Re: Many Colon Problems

Gymmy Bob said:

Colonics are not done for the purpose of relieving cancer.

Please quote anywhere, from any post that I have made to MHA, where I have
said that?

I have not done so, and am wondering why you would suggest that.

Particularly when I made a post early on clarifying that exact point, and
then later on again, restated it.

Attempting to debate anything on mha becomes such a waste of time when
everything has to be re- re- re- repeated so many times, when anything one
says is misread to such an extent that it seems to be deliberate.

Quoted message said:

They are done
to remove toxins from the system by giving the blood and system a break
from new toxins inorder for the elimination systems to catch up.

"Toby Joe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

On 05 Apr 2004 02:00:22 GMT, Toby Joe <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>> In the in the absence of repeatable studies showing
>> that *treatment 01* has a positive reduction in the
>> incidence of *disease 01*, the undeniable scientific
>> conclusion, by inference, is that *treatment 01* has no
>> repeatable effect upon the reduction of *disease 01*.
>
>Translation:
>"Little research has yet been carried out on this topic, so, we
>don't rightly know.."
>
>Thank you for the clear explanation 🙂

TJ you are urged to read the above again, and slowly,
so that you may comprehend.
Much research has been carried out, with repeatable results
in multiple studies.

...To effect that "colonics do NOT reduce" the incidence of colon
cancer. For that is the claim that was made.

In which case, from the "much research" showing that colon irrigation
does "NOT reduce" the incidence of colon cancer, it will be a simple
matter for you to provide a few medline-verifiable study abstracts
showing evidence of that.

--
http://costofwar.com/
http://www.millennium-debate.org/ind1dec032.htm

Hawki has made the claim that "colonics do NOT reduce" the incidence of
cancer.

I am asking for the evidence on which that claim was based.

Nothing to do with "curing".

To do with "reducing the incidence".

Toby Joe said:

Gymmy Bob said:

Colonics are not done for the purpose of relieving cancer.

Please quote anywhere, from any post that I have made to MHA, where I
have said that?

I have not done so, and am wondering why you would suggest that.

Particularly when I made a post early on clarifying that exact point, and
then later on again, restated it.

Attempting to debate anything on mha becomes such a waste of time when
everything has to be re- re- re- repeated so many times, when anything
one says is misread to such an extent that it seems to be deliberate.

Quoted message said:

They are done
to remove toxins from the system by giving the blood and system a break
from new toxins inorder for the elimination systems to catch up.

"Toby Joe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] wrote:
> On 05 Apr 2004 02:00:22 GMT, Toby Joe <[email hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> >> In the in the absence of repeatable studies showing
> >> that *treatment 01* has a positive reduction in the
> >> incidence of *disease 01*, the undeniable scientific
> >> conclusion, by inference, is that *treatment 01* has no
> >> repeatable effect upon the reduction of *disease 01*.
> >
> >Translation:
> >"Little research has yet been carried out on this topic, so, we
> >don't rightly know.."
> >
> >Thank you for the clear explanation 🙂
>
> TJ you are urged to read the above again, and slowly,
> so that you may comprehend.
> Much research has been carried out, with repeatable results
> in multiple studies.

...To effect that "colonics do NOT reduce" the incidence of colon
cancer. For that is the claim that was made.

In which case, from the "much research" showing that colon irrigation
does "NOT reduce" the incidence of colon cancer, it will be a simple
matter for you to provide a few medline-verifiable study abstracts
showing evidence of that.

--
http://costofwar.com/
http://www.millennium-debate.org/ind1dec032.htm

Please quote anywhere I have use the word "curing".

Attempting to debate anything on mha becomes such a waste of time when
everything has to be re- re- re- repeated so many times, when anything
one says is misread to such an extent that it seems to be deliberate.

Your conversation is about colon cancer and colonics. If you are going to
deny your own posts then there isn't appoint to this discussion.

My statement stands. Colonics are not done for cancer purposes.

"Toby Joe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hawki has made the claim that "colonics do NOT reduce" the incidence of
cancer.

I am asking for the evidence on which that claim was based.

Nothing to do with "curing".

To do with "reducing the incidence".

Toby Joe said:

Gymmy Bob said:

Colonics are not done for the purpose of relieving cancer.

Please quote anywhere, from any post that I have made to MHA, where I
have said that?

I have not done so, and am wondering why you would suggest that.

Particularly when I made a post early on clarifying that exact point,

and

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

then later on again, restated it.

Attempting to debate anything on mha becomes such a waste of time when
everything has to be re- re- re- repeated so many times, when anything
one says is misread to such an extent that it seems to be deliberate.

Quoted message said:

They are done
to remove toxins from the system by giving the blood and system a

break

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

from new toxins inorder for the elimination systems to catch up.

"Toby Joe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> [email hidden] wrote:
> > On 05 Apr 2004 02:00:22 GMT, Toby Joe <[email hidden]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >> In the in the absence of repeatable studies showing
> > >> that *treatment 01* has a positive reduction in the
> > >> incidence of *disease 01*, the undeniable scientific
> > >> conclusion, by inference, is that *treatment 01* has no
> > >> repeatable effect upon the reduction of *disease 01*.
> > >
> > >Translation:
> > >"Little research has yet been carried out on this topic, so, we
> > >don't rightly know.."
> > >
> > >Thank you for the clear explanation 🙂
> >
> > TJ you are urged to read the above again, and slowly,
> > so that you may comprehend.
> > Much research has been carried out, with repeatable results
> > in multiple studies.
>
> ...To effect that "colonics do NOT reduce" the incidence of colon
> cancer. For that is the claim that was made.
>
> In which case, from the "much research" showing that colon

irrigation

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> does "NOT reduce" the incidence of colon cancer, it will be a

simple

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> matter for you to provide a few medline-verifiable study abstracts
> showing evidence of that.

--
http://costofwar.com/
http://www.millennium-debate.org/ind1dec032.htm

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Many Colon Problems
From: Toby Joe [email hidden]
Date: 4/5/2004 7:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Hawki has made the claim that

Quoted message said:

"colonics do NOT reduce" the incidence of
cancer.

I am asking for the evidence on which that claim was based.

sorry you have it backwards...those that try and claim colonics DO prevent
cancer have the burden of proof...

one cannot prove a negative...

and this is about the gazillionith time this has been pointed out to you....

why don't YOU design a study ?? How would you go about it??? How would it be
blinded??...How far out (years) would it take to get results ??

sorry up to the alties to demonstrate the efficacy...which of course they can't
hawki.....