rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

System for eliminating deadspot

Started by skicker · · Last activity · 48 posts · 677 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
3 April 2006
Last activity
19 November 2007
Original author
skicker
Posts
48
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
677
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 48
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Saw this today, its supposed to eliminate the deadspot when pedalling a
    bike.

    http://tinyurl.com/rbdmb

    Wonder what this would be like on a unicycle?

    --
    skicker
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    skicker's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7788
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  2. skicker said:

    Saw this today, its supposed to eliminate the deadspot when pedalling a
    bike.

    http://tinyurl.com/rbdmb

    Wonder what this would be like on a unicycle?

    What begins as a bad idea on the bicycle will turn into a worse one on
    the unicycle, as I'm sure the cranks are not designed to deal with
    pressure applied in the backwards direction.

    --
    tholub
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tholub's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/804
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  3. Complete nonsense. Another example of I don't practise my archery so I
    need a better bow.

    --
    Mikefule

    Most will fail
    And all will die
    So none shall live
    To tell the tale
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  4. I suppose it may help the type of cyclist who just stomps down on the
    top pedal, but that's not how you should be pedalling. I wouldn't
    fancy trying to spin that setup at any sort of speed. I'm very
    sceptical, but if anybody wants to buy me a set I'll give them a try
    😉
    I reckon it would feel very weird on a unicycle, with the foot speed
    changing at the top of every stroke.

    Rob

    --
    rob.northcott

    'Dartmoor Muni Weekend'
    (http://www.unicyclist.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46116) - Last
    weekend in May 2006
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    rob.northcott's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7436
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  5. Hmm. Whiplash! (Check the same thread in JC started by evil-nick)

    I converted my BMX cranks into Rotor Cranks by doing dirt jump! My old
    unicycle also had "Rotor Cranks" before I snapped it's hub.

    I can't say it seemed to be much different once you get comfortable
    with the odd rotation. The "science" behind the idea sounds rather
    quack though.

    If you want to try it, and have a unicycle with a splined hub, just
    rotate one of the cranks a few degrees and see what it is like.

    If you don't have a splined hub, do a few drops until your hub twists
    to the desired angle. LOL!

    Are you sure the site isn't a prank?

    It reminds me of: http://www.classicrendezvous.com/Italy/PMP_main.htm

    --
    UNIquelyCanadian

    ~Cameron
    Macro Photography: _www.camerondonaldson.com__

    “When someone tells you there is no such thing as truth, they are
    asking you not to believe them. So don’t.”
    - Dr. Roger Scruton
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    UNIquelyCanadian's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7524
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  6. It presumably adds a very slight amount of efficiency for people who are
    riding at a very high level. It probably doesn't reduce efficiency, or
    else people wouldn't be winning races with it.

    Spinning shouldn't be a problem as you're still spinning, just that the
    feet are spinning at slightly different speeds at any point. I guess
    their point is that even the best spinners can't apply constant force
    all the way round whilst riding flat out as they inevitably can push
    down harder than they can push forwards.

    This sort of thing is surely less important on a fixed gear anyway, as
    the wheel momentum pushes you through the dead spot anyway.

    Joe

    --
    joemarshall

    my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albuq44
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  7. While reducing the dead spot for one leg, doesn't this create a worse
    dead spot for the other leg?

    --
    phlegm
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    phlegm's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8382
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  8. UNIquelyCanadian said:

    I converted my BMX cranks into Rotor Cranks by doing dirt jump! My old
    unicycle also had "Rotor Cranks" before I snapped it's hub.

    That's not how the Rotor Cranks work. The amount of offset is not
    fixed like you'd have if you had a bent hub. The offset changes
    throughout the pedal stroke. 'See the simulation here'
    (http://www.rotorbike.com/eng/simulador_RS4_RD2_53.htm).

    I wouldn't want them on a unicycle. We control our balance by being
    able to make micro-adjustments to the pedaling motion. Having the
    cranks change in offset while you are pedaling would just mess
    everything up.

    For bikes the concept might work, but not on a unicycle.

