[email hidden] (DEBBEE1023) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:<< While I agree with much you have to say, they don't lose interest, they are obsessed with
belittling and badgering. >>
And it gets frustrating, because you find yourself coming back at them, because they are so
disgusting, that they can make you sick. You'd like to ignore them, however, sometimes, you
wonder how many lives could be saved if the stuff discussed in here, has worked for some people,
and is belittled by "them", isn't challenged by some of us with personal experience, because can
you imagine someone who is at wits end with a problem that perhaps alternative medicine could
actually help?
Don't worry, people will continue to try anything no matter what is said on this NG. Immortality
rings, "cleanses" for "toxins" that aren't specified or measured before or after the fact, zappers,
yanking out teeth, & all sorts of other alt. ideas (good & bad) will be auditioned for the big show.
Many people without any health problems will give 'em a whirl. People who should be seeking other
treatments will too. It's going to happen & nothing said on MHA -- or anywhere else -- will change
that. You definitely overestimate the importance of the opinions of people on the 'net. "Saving
lives" -- puhleeze! Nobody here is saving lives. For goodness' sake, it's a discussion group --
nothing else.
Quoted message said:If they listened to the "garbage" that some of the anti-alts had to say, they might miss out on a
therapy that might work for them.
Geez, nobody wants to miss out on something like immortality rings!
Your choice of the words "miss out" is interesting -- effective treatments don't get "missed out"
on. They are endorsed by laypeople, medical providers, & everybody making money from them. They are
studied & the results of the research into them are heralded in the media.
Quoted message said:And really who only knows if there isn't just one or two people here that use a variety of handles
to make it look like a whole mess of people are posting.
The same could be said about those advocating anything "all natural", "organic", & "alternative".
Maybe YOU are using multiple identities -- it's just as likely as anyone else doing so. And what
difference does it make if one person expresses a particular POV or ten do? Does it make the opinion
more accurate? Nope.
Quoted message said:Just watch for the "gang bang" when you post something they don't like.
thread again? Weird....
And the difference when the shoe is on the other foot? None. Even when discussing disgusting anti-
Semetism or homophobic rhetoric, other posters feel free to express their bigotry in response to
opinions they don't like. So? It's called freedom of speech. You certainly take advantage of it, but
you have such a nagging problem with others doing the same. Tough.
Quoted message said:<< Their aim is to run off those who have used alternative medicine with success, or yack about
placebo. In reality, they know alternative mediicine is growing and it eats their socks, because
they have an insane EGO and can't stand to be wrong. >>
Ain't that the truth. However, they want "proof", and my "proof" isn't any of their business.
Don't expect unquestioned belief WRT what you claim, expecially in light of the whoppers you've
related. Make an unlikely claim, people will call you on it. While you have the right to refuse
answers about your claims, you don't have the right to stop the disbelief. You claim to be a
"journalist" & give no indication through your writing that anyone would pay you to put pen to
paper. You talk about "toxins" being flushed out of people & refuse to specify any particular
toxins or their measurements. People telling the truth have no problem giving specifics to back up
their claims -- people who lie can't. "My blood level of _____ was _____ as measured by the
______test" isn't anything embarassingly personal for someone claiming that they were "cured" of
toxic poisoning by whatever therapy they claim was so helpful. Expect to be disbelieved when the
claim has no objective findings to show its efficacy. Do YOU believe everything everyone tells you?
I hope NOBODY does.
Quoted message said:I know what has worked for me (and what hasn't), and some of the (and what hasn't), was
conventional medicine, and being prescribed drugs that made me (and conventional medicine admitted
to this) even sicker
As there are alt. treatments that can make a person sicker...... No difference there.
Quoted message said:....who says you cannot take your ownself off of prednisone....watch me doc
Where in the hell did you ever hear that nonsense? People taper off prednisone all the time. Doctors
advise gradual reduction when the patient has been on HIGH doses, especially for long periods of
time. That's good sense. You've just thrown out another statement to show that you don't know what
you're talking about.
Quoted message said:.....and "what part of this do you not get?"
There's a lot "you do not get". You're not a radical health care expert -- extraordinary in any way
-- or even in possession of basic critical thinking skills.