Rttc was bloody AUK;



M

MartinM

Guest
Just trying to find out the results of our club's TT on Sunday,
happened to see this;

Full address details are shown for all events to the Easter. After that
time the address details will only be available after entries have
closed. In order to get the address details and enter events it will be
necessary to have a handbook. Please click HERE to obtain an order
form.

How pathetic! like going in a restaurant and having to pay to see the
menu (which was also said about charging for directory enquiries). No
wonder it's a dying sport.
 
MartinM wrote:
> Just trying to find out the results of our club's TT on Sunday,
> happened to see this;
>
> Full address details are shown for all events to the Easter. After that
> time the address details will only be available after entries have
> closed. In order to get the address details and enter events it will be
> necessary to have a handbook. Please click HERE to obtain an order
> form.
>
> How pathetic! like going in a restaurant and having to pay to see the
> menu (which was also said about charging for directory enquiries). No
> wonder it's a dying sport.
>

Sport?

This always appears to me as the cycling equivalent of train-spotting.



druidh
 

> No wonder it's a dying sport.


The age of most competitors will assist its demise ;-)

The sooner this excuse for a 'sport' is taken off the public highways
the better.

tt
 
druidh wrote:
> MartinM wrote:
> > Just trying to find out the results of our club's TT on Sunday,
> > happened to see this;
> >
> > Full address details are shown for all events to the Easter. After that
> > time the address details will only be available after entries have
> > closed. In order to get the address details and enter events it will be
> > necessary to have a handbook. Please click HERE to obtain an order
> > form.
> >
> > How pathetic! like going in a restaurant and having to pay to see the
> > menu (which was also said about charging for directory enquiries). No
> > wonder it's a dying sport.
> >

> Sport?
>
> This always appears to me as the cycling equivalent of train-spotting.


maybe but the event in question generated 90+ entries; it's not my cup
of tea either but with so few road racing events it continues to be
popular. Just can't see why they need to be so secretive about events.
 
MartinM wrote:

> popular. Just can't see why they need to be so secretive about events.


Bacause for years their main source of income has been from selling
the handbook. They haven't adapted yet to how things have changed.

I guess to compenstate they'd have to increase the levy per ride
by 50p or so maybe? The screams of pain from the old giffers
would be deafening.

Arthur

--
Arthur Clune
 
Arthur Clune wrote:
> MartinM wrote:
>
> > popular. Just can't see why they need to be so secretive about events.

>
> Bacause for years their main source of income has been from selling
> the handbook. They haven't adapted yet to how things have changed.
>
> I guess to compenstate they'd have to increase the levy per ride
> by 50p or so maybe? The screams of pain from the old giffers
> would be deafening.


Just out of interest how much from a normal TT entry fee goes in prize
money? one (very minor) reason I moved from TT to Audax was that I
would rather my entry fee went towards cake for me than a new set of
tubs for the winner.
 
triddletree wrote:

> The sooner this excuse for a 'sport' is taken off the public highways
> the better.


OK, I'll bite. It allows people who would be dropped in a mass-start
race to compete, otherwise we'd all just have to ride with the CTC. The
minimum fitness level for even 4th cat road racing is HIGH, and even
with training many cyclists (i.e. me) can't sustain that much power.
Plus the lower categories have frequent accidents due to incompetent
riders; both the races I've marshalled had at least three people carted
away by ambulance, and they were only about an hour long.

You may have noticed that mass-start racing is practically impossible to
organise in Britain these days because of traffic densities and police
vetoes. Our club's event now has to be staged 30 miles away on the
other side of the county because the "B" road route we've used for years
now has too much traffic, according to Plod.

But maybe you're just a motoring troll?
 
Zog The Undeniable wrote:

>
> OK, I'll bite. It allows people who would be dropped in a mass-start
> race to compete, otherwise we'd all just have to ride with the CTC. The


TLI organise Australian Pursuits, which work for all levels. Much the
best option for most people.

--
Arthur Clune
 
MartinM wrote:
>
> Just out of interest how much from a normal TT entry fee goes in prize
> money? one (very minor) reason I moved from TT to Audax was that I
> would rather my entry fee went towards cake for me than a new set of
> tubs for the winner.


Not a vast amount. When I ran our clubs 50 we gave about 100 quid in prizes
and some of that was for '20/40/60th'/handicap type prizes where anyone
could get the money. Since we were charging 4.50 or a fiver entry at the
time it's not a vast amount. The cost of hiring a hall/tea coffee etc
was more.

Arthur

--
Arthur Clune
 
Arthur Clune wrote:
> Zog The Undeniable wrote:
>
> >
> > OK, I'll bite. It allows people who would be dropped in a mass-start
> > race to compete, otherwise we'd all just have to ride with the CTC.


not at all, many lower distance Audax events have gotten very sporting
(if you wish to do so) since the mudguard rule was dropped. And there's
all the sportives, between the two they offer a prefect alternative to
traditional British cycle racing IMHO


> TLI organise Australian Pursuits, which work for all levels. Much the
> best option for most people.


heard of this, could you give some details please?
 
in message <[email protected]>,
triddletree ('[email protected]') wrote:

>> No wonder it's a dying sport.

