Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

sugarloaf gradient

Started by lupson · · Last activity · 51 posts · 2,684 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
9 September 2004
Last activity
15 September 2004
Original author
lupson
Posts
51
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,684
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 51
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. has anyone ever ridden in clermont florida? im trying to find out the gradient of suarloaf mountain

  2. lupson said:

    has anyone ever ridden in clermont florida? im trying to find out the gradient of suarloaf mountain

    I've ridden it a few times in the triathlons that I've participated in there (Florida Challenge and Great Floridian). I'm not sure what the grade is but I required a 39/25 (700C wheels) to get up it without straining. If I had to guess, I'd say the bottom half is probably 10-11% and the top half is around 8%.

  3. "lupson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    has anyone ever ridden in clermont florida? im trying to find out the
    gradient of suarloaf mountain

    Never been there, but living in east Tennessee I couldn't resist looking for
    what passes for a mountain in FL... ;-)

    A quick look at it on TopoUSA says the west side's 7% avg, east and south
    are 6% avg. Very short max bits on the west at 12%, east at 15%. Topo's
    not the most accurate source in the world, as slight errors in the road
    overlay can result in big errors on gradient, but with dead-straight roads
    like those it's less likely to be off by much. The hill gains about 200ft
    in .52mi. from the west.

    SB

  4. Steve Blankenship said:

    "lupson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    has anyone ever ridden in clermont florida? im trying to find out the
    gradient of suarloaf mountain

    Never been there, but living in east Tennessee I couldn't resist looking for
    what passes for a mountain in FL... ;-)

    A quick look at it on TopoUSA says the west side's 7% avg, east and south
    are 6% avg. Very short max bits on the west at 12%, east at 15%. Topo's
    not the most accurate source in the world, as slight errors in the road
    overlay can result in big errors on gradient, but with dead-straight roads
    like those it's less likely to be off by much. The hill gains about 200ft
    in .52mi. from the west.

    SB

    Dear Steve,

    Here's the terraserver topo view of the west side:

    http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?t=2&s=12&x=537&y=3948&z=17&w=2

    The towering 307 foot peak is to the east. You can zoom in
    to absurd detail.

    This being Florida, the contour lines are at 5-foot
    intervals.

    The steep part, for example, from south of the clay pit to
    the west to the 250 foot subsideriary peak, shows the road
    rising steeply around the corner from 125 feet to 250 feet
    in 500 yards, which is 125 feet in 1500 feet, or an 8.3%
    grade.

    The steep part up to the 305-foot summit starts at 205 feet
    and levels out sharply at 275 feet, a 75-foot gain in about
    200 yards, or 75 feet in 600 feet, a 12.5% grade.

    To the east, it looks like a 85-foot straight drop in 450
    yards from 240 feet down to the Coast Line tracks at 155
    feet, 85 feet in 1350 feet, or 6.3% grade.

    For comparison, here's the S-bend down the gully 40 seconds
    from my driveway on the bluff above the Arkansas River in
    Pueblo, Colorado:

    http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?t=2&s=11&x=1327&y=10588&z=13&w=1

    It's the modest curve above and to the right of the 4750. It
    reaches 9% for a few feet in the first curve in its 50-foot
    plunge to the flat runout at 4700 feet to the river.

    Somehow, I doubt that Alpine gearing or great descending
    skills are necessary.

    Carl Fogel

  5. Steve Blankenship said:

    "lupson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    has anyone ever ridden in clermont florida? im trying to find out the
    gradient of suarloaf mountain

    Never been there, but living in east Tennessee I couldn't resist looking for
    what passes for a mountain in FL... ;-)

    A quick look at it on TopoUSA says the west side's 7% avg, east and south
    are 6% avg. Very short max bits on the west at 12%, east at 15%. Topo's
    not the most accurate source in the world, as slight errors in the road
    overlay can result in big errors on gradient, but with dead-straight roads
    like those it's less likely to be off by much. The hill gains about 200ft
    in .52mi. from the west.

    Hmm, a little lower than the Sugarloaf Mountain in Tennessee I climbed a
    few years back, too. (The one in the Parksville quad, close to a YMCA
    camp!) 312 vs. 1642 feet, and that's just the foothills, folks! I'd
    hate to have to lug a bike to the top of the Tennessee version!

    Pat

  6. lupson said:


    has anyone ever ridden in clermont florida? im trying to find out the
    gradient of suarloaf mountain

    Mountain? Florida? One of those terms must be in error. Last I
    checked, the highest natural elevation in the state of FL was about
    330 feet above sea level.

