Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Spoke line correction

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 52 posts · 1,483 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
20 February 2007
Last activity
23 February 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
52
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,483
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–52 of 52
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Andrew Lee said:

    I got some Sapim Lasers recently. After reading what you wrote, I


    took a

    Quoted message said:

    look at a wheel (with Dura Ace 7700 hubs) that I laced up the other


    day

    Quoted message said:

    but haven't gotten around to tensioning yet. Same long elbows on


    the

    Quoted message said:

    Lasers too. I'd say very long, actually. You're right - they don't


    look

    Quoted message said:

    good to me compared to the very tight/flush fit of Wheelsmith spokes


    with

    Quoted message said:

    Deore LX hubs on my old mountain bike. I'll finish the wheel and see


    what

    Quoted message said:

    I think then...

    Quoted message said:
    Andrew Lee said:

    Here's a photo of the Sapim Lasers on a 7700 front hub before
    tensioning and
    before spoke line correction:
    http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9971/img3416vx4.jpg

    daveornee said:

    http://img76.imageshack.us/my.php?image=02210002ls0.jpg
    Dura Ace 7700 front with 3X Sapim Laser
    http://img337.imageshack.us/my.php?image=02210003lw1.jpg
    Campy Record front with 3X Sapim Laser
    Both after tensioning, spoke line correcting, and stabilizing the
    wheels.

    Two shots of a wheel with Asahi 14-16-14 SS in a Chorus front:
    http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/SPOXFLNG.JPG

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  2. Ben C said:

    On 2007-02-21, [email hidden] <[email hidden]> wrote:
    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    A quick check shows that the Google Group archive for RBT is working
    fine from Pueblo, Colorado for October through today. I can search by
    date, see posts month-by-month in user profiles, find posts with the
    quick search that fall within the suspect months.

    Maybe you're right, and indexes east of the Mississippi are damaged.

    If I had any faith in computers, this would shake it.

    I tried searching RBT for "spoke line correction" from a location well
    to the east of the Mississippi.

    http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.bicycles.tech/search?q=spoke+line+correction&start=0&scoring=d&hl=en&

    I clicked "Sort by Date". I got three recent messages, followed by one
    dated 27 Sep 2006.

    This is what my screen looks like:

    http://www.tidraso.co.uk/misc/google.png

    Dear Ben,

    What do you get if you sort the main topic list by first message and
    page back? My page starts with 1-30 of 92827:

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/topics?tsc=2

    Does the October-January hole appear when you look at things this way?

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  3. On 2007-02-22, [email hidden] <[email hidden]> wrote:
    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    Dear Ben,

    What do you get if you sort the main topic list by first message and
    page back? My page starts with 1-30 of 92827:

    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/topics?tsc=2

    It's all there, 92827 messages.

    Quoted message said:

    Does the October-January hole appear when you look at things this way?

    No hole.
    http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/topics?start=670&sa=N
    shows threads from Dec 5 to Dec 3 including "I fixed a broken spoke".

    It seems the messages are all there, but that part of the search index
    is missing.

  4. On 2007-02-21, [email hidden] <[email hidden]> wrote:
    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    I tried the numeric address, went to RBT, and got the same 27 hits for
    spoke line correction.

    But I end up in groups.google.com, not groups.google.co.uk.

    It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.

    I wasn't sure whether using the numeric address would make any
    difference because many things can happen behind the scenes. Google know
    who you are and where you're connecting from and are not easily fooled.

    A few times we have been aghast by the accuracy of your searches and you
    have insisted modestly that finding things with Google is "as easy as
    finding ice cream on a rug with a basset hound". I don't mean to
    discredit your reputation, but what if all along you've been connecting
    to a different and more powerful Google from the rest of us?

  5. quote='A Muzi' Andrew Lee said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I got some Sapim Lasers recently. After reading what you wrote, I


    took a

    Quoted message said:

    look at a wheel (with Dura Ace 7700 hubs) that I laced up the other


    day

    Quoted message said:

    but haven't gotten around to tensioning yet. Same long elbows on


    the

    Quoted message said:

    Lasers too. I'd say very long, actually. You're right - they don't


    look

    Quoted message said:

    good to me compared to the very tight/flush fit of Wheelsmith spokes


    with

    Quoted message said:

    Deore LX hubs on my old mountain bike. I'll finish the wheel and see


    what

    Quoted message said:

    I think then...

    Quoted message said:
    Andrew Lee said:

    Here's a photo of the Sapim Lasers on a 7700 front hub before
    tensioning and
    before spoke line correction:
    http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9971/img3416vx4.jpg

    daveornee said:

    http://img76.imageshack.us/my.php?image=02210002ls0.jpg
    Dura Ace 7700 front with 3X Sapim Laser
    http://img337.imageshack.us/my.php?image=02210003lw1.jpg
    Campy Record front with 3X Sapim Laser
    Both after tensioning, spoke line correcting, and stabilizing the
    wheels.

