General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Regiments that work

Started by Elana · · Last activity · 49 posts · 1,055 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
1 December 2004
Last activity
5 December 2004
Original author
Elana
Posts
49
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,055
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–49 of 49
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. : > >
    : > > > Luna, stop it! You don't need to defend yourself to that nut! He is
    trying
    : > > > to make you feel inferior. Just ignore him.
    : > > >
    : > > > Pat in TX
    : > > >
    : > > >
    : > >
    : > > I wish I knew what you were talking about, but you didn't quote
    anything.
    : >
    : > (s)he's talking about your conversation with mu. how hard is it to
    : > figure out?
    :
    : Couldn't remember which thread I was arguing with Mu in and which one I
    was
    : arguing with JC in.
    :
    : >or are you not following the thread you're participating
    : > in?
    :
    : I am following many threads in many newsgroups. I don't take notes or
    save
    : threads to my hard drive, because people are supposed to quote what
    they're
    : replying to. Most do. Pat doesn't. I don't know why.
    :
    : --
    : Michelle Levin

    Luna, I put my reply under your post. It is therefore connected in a
    stairstep manner. Surely, you can see that.

    Pat in TX

  2. But if you posted your reply the day after she posted (and read her own
    post) it will not be in order. She would have to backtrack and open her
    post to see what you are replying to.

    In news:[email hidden],
    Pat <[email hidden]> stated
    |
    | Luna, I put my reply under your post. It is therefore connected in a
    | stairstep manner. Surely, you can see that.
    |
    | Pat in TX

  3. Luna said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    (The Queen of Cans and Jars) said:
    Luna said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, "Pat" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    > Luna, stop it! You don't need to defend yourself to that nut! He is
    > trying to make you feel inferior. Just ignore him.
    >
    > Pat in TX
    >
    >

    I wish I knew what you were talking about, but you didn't quote anything.

    (s)he's talking about your conversation with mu. how hard is it to
    figure out?

    Couldn't remember which thread I was arguing with Mu in and which one I was
    arguing with JC in.

    it's this very thread. all you have to do is follow it.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    or are you not following the thread you're participating
    in?

    I am following many threads in many newsgroups. I don't take notes or save
    threads to my hard drive, because people are supposed to quote what they're
    replying to. Most do. Pat doesn't. I don't know why.

    pat knows how to quote, and does it all the time. (s)he doesn't like
    mu, and therefore chose not quote him.

    you should be tagged into this thread, since you've posted in it several
    times. it shouldn't be that hard to follow.

  4. In article <[email hidden]>, "Pat" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    : > >
    : > > > Luna, stop it! You don't need to defend yourself to that nut! He is
    trying
    : > > > to make you feel inferior. Just ignore him.
    : > > >
    : > > > Pat in TX
    : > > >
    : > > >
    : > >
    : > > I wish I knew what you were talking about, but you didn't quote
    anything.
    : >
    : > (s)he's talking about your conversation with mu. how hard is it to
    : > figure out?
    :
    : Couldn't remember which thread I was arguing with Mu in and which one I
    was
    : arguing with JC in.
    :
    : >or are you not following the thread you're participating
    : > in?
    :
    : I am following many threads in many newsgroups. I don't take notes or
    save
    : threads to my hard drive, because people are supposed to quote what
    they're
    : replying to. Most do. Pat doesn't. I don't know why.
    :
    : --
    : Michelle Levin

    Luna, I put my reply under your post. It is therefore connected in a
    stairstep manner. Surely, you can see that.

    Pat in TX

    I logged on to the internet and read your reply after I'd read another
    group of messages earlier in the day. The ones I'd read earlier were
    marked as read, so the headings didn't show up in my newsreader anymore.

    Now, what I could have done is, I could have marked the whole group unread
    and downloaded the many thousands of headings, and searched them to find
    this thread and then I could have read the whole thread again and seen that
    yours was after the ones between Mu and me.

    --
    Michelle Levin
    http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

    I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.


  5. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You posted several photos of you acting recently, did you not? You were on
    stage showing us your weight loss? Am I incorrect?

    Luna said:

    Incorrect. Maybe you're thinking of someone else.

    http://techops.net/gallery/video_shoot_3/074_G
    http://techops.net/gallery/video_shoot_3/069_G

    ?????????????????????????????????????????????

  6. The Queen of Cans and Jars said:

    pat knows how to quote, and does it all the time. (s)he doesn't like
    mu, and therefore chose not quote him.

    What Pat doesn't "like" is the truth.

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    MU said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You posted several photos of you acting recently, did you not? You were on
    stage showing us your weight loss? Am I incorrect?

    Luna said:

    Incorrect. Maybe you're thinking of someone else.

    http://techops.net/gallery/video_shoot_3/074_G
    http://techops.net/gallery/video_shoot_3/069_G

    ?????????????????????????????????????????????

    Oh, THAT. That wasn't on the stage, that was for video material for a
    science-fiction convention. I'm a member of the tech staff and we do a
    video presentation every year, clips of which run on a screen before major
    events, and on the hotel channel. None of us are actors, we just pretend
    to be.

    --
    Michelle Levin
    http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

    I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    MU said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You posted several photos of you acting recently, did you not? You were on
    stage showing us your weight loss? Am I incorrect?

    Luna said:

    Incorrect. Maybe you're thinking of someone else.

    http://techops.net/gallery/video_shoot_3/074_G
    http://techops.net/gallery/video_shoot_3/069_G

    ?????????????????????????????????????????????

    Oh, THAT. That wasn't on the stage, that was for video material for a
    science-fiction convention. I'm a member of the tech staff and we do a
    video presentation every year, clips of which run on a screen before major
    events, and on the hotel channel. None of us are actors, we just pretend
    to be.

    --
    Michelle Levin
    http://www.mindspring.com/~lunachick

    I have only 3 flaws. My first flaw is thinking that I only have 3 flaws.

  9. Luna said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://techops.net/gallery/video_shoot_3/074_G
    http://techops.net/gallery/video_shoot_3/069_G

    ?????????????????????????????????????????????

    Oh, THAT. That wasn't on the stage, that was for video material for a
    science-fiction convention. I'm a member of the tech staff and we do a
    video presentation every year, clips of which run on a screen before major
    events, and on the hotel channel. None of us are actors, we just pretend
    to be.

    ok, you're not an actor.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.