In article <[email hidden]>,
Dave said:"Dave" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:In article <[email hidden]>,
"Dave" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> "Rich Shewmaker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
> > How about we start with the subject of microscopic examination of
human
Quoted message said:> > blood? Or perhaps you would prefer a body of knowledge that's off
topic
Quoted message said:> for
> > this newsgroup such as art history, or baseball, or American
literature,
Quoted message said:> or
> > geography. You can call me "ignorant" if you wish, but I'm smarter
than
Quoted message said:> you,
> > and better educated, and I have more "real experience" than you
besides.
Quoted message said:>
> I'm sure you are correct when you say you have lots of knowledge. You
> have probably studied many things very diligently. What you don't
> possess is understanding. Understanding is a spiritual thing. It
> can't be learned it is acquired by getting in touch with the
> universe. It allows us to understand things that we have never even
> studied.
You can't "understand" something without having knowledge of it upon
which to base your "understanding." For some things, obtaining this
knowledge involves study. In others (for instance, people skills) this
knowledge comes from life experience.
It is like I said, the understanding to which I refer is spiritual. It is
not learned or studied.
It just is.
B.S. The greatest spiritual people of the world spent their lifetimes
trying to "understand." Your claim of a "spiritual understanding" that
does not require any sort of study or life experience (that "just is,"
as you so quaintly put it) strikes me as really being more of an excuse
for intellectual laziness, an excuse not to have to defend your
assertions when challenged.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>It is the secret that the people you refer to as "alties"
> possess to one degree or another. It is the reason you hate us so,
> because you can't understand what we understand. We live life on a
> higher (spiritual) plane.
Those who truly live on a "higher" (spiritual) plain (as you put it)
generally remember one of the greatest virtues: humility. Gandhi didn't
brag about "living on a higher plain," nor did Jesus, Martin Luther
King, etc., etc., etc. None of them claimed that anyone couldn't
understand what they understood.
And I never ever brag about it nor usually even mention it.
Quoted message said:> So, I live my life with love. I help people every single day because I
care
Quoted message said:> about them.
Not to mention a profitable business selling herbs.
Does someone give you your food? Your medicine? Why would you expect that I
would?
Obviously irony is lost on you, and you don't see my point. I don't
begrudge you a means to make a living, as long as it's honest. I'll make
my point explicit: Why do alties so frequently criticize doctors for
"making money off of sick people"?
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> So you can tell anyone you wish that you are better educated than me
and
Quoted message said:can
Quoted message said:> answer more technical questions than me. But I wish for you to find
> understanding so you no longer need that to be secure with yourself.
"Understanding" that goes against science and even common sense is no
"understanding" at all.
You make my case.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>If you
> are sick, I wish you to find the path to health. If not, I hope you
will
Quoted message said:> study the benefits of supplements.
One hopes you will also realize the limitations of supplements. So far,
I have not gotten the impression that you do.
You continue to make my case. You don't seem to understand that you
will not continue (you aren't now but don't know it) to be healthy
unless you take good quality (there's tons of [censored] out there)
supplements every single day.
During evolution, humans didn't take supplements, nor did their hominid
ancestors. Supplements are not necessary to maintain health. A good diet
and healthy lifestyle are.
Quoted message said:As long as you maintain your ignorance
of such matters, you do yourself and everyone you council a
disservice.
As long as you keep making incorrect claims that people won't be healthy
unless they take supplements every single day, you do everyone YOU
counsel a disservice.
Quoted message said:In order to be a doctor you study for 10 years. You study about the
bodily functions from the perspective of medicines and how they
affect those systems.
We study anatomy, biochemistry, and physiology BEFORE learning about how
medicines work.
Quoted message said:The trouble is that "nature" (the all powerful
force) designed us to function by eating natural things in a natural
form.
Quite correct. Which means that supplements are not necessary for good
health--contrary to your original claim that they are.
Quoted message said:Generally speaking, once any substance is heated to the
temperature necessary to create a fabricated substance, the "natural"
properties are destroyed.
Not heating meat results in a risk of disease that is too high to be
acceptable. Otherwise, eating lots of fresh fruit and vegetables is
certainly a good idea for a healthy diet. If you eat a healthy diet,
supplements are not necessary.
Quoted message said:The result is a substance in a form that is
foreign to our bodies.
How is the preparation of supplements NOT making those supplements
equally a substance "foreign" to our bodies?
Quoted message said:Anyway, the posts I have seen here regarding immune systems and
supplements are so misguided as to denote ignorance of the subject
from the posters.
Nearly every post I have seen from you is so misguided as to demonstrate
your ignorance about a great many things.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"