General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

PR?

Started by Peter Allen · · Last activity · 16 posts · 845 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
7 September 2005
Last activity
8 September 2005
Original author
Peter Allen
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
845
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Can someone please point me at a link that tells me the last part of the
    above article is plain wrong or at least a serious mis-representation?

    Otherwise - what the hell does Bush think he's doing?

    Peter

  2. "Peter Allen" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:dfmteo$bmj$1
    @domitilla.aioe.org:

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Same as he's been doing since 2001. Got him re-elected, didn't it?

    Hugh

    --
    Exercise is a dirty word. Whenever I hear it, I wash my mouth out with
    chocolate. ("Ladi"😉

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Peter Allen said:

    http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Can someone please point me at a link that tells me the last part of the
    above article is plain wrong or at least a serious mis-representation?

    Otherwise - what the hell does Bush think he's doing?

    Peter

    Uh,

    Bush is a Moron...

    Was that a rhetorical question?
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  4. Hugh Beyer said:

    "Peter Allen" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:dfmteo$bmj$1
    @domitilla.aioe.org:

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Same as he's been doing since 2001. Got him re-elected, didn't it?

    Yes, but if he really is telling a bunch of firemen that making him look
    good in a photo is more important than doing vital work (and probably saving
    lives) in a crisis, he doesn't just need impeaching, he needs killing.

    Peter

  5. Peter Allen said:

    http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Can someone please point me at a link that tells me the last part of
    the above article is plain wrong or at least a serious
    mis-representation?

    Otherwise - what the hell does Bush think he's doing?

    No matter what President Bush does it's going to draw criticism. When
    he kept to his original schedule and tried to let the local
    authorities deal with the problem he got criticized for not doing
    enough. So now Bush is at ground zero and that means that rescuers
    are being pulled off rescue details to accompany him. You didn't
    seriously think that the President of the United States was going to
    wade around New Orleans by his lonesome did you?

    Bush might want to rethink his decision to appoint whoever is running
    FEMA though. Using trained firefighters to hand out leaflets at this
    point is just stupid.

    Jason

  6. Jason Earl said:
    Peter Allen said:

    http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Can someone please point me at a link that tells me the last part of
    the above article is plain wrong or at least a serious
    mis-representation?

    Otherwise - what the hell does Bush think he's doing?

    No matter what President Bush does it's going to draw criticism. When
    he kept to his original schedule and tried to let the local
    authorities deal with the problem he got criticized for not doing
    enough. So now Bush is at ground zero and that means that rescuers
    are being pulled off rescue details to accompany him. You didn't
    seriously think that the President of the United States was going to
    wade around New Orleans by his lonesome did you?

    No, of course not - I'm hoping that, or something like that, is the actual
    situation (but why not use real soldiers not firemen?). But what the paper
    _says_ is that the firemen are there just for PR when they could be saving
    lives.

    Peter

  7. "Peter Allen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Can someone please point me at a link that tells me the last part of the
    above article is plain wrong or at least a serious mis-representation?

    Otherwise - what the hell does Bush think he's doing?

    One never knows when the Commander in Chief may spontaneously combust. It's
    wise to be prepared.

    Seriously, it's all about the photo-op, and has been since, oh...maybe FDR?

  8. Peter Allen said:
    Jason Earl said:
    Peter Allen said:

    http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Can someone please point me at a link that tells me the last part of
    the above article is plain wrong or at least a serious
    mis-representation?

    Otherwise - what the hell does Bush think he's doing?

    No matter what President Bush does it's going to draw criticism. When
    he kept to his original schedule and tried to let the local
    authorities deal with the problem he got criticized for not doing
    enough. So now Bush is at ground zero and that means that rescuers
    are being pulled off rescue details to accompany him. You didn't
    seriously think that the President of the United States was going to
    wade around New Orleans by his lonesome did you?

    No, of course not - I'm hoping that, or something like that, is the
    actual situation (but why not use real soldiers not firemen?). But
    what the paper _says_ is that the firemen are there just for PR when
    they could be saving lives.

    If GW rolled around with a bunch of soldiers then the media would
    probably run a story about looting in New Orleans and that the
    President was trying to protect property instead of saving lives. At
    least if Bush is seen with firefighters no one is going to think that
    he's there to suppress looting.

    No matter what Bush does some people are going to criticize him, and
    with good reason. Bush isn't going to do anything in New Orleans but
    get in the way. Heck, we would be better off with him at his ranch in
    Texas. Unfortunately Bush has to be seen "doing something" about New
    Orleans and that doesn't mean coordinating the effort from Washington
    D.C., that means wading around in the muck wasting the time of fire
    fighters. Anyone with half a brain realizes that this is the case.

