Bob Denton <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:I have a late 2001 Tuscany which I have been really pleased with. I bought it as parts, but I
bought the frame from my LBS and the fit was excellent.
My last bike lasted over ten years and I hope to get another ten out both of us. I am leary of the
2002/2003 integrated headset. I'd like to know that in 5 or 6 years I won't be combing E-bay
looking for a headset.
I'm building up a new frame, and I ran into the Chris King comments on the internal headset. In
searching the newsgroups, there seems to be a general option that internal headsets are bad. Here's
some points I think are missing from King's comments:
-As I understand it, the integrated headset is a Cane Creek design, so I'm willing to bet that King
has to work out some deal with Cane Creek in order to produce an internal headset to CC specs. I
assume (you know what happens when you assume) that it's the same deal for the zero stack (internal)
headset, so King came up with a different (Perdido) yet very similar design.
-I think it's a financial benefit to King if the industry quits using the internal headset.
-My Litespeed frame (Sienna) has internal headset "cups" pressed into the frame. The "cups" are made
out of 6/4 titanium, so they should be very hard compared to the bearing races that contact the
cups. I assume (there I go again) that the bearing race metal would wear out before the 6/4 Ti cups.
If the cups are damaged, they can be easily replaced (according to Litespeed). This gets rid of the
big alarm bell that King has been ringing concerning the internal headset.
-A frame using an integrated headset with pressed in cups is pretty similar to the internal headset
that both King and Cane Creek seem to like better than the internal headset.
One caviat, I haven't riden this new bike with the internal headset yet (there's -15 F windchills
outside). The thing may creek like a cat in heat and I'll change my tune...
Jay Wenner