UK and Europe · Public discussion

Track frame question

Started by Paul D · · Last activity · 36 posts · 985 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 February 2006
Last activity
18 February 2006
Original author
Paul D
Posts
36
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
985
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 36
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Crashed my 531-framed bike I've been using as a fixed/SS (flip flop hub) and
    I'm pretty sure the frame's not well. Been looking at replacement frames
    with 120mm OLN, mainly track frames. However, I want to be able to fit a
    rear brake as well as an 'emergency' brake for using the singlespeed.

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame? Would it then
    be up to the stresses when the brake was used? Is this is a stupid question
    and I should go and look at something built for the job like a Specialized
    Langster (which doesn't seem to come frame-only)?

  2. Paul D said:

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame? Would it then
    be up to the stresses when the brake was used? Is this is a stupid question
    and I should go and look at something built for the job like a Specialized
    Langster (which doesn't seem to come frame-only)?

    Are you _sure_ you want another track frame? What with compromised
    geometry and toe overlap?

    If you like 531, why not but a SJS frame off the peg?
    If you fancy something blue why not an on-one Pompino?

    Both about 180 pounds. Of course you could try having the frame
    renovated - I did just that, albeit with a slightly curved top tube
    :-), but would probably go along teh SJS route now

    regards
    daren
    --
    remove outer garment for reply

  3. Paul D said:

    Crashed my 531-framed bike I've been using as a fixed/SS (flip flop hub) and
    I'm pretty sure the frame's not well. Been looking at replacement frames
    with 120mm OLN, mainly track frames. However, I want to be able to fit a
    rear brake as well as an 'emergency' brake for using the singlespeed.

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame? Would it then
    be up to the stresses when the brake was used? Is this is a stupid question
    and I should go and look at something built for the job like a Specialized
    Langster (which doesn't seem to come frame-only)?

    You could always fit v-brakes to the frame using one of these:

    http://aebike.com/site/page.cfm?PageID=30&SKU=BR9121

    - they are are fixed to the seat-stays with hose (jubilee) clips: I
    used them on a hybrid-MTB conversions, and despite looking a bit odd,
    they work very well.

  4. Paul D said:

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame?

    No need when you have one of these:

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7217500434

    (It is the in "Brake Components" section).

    ~PB

  5. Pete Biggs said:
    Paul D said:

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame?

    No need when you have one of these:

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7217500434

    (It is the in "Brake Components" section).

    That's great. My "ho" collects those, too.

    Mind you, I find the seller's use of that word offensive.
    --
    Ambrose

  6. Pete Biggs said:
    Paul D said:

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame?

    No need when you have one of these:

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7217500434

    There seems to be some mistake. This links to a picture of a very nice
    Suzuki GSX600F, but I think uk.rec.motorcycles might be interested....

  7. sothach said:
    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame?

    No need when you have one of these:

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7217500434

    There seems to be some mistake. This links to a picture of a very
    nice Suzuki GSX600F, but I think uk.rec.motorcycles might be
    interested....

    I know eBayland is a strange place but it was a teapot a minute ago!
    ....All good fixies carry one to rub against the tyre in case of emergency.

    Try http://tinyurl.com/crp5z

    ~PB

  8. Response to Pete Biggs:

    Quoted message said:

    I know eBayland is a strange place but it was a teapot a minute ago!
    ...All good fixies carry one to rub against the tyre in case of emergency.

    Does it have to be colleable, or will an ordinary teapot do?

    --
    Mark, UK
    "There are some things only intellectuals are crazy enough to believe."

  9. in message <[email hidden]>, Pete Biggs

    (') said:
    Paul D said:

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame?

    No need when you have one of these:

    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7217500434

    (It is the in "Brake Components" section).

    Who wouldn't stop for a nice cup of tea?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; I put the 'sexy' in 'dyslexia'

  10. Paul D said:

    Crashed my 531-framed bike I've been using as a fixed/SS (flip flop hub) and
    I'm pretty sure the frame's not well. Been looking at replacement frames
    with 120mm OLN, mainly track frames. However, I want to be able to fit a
    rear brake as well as an 'emergency' brake for using the singlespeed.

    The Fuji Track has a proper rear brake bridge as well as a drilled fork
    crown. There are no brake cable guides so you'd have to use the clip-on
    type.

    Quoted message said:

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame?

    I wouldn't do it, personally. There's not much material there and it
    could crush. A modern brake wants a flat surface for the washers to
    contact, too.

    Pic of the Fuji brake bridge here:

    http://www.peeble.com/bikes/bikes.htm

  11. Ta for that. There's a similar fuji on ebay at the mo which I might have a
    punt on & sell off the bits I don't need afterwards.

    "Zog The Undeniable" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:43f0dbdf.0@entanet...

    Quoted message said:
    Paul D said:

    Crashed my 531-framed bike I've been using as a fixed/SS (flip flop hub)
    and I'm pretty sure the frame's not well. Been looking at replacement
    frames with 120mm OLN, mainly track frames. However, I want to be able to
    fit a rear brake as well as an 'emergency' brake for using the
    singlespeed.

    The Fuji Track has a proper rear brake bridge as well as a drilled fork
    crown. There are no brake cable guides so you'd have to use the clip-on
    type.

    Quoted message said:

    So, is it possible (or even sensible) to drill the rear bridge on a
    aluminium or steel (not decided which I want yet) track frame?

    I wouldn't do it, personally. There's not much material there and it
    could crush. A modern brake wants a flat surface for the washers to
    contact, too.

