rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

NAUCC/UNICON marathon suggestion

Started by David_Stone · · Last activity · 11 posts · 378 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
1 June 2007
Last activity
2 June 2007
Original author
David_Stone
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
378
Views / 30 days
4

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a sugg for anyone thinking of including a marathon in their
    host-city's racing:

    Offer a marathon open to expert riders only. The thing takes long
    enough as it is, so no one should be expected to wait around while some
    9-year-old on a 24" takes 8 hours to finish.

    Instead, keep people moving (or: out of the running) by mandating
    certain split times. If you run a 43km ride, then a good idea would be
    a 10 km split time of, say, 30 minutes. Any slower than that and the
    competitor would have to bow out of the ride (or simply not have the
    ride be official) as DQ. This would make the ride a much more
    interesting sport for spectators, too.

    I'd bet we could see some awesome times, and maybe even a broken
    record, in the marathon if we played by stricter rules and if we ran
    this race more often.

    As for riding 16 mph for over an hour: I've done it, but I've never
    tried it for a full 26 miles. I maintained that speed for about an hour
    on a Coker with 125s. I think I could do even better on my 29" guni,
    but I know there are a few people who could do better still (Ken,
    Smiley, Roger, Christian, ...). I'd just like to see someone snag that
    record!

    --
    David_Stone

    Dictator for Life,
    NYUC

    Check out my blog (or else):
    http://newyorkunicycle.blogspot.com/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    David_Stone's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3834
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  2. Any convention host that endeavors to set up their own marathon course
    would, in my humble opinion, own the choice to do this or not.
    Certainly you wouldn't want it open to riders of any speed! Less-fit
    riders are much less inclined to take on a ride of such a distance,
    based on the attendance at Unicon. The 10k gets a lot more "try it and
    see" riders.

    Today I rode 37.2 miles, including the first 18.1 nonstop! Now I'm
    either as ready as I'll ever be for the Tahoe ride day after tomorrow,
    or I'm overtrained and I'm going to be sore Sunday morning...

    --
    johnfoss

    John Foss
    Email: "jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com
    -----------------------------------------------

    "pretty much every trail that we've done on the California or Moab Muni
    weekends is an XC trail." -- Kris Holm, on XC from a North Shore point
    of view
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  3. David_Stone said:

    ...If you run a 43km ride, then a good idea would be a 10 km split time
    of, say, 30 minutes. Any slower than that and the competitor would have
    to bow out of the ride...

    That's pretty stringent. I rode a 25.4 mile ride Monday at 11.94 mph
    avg and I thought that was pretty fast. What do I do, I guess.
    🙄

    David_Stone said:

    As for riding 16 mph for over an hour: I've done it, but I've never
    tried it for a full 26 miles. I maintained that speed for about an hour
    on a Coker with 125s. I think I could do even better on my 29" guni,
    but I know there are a few people who could do better still (Ken,
    Smiley, Roger, Christian, ...). I'd just like to see someone snag that
    record!

    I've exceeded 16 mph, (my best is 17.85mph) but only for a sprint. It's
    phenomenal to me that anyone could keep it up for any sustained period.

    --
    steveyo

    steveyo
    ...like having your own personal rollercoaster...

    - a few 'uni race write-ups'
    (http://home.nycap.rr.com/rduhan/uni_race_writeups/)
    - muni and kokopelli uni 't-shirts, mugs and stickers'
    (http://www.cafepress.com/steveyo)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    steveyo's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7228
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  4. johnfoss said:

    ...Today I rode 37.2 miles, including the first 18.1 nonstop! Now I'm
    either as ready as I'll ever be for the Tahoe ride day after tomorrow,
    or I'm overtrained and I'm going to be sore Sunday morning...

    :eek: I would be resting more this close to a race of that magnitude.
    You're an animal.

    --
    steveyo

    steveyo
    ...like having your own personal rollercoaster...

    - a few 'uni race write-ups'
    (http://home.nycap.rr.com/rduhan/uni_race_writeups/)
    - muni and kokopelli uni 't-shirts, mugs and stickers'
    (http://www.cafepress.com/steveyo)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    steveyo's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7228
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  5. steveyo said:

    That's pretty stringent. I rode a 25.4 mile ride Monday at 11.94 mph
    avg and I thought that was pretty fast. What do I do, I guess.
    🙄

    I've exceeded 16 mph, (my best is 17.85mph) but only for a sprint.
    It's phenomenal to me that anyone could keep it up for any sustained
    period.

    Hey, Steve.

    Yeah, that's the thing about a marathon. No one, and I mean not even
    your mom, wants to watch someone take nearly three hours to finish a
    'race.' That's why an organizer would have to impose a minimum time for
    certain mile- (or km-) markers. The race would have to end before the
    excitement did. I think a rider would have to maintain at least 13-14
    mph (breaks included) for this to seem interesting. The premier riders
    would definitely make it fun to watch, especially at the end. And
    thanks to our on-back water-packs, spectators wouldn't have to hand out
    water in little paper cups!

    --
    David_Stone

    Dictator for Life,
    NYUC

    Check out my blog (or else):
    http://newyorkunicycle.blogspot.com/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    David_Stone's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3834
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  6. David_Stone said:

    Hey, Steve.

