T
triddletree
Guest
Richard wrote:
> triddletree wrote:
>
>> Richard wrote:
>>
>>> triddletree wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> I don't think you can call a concern about 12-year olds being
>>>> permitted to race on major trunk roads amongst heavy commercial and
>>>> holiday traffic a prejudice.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So, with no knowledge of the statistics of the risk to that child in
>>> that activity, you're not pre-judging the issue? (that'd be a
>>> pre-judice, by the way).
>>
>>
>> So its impossible to have a concern about anything without having a
>> whole raft of statistics to back it up?
>
>
> I didn't say that. I said that if you don't have the statistics, then
> any concerns you do have are prejudices, by definition.
Sorry, I don't do pedantry.
tt
> triddletree wrote:
>
>> Richard wrote:
>>
>>> triddletree wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> I don't think you can call a concern about 12-year olds being
>>>> permitted to race on major trunk roads amongst heavy commercial and
>>>> holiday traffic a prejudice.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So, with no knowledge of the statistics of the risk to that child in
>>> that activity, you're not pre-judging the issue? (that'd be a
>>> pre-judice, by the way).
>>
>>
>> So its impossible to have a concern about anything without having a
>> whole raft of statistics to back it up?
>
>
> I didn't say that. I said that if you don't have the statistics, then
> any concerns you do have are prejudices, by definition.
Sorry, I don't do pedantry.
tt