UK and Europe · Public discussion

Re: Asterisks

Started by Simonb · · Last activity · 10 posts · 388 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
28 September 2004
Last activity
28 September 2004
Original author
Simonb
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
388
Views / 30 days
1

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ian Scott said:

    ...or am i missing something?

    Shouldn't this cover it?

    helmet
    h*lm*t
    h****t
    h*lm*ts
    h****ts
    h-word

  2. Quoted message said:

    Shouldn't this cover it?

    helmet
    h*lm*t
    h****t
    h*lm*ts
    h****ts
    h-word

    Ah... you missed out the various combinations of H*lf*rds.. ;-)

    H*lf*rds
    Halfrauds
    Halfwits
    H*****ds
    Half**ds

    The words that should not be spoken out loud ;-) I'm sure there's more.

    Mind you, this is Usenet and it's not moderated, so I take the view that if *I*
    don't want to see something/someone, it's up to me to set my kill-file
    appropriately or simply not read the post. If someone posts something I don't
    like, that's my problem, not the poster's.

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

  3. On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:20:05 +0100, "Simonb"
    <[email hidden]> ("Simonb"

    ) said:
    Ian Scott said:

    ...or am i missing something?

    Shouldn't this cover it?

    helmet
    h*lm*t
    h****t

    Hang on, how are we going to discuss the Prince of Denmark without
    getting into all those tedious "to be/not to be" flame wars if we
    don't mask the name of the play?

    --
    Matt K.
    ""reproduces if added to its quotation." reproduces if added to
    its quotation."

  4. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers said:


    H*lf*rds
    Halfrauds
    Halfwits
    H*****ds
    Half**ds

    You forgot ******** Helen 🙂

  5. Whingin' Pom <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    Hang on, how are we going to discuss the Prince of Denmark without
    getting into all those tedious "to be/not to be" flame wars if we
    don't mask the name of the play?

    Refer to it as "The Danish Play" in the style of Macbeth? Damn. Now
    I've gone and said 'Macbeth' (cue appropriate Blackadder the Third
    footage....) ;-)

    David E. Belcher

  6. Succorso said:

    You forgot ******** Helen 🙂

    And b*bshorts.

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (David E. Belcher) said:

    Refer to it as "The Danish Play" in the style of Macbeth? Damn. Now

    Stoppit. We performed the scottish play[1] a few years ago, and I did
    myself a nasty ingury on the last night.

    [1] Verdi's version of it.

    --
    Nick Kew

    Alex Salmond - thank you for saying the obvious. Can you repeat what
    James VI did, for us poor sassenachs with no acceptable leaders?

  8. "Simonb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Ian Scott said:

    ...or am i missing something?

    Shouldn't this cover it?

    helmet
    h*lm*t
    h****t
    h*lm*ts
    h****ts
    h-word


    nope, you forgot:
    **lmet
    h**met
    he**et
    hel**t
    helm**

    not to mention:

    **lmets
    h**mets
    he**ets
    hel**ts
    helm**s
    helme**

    or even

    ***met
    h***et
    he***t
    hel***

    As for Halfords.....

    I could go on...

    And the basic reason is that some folk here are perpetuating a convention
    whereby helmet and Halfords are words that can not be spelled out in full by
    'true believers' because they are represenative of all that is reviled by a
    minority of posters to the newsgroup who like to pass off the convention as
    an in house joke. It's almost as sad as folk who can reel off entire Monty
    Python scripts and convulse at the hearing of the smallest fragment of a
    Monty Python quote.

    Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise
    fnaarrr, fnaarrr, fnaarrr, snort.....

    Vernon the obsessive
    in Leeds

  9. vernon levy said:

    [...] the basic reason is that some folk here are perpetuating a
    convention whereby helmet and Halfords are words that can not be
    spelled out in full by 'true believers' because they are
    represenative of all that is reviled by a minority of posters to the
    newsgroup who like to pass off the convention as an in house joke.
    It's almost as sad as folk who [etc...]

    Blimey Vernon, I wouldn't take it /that/ seriously. It's only a newsgroup,
    after all.


  10. Quoted message said:


    Blimey Vernon, I wouldn't take it /that/ seriously. It's only a newsgroup,
    after all.


    I don't take it /that/ seriously. Life would be unbearable for me if I took
    it /that/ seriously :-)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.