Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

MTB ISIS bottom bracket choices

Started by ZeeExSixAre · · Last activity · 6 posts · 616 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
12 April 2004
Last activity
13 April 2004
Original author
ZeeExSixAre
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
616
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Going through MTBR.com, there are few parts of a bike that have been more
    problematic than the bottom bracket. Numerous reports of short-life,
    abbreviated rides because of ISIS bottom bracket failure infest MTBR, and it
    seems that unless you have a Phil Wood, your BB will find an untimely death
    in minutes.

    So what's the verdict? Are ISIS bearings too small? Are there any that
    don't develop play in short periods of time?

    Phil Wood owners may just be pussyfooting the BB and thus, it looks like it
    has a good track record, but it in fact may not be. Plus, the ones that buy
    PW products usually aren't your typical mountain biking type... i.e. they're
    [censored] expensive.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  2. ----------
    In article <[email hidden]>, "ZeeExSixAre"

    Quoted message said:

    Going through MTBR.com, there are few parts of a bike that have been more
    problematic than the bottom bracket. Numerous reports of short-life,
    abbreviated rides because of ISIS bottom bracket failure infest MTBR, and it
    seems that unless you have a Phil Wood, your BB will find an untimely death
    in minutes.

    So what's the verdict? Are ISIS bearings too small? Are there any that
    don't develop play in short periods of time?

    Phil Wood owners may just be pussyfooting the BB and thus, it looks like it
    has a good track record, but it in fact may not be. Plus, the ones that buy
    PW products usually aren't your typical mountain biking type... i.e. they're
    [censored] expensive.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training


    I'm well over 200 lbs. The Truvativ BB lasted about 2 months before it
    developed play in the bearings, +- 60 miles a week. The Race Face has been
    hanging in there since last summer but won't stay tight in the shell despite
    repeated torqueing to spec. Both bb's were the x country models. Don't know
    about the PW.

    Paul

  3. ZeeExSixAre said:

    Going through MTBR.com, there are few parts of a bike that have been more
    problematic than the bottom bracket. Numerous reports of short-life,
    abbreviated rides because of ISIS bottom bracket failure infest MTBR, and it
    seems that unless you have a Phil Wood, your BB will find an untimely death
    in minutes.

    So what's the verdict? Are ISIS bearings too small? Are there any that
    don't develop play in short periods of time?

    Most of the stories I've heard involve short lifespan. Is that the result
    of smaller bearings?

    The current concensus on STW is that much is dependent upon the
    installation and how well they are maintained. People who have had their
    frames' BBs faced and/or installed them on 'better' frames seem to have
    had fewer problems. Similarly, regularly pulling them out and making sure
    there's no moisture in the BB shell appears to help.

    I've been running an RF Evolve FR for over a year with no problems.
    Having said that, it started making some odd noises last time I was out...

  4. ----------
    In article <[email hidden]>, Chris Phillipo

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    [censored] expensive.

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training


    I'm well over 200 lbs. The Truvativ BB lasted about 2 months before it
    developed play in the bearings, +- 60 miles a week. The Race Face has been
    hanging in there since last summer but won't stay tight in the shell despite
    repeated torqueing to spec. Both bb's were the x country models. Don't know
    about the PW.

    Paul

    What many people don't realize is that Truvative ISIS BBs have ajustable
    bearing races. With a pair of Truvativ lockring tools you can easily
    adjust out the play. The bearings are even sericable if you want take
    completely apart.
    --
    _________________________
    Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia
    http://www.ramsays-online.com

    You're right I didn't know that. I'll take another look at truvativ. I
    might even have that bb laying around.

    Paul

  5. "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    ZeeExSixAre said:

    Going through MTBR.com, there are few parts of a bike that have been


    more

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    problematic than the bottom bracket. Numerous reports of short-life,
    abbreviated rides because of ISIS bottom bracket failure infest MTBR,


    and it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    seems that unless you have a Phil Wood, your BB will find an untimely


    death

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in minutes.

    So what's the verdict? Are ISIS bearings too small? Are there any that
    don't develop play in short periods of time?

    Most of the stories I've heard involve short lifespan. Is that the result
    of smaller bearings?

    The current concensus on STW is that much is dependent upon the
    installation and how well they are maintained. People who have had their
    frames' BBs faced and/or installed them on 'better' frames seem to have
    had fewer problems. Similarly, regularly pulling them out and making sure
    there's no moisture in the BB shell appears to help.

    I've been running an RF Evolve FR for over a year with no problems.
    Having said that, it started making some odd noises last time I was out...

    The spindle is big, and so there is less room for bearings. Now if square
    taper bearings are larger and have less problems, I can see that being the
    rectifying issue. But I just don't know... I guess BBs are a replaceable
    item. Now that Chris mentioned that Truvativs are serviceable, however...

    --
    Phil, Squid-in-Training

  6. "ZeeExSixAre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    ZeeExSixAre said:

    Going through MTBR.com, there are few parts of a bike that have been


    more

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    problematic than the bottom bracket. Numerous reports of short-life,
    abbreviated rides because of ISIS bottom bracket failure infest MTBR,


    and it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    seems that unless you have a Phil Wood, your BB will find an untimely


    death

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in minutes.

    So what's the verdict? Are ISIS bearings too small? Are there any


    that

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    don't develop play in short periods of time?

    Most of the stories I've heard involve short lifespan. Is that the


    result

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of smaller bearings?

    The current concensus on STW is that much is dependent upon the
    installation and how well they are maintained. People who have had their
    frames' BBs faced and/or installed them on 'better' frames seem to have
    had fewer problems. Similarly, regularly pulling them out and making


    sure

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    there's no moisture in the BB shell appears to help.

    I've been running an RF Evolve FR for over a year with no problems.
    Having said that, it started making some odd noises last time I was


    out...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The spindle is big, and so there is less room for bearings. Now if square
    taper bearings are larger and have less problems, I can see that being the
    rectifying issue. But I just don't know...

    The Spanish BB being developed in BMX by flybikes looks very interesting, I
    could see it crossing over to MTB's if it takes off.

    http://flybikesbmx.com/noticias/spanishbb02eng.htm

    Steve.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.