In article <[email hidden]>,
Mary Fisher said:My take on pension schemes is the following:
You save in a pension scheme and accumulate (for example, not an actual
figure) £/$ x.
OK?
You retire at 65 - parties, clocks, handshakes, the lot.
At 65 +one day you die - naturally or by bus or whatever.
Where's your pension?
What's your estate worth for your heirs?
Now, the alternative.
You save in a bank account, building society whatever. You accumulate (for
example, not an actual figure) £/$ x.
At 65 you retire, parties etc.
At 65 + one day you die - naturally or by bus or whatever.
Where are your savings?
What's your estate worth for your heirs?
£/$ x - one day.
Guess what we've done?
I don't know. The impossible?
Obviously, if you know that you are going to die the day after you
retire at age 65, then you should take your retirement as cash and not
an annuity (monthly payments). Better yet, you should retire earlier so
you can enjoy your money! Say retire at age 55, and spend 10% of your
money each year so you get maximum enjoyment out of it.
Of course, very few of us have the luxury of knowing when we will die.
That's why we have life insurance and pensions. Given an amount of "x"
at retirement, the pension folks can guarantee a fixed monthly amount
for the rest of your life. Those people who die early lose money, those
who live longer get more money, but on average, it works out. Of
course, if you have been supporting a spouse or dependents, you can have
the pension continue after you die, until they die or are no longer
dependent. I just retired, and was given five different options. The
last was a "build it yourself" where I could specify pretty much
whatever I wanted. Of course, they are going to plug all of this into
their formulas, and your monthly pension payment will go down according
to what you specify. The highest is just myself, and then less to cover
my spouse if I die first, and then less as others are added.