    I live at 400 feet elevation, and I'm only 2 miles from Puget Sound.
    And I don't live on a mountain.

    Florida has mountains like Florida has free and fair elections!

    Chalo Colina

  7. "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Mountain? Florida? One of those terms must be in error. Last I
    checked, the highest natural elevation in the state of FL was about
    330 feet above sea level.

    Quoted message said:

    I live at 400 feet elevation, and I'm only 2 miles from Puget Sound.
    And I don't live on a mountain.

    Quoted message said:

    Florida has mountains like Florida has free and fair elections!

    If you're a fat rich republican not only do you get what you want with
    elections, but you also consider riding a 300 foot elevation on a bicycle to
    be scaling a mountain.

    Quoted message said:

    Chalo Colina

  8. George Bush said:

    "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Florida has mountains like Florida has free and fair elections!

    If you're a fat rich republican

    In Chalo's case, one out of three IS bad.

    Bill "although he's right -- someone should have fired all those Democrat
    election officials" S.

  9. "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    lupson said:


    has anyone ever ridden in clermont florida? im trying to find


    out the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    gradient of suarloaf mountain

    Mountain? Florida? One of those terms must be in error. Last


    I

    Quoted message said:

    checked, the highest natural elevation in the state of FL was


    about

    Quoted message said:

    330 feet above sea level.

    I live at 400 feet elevation, and I'm only 2 miles from Puget


    Sound.

    Quoted message said:

    And I don't live on a mountain.

    Dang, Chalo, Queen Anne hill would be like the Everest of
    Florida. I commute home along the Willamette River and then take
    a mile jog up through Riverview Cemetery (near the foot of the
    Sellwood bridge) to get home. That is about a 400 foot elevation
    gain -- and basically a speed bump in the westside landscape. I
    do miss the fact that urban Portland does not have any long
    climbs like Page Mill or the various ascents to Skyline in the SF
    Bay Area. You have to get way east toward Mt. Hood before you
    can do any climbs with more than a two thousand foot gain. -- Jay
    Beattie.

  10. S o r n i said:


    George Bush said:


    Chalo said:


    Florida has mountains like Florida has free and fair elections!

    If you're a fat rich republican

    In Chalo's case, one out of three IS bad.

    There you go again with your rapier-like wit!

    I'll say it again; you don't legitimize whatever bogus point you were
    trying to make by calling someone fat, gay, Communist, or whatever
    other irrelevant thing your stunted intellect causes you to flatulate
    out. You just make yourself look like a jerk, and a bigoted one at
    that.

    If that was your aim, then carry on as you like.

    Chalo Colina

  11. Jay Beattie said:


    Chalo said:


    I live at 400 feet elevation, and I'm only 2 miles from Puget
    Sound. And I don't live on a mountain.

    Dang, Chalo, Queen Anne hill would be like the Everest of
    Florida.

    Don't you mean "Queen Anne Mountain"? ;^)

    But I don't live there anyway, and I was somewhat mistaken about the
    elevation at my place on Capitol Hill. I misread a cluttered topo
    map's contour line to read "400", which I interpreted as feet, when it
    was actually 100 meters-- that's 330 feet. It's still a mountain by
    Floridian standards, though.

    Quoted message said:

    I
    do miss the fact that urban Portland does not have any long
    climbs like Page Mill or the various ascents to Skyline in the SF
    Bay Area. You have to get way east toward Mt. Hood before you
    can do any climbs with more than a two thousand foot gain.

    Ugh. My bronchi are burning just thinking about it.

    Chalo Colina
    "king of the mountain"

  12. Chalo said:
    S o r n i said:


    George Bush said:


    "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > Florida has mountains like Florida has free and fair elections!

    If you're a fat rich republican

    In Chalo's case, one out of three IS bad.

    There you go again with your rapier-like wit!

    I'll say it again; you don't legitimize whatever bogus point you were
    trying to make by calling someone fat, gay, Communist, or whatever
    other irrelevant thing your stunted intellect causes you to flatulate
    out. You just make yourself look like a jerk, and a bigoted one at
    that.

    How do you know I wasn't calling you rich?

