Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

OS vs. 26.0mm handlebars?

Started by damyth · · Last activity · 22 posts · 1,168 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
23 August 2006
Last activity
26 August 2006
Original author
damyth
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,168
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–22 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:
    Tim McNamara said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    damyth said:

    If you had to buy a new (non-carbon) handlebar and stem today, would
    you choose an OS handlebar or a more conventional 26.0mm handlebar?
    Why?

    I'd choose the 26.0 because I like a deep drop traditionally shaped Maes
    bend. I dislike "ergo" bars with short reach and shallow drops.

    The reason I chose 26.0 bars for my recent bikes is because my very
    favorite bars, TTT Morphe 46 cm, come in 26.0. Long reach, short drop,
    anatomic bend. Wonderfully comfortable bars. I never see people with
    deep drop bars ever riding in the drops.

    Is 165mm deep? If so, I use the drops on deep-drop bars.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

  2. jim beam said:
    Qui si parla Campagnolo said:
    jim beam said:

    Mark Hickey wrote:
    > jim beam <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    >> damyth wrote:
    >>> If you had to buy a new (non-carbon) handlebar and stem today, would
    >>> you choose an OS handlebar or a more conventional 26.0mm handlebar?
    >> os.
    >>
    >>> Why?
    >> better fatigue resistance.
    > I'm not so sure - seems to me that it just moves the problem area
    > further outboard
    yes and no. if bars fail, it's usually at the stress riser on the
    clamp. a larger diameter bar at this point helps alleviate that
    substantially.

    > (which is a good thing, in and of itself).
    yes

    > The two
    > things that have made me wonder about the "advantage"....
    >
    > 1) It's not like there was an epidemic of 26.0mm clamp bars failing
    stem clamps have gotten a lot more intelligently designed recently. in
    the old days, the clamp edges were sharp. today, they're slightly
    rounded. that reduces the riser. o/s bars reduces those effects still
    further.

    > and...
    >
    > 2) It seems like if you were to increase the weight of the 26.0mm
    > clamp bar and stem by the same amount the 31.8mm bars gain, you'd end
    > up with a bar that's probably at least as "real-world reliable and
    > strong" as the 31.8mm bar.
    the o/s bar should still be superior in fatigue.

    > I also seem to remember some posts about 31.8mm bars failiing at the
    > taper, but I could be mis-remembering.
    quite possibly, but that'll be a manufacturing problem, not an issue
    with the "bigger is better" design philosophy.

    > No real dog in this hunt - I'll happily continue to sell quality bars
    > and stems of both specs, and keep my nose in the wind for problems.
    >
    > Mark Hickey
    > Habanero Cycles
    > http://www.habcycles.com
    > Home of the $795 ti frame

    JRA, how many handlebars have you seen break...26mm, no face plate
    stem?? I have seen zero, in 21 years of wrenching.


    i've had a bar come apart in my hands sprinting. it was fatigued at the
    clamp.

    I had an aluminum bar crack but I noticed it before it was a problem.
    A friend broke aluminum bars two years ago and crashed.

    JT

    ****************************
    Remove "remove" to reply
    Visit http://www.jt10000.com
    ****************************

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.