Road Cycling · Public discussion

Serotta makes headlines

Started by Ken Marcet · · Last activity · 82 posts · 2,514 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 March 2005
Last activity
27 March 2005
Original author
Ken Marcet
Posts
82
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,514
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 82
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Agreed, Ken.

    I think there's a difference between being able to financially afford a
    $6k bike, and being able to realistically work it into your life.

    I have a bike that I ride around on during the weekends and a car I use
    about every day. I would bike to class if I could, but where I live
    doesn't make this a real option. The only way I could do it would be
    to move closer to where I went to school. Also, there's no public
    transportation in my area, not to mention the snowy winters that making
    bicycling practically impossible.

    I bike when I can, but I drive almost all the time.

    -Bill H.

  2. There is definitely some truth to this. I am a large mouth bass when I see
    bright shiny things cross my path :~)

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Peter Cole said:

    Functionally, you don't *need* to spend a lot to get a really nice
    bike, the point of diminishing returns is lower than ever, but if you
    *want* high-zoot, it's not such a bad lust, as lusts go.

    If anyone can use such a bike, all power to 'em, I sez.
    But personally, I can not use such a bike. I'd be scared
    to put a U-lock on it for fear of marring the paint.
    In fact I'd be scared to park it and leave it unattended.
    I might end up vigilantly guarding it like the character
    Bogart played in 'Treasure of the Sierra Madre' and his
    gold. I think I now know why such chattles are sometimes
    referred-to as 'trappings'.

    There are some really impressively elegant (and accordingly
    priced) bicycles out there. But like the saying goes, we
    should be careful of what we wish for.

    If anyone gave me a bike like Kerry's Serotta for free,
    I might not be averse to sticking a milk crate on it and
    riding it in the rain to the supermarket.

    On second thought ...

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    -- Nothing is safe from me.
    Above address is just a spam midden.
    I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

  4. A very good point. My bikes I guard and never leave out of my sight. I would
    never lock it to a pole. If I need to go shopping verses "riding" I take my
    choice of several beater bikes I have.

    Lets not confuse the purpose of our bikes. Some people use it as a mode of
    transportation in a very utilitarian sense. My Serotta and Colnago do not
    fit this paradigm. They are purely recreational, for fitness and serious
    distance riding. I would think that this distinction would be obvious. Any
    other type of riding would be silly on these machines.

    Different clothing for different purposes as far as my thinking goes.

  5. David L. Johnson said:
    Matt O'Toole said:
    Ken Marcet said:

    I mean how many people can really afford to spend 6 grand on a


    bike?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    The same people who can afford $50k-plus cars and million dollar


    homes,

    Quoted message said:


    This is not true. If you can afford a $6,000 car, then you can


    afford a

    Quoted message said:

    $6,000 bike, instead.
    David L. Johnson

    My fave is the guy with the Litespeed UnObtanium hanging off the
    back of a clapped out Jetta. Probably a 5k$ bikes on a 1k$ car.
    Man has his priorites in order, now dropping 5k$ on a factory built
    bike when there are lots of fine one man shops is another question.
    Me, I'd take a Bruce Gordon over a Serotta/Colnago class ride any time.

    Scott G.
    Support your local framebuilder.

  6. People rave about Seven's too.

  7. Bill H. said:

    Agreed, Ken.

    I think there's a difference between being able to financially afford a
    $6k bike, and being able to realistically work it into your life.

    Depends on your life, and the extent to which you are willing to work the
    bike into it.

    Quoted message said:


    I have a bike that I ride around on during the weekends and a car I use
    about every day.

    I use my bike every day, and the car usually on weekends.

    Quoted message said:

    I would bike to class if I could, but where I live
    doesn't make this a real option. The only way I could do it would be to
    move closer to where I went to school.

    For some, that is not an option. But if it is, consider it seriously.
    This option just became available this year for me (since my wife can no
    longer work, eliminating the pressure to not live near my office), and
    that has made a huge difference in my life.

    Quoted message said:

    transportation in my area, not to mention the snowy winters that making
    bicycling practically impossible.

    I ride under all conditions. The only time I would want to take the car
    is when it's snowing, or raining (such as today), but those are precisely
    the times when there is no place to park. So, I got studded tires,
    fenders, and a decent rain parka.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | What is objectionable, and what is dangerous about extremists is
    _`\(,_ | not that they are extreme, but that they are intolerant.
    (_)/ (_) | --Robert F. Kennedy

  8. Peter Cole said:

    Sure, but there's no correlation, you know what I mean? Actually, I
    think there's a negative correlation in the group I ride with. It seems
    that people are constantly "upgrading" but most are riding less as time
    goes on.

    I've noticed a definite correlation here: the slower the ride, the more
    prevalent the titanium.

    --

    David L. Johnson

    __o | When you are up to your ass in alligators, it's hard to remember
    _`\(,_ | that your initial objective was to drain the swamp. -- LBJ
    (_)/ (_) |

  9. Peter Cole said:
    Matt O'Toole said:
    Peter Cole said:

    I know a guy with several. He's just a single professional who
    spends his disposable income on bikes. Of course he's middle-aged,
    overweight and a pretty mediocre rider, a fairly typical high-end
    bike owner.

    To be fair, I know plenty of successful people who are fit and fast
    too. Some people just have their [censored] together in general, you know?

    Sure, but there's no correlation, you know what I mean?

    Yup.

    Quoted message said:

    Actually, I
    think there's a negative correlation in the group I ride with. It
    seems that people are constantly "upgrading" but most are riding less
    as time goes on. I think a common motivation is to get a better bike
    to stimulate more riding and better fitness. It's kind of like people
    who get a dog to lose weight.