    Two shots of a wheel with Asahi 14-16-14 SS in a Chorus front:
    http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/SPOXFLNG.JPG

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971[/QUOTE]
    Andrew,
    I only can view on shot of the wheel, but it is refreshing that your posting is related to the topic.
    Your build (or whoever did it) looks good to me.
    What are your comments about the photographs I posted?

  6. On Feb 21, 11:22 am, daveornee <daveornee.2md...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    I have never had "too short" an elbow, but I think that would not be
    great either. It would make lacing the wheel very difficult.
    I welcome other comments on the images & interpretations.

    What I meant was that the J can require some extra force to align it.
    I guess this makes it a little harder to build, but it seems to give
    the J much better support. The WS AE15s I have seem to hug the edge of
    the flange quite well with the inner radius of the bend. The J is
    clearly greater than 90 degrees, it is short, and the spoke is 1.8mm
    so it can easily sit at an angle in the hub hole.

    Dave, you've been using Sapim spokes for sometime now... yes? Have you
    noticed any change in the shape and length of the J? Have you used
    spoke head washers at all?

  7. Ben C said:

    On 2007-02-21, [email hidden] <[email hidden]> wrote:
    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    I tried the numeric address, went to RBT, and got the same 27 hits for
    spoke line correction.

    But I end up in groups.google.com, not groups.google.co.uk.

    It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.

    I wasn't sure whether using the numeric address would make any
    difference because many things can happen behind the scenes. Google know
    who you are and where you're connecting from and are not easily fooled.

    A few times we have been aghast by the accuracy of your searches and you
    have insisted modestly that finding things with Google is "as easy as
    finding ice cream on a rug with a basset hound". I don't mean to
    discredit your reputation, but what if all along you've been connecting
    to a different and more powerful Google from the rest of us?

    Dear Ben,

    It helps to be a Stonecutter . . .

    Homer: [pulls out a decal] What's this?
    Lenny: You put that sticker on your car so you won't get any tickets.
    And this other one keeps paramedics from stealing your wallet
    while they're working on you.
    Carl: Oh, and don't bother calling 911 any more...here's the _real_
    number. [hands him a card with "912"]

    http://www.snpp.com/episodes/2F09.html

    Cheers,

    Number Fourteen

  8. Ron Ruff said:

    On Feb 21, 11:22 am, daveornee <daveornee.2md...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    I have never had "too short" an elbow, but I think that would not be
    great either. It would make lacing the wheel very difficult.
    I welcome other comments on the images & interpretations.

    What I meant was that the J can require some extra force to align it.
    I guess this makes it a little harder to build, but it seems to give
    the J much better support. The WS AE15s I have seem to hug the edge of
    the flange quite well with the inner radius of the bend. The J is
    clearly greater than 90 degrees, it is short, and the spoke is 1.8mm
    so it can easily sit at an angle in the hub hole.

    Dave, you've been using Sapim spokes for sometime now... yes? Have you
    noticed any change in the shape and length of the J? Have you used
    spoke head washers at all?


    Spoke support via the J hugging the edge of the flange is nice. However, it may only be obtained, in most cases, on spokes with the heads to the inside the flange.
    I don't measure either the j-bend angle or the disance from head to bend. The only spokes I have ever sensed that were way out of range..... and I experienced spoke breakage, were a couple of batches from DT.
    The variances I have seen with Sapim have been small, usually in the range that I would juudge to be ~0.1 mm delta. Most important to note: I built over 1,000 wheels using Sapim (mostly Race 14/15 DB) spokes and have never had a report of a broken spoke. We ride Sapim spokes on all the "fleet" here, including road, mountain, tandem, and touring bicycles. I have had no troubles of any kind with Sapim.
    I have had more than a handful of problems with Wheelsmith spokes. They have had short fatigue life (under 10,000 miles on a 32H 3X front wheel) and in one batch they continued to stretch past the point of use.
    The only times I have had bad experiences with DT were the very long "elbow" (distance from head to j-bend) spokes. I had a couple of batches of them with this difficulty in both Competition and Alpine III spokes.
    I tried spoke washers with these batches, but still had breakage problems with them. DT would not own up to the problems or take back the product. It was then that I switched to Sapim.
    I do not use spoke washers on any of my wheels built with Sapim spokes. I am not against using them, but I haven't found the need to do so.

