On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 19:42:05 -0500, PeterH <
[email protected]> wrote:
.Mike Vandeman wrote: . .>On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:57:02 +0000 (UTC), Laura Bush <
[email protected]>
wrote: .> .>.I think Vandeman is a shill for the mountain bike industry. It turns out .>.to be a
great way for families to enjoy nature .> .>You mean "destroy nature". Tell the truth. .> .Truth?
You're redefining commonly used terms to suit your own argument & .you blather about some puny
obstacle called "truth"?
What part of "destroy nature" is too hard for you to understand?
.> .> and get some exercise .>.together, without burning gasoline. .> .>BS. They use their SUVs .>
.Ergo: to own a mountain bike is to own an SUV? If one does not own an .SUV, then mayhap, one is
prevented from owning a mountain bike?
You can OWN one, but if you want to USE it off-road, you have to carry it on your SUV. I notice that
you didn't deny it.
.Where do these nutso fixations of yours come from? . .> to carry their mountain bikes to the
trailhead. .> .Since using (a vehicle) to carry the bike to the trailhead, then the .biker, no
matter what other conditions obtain, they get no exercize or, .in term of physics, perform no work.
Idiot.
By this extension of your .aargument, the second law of thermodynamics is suspended but, it seems,
.only for mountain bikers. This is reminiscent of selling/trading .indulgences 1,000 years ago. . .
.> Tell the .>truth. .> .You'll apparently nver know the difference. . .> .>=== .>I am working on
creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to .>humans ("pure habitat"). .> .Again the delusion
over "pure" & how it may apply to human thought. . .Take two apsirins & call a shrink in the
monring. . .Pete H
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to
help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande