Brian Broderick said:Carbon is really out of my performance range
Not sure how you are using the term "performance" as good carbon can
be done for similar pricing as some of the metal frames you listed.
Quoted message said:Checking out Richard Sachs now...
Richard is one of the premier custom builders on the planet and his
frames are very nice. At least I like mine and it's almost 30 years
old. He also has a waiting list of several years and you may not want
to wait that long. ATMO
If you like steel, and there is a lot to like about steel, there are a
large number of builders to choose from. For some helpful background
check out Carl Strong's website and read the section on how to find
and choose a framebuilder.
http://www.strongframes.com/choose_builder/
Quoted message said:Please, if anyone has any other thoughts to contribute, continue!
I agree with another poster who mentioned that one persons opinion on
a frameset may not pertain to you. You need to decide what you are
looking for and make some educated guesses to work toward a new bike.
It's normal to do some test riding but short test rides really won't
tell you how a bike will work out long term. Also, several of the
bikes you listed won't be readily available for testing.
Fit is far more important than frame material or parts choice so find
someone local that is a good fitter to work with. There are a lot of
very good bikes out there of various materials. I happen to like steel
but also ride carbon fiber. I wouldn't be any faster, slower, more or
less comfortable on well done Ti or aluminium.
Since you are doing some research, here are a few things worth looking
at (far from inclusive):
Carbon fiber: Calfee, Crumpton, Ruegamer, Parlee
Steel: Sachs, Weigle, Landshark, Kirk, Vanilla, Della Santa, Co-Motion
Ti: Moots, Habanero, Lynskey, Strong, Dean
Lots of framebuilder links at this site: http://www.classicrendezvous.com/USA/USA.htm
Good luck, ride lots!
Mark