>
> The age of most competitors will assist its demise ;-)
>
> The sooner this excuse for a 'sport' is taken off the public highways
> the better.


Well, of course, we do run off-road time trials[1] and they're extremely
popular especially with the kids. But on-road time trials are fun, too,
if you don't take them too seriously.

[1]
<URL:http://www.stewartry-wheelers.org/wheelers/story/article_44.html>

--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

'Victories are not solutions.'
;; John Hume, Northern Irish politician, on Radio Scotland 1/2/95
;; Nobel Peace Prize laureate 1998; few have deserved it so much
 
Simon Brooke wrote:
> in message <[email protected]>,
> triddletree ('[email protected]') wrote:
>
>
>>>No wonder it's a dying sport.

>>
>>The age of most competitors will assist its demise ;-)
>>
>>The sooner this excuse for a 'sport' is taken off the public highways
>>the better.

>
>
> Well, of course, we do run off-road time trials[1] and they're extremely
> popular especially with the kids. But on-road time trials are fun, too,
> if you don't take them too seriously.


But why does it all have to take place as some sort of "race" anyway?
What's wrong with just going for a good cycle?


druidh
 
druidh wrote:

> What's wrong with just going for a good cycle?


Nothing. But some people like racing.
 
"druidh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> But why does it all have to take place as some sort of "race" anyway?
> What's wrong with just going for a good cycle?
>
>
> druidh


Because we aren't all the same.
Because it's done safely with no massed start.
Because a lot of people enjoy it.
Because it's a simple way of testing yourself on a bike over a specific
distance.
Because there simply aren't road races or circuit races in some parts of the
country so it's the only form of competitive cycling available to many.
Because entry fees to events is cheap (£6.50 per adult approx).
Because if you don't have the finances for specialist equipment, fairy nuff,
a set of clip on bars for under £35.00 will convert your bike into one you
can TT on...

Cheers, helen s
 
"wafflycat" <w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "druidh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >
> > But why does it all have to take place as some sort of "race" anyway?
> > What's wrong with just going for a good cycle?
> >
> >
> > druidh

>
> Because we aren't all the same.
> Because it's done safely with no massed start.
> Because a lot of people enjoy it.
> Because it's a simple way of testing yourself on a bike over a specific
> distance.
> Because there simply aren't road races or circuit races in some parts of

the
> country so it's the only form of competitive cycling available to many.
> Because entry fees to events is cheap (£6.50 per adult approx).
> Because if you don't have the finances for specialist equipment, fairy

nuff,
> a set of clip on bars for under £35.00 will convert your bike into one you
> can TT on...
>
> Cheers, helen s
>


where do you get said clip on bars I want some.

cheers
Jon_H
 
Zog The Undeniable wrote:

> triddletree wrote:
>
>> The sooner this excuse for a 'sport' is taken off the public highways
>> the better.

>
>
> OK, I'll bite. It allows people who would be dropped in a mass-start
> race to compete, otherwise we'd all just have to ride with the CTC.


I agree some RRs can be like this, and it is good to see BC's
Competition Review which tries to address this. There are of course
other events that can 'test' you personally such as audax events or the
growing number of cyclo-sportif events. Then of course there is a wide
range of offroad racing.

The
> minimum fitness level for even 4th cat road racing is HIGH, and even
> with training many cyclists (i.e. me) can't sustain that much power.


See above. There are many events that can test you.

> Plus the lower categories have frequent accidents due to incompetent
> riders; both the races I've marshalled had at least three people carted
> away by ambulance, and they were only about an hour long.


I suspect that is unusual. Last year I attended perhaps a dozen road
races and only witnessed one 'crash' which was treated with the
organiser's first aid kit.
ISTR that more riders have been killed in TTs than RR's.

A major difference with TTs are that they are held on the Open Road
whereas most road races are on closed circuits or use a form of rolling
road closure. RR's have police permission for each event while TT's have
a less regulatory notification system. IMO there is no place for any
racing on roads where it mixes _directly_ other traffic.


> You may have noticed that mass-start racing is practically impossible to
> organise in Britain these days because of traffic densities and police
> vetoes. Our club's event now has to be staged 30 miles away on the
> other side of the county because the "B" road route we've used for years
> now has too much traffic, according to Plod.


Regrettable.
In my area road races on public roads have virtually ceased. Much of
that is because the events require increasingly higher levels of
marshalling to ensure segregation from other traffic. Often costly
police marshalling is required which can be prohibitive. Nearly all
events are now on closed circuits/tracks.
We are becoming a much more densly populated country and roads are
becoming busier. As a one-time race organiser I know the problems.

> But maybe you're just a motoring troll?


Don't be silly.
When people see ****-up/head down 'cyclists', chasing Tesco lorries on
near motorway standard roads, it does not send out the message that
cycling is a responsible activity.
TTs on _public roads_ will either die out because so few are entering
the 'sport' or they will be banned from the roads on grounds of safety.
Whichever comes first doesn't really matter, but IMO the sooner the better.
If TT-ing is to survive it needs to move to closed roads/circuits.

tt
 
Jon_H wrote:
> thanks very much
>
> cheers
> Jon_H
>
>

I've got a set of these that won't fit my new bike (on account of it
having an OS bar). Let me know if you're interested in them. A bit
marked, but complete.


druidh