  9. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Andrew Lee wrote:
    >> I got some Sapim Lasers recently. After reading what you wrote, I
    > took a
    >> look at a wheel (with Dura Ace 7700 hubs) that I laced up the


    other day

    Quoted message said:

    >> but haven't gotten around to tensioning yet. Same long elbows on
    > the
    >> Lasers too. I'd say very long, actually. You're right - they


    don't look

    Quoted message said:

    >> good to me compared to the very tight/flush fit of Wheelsmith


    spokes with

    Quoted message said:

    >> Deore LX hubs on my old mountain bike. I'll finish the wheel and


    see what I think then...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Andrew Lee Wrote:
    > Here's a photo of the Sapim Lasers on a 7700 front hub before
    > tensioning and before spoke line correction:
    > http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9971/img3416vx4.jpg

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    daveornee said:

    http://img76.imageshack.us/my.php?image=02210002ls0.jpg
    Dura Ace 7700 front with 3X Sapim Laser
    http://img337.imageshack.us/my.php?image=02210003lw1.jpg
    Campy Record front with 3X Sapim Laser
    Both after tensioning, spoke line correcting, and stabilizing the
    wheels.

    Quoted message said:
    A Muzi said:

    Two shots of a wheel with Asahi 14-16-14 SS in a Chorus front:
    http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/SPOXFLNG.JPG

    daveornee said:

    I only can view on shot of the wheel, but it is refreshing that your
    posting is related to the topic.
    Your build (or whoever did it) looks good to me.
    What are your comments about the photographs I posted?

    I added a photo with two views of the same flange [I spliced 2 shots
    together, one above, one below] built with Asahi 14-16-14 for
    comparison. Then I compared the photos and couldn't cull any wisdom
    from them. Your wheel looks like ours.

    The OP photo was "untensioned". It may well have been fine after the
    wheel was actually built.
    ??
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  10. A Muzi said:

    > >>> Andrew Lee wrote: built with Asahi 14-16-14 for
    comparison. Then I compared the photos and couldn't cull any wisdom
    from them. Your wheel looks like ours.

    The OP photo was "untensioned". It may well have been fine after the
    wheel was actually built.
    ??
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971


    Andrew,
    Got it! I was working on another project when I first looked at your "two" images sandwiched together. Duh!

    I think Ron Ruff's view is that the spoke should hug the hub flange as it exits the hole. In your images the spokes look to do just that.... on the ones with heads "inside" the hub.

    The Sapim Laser 14/17 DB spokes used in my photographs have a very small gap as they exit the hub holes... before resting against the hub flange.... nearer to the outer edge.
    You can see a little bit of light in the openings... especially on the Dura Ace version.

    It also sounds like at least one batch of Wheelsmith spokes that Ron Ruff has are fabricated to "complete the bend yourself" arrangement.

  11. daveornee said:

    I built over 1,000 wheels using Sapim (mostly Race 14/15 DB) spokes and
    have never had a report of a broken spoke. We ride Sapim spokes on all
    the "fleet" here, including road, mountain, tandem, and touring
    bicycles. I have had no troubles of any kind with Sapim.

    Well, in that case I'm going to quit worrying about it!

    Also, do you "improve the spoke line" by bending the spoke at the
    flange so that it heads straight for the rim? I'm thinking the Sapims
    I have probably don't need it. There was a big discussion about this a
    little while back... I don't remember if you were involved.

    Quoted message said:

    I have had more than a handful of problems with Wheelsmith spokes.

    I haven't built so many wheels, but the WS spokes I've used have been
    fine. I wonder if the quality suffered when they moved production from
    Japan to Montana ~'96. Now they've been bought by Hayes, and I heard a
    rumor that they will be made in China now (like almost everything
    else).

    The only issue I have is the newer AE15s have a rough finish in the
    bladed part. I'm pretty sure that the ones I used over a decade ago
    were very smooth.

  12. quote='Ron Ruff'daveornee said:

    I built over 1,000 wheels using Sapim (mostly Race 14/15 DB) spokes and
    have never had a report of a broken spoke. We ride Sapim spokes on all
    the "fleet" here, including road, mountain, tandem, and touring
    bicycles. I have had no troubles of any kind with Sapim.

    Well, in that case I'm going to quit worrying about it!

    Also, do you "improve the spoke line" by bending the spoke at the
    flange so that it heads straight for the rim? I'm thinking the Sapims
    I have probably don't need it. There was a big discussion about this a
    little while back... I don't remember if you were involved.

    Quoted message said:

    I have had more than a handful of problems with Wheelsmith spokes.

    I haven't built so many wheels, but the WS spokes I've used have been
    fine. I wonder if the quality suffered when they moved production from
    Japan to Montana ~'96. Now they've been bought by Hayes, and I heard a
    rumor that they will be made in China now (like almost everything
    else).

    The only issue I have is the newer AE15s have a rough finish in the
    bladed part. I'm pretty sure that the ones I used over a decade ago
    were very smooth.[/QUOTE]
    My spoke line improvement provides nearly "the spoke at the
    flange so that it heads straight for the rim".... the nearly part is due to the spoke crossing. Some rim holes don't allow the nipple to rotate freely enough to have the spoke point exactly as I want; in those cases I make the needed correction at the top of the nipple.

    Some of the Wheelsmith spoke finish I have seen (and still have on my stand-by super-stiff touring wheels with DH13 spokes on Phil Wood hubs) is better than any other spokes I have seen ..... in the finish category.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.