skicker said:Wonder what this would be like on a unicycle?
Extremely expensive! You'd have to modify the pricy stuff shown on that
site, to an unknown cost.
tholub said:What begins as a bad idea on the bicycle will turn into a worse one on
the unicycle, as I'm sure the cranks are not designed to deal with
pressure applied in the backwards direction.
Uh, don't you ever idle or hop? 🙂
But it's true, bicycle cranks really aren't made to handle pressure in
both directions. That's why the square taper design isn't quite good
enough for unicycles.
I think riding with those cranks would be interesting, but only the
richest of rich people would likely benefit. To me, the dead spot is
part of what makes unicycling the challenge it is. Overcoming the dead
spot is a big part of learning to ride.
However, reducing dead spot for things like MUni or rolling trials
would be very interesting. I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to ride
with those type of cranks, you'd just need a bit of time to get used to
the different foot movement. Then you could experiment with the ability
to ride over terrain while never getting stuck in the dead spot!
--
johnfoss
John Foss
"jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com
-----------------------------------------------
"Idiot America—where fact is merely that which enough people believe,
and truth is measured only by how fervently they believe it." --
Charles Pierce, in Esquire Magazine
------------------------------------------------------------------------
johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252