    The Rotor Cranks aren't new. I knew about them more than two years
    ago. Strange that it just hit the blogs like it was new.

    --
    john_childs

    john_childs (att) hotmail (dott) com
    Gallery: http://gallery.unicyclist.com/john_childs
    'Unicycling Bookmark List' (http://backcountry.unicyclist.com/) ::
    'World Clock' (http://tinyurl.com/a99y3)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    john_childs's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  9. joemarshall said:

    It presumably adds a very slight amount of efficiency for people who are
    riding at a very high level. It probably doesn't reduce efficiency, or
    else people wouldn't be winning races with it.

    There was a Cat 1 racer here in California who did a series of races on
    an old steel Peugeot, in sneakers and cutoff jeans, on platform pedals.
    I forget if he had straps or not. He won at least one race that way;
    I remember the interview afterwards. The point being, whether someone
    wins a race or not has a lot more to do with the rider than the bike,
    so it's easy to introduce inefficiencies into the system and still win
    races.

    If nothing else, these introduce extra rotating weight.

    Note that they are *not* simply offset cranks; there's some sort of
    racheting mechanism which changes the position of the cranks relative
    to each other during the pedal stroke.

    --
    tholub
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tholub's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/804
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  10. Watching the simulation it shows how the gearing changes as the crank
    position changes, i suspect this would be highly tricky to ride on a
    unicycle, especially as effectively both your feet are on different
    gears, they would always be moving at different speeds (except at the
    cros-over point). This could seriously mess with your balance I think.
    The way it works is highly impressive, but I don't think it would be
    viable for a unicycle.

    --
    kington99

    Dave

    - what a thoroughly post-modern subversion of the cycling genre -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    kington99's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9417
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  11. john_childs said:

    That's not how the Rotor Cranks work. The amount of offset is not fixed
    like you'd have if you had a bent hub. The offset changes throughout
    the pedal stroke. 'See the simulation here'
    (http://www.rotorbike.com/eng/simulador_RS4_RD2_53.htm).

    I wouldn't want them on a unicycle. We control our balance by being
    able to make micro-adjustments to the pedaling motion. Having the
    cranks change in offset while you are pedaling would just mess
    everything up.

    For bikes the concept might work, but not on a unicycle.

    The Rotor Cranks aren't new. I knew about them more than two years
    ago. Strange that it just hit the blogs like it was new.

    True. 🙂 However,doesn't bent cranks do the same thing for the "dead
    spot" though? Or am I missing something?

    I'm still kind of dubious about the idea...

    --
    UNIquelyCanadian

    ~Cameron
    Macro Photography: _www.camerondonaldson.com__

    “When someone tells you there is no such thing as truth, they are
    asking you not to believe them. So don’t.”
    - Dr. Roger Scruton
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    UNIquelyCanadian's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7524
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  12. I think you'd learn to ride them just fine, similar to riding a two
    wheeler or myron cycle. It's just a matter of time on it until you get
    proficient.

    --
    Gilby
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Gilby's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  13. Well Im not expert.. but considering you'd put that on a coker.. that
    would be very pointless Im sure someone with a geared coker would go as
    fast as someone with that.. correct me if Im wrong tho..

    --
    maxisback

    Quiters never win, winners never quit , the ones who never win and never
    quit are just dumb
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    maxisback's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10885
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  14. The only thing I can think of them being useful for are maybe muni, so
    you always have a pedal that can produce power, and people learning. I
    see a lot of people getting stuck in a no-power situation.

    In any case, I'm not planning on running out and putting a set on my
    muni, I just wanted to know what other people thought...

    --
    evil-nick

    Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total
    obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and
    through me. And when it has gone past, I will turn the inner eye to see
    its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will
    remain.

    * Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear.

    I'm late for checkers with the Dalai Lama!

    My gallery:
    http://evil.linuxfreak.ca/uni.html
    Our Club:
    http://cs.ubishops.ca/~buuc/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    evil-nick's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/6692
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  15. phlegm said:

    While reducing the dead spot for one leg, doesn't this create a worse
    dead spot for the other leg?