    Pic of the Fuji brake bridge here:

    http://www.peeble.com/bikes/bikes.htm

  12. Quoted message said:

    Ta for that. There's a similar fuji on ebay at the mo which I might
    have a punt on & sell off the bits I don't need afterwards.

    Gnargh, don't tell everyone will you! Before there was only us two eyeing
    it up, now there's squillions.

  13. in message <43f0dbdf.0@entanet>, Zog The Undeniable

    (') said:

    Pic of the Fuji brake bridge here:

    http://www.peeble.com/bikes/bikes.htm

    Oh, that '93 Cannondale. Lust! Drool! How I wanted one of those...

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    Morning had broken, and I found when I looked that we had run out
    of copper roove nails.

  14. "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <43f0dbdf.0@entanet>, Zog The Undeniable

    (') said:

    Pic of the Fuji brake bridge here:

    http://www.peeble.com/bikes/bikes.htm

    Oh, that '93 Cannondale. Lust! Drool! How I wanted one of those...

    That's still a nice looking bike.

    Cheers, helen s

  15. wafflycat said:

    That's still a nice looking bike.

    Plenty of nice-looking bikes from that era:

    http://www.widerworld.co.uk/eddy-yet-again.jpg

    Eddy will be out again in April. :-)

  16. in message <[email hidden]>, Simon Bennett

    (') said:
    wafflycat said:

    That's still a nice looking bike.

    Plenty of nice-looking bikes from that era:

    http://www.widerworld.co.uk/eddy-yet-again.jpg

    Eddy will be out again in April. :-)

    Isn't the same. Beautiful, I agree, but not the same. In the late
    eighties and early nineties, a Cannondale mountain bike was the summit
    of my worldly ambition. In the bike shop this afternoon was a beautiful
    mid-90s F500 being converted to Rohloff. Lovely bike.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    to err is human, to lisp divine
    ;; attributed to Kim Philby, oddly enough.

  17. "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Simon Bennett

    (') said:
    wafflycat said:

    That's still a nice looking bike.

    Plenty of nice-looking bikes from that era:

    http://www.widerworld.co.uk/eddy-yet-again.jpg

    Eddy will be out again in April. :-)

    Isn't the same. Beautiful, I agree, but not the same. In the late
    eighties and early nineties, a Cannondale mountain bike was the summit
    of my worldly ambition. In the bike shop this afternoon was a beautiful
    mid-90s F500 being converted to Rohloff. Lovely bike.

    Not just me then. The Cannondale referred to was indeed a nice-looking bike.
    The Eddy wasn't in the same aesthetic standard, alas. But you know what they
    say, that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Ferzample, I just can't find
    anything pleasing to look at in a full-suspension mountain bike no matter
    how expensive and top-of-the-range it may be, yet

    http://www.cervelo.com/models/fullsize/2006_Cervelo_P3_Carbon.png

    is a thing of exceeding beauty to mine offspring and I can see why as it is
    a thing of beauty.

    Cheers, helen s

  18. wafflycat said:

    http://www.cervelo.com/models/fullsize/2006_Cervelo_P3_Carbon.png

    Eww. Pugly.

  19. "Simon Bennett" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    wafflycat said:

    http://www.cervelo.com/models/fullsize/2006_Cervelo_P3_Carbon.png

    Eww. Pugly.

    You see, beauty is in the eye of the beholder :-)

    Cheers, helen s

  20. in message <[email hidden]>, wafflycat

    ('w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com') said:


    "Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>, Simon Bennett

    (') said:

    wafflycat wrote:

    > That's still a nice looking bike.

    Plenty of nice-looking bikes from that era:

    http://www.widerworld.co.uk/eddy-yet-again.jpg

    Eddy will be out again in April. :-)

    Isn't the same. Beautiful, I agree, but not the same. In the late
    eighties and early nineties, a Cannondale mountain bike was the summit
    of my worldly ambition. In the bike shop this afternoon was a
    beautiful mid-90s F500 being converted to Rohloff. Lovely bike.

    Not just me then. The Cannondale referred to was indeed a nice-looking
    bike. The Eddy wasn't in the same aesthetic standard, alas. But you
    know what they say, that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
    Ferzample, I just can't find anything pleasing to look at in a
    full-suspension mountain bike no matter how expensive and
    top-of-the-range it may be, yet

    http://www.cervelo.com/models/fullsize/2006_Cervelo_P3_Carbon.png

    is a thing of exceeding beauty to mine offspring and I can see why as
    it is a thing of beauty.

    De gustibus nil disputandem est, as they say. No, I can't like that,
    although I can see why someone else can (and I can also see that it is
    exceedingly fit for purpose). Curiously, though, I find the Isaac Joule
    <URL:http://us.st11.yimg.com/store1.yimg.com/I/glorycycles_1882_8867769>
    an exceedingly good looking bike, and it isn't that different. I think
    it's the curvature of the seat tube around the front of the wheel on the
    Cervelo that puts me off. I see /exactly/ why it's a good thing -
    shorter chain stay, better stiffness, better power transmission, but not
    pretty.

    On the other hand, I think this
    <URL:http://www.cannondale.com/rush/images/6vm4krep.jpg>
    a good looking bike, and I think this
    <URL:http://www.cannondale.com/bikes/02/images/large/j1000_02.jpg>
    is a great looking bike (it's an 02, and is more gracile about the swing
    arm and the trunnion cage than mine - but I like mine too!)

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; IE 3 is dead, but Netscape 4 still shambles about the earth,
    ;; wreaking a horrific vengeance upon the living
    ;; anonymous

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.