UK and Europe · Public discussion

Stopped for speeding?

Started by Dylan Smith · · Last activity · 85 posts · 1,746 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
11 April 2007
Last activity
16 April 2007
Original author
Dylan Smith
Posts
85
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,746
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 81–85 of 85
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Alan Holmes said:

    Professional cyclists use light weight bikes wich do not perform as well as
    heavier bikes.

    Good grief, that's like saying Formula 1 drivers use light cars that
    don't perform as well as my Range Rover!

    --
    Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
    Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de

  2. Ziggy proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    It reminds me of how, many years ago, some of the people I worked with
    would have tales about how they got x+20 mph out of their car on the flat
    when the manufacturer's stated top speed was x mph.

    Depends on the car, my current car maxes at 149 and clocks max at 180mph
    according to the manufacturer, ive never even tried to reach it but I have
    had it at 135 *with ease* - though its rev-limited so it would never go
    past whatever speed that is unless the hill was very very steep 🙂

    However my old peugeot 205 1.1 litre (4 speed, 44hp) was quoted as having a
    top speed of 85mph by Peugeot, clocks ended at 110mph, it had no rev
    limiter and was several times pushed past the 105mph mark on a downward
    sloping section of track. Now assuming the ~10% error and it was actually
    getting closer to 95mph (it held 70 (with a GPS) at an indicated 74, I
    never tested it at high speeds with the GPS).

    Either way you should never trust manufacturers values - TVR are well known
    for quoting 350bhp models and having closer to 250bhp when actually tested.
    It works both ways.

    J

  3. Alan Holmes proclaimed to uk.rec.cycling ...

    Quoted message said:

    At the time I was talking about there were no different tyre sizes!

    They were sold for specific wheel sizes.

    Alan

    A friend and I recently realised that, though we use the same size wheel and
    tyre combo, and calibrated our computers the same, I was getting 1mph
    faster average than he over the same course, despite starting and arriving
    together. Figured out that my tyres flex more than his and mine were
    effectively smaller diameter when loaded. We double checked with my
    bar-mounted GPS and his was correct and mine was reading ~0.75-1mph slower
    than the GPS and his. I did run some calcs afterwards and I'm fairly sure
    it worked out that the flex would have to be fairly large (which it isnt)
    so clearly the accuracy of the computers is also in question, just
    compounded by the tyre flex.

  4. In news:[email hidden],
    Coyoteboy <[email hidden]> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us:

    Quoted message said:

    A friend and I recently realised that, though we use the same size
    wheel and tyre combo, and calibrated our computers the same, I was
    getting 1mph faster average than he over the same course, despite
    starting and arriving together. Figured out that my tyres flex more
    than his and mine were effectively smaller diameter when loaded. We
    double checked with my bar-mounted GPS and his was correct and mine
    was reading ~0.75-1mph slower than the GPS and his. I did run some
    calcs afterwards and I'm fairly sure it worked out that the flex
    would have to be fairly large (which it isnt) so clearly the accuracy
    of the computers is also in question, just compounded by the tyre
    flex.

    Also I think the clocks in cycle-computers are not as accurate as the
    manufacturers might have us believe.

    --
    Dave Larrington
    <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk>
    I am Wan, for I am pursued by the Army of Plums.

  5. In article said:

    "Alan Braggins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    In article said:


    You cannot say that in this group, I was called a liar for saying I had
    averaged 29.5 over 84 miles!

    It was gently suggested that you might be mistaken, rather than anyone
    assuming you were deliberately deceitful, at least in the threads I've
    seen. You have repeated shown that your observation skills and/or memory
    are problematic at times.

    And, whether you like it or not, when you grow up you will find that at
    times you will forget things!

    No doubt. But I trust that when someone points out that my memory of
    something is physically implausible, I will consider that my memory might
    be wrong rather than objecting to being called a liar.

    For example, I distinctly remember being able to fly when I was a small
    child. But I accept that no, that didn't really happen, I dreamt it.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.