    On the other hand, there is no doubt that for some Bush's presence is
    a morale booster, and that's something that's very hard to quantify.
    Bush's presence is almost certainly a hindrance to the job of actually
    helping people out. However, his presence almost certainly makes some
    of the people in New Orleans feel like something is "being done." So
    while Bush's presence is a hindrance to the actual work, it probably
    makes the people feel better about the situation.

    Jason

  9. Peter Allen wrote:

    re George W. Bush

    Quoted message said:

    he doesn't just need impeaching, he needs killing.

    Peter

    Ouch.

    --
    Curt
    http://curtjames.com/

  10. On 7 Sep 2005 15:46:23 -0700, "Curt James" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    he doesn't just need impeaching, he needs killing.

    Peter

    While not PC, it is accurate.

    TBR

    "As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
    more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
    the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
    White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
    H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
    "Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
    but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."

  11. "Peter Allen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Can someone please point me at a link that tells me the last part of the
    above article is plain wrong or at least a serious mis-representation?

    Otherwise - what the hell does Bush think he's doing?

    Why do you give a [censored]? You limy [censored].

  12. On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 12:39:32 -0600, Jason Earl <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Allen said:

    http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

    Can someone please point me at a link that tells me the last part of
    the above article is plain wrong or at least a serious
    mis-representation?

    Otherwise - what the hell does Bush think he's doing?

    No matter what President Bush does it's going to draw criticism. When
    he kept to his original schedule and tried to let the local
    authorities deal with the problem he got criticized for not doing
    enough. So now Bush is at ground zero and that means that rescuers
    are being pulled off rescue details to accompany him. You didn't
    seriously think that the President of the United States was going to
    wade around New Orleans by his lonesome did you?

    Bush might want to rethink his decision to appoint whoever is running
    FEMA though. Using trained firefighters to hand out leaflets at this
    point is just stupid.

    Jason

    You mean political cronys can't be trusted to run a disaster relief
    effort on a national scale? Whodathunkit!

    --
    Is this thing on?

  13. John said:

    - what the hell does Bush think he's doing?

    Please don't use the words "Bush" and "think" in the same sentance.

    TBR

    "As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
    more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
    the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
    White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
    H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
    "Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
    but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."

  14. On 7 Sep 2005 18:48:37 -0700, "Curt James" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    When you said you had a nuke in your basment (was it?) I actually joked
    that someone should contact Homeland Security. Well, Katrina has shown
    that HS is a dismal failure and an incredible waste of taxpayer money.
    With that in mind, I suppose that it's absurd to expect anyone to take
    notice that you and ol' Peter are encouraging the execution of a U.S.
    President.

    Saying "he needs killing" is not "encouraging" you moron.

    www.gaycurtthepresidentkiller.org

    TBR

    "As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
    more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
    the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
    White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
    H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
    "Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
    but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."

  15. Curt James said:
    The Broken Record said:
    Quoted message said:

    > he doesn't just need impeaching, he needs killing.
    >
    > Peter

    While not PC, it is accurate.

    TBR

    When you said you had a nuke in your basment (was it?) I actually
    joked that someone should contact Homeland Security. Well, Katrina
    has shown that HS is a dismal failure and an incredible waste of
    taxpayer money. With that in mind, I suppose that it's absurd to
    expect anyone to take notice that you and ol' Peter are encouraging
    the execution of a U.S. President.

    Why assume that 'killing' automatically means illegally? There is a process
    called trial by jury, which in certain situations (like deliberately causing
    the death of several people) can result in a death sentence. No, I don't
    think it's ever going to happen, but, assuming the newspaper article isn't
    misrepresenting the situation (and I'd like to think it is, just haven't
    seen any decent explanation), Bush has basically shown up and said 'hey
    folks, all 50 of you can stop saving lives for a few hours, I need some
    firemen to stand behind me for a photo-op and make me look good'. Which is
    at least disgusting, if not criminal.

    That said, this sort of situation probably is the kind of thing which causes
    some lone nutter with his constitutionally protected penis extension to take
    a pot shot at a President, and no doubt Brink would tell us he was trying to
    defend himself from a tyrannical (or perhaps genocidal?) Bush.

    Peter

  16. Peter Allen said:

    That said, this sort of situation probably is the kind of thing which causes
    some lone nutter with his constitutionally protected penis extension to take
    a pot shot at a President, and no doubt Brink would tell us he was trying to
    defend himself from a tyrannical (or perhaps genocidal?) Bush.

    It'll never happen, know why? Two words guarantees Bushit will never
    be shot: President Cheney
    TBR

    "As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
    more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day
    the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the
    White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
    H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
    "Anyone with degrees from Yale and Harvard is presumed to be intelligent,
    but George W. Bush has managed to overcome that presumption."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.