General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Rope Usage

Started by Dominic Sexton · · Last activity · 6 posts · 356 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 May 2005
Last activity
3 May 2005
Original author
Dominic Sexton
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
356
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>, spamfrog
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    The person who now accompanies me hillwalking has vertigo. He was freaked
    out on the last ridge walk we did and wants to use a rope next time, he
    doesn't like the idea of just tying the rope around the waist and would
    prefer to wear a harness.
    He has also asked about using a belay device for tricky steps or possible
    escapes.
    I am just wondering whether the above would be considered overkill or worth
    it to give someone a bit of confidence and stop them freaking or freezing on
    the next ridge or rock tower.

    Practically a harness and a belay device will make almost no difference
    except on very steep ground as found on some sustained scrambles and
    graded climbs.

    More important than the kit is the knowledge of how to use it. Selecting
    suitable anchor for the rope / belayer is one of the trickier aspects
    and without a good anchor the value of a rope is limited. In fact a body
    belay and waist loop can be more appropriate than a belay plate and
    harness if you have poor anchors because they apply the stopping force
    gradually.

    On a ridge walk where the ground is not very steep in the direction of
    travel but is steep to the sides it is actually quite difficult (and
    slow and requiring lots of kit) to provide better protection than
    keeping the person on a short confidence rope round their waist. If done
    well any stumble or loss of balance can be held without them going
    anywhere other than sitting down.

    --

    Dominic Sexton

  2. The message <[email hidden]>
    from Dominic Sexton <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    On a ridge walk where the ground is not very steep in the direction of
    travel but is steep to the sides it is actually quite difficult (and
    slow and requiring lots of kit) to provide better protection than
    keeping the person on a short confidence rope round their waist. If done
    well any stumble or loss of balance can be held without them going
    anywhere other than sitting down.

    I have been led to believe that in the Alps where moving together is
    often the preferred option the idea was that should one of a roped pair
    fall of one side of a ridge the other party would jump off the opposite
    side. There is a possibly apocryphal tale of one of a pair, having seen
    his partner fall through a cornice, do that having forgotten that they
    were at that time unroped.

    --
    Roger Chapman so far this year 34 summits
    New - 15 (Marilyns 4, Sweats 1, Outlying Fells 10)
    Repeats - 19 (Marilyns 5, Sweats 10, Wainwrights 12, Outlying Fells 0)

  3. Roger said:

    There is a possibly apocryphal tale of one of a pair, having seen
    his partner fall through a cornice, do that having forgotten that


    they

    Quoted message said:

    were at that time unroped.

    A kind of antithesis to the 'Left testicle tied to bedstead' Chinese
    torture joke ? :-)

    Chris

  4. Lots of stuff snipped

    Quoted message said:

    If done
    well any stumble or loss of balance can be held without them going
    anywhere other than sitting down.

    And if done badly can result in two dead bodies rather than one.

    Correct use of ropes in exposed places is a good skill to learn, not
    something to try "on the job" without proper training, especially the safety
    of the person, controlling the rope.

    Cheers,

    Glenn (going back into his special lurking place)

    Web site: http://www.andromeda-park.demon.co.uk
    Speleo Vercors: http://www.speleo-vercors.org
    Web Album: http://community.webshots.com/user/speleovercors

  5. In message <[email hidden]>

    Roger said:

    The message <[email hidden]>
    from Dominic Sexton <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    On a ridge walk where the ground is not very steep in the direction of
    travel but is steep to the sides it is actually quite difficult (and
    slow and requiring lots of kit) to provide better protection than
    keeping the person on a short confidence rope round their waist. If done
    well any stumble or loss of balance can be held without them going
    anywhere other than sitting down.

    This short-roping technique is one that many Mountain Guides would use
    for their nervous clients. However it does require a degree of skill
    and anticipation from the person doing the "guiding" if an accident
    involving both parties is to be avoided.

    Quoted message said:


    I have been led to believe that in the Alps where moving together is
    often the preferred option the idea was that should one of a roped pair
    fall of one side of a ridge the other party would jump off the opposite
    side.

    Actually the main reason for adopting "moving together" is to avoid
    the need to keep getting the rope out for tricky sections and then
    putting it away again for easier sections with the inevitable delaying
    factor. The idea is that you can quickly improvise belays where
    necessary but that you continue to remain roped together for the
    easier sections in between. However for this to work well it is best
    if both individuals are competent and also confident in rope handling,
    and also they should be aware of the risks they are taking when moving
    together without a belay for example as you indicate when moving along
    a knife-edge ridge.

    Quoted message said:

    There is a possibly apocryphal tale of one of a pair, having seen
    his partner fall through a cornice, do that having forgotten that they
    were at that time unroped.

    I've more often heard of the situation where both roped climbers fell
    as a result of one of them stumbling.

    --
    M.R. Clark PhD
    Cambridge University, Department of Pathology
    Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP
    Tel +44 (0)1223 333705

  6. Glenn said:

    Correct use of ropes in exposed places is a good skill to learn, not
    something to try "on the job" without proper training, especially the safety
    of the person, controlling the rope.

    Seconded.

    Climbing equipment such as ropes, harnesses and belay protection are
    designed to be used in certain ways, and getting it wrong even
    slightly can seriously compromise the entire safety system.

    Unless you're confident handling a rope, setting up any necessary
    belays and (most importantly) holding a fall then IMO the use of even
    a walking safety rope just gives a false and possibly dangerous sense
    of security. Practice makes perfect, and you usually only get the one
    chance to stop a fall!

    Al
    --
    <alanATajbremnerDOTplusDOTcom>

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.