MU said:Luna said:Telling me to go dislike someone else for the evening is defensive, and a
bit dismissive, implying that I was disliking you.
Your judgment, as faulty as it is.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>Anyway, I'm curious about the statistics for people who have successfully
>maintained a significant weight loss for a significant period of time. You
>said most of them don't exercise. Can you point me to a study that
>confirms that?
As soon as you show me your credentials, history and expertise to decipher
the same.
Translation: "No, I can't. Other people have asked the same questions;
people with PhD's and serious credentials in science and I didn't give
them anything either."
MU_dbath is the same blowhole who says that *he* isn't qualified to
read scientific studies. If that's so, how can he be expected to know
one from another. Poor guy...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I can read and comprehend the English language. That is all the expertise
I need to read the results of a study.
Quoted message said:Sorry, this is further proof that you haven't a clue regarding the
necessary educational background and experience in several fileds that link
to discerning research.
<LOL> "Discerning research..." Mouth farts from the biggest gasbag on
usenet. See how clearly he understands what research is and how it
works? And do re-read that sentence of his. Note the brilliant
construction and clarity of meaning. Bwah.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:If you need more, I passed all of my elementary and highschool math
courses, which means I can understand statements like "X% of people who
successfully maintain a weight loss of Y pounds for Z number of years
exercise regularly." I also got an A in Introduction to Statistics in
college, so I am familiar with concepts of adequate sample sizes in a given
population, error percentages, and the like.
See above.
Translation from MU_lish: "I still have no answer for you."
Quoted message said:Luna said:I have not read every post you have ever made on Usenet. I have read every
post you've ever made on the low-carb group since I subscribed, and I could
very well be wrong, but I don't recall your ever saying before that most
people who successfully maintain a significant weight loss do so without
exercising.
Again, this is a bad day for you. I have repeatedly said that and did so to
highlight, as a trainer myself, the appropriate role that exercise has in
weight loss. Let me repeat, please write it down.
Exercise is not required nor is it statistically part and parcel of weight
maintenace.
MU_ppet *says* he's a trainer. But, funny thing, no details. Nothing
to support it. No endorsements. Same deal as Chung. They reinforce
each other and that's their entire cheering section.
"Exercise is not statistically part..." This is the sort of inflated
prattle the truly uneducated try to foist off as some sort of mature,
grownup talk when they really have nothing to say.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:If, as you imply, you are basing that statement on anecdotal
evidence from your personal and professional life, and you actually don't
know of any statistical studies that back up your assertion,
I do.
Poor MU_ff never heard of "put up or shut up."
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:then I promise
I will not discount your experience simply because it was not an "official"
study. Even if your evidence is anecdotal, you may know enough people for
whom this is true to make it a significant data point.
Take the 1,000 plus I have worked with and you hve much more than a single
data point.
<LOL> Notice how well he understands the concept of "data point." The
*fact* of the matter is that MU_lchpile has *never* offered
educational credentials, endorsements from anyone or any sort of
continuing education courses to even begin to credit him with the
remotest scintilla of credibility.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:When I read something that runs counter to what I'd been lead to believe,
it piques my curiosity. I was not challenging what you said, I was only
trying to initiate a more in depth discussion on the topic. You say "this
is so" and I say "really? where did you learn this?" and you tell me I'm
too ignorant to understand.
Never said you were ignorant just inexperienced and waaaaaaay out of your
league to be discussing the (in)validity of citations). So am I.
Did you mean that, MU_tt? You're not qualified to be discussing
citations? Pity. Because without that, you have nothing.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:If you are confident in the accuracy of your
statement, then you would have no need to deflect curiosity by turning the
topic towards my ability or lack thereof to understand your evidence.
That is tactic used only by those who have no evidence.
Maybe for some, maybe not. In my case, I am sick to death of folks who
blather about spouting "facts, research" and the like as if they have a
clue.
And yet, you never offer anything but your crass, blustery,
unsupported opinion. See how that works, fraud-boy?
Bob