    Thats what I thought at first too, but its not just regular crank arms
    set at a slight angle...its a geared hub, so whichever crank arm is at
    the top is automatically slightly ahead.
    I personally think it could work, for distance riding at least.

    --
    James_Potter

    i still believe that all you need is love...john
    lennon
    mikael atkinson
    jonny peacock is my main man.
    mdotedotatkinsonatgmaildotcom
    *President of the 'MRIS' (http://tinyurl.com/dk2de)*
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    James_Potter's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3807
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  16. It looks promising to me. My first thought, Gee I could uni up to a
    curb and always be sure that I'd be in a power stroke position to ride
    up it.

    --
    Chrashing

    Regards,
    Ken ... unicycle enthusiast.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chrashing's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7501
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  17. I'm not sure about you guys, but I've found at least a couple decent
    ways to get around the dead spot.

    If I'm going to be going up over a curb, I do a tiny little hop before
    I hit it if my pedals are in "the power position".

    Sometimes if I need to change my pedal position but can't roll
    anywhere, I do a little hop in place with my pedals askew, and then
    align them midair.

    I always thought doing things the hard way was half the fun of
    unicycling.

    EDIT: Make that "more than half the fun".

    --
    unisteve

    -\"i live on the edge. sometimes i fall off.\"-

    harper is my hero.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    unisteve's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/543
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  18. skicker said:

    Wonder what this would be like on a unicycle?

    Extremely expensive! You'd have to modify the pricy stuff shown on that
    site, to an unknown cost.

    tholub said:

    What begins as a bad idea on the bicycle will turn into a worse one on
    the unicycle, as I'm sure the cranks are not designed to deal with
    pressure applied in the backwards direction.

    Uh, don't you ever idle or hop? 🙂

    But it's true, bicycle cranks really aren't made to handle pressure in
    both directions. That's why the square taper design isn't quite good
    enough for unicycles.

    I think riding with those cranks would be interesting, but only the
    richest of rich people would likely benefit. To me, the dead spot is
    part of what makes unicycling the challenge it is. Overcoming the dead
    spot is a big part of learning to ride.

    However, reducing dead spot for things like MUni or rolling trials
    would be very interesting. I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to ride
    with those type of cranks, you'd just need a bit of time to get used to
    the different foot movement. Then you could experiment with the ability
    to ride over terrain while never getting stuck in the dead spot!

    --
    johnfoss

    John Foss
    "jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com
    -----------------------------------------------

    "Idiot America—where fact is merely that which enough people believe,
    and truth is measured only by how fervently they believe it." --
    Charles Pierce, in Esquire Magazine
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  19. johnfoss said:

    Extremely expensive! You'd have to modify the pricy stuff shown on that
    site, to an unknown cost.

    Uh, don't you ever idle or hop? 🙂

    But it's true, bicycle cranks really aren't made to handle pressure in
    both directions. That's why the square taper design isn't quite good
    enough for unicycles.

    I think riding with those cranks would be interesting, but only the
    richest of rich people would likely benefit. To me, the dead spot is
    part of what makes unicycling the challenge it is. Overcoming the dead
    spot is a big part of learning to ride.

    However, reducing dead spot for things like MUni or rolling trials
    would be very interesting. I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to ride
    with those type of cranks, you'd just need a bit of time to get used to
    the different foot movement. Then you could experiment with the ability
    to ride over terrain while never getting stuck in the dead spot!

    The issue isn't that they're bicycle cranks; it's that they've got some
    funky ratcheting mechanism that probably isn't set up to provide real
    power in the rearward direction. And yes, that would mess up your
    idling and hopping, not to mention going downhill.

    And there's no way these cranks can eliminate the dead spot; the dead
    spot is biomechanical. All they can do is move it around.

    --
    tholub
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tholub's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/804
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

  20. Yes but arnt they moving it so you would never reach it??

    Mike

    --
    swarbrim

    😄 add me at [email hidden]

    "I know how you feel. I live in England, and I was given a raincoat for
    Christmas three years ago, and I still haven't had chance to use it. "
    -- Mike Fule
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    swarbrim's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/11005
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48252

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.