    I've noticed this too. When people's riding slacks off, they start thinking
    about gear. Either this is to maintain some connection to the sport when
    they're not riding, or to get themselves motivated about riding again. Of
    course it's a bunch of bunk, but it's no different than buying clothes one
    doesn't need or other kinds of unnecessary consumption.

    Quoted message said:

    MTB'ers seem to be even worse than roadies for being drawn to bright
    and shiny things. There's not much of the retro-fetishism that plagues
    the road warriors, so newer is always better. Nobody seems to wear
    anything out any more. Ride it for a while, then Ebay it.

    This is definately true. For one thing there's at least the perception that MTB
    stuff is improving all the time. I do think this was true until a few years
    ago, but not anymore. Also, I think MTB'ing attracts more gearheads -- people
    who are attracted to the gear as much or more than the activity. As I'm sure
    you've noticed, other sports and hobbies are rife with this too.

    Matt O.

  10. Brian Wax said:

    There is definitely some truth to this. I am a large mouth bass when
    I see bright shiny things cross my path :~)

    Hey, I know a guy who's making custom fly rods, out of the finest high modulus
    carbon composites...

    It's long been my contention that fishing lures are not designed to lure fish,
    but fishermen!

    Matt O.

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Brian Wax said:

    Lets not confuse the purpose of our bikes. Some people use it as a mode of
    transportation in a very utilitarian sense. My Serotta and Colnago do not
    fit this paradigm. They are purely recreational, for fitness and serious
    distance riding. I would think that this distinction would be obvious. Any
    other type of riding would be silly on these machines.

    Quite so. I'm just saying that if anyone becomes infatuated
    with such a dream bike, they should have a real good think
    about what they'd be committing themselves to.

    It seems many people broadly classify riding as either
    recreational/fitness, or transportational/commuting.
    But I think there's a much broader spectrum of ways to
    use bicycles, with a lot of overlap. When a bike shop
    staffer asks a prospective customer: "What kind of riding
    do you intend to do," that can be a downright complex and
    difficult question to answer thoroughly. And whether or
    not they'd ever be locking the bike is just one thing to
    consider. There's also what kind of weather one intends
    to ride in, how much maintenance one is willing or able
    to perform, storage ... all kinds of stuff. It's really
    quite easy to end up with the wrong bike for one's purposes.
    Nevertheless Serottas, Colnagos and beautiful custom jobs
    on Eisentraut frames /are/ appropriate bikes for some
    people such as yourself. Thank goodness there's a bicycle
    for just about every need and niche.

    Maybe bike shops could print out some 'buyers' guides' that
    cover those sort of considerations, to hand out to prospective
    customers along with some product literature & catalogues,
    to aid their decision making. I've got a sneaking hunch
    Mike Jacoubowsky already does that.

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    -- Nothing is safe from me.
    Above address is just a spam midden.
    I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

  12. Brian Wax said:

    People rave about Seven's too.


    If I were buying a new custom steel frame the only person I would get it
    from is Richard Sachs.....................

  13. Jeff Martin said:
    Brian Wax said:

    People rave about Seven's too.


    If I were buying a new custom steel frame the only person I would get it
    from is Richard Sachs.....................

    A year is a loooong time to wait. You are a far more patient man than
    I ;-)

  14. "Jeff Martin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Brian Wax said:

    People rave about Seven's too.


    If I were buying a new custom steel frame the only person I would get it
    from is Richard Sachs.....................

    I heard recently his waiting period is now up to 39 months! Now that's job
    security!

  15. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sure, but there's no correlation, you know what I mean? Actually, I
    think there's a negative correlation in the group I ride with. It seems
    that people are constantly "upgrading" but most are riding less as time
    goes on.

    I've noticed a definite correlation here: the slower the ride, the more
    prevalent the titanium.

    This does not correlate with my experience.

    Perhaps you haven't sampled data from the far enough out on the curve.....

    Chris Neary
    [email hidden]

    "Science, freedom, beauty, adventure: what more could
    you ask of life? Bicycling combined all the elements I
    loved" - Adapted from a quotation by Charles Lindbergh

  16. Tom Keats said:

    ...
    Nevertheless Serottas, Colnagos and beautiful custom jobs
    on Eisentraut frames /are/ appropriate bikes for some
    people such as yourself. Thank goodness there's a bicycle
    for just about every need and niche....

    I would rather ride this bike at one-third the price than any of those
    mentioned above: <http://www.ihpva.org/incoming/2002/sunset/Sunset001.jpg>.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Earth (Downstate Illinois, North of Forgottonia)

  17. Ken Marcet said:

    ...
    I guess I would have to agree with you. Just as long as your hobbies don't
    include homemade weapons of mass destruction!

    I am having trouble finding the "Buy it Now" buttons on this site:
    <http://www.strategic-air-command.com/weapons/nuclear_bomb_chart.htm>.
    Is there something wrong with my browser?

    --
    Tom Sherman - Earth (Downstate Illinois, North of Forgottonia)

  18. Matt O'Toole said:

    ...
    Hey, did you know that most rich people in America are self made, and not scions
    of old money (or married to them)? Save your pennies....

    Drinking Kool-Aid at the Norquist residence?

    --
    Tom Sherman - Earth (Downstate Illinois, North of Forgottonia)

  19. That's cool. Stay well within your limits. If you know what is right for
    you; then most of us in this group would only encourage you.

  20. Look up the term non sequitur

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.