poptop...called a
    "weekender" I believe) might work pretty well. It'd be nice to be able to
    park, pop the top and have standing room to change clothes and such.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (Paul Southworth) said:
    In article said:
    Ryan Cousineau said:

    >Yep, GM has the worst designers on the planet. Top 3 ugliest motor
    >vehicles
    >of the last decade, Aztek, Avalanche, and any Cadillac.

    Quoted message said:

    And as for the Cadillacs, I understand that the "Art & Science" design
    theory is not for everyone, but the newest cars from them are very, very
    interesting.

    You want ugly? I'll give you ugly. These look much worse in real life
    than any picture can do justice:

    http://www.cadillac.com/cadillacjsp/models/gallery.jsp?model=escalade

    Yeah but the EXT is the real babboon's ass, it "blows" the Escalade
    away in my humble opinion.

    Oh yeah, full-size SUVs in general are pretty sad vehicles, and I would
    sooner own a 10-year-old sedan than one of those brutes (and in my
    income bracket, I am free of the burden of such a decision).

    That said, the recent trend in new SUVs seems to be shrinkage and
    wagonization. Note the Nissan Murano, which is basically a modestly
    elevated short station wagon with a V8. Note also that Volvo and Subaru
    are absolutely convinced they can make a go of SUVness by selling
    station wagons with extra ground clearance. And what's that in the
    Cadillac lineup?

    http://www.cadillac.com/cadillacjsp/models/gallery.jsp?model=srx

    SRX you say? I say slightly-elevated wagon.

    Check out the "Cargo Management System," surely the most pretentious
    name ever for floor bins.

    Ironically, SUVs are now morphing from my least favourite type of
    vehicle (SUVs) into my favourite type of vehicle (wagons and
    hatchbacks). This is a good thing! I am not looking forward to the
    upcoming used-market glut of SUVs, but a few years after that, when the
    wagons come up for sale, I'll be happy.

    My Tercel sedan swallows a bike nicely thanks to its fold-down rear
    seats,
    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] http://www.sfu.ca/~rcousine/wiredcola/
    President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.