    Tomorrow's the 3rd anniversary of 9/11, Chalo. Many brave Americans --
    among them Patrick Tillman -- gave their lives (*IN AFGHANISTAN*) fighting
    those who harbored and supported the murderous, terrorist slimeballs who
    perpetrated that vile act. I would think someone like you -- who calls
    someone like Tillman a murderer and a coward and God knows what else --
    would have thick enough skin to withstand a few "you're a gross, fat ugly
    pig" remarks from people like me who deplore what you say and believe, and
    lash out with relatively mild personal attacks in response. Guess not. Too
    [censored] bad.

    Even nutsacks like Howard Dean supported U.S. actions in Afghanistan, but
    you're so blinded by some pathetic, outdated ideology that you resort to
    hate-filled, incendiary remarks. You obviously want a reaction; I'm happy
    to oblige.

    Bill "haven't seen even one person support your view of Tillman, by the way,
    and there are LOTS of lefties around" S.

  13. [email hidden said:

    "]Dear Steve,

    Here's the terraserver topo view of the west side:

    http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?t=2&s=12&x=537&y=3948&z=17&w=2

    The towering 307 foot peak is to the east. You can zoom in
    to absurd detail.

    Carl Fogel

    Cool site. But you didn't zoom in on Sugarloaf. It's a bit further north and tops out at 316 feet...

    http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?t=2&s=12&x=535&y=3962&z=17&w=2

    It looks like it rises ~210ft in 900yds for an average grade of just under 8%
    The steep part from 125ft to 215ft takes about 300yds for an average grade of 10%. It looks like the first 25ft from 125ft to 150ft take ~70yds for a grade of ~12%

  14. S o r n i said:

    Bill "haven't seen even one person support your view of Tillman, by the way,
    and there are LOTS of lefties around" S.

    Consensus is not truth.

  15. Jim Smith said:
    S o r n i said:

    Bill "haven't seen even one person support your view of Tillman, by
    the way, and there are LOTS of lefties around" S.

    Consensus is not truth.

    Didn't say or imply that it was. Do you agree with Chalo? (Google it if
    unsure; got quite a response IIRC.)

    Bill "devout pacifists don't spew hate-filled bile" S.

  16. S o r n i said:
    Jim Smith said:
    S o r n i said:

    Bill "haven't seen even one person support your view of Tillman, by
    the way, and there are LOTS of lefties around" S.

    Consensus is not truth.

    Didn't say or imply that it was. Do you agree with Chalo? (Google it if
    unsure; got quite a response IIRC.)

    I have read the thread. I don't know anything about Tillman or his motives.

  17. Gonzo Bob said:


    Quoted message said:
    Steve Blankenship said:

    "lupson" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message

    Quoted message said:

    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > has anyone ever ridden in clermont florida? im trying to find out


    the

    Quoted message said:

    > gradient of suarloaf mountain

    Never been there, but living in east Tennessee I couldn't resist


    looking for

    Quoted message said:

    what passes for a mountain in FL... ;-)

    A quick look at it on TopoUSA says the west side's 7% avg, east and


    south

    Quoted message said:

    are 6% avg. Very short max bits on the west at 12%, east at 15%.


    Topo's

    Quoted message said:

    not the most accurate source in the world, as slight errors in the


    road

    Quoted message said:

    overlay can result in big errors on gradient, but with dead-straight


    roads

    Quoted message said:

    like those it's less likely to be off by much. The hill gains about


    200ft

    Quoted message said:

    in .52mi. from the west.

    SB

    Dear Steve,

    Here's the terraserver topo view of the west side:

    http://tinyurl.com/3qzs9

    The towering 307 foot peak is to the east. You can zoom in
    to absurd detail.

    Carl Fogel

    Cool site. But you didn't zoom in on Sugarloaf. It's a bit further
    north and tops out at 316 feet...

    http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.aspx?t=2&s=12&x=535&y=3962&z=17&w=2

    Dear Bob,

    You're absolutely right (at least I think you are).

    I got lost amidst all those towering 300+ foot Floridian
    mountains.

    If I've got the right spot now, Highway 455 drops southward
    about 95 feet from the east shoulder of the Sugarloaf
    massif, from about 205 feet down to about 110 feet in about
    400 yards, or 1200 feet, about an 8% grade.

    Further south is a climb that might be 35 feet in 50 yards,
    or 150 feet, an impressive 23.3% grade--but perhaps a bit
    short to reach terminal velocity.

    I had no idea that Florida was dotted with so many closely
    packed peaks. I wonder whether some of them are still
    unclimbed?

