G
Dave W wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Must be you - I didn't see any irony in the post.
> >
> > E.P.
> >
>
> public perception? coming from JD?
>
> yeah, must be me.
>
It is. Because you're not biased at all, right? A little Google shows
what a huge hard-on you have for JD. So, if there is any irony in
"public perception", you have just stepped right in a big pile of it.
HAND,
E.P.
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Must be you - I didn't see any irony in the post.
> >
> > E.P.
> >
>
> public perception? coming from JD?
>
> yeah, must be me.
>
It is. Because you're not biased at all, right? A little Google shows
what a huge hard-on you have for JD. So, if there is any irony in
"public perception", you have just stepped right in a big pile of it.
HAND,
E.P.