    Yeah, that's the thing about a marathon. No one, and I mean *not even
    your mom*, wants to watch someone take nearly three hours to finish a
    'race.' That's why an organizer would have to impose a minimum time for
    certain mile- (or km-) markers. The race would have to end before the
    excitement did. I think a rider would have to maintain at least 13-14
    mph (breaks included) for this to seem interesting. The premier riders
    would definitely make it fun to watch, especially at the end. And
    thanks to our on-back water-packs, spectators wouldn't have to hand out
    water in little paper cups!

    I'll just have to work harder. BTW, my mom ran in a marathon, and took
    longer than 3 hours, so she's not a good example.

    --
    steveyo

    steveyo
    ...like having your own personal rollercoaster...

    - a few 'uni race write-ups'
    (http://home.nycap.rr.com/rduhan/uni_race_writeups/)
    - muni and kokopelli uni 't-shirts, mugs and stickers'
    (http://www.cafepress.com/steveyo)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    steveyo's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7228
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  7. Similar to Sailboat racing, IMHO all races should be "one-design" races
    to pit human against human and factor out any mechanical advantage.
    36ers only race against 36ers...24s against 24s...etc. Set up distances
    accordingly.

    But I wouldn't exclude the just-for-fun racers. That's why most of us
    participate.

    -Mmud.

    --
    Memphis Mud
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Memphis Mud's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1987
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  8. I rode the unicon marathon this year, having never ridden that distance
    before, on a last minute whim. It was the highlight of my week and a
    very happy memorey. It since has inspired me to by an N36 of my own and
    get in to distance riding. Please don't take this opportunity away from
    people like me, it really was one of the most fantastic days of my
    life.

    And since when has this been about the spectators? It's not like they
    have to stay to see the backmarkers trundle through. I agree
    reorganising it so that all the fast riders took off together, instead
    of the stagered small groups at unicon 13, would make the finish more
    spectacular, as they would be closer packed and it would be obvious who
    was winning, no need to remember who went off in which group and what
    the relative start times were.

    --
    kington99

    Dave

    - what a thoroughly post-modern subversion of the cycling genre -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    kington99's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9417
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  9. Maybe instead of offering a race especially for the elite few who want
    to exclude the fray from competition, two vans could be arranged to
    pick up the people at different intervals, or there could be separate
    start times. As someone who would be in the fray with the bulk of the
    riders, I guess I am biased to keep it all in good fun.

    Also... give the 9yo on a 24 due credit, he's had a harder race than an
    adult on a coker! That'd be the sporting thing to do.

    All in all. I suppose it largely depends on the nature of the
    competition. If folks want to be all serious about it, fine, have a
    separate race at the exclusion of most. The Memphis NAUCC had such a
    warm open spirit, however, I think such exclusions wouldn't have been
    consistent with the rest of the conference.

    --
    podzol

    http://www.wobblinglions.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    podzol's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10131
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  10. at last UNICON I rode the 10k race in just over one hour :p !
    I would have been able to run it in 45 minutes but I was washed out
    (as usual when temperature is over 20° C 🙂 ) and decided to wait for a
    pal who had his own problems.
    What I liked about that is that nobody objected and so I enjoyed it!
    for sure I did not want to run the marathon but would you have objected
    if I had decided to spend 4 hours on the saddle with long pauses for
    drinks and pee 😄 ?
    what I really like about unicycling event is that you get your own
    choice of competitiveness.
    so is your argument only about the problem of immobilizing the
    organizers for such a long time? I can understand that but may be we
    can imagine some compromise for security reasons ..... I can read my
    watch if I want to know how long the ride was ....

    --
    wobbling bear

    One Wheel : bear necessity
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    wobbling bear's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3716
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  11. wobbling bear said:

    so is your argument only about the problem of immobilizing the
    organizers for such a long time? I can understand that but may be we
    can imagine some compromise for security reasons ..... I can read my
    watch if I want to know how long the ride was ....

    Exactly. I don't want to immobilize the organizers. And it would also
    be cool if, somehow, we could get the marathon to end (if not run in
    its entirety) where spectators could possibly witness history or at
    least an exciting finish.

    I have nothing against a bunch of ppl deciding it would be fun to go
    off and ride 26 miles on their own, stopwatches in hand. I just don't
    want to saddle the organizers with the task of monitoring them for
    upwards of 4 hours. That wouldn't be fair to them, and it would also
    reduce the chances of the event being run at the following NAUCCs
    (precedent being what it is).

    Anyway, I'm mainly speaking hypothetically bc I don't see that anyone
    is planning to run a marathon at an NAUCC in the near future. If it's
    done as a race, I'm just suggesting that it be relegated to the people
    who would make it practical. And I'm only making this point about the
    marathon -- and not the shorter races -- because it's so damn long. I
    don't mind watching someone ride around the track at a snail's pace for
    a shorter race like the 1600m, but if it's the 43000m, that's another
    matter entirely!

    --
    David_Stone

    Dictator for Life,
    NYUC

    Check out my blog (or else):
    http://newyorkunicycle.blogspot.com/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    David_Stone's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3834
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/61357

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.