    Carl Fogel

  18. On 10 Sep 2004 17:26:55 -0700, [email hidden]

    (Chalo) said:
    Jay Beattie said:


    Chalo said:


    I live at 400 feet elevation, and I'm only 2 miles from Puget
    Sound. And I don't live on a mountain.

    Dang, Chalo, Queen Anne hill would be like the Everest of
    Florida.

    Don't you mean "Queen Anne Mountain"? ;^)

    But I don't live there anyway, and I was somewhat mistaken about the
    elevation at my place on Capitol Hill. I misread a cluttered topo
    map's contour line to read "400", which I interpreted as feet, when it
    was actually 100 meters-- that's 330 feet. It's still a mountain by
    Floridian standards, though.

    Quoted message said:

    I
    do miss the fact that urban Portland does not have any long
    climbs like Page Mill or the various ascents to Skyline in the SF
    Bay Area. You have to get way east toward Mt. Hood before you
    can do any climbs with more than a two thousand foot gain.

    Ugh. My bronchi are burning just thinking about it.

    Chalo Colina
    "king of the mountain"

    Dear Chalo,

    I've made so many typos and miscalculations lately (I missed
    Sugarloaf Mountain by a mile or so!) that I'm delighted to
    point out that 100 meters is 394 feet, so your original 400
    foot estimate turns out to be darned good anyway, a margin
    of error of slightly less than plus or minus one Chalo.

    It would be nice if the various free maps available included
    an obvious legend on the maps themselves explaining whether
    meters or feet are being used. I know enough about Colorado
    elevations to be able to tell at a glance (5,000 to 14,000
    around the front range is feet, anything less is meters),
    but in Florida and the Calfornia or Washington coastlines
    I'm out of my depth, to mix a metaphor.

    Carl "39.4 or fight!" Fogel

  19. Jim Smith said:
    S o r n i said:
    Jim Smith said:

    "S o r n i" <[email hidden]> writes:

    > Bill "haven't seen even one person support your view of Tillman, by
    > the way, and there are LOTS of lefties around" S.

    Consensus is not truth.

    Didn't say or imply that it was. Do you agree with Chalo? (Google
    it if unsure; got quite a response IIRC.)

    I have read the thread. I don't know anything about Tillman or his
    motives.

    Thank you for being honest.

    What I believe is that Pat Tillman was so moved by the events of 9/11 that
    he gave up millions of dollars and an NFL lifestyle to go fight those he
    (and nearly everyone) thought responsible for the attacks. A better man
    than I, no doubt.

    I don't understand Chalo's position (calling Tillman a gutless murderer and
    worse). I mean, if the US doesn't have the right to retaliate against those
    responsible for killing close to 3,000 innocent people on its soil and
    severely disrupting its economy, then he must think it's NEVER justified to
    go to war. I remember asking him that, and don't recall ever seeing a
    reply.

    Also, let's say someone is an avowed pacifist. No war is ever OK, no matter
    what. I can accept that (although not agree with it, obviously). What
    motivates that person to single out one (obviously idealistic) soldier for
    vitriol, ridicule and scorn? Doesn't such hatred and meanness betray the
    very point of being a pacifist?

    I have a dime-store psychological theory in this particular case, but since
    it involves that someone's morbid obesity as an excuse to be hateful and
    contrary to overwhelming public opinion just to garner attention I won't go
    into it.

    Bill "that's what I think" S.

  20. Quoted message said:


    (Chalo) said:


    Jay Beattie said:


    "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > I live at 400 feet elevation, and I'm only 2 miles from Puget
    > Sound. And I don't live on a mountain.

    Dang, Chalo, Queen Anne hill would be like the Everest of
    Florida. )

    But I don't live there anyway, and I was somewhat mistaken about the
    elevation at my place on Capitol Hill. I misread a cluttered topo
    map's contour line to read "400", which I interpreted as feet, when it
    was actually 100 meters-- that's 330 feet.

    I've made so many typos and miscalculations lately (I missed
    Sugarloaf Mountain by a mile or so!) that I'm delighted to
    point out that 100 meters is 394 feet, so your original 400
    foot estimate turns out to be darned good anyway, a margin
    of error of slightly less than plus or minus one Chalo.

    I hate to break it to you Carl, but you are using decimal feet, a
    /faux pas/ in France and far too rational to belong in a British
    measurement system. 100m is definitely 3,937 inches, but the Brits
    must have learned to count their inches on their woefully inbred
    king's superfluity of toes. Hence 3937/12 or 328.083 feet.

    Chalo Colina

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.