General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Mental marathoning

Started by ahass · · Last activity · 28 posts · 997 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
17 September 2003
Last activity
30 September 2003
Original author
ahass
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
997
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–28 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    THe caveat is I am a deviation from the formulas which you use to arrive at those times.

    So am I ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    I hold my speed better than most people as distance increases. I was capable of no faster than
    1:12+ (had 1:13:20 PR) when I ran 2:29:27, and ran a 33:15 10k 3 weeks before that marathon. I
    figured if I could run 1:09 at the race I bonked and ran 1:10:58 I was ready. So since I
    overtrained I lost my chance at a good reference race.

    OK the logic holds up as far as I can see. I just wonder if you couldn't do faster 10k/21k if you
    tuned your training to those distances. Our late trainer (olympic selection marathoner in 2h11)
    wasn't worth squat (this IS relative of course :-)))) at 10k and 21k coz he trained specifically for
    marathons.

    Quoted message said:

    ---The problem with body weight is that it is dangerous to adjust it this close to a race, as I
    might end up getting too tired or too light and ruining myself. I currently weight 146-148 at
    about 5% BF,

    Check. I figured you did know what you were doing :-). That 5% BF figure makes me shiver with envy,
    I was at 10% when I did my PB (67kg/6.5kg fat) and it wasn't "natural" 69kg/8kg is more like my
    everyday make-up (5'11"/180cm)

    Quoted message said:

    I hoped to race at 145 and still do. I don't have a lot of fat to spare as I've burned out every
    time I dip below 145 (I'm 5'10"😉.

    OK I'm convinced :-)

    Quoted message said:

    ---Just hammering my few remaining workouts,

    OK

    Quoted message said:

    shortening my taper a bit,

    ONE extra workout eh? No more /n'est-ce pas/?

    Quoted message said:

    and hoping for the best 😉 Andy Hass

    Make it happen!

  2. Quoted message said:

    ----Problem is that vVO2max isn't all that important in the marathon.

    True. But I was working on the idea that maybe you would not lose your aerobic capacity (read:
    percentage of vVO2max useable over 42k), at least not as quickly, as you would lose actual vVO2max,
    which falls of quicker I understand.

    By improving your vVO2max, the percentage you'd need to hold over 42k, in order to do the same time,
    would be proportionally lower, maybe allowing you to lay off the long hard stuff enough to refill
    your tanks. The idea (which is probably wrong) was that, say, you can do

    22.1 km/h vVO2max and hold 80% over 42k => 17.7 km/h gives a 2h22

    if you can sharpen vVO2max up to

    23.4 km/h, then for a 2h23 marathon at 17.7 km/h => 79% vVO2max

    Quoted message said:

    The only time I would approach that level of intensity is the last half mile.

    I still like to do a vVO2max maintenance session, once per week (or fortnight) all the way through
    the program, right up to final taper.

    Quoted message said:

    Aerobic threshhold is best developed/kept (IMHO) by tempo runs at/just below this level of
    intensity...ie marathon pace to half marathon pace.

    Agreed, though I don't use marathon pace as it's neither here nor there, physiologically, as far as
    I can gather. From half marathon pace to a bit less than 10k seem to be the "in" thing over here
    since Billat's recent work.

    She found, after measuring elite (olympic class I believe) marathon runners from various countries,
    that none of them ever trained at projected marathon pace, but at what I've seen called "threshold+"
    pace (more than 21k but less than 10k pace). They don't get more efficient at running at marathon
    pace, they just get all over quicker.

    Quoted message said:

    Since this post, things have turned around somewhat. My legs are back together again, and I've
    had a few really decent workouts.

    Phew!Excellent news. Had me worried there - I hate it when [censored] happens after all that training.
    Hope it was just passing tiredness. Don't go mad trying to catch up on "lost" time (see Noake's
    account of Ron Hill's best races, which all "happened" after he had forced layoffs due to injury or
    illness, which prevented him overdoing things in the final weeks...)

  3. Scott Williams said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    ---Just hammering my few remaining workouts, shortening my taper a bit, and hoping for the best
    😉 Andy Hass

    Quoted message said:

    Go get 'em, Andy.

    Quoted message said:

    Could that have been you I saw heading up Main, 8 am-ish in the morning a couple weeks ago? I was
    driving my son to school and noticed someone looking a bit like you heading out HRD-way.

    Quoted message said:

    Scott

    Hey Scott, Nope, wasn't me. People used to see me all the time running my Miller/
    Maple/Stadium/Oackard or Washtenaw route, but I no longer live in Ann Arbor. I moved to Belleville
    the start of August. I still train in town a day or two a week (Gallup Park repeats on Tuesday last)
    since I work in the cancer center. Traffic sucks! Andy Hass

  4. steve common said:

    By improving your vVO2max, the percentage you'd need to hold over 42k, in order to do the same
    time, would be proportionally lower, maybe allowing you to lay off the long hard stuff enough to
    refill your tanks. The idea (which is probably wrong) was that, say, you can do

    Quoted message said:

    22.1 km/h vVO2max and hold 80% over 42k => 17.7 km/h gives a 2h22

    Quoted message said:

    if you can sharpen vVO2max up to

    Quoted message said:

    22.4 km/h, then for a 2h23 marathon at 17.7 km/h => 79% vVO2max

    ---This is a good theory, don't know if it works though...

    Quoted message said:

    I still like to do a vVO2max maintenance session, once per week (or fortnight) all the way through
    the program, right up to final taper.

    ---Exactly. My tapers consist of first cutting out AM runs, then slicing into the long run and other
    runs over 10 miles, then doing almost nothing over 9 miles the 2nd week out, and only dropping the
    speed at the very end. If I'm only running half the total miles I'm used to, the track sessions
    don't seem very hard anymore! This time is a little screwed up since the AM runs have been gone for
    a month due to my problems. Basically... 3rd week out (this week) M-off T-8X800 W-10 T-14 F-8 (hammy
    soreness) S-12 S-16 2nd out M-off T-6Xmile (last challenging session) W-9 T-8 F-9 S-10 with some
    speed S-12 M-off T-8 W-7 T-6 F-off S-3 S-RACE

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Aerobic threshhold is best developed/kept (IMHO) by tempo runs at/just below this level of
    intensity...ie marathon pace to half marathon pace.

    Quoted message said:

    Agreed, though I don't use marathon pace as it's neither here nor there, physiologically, as far
    as I can gather. From half marathon pace to a bit less than 10k seem to be the "in" thing over
    here since Billat's recent work.

    ---I totally agree with you there. However, elite guys have pretty much developed their stamina over
    the marathon and aerobic ability. The development left is in peaking those abilities best for the
    race. For someone like me who is still improving a lot, long tempos are important. From personal
    experience, the runs that give me the most bang for the buck are 8-10 mile tempos, which are too
    long to be doing sub- half marathon pace. I usually end up doing them around MP or even a bit
    slower...in trainers. Flats would put them below MP. If I hadn't blown up during my most important
    training time, I would have done a few runs with like 2-3X20min at the pace you describe.

    Quoted message said:

    She found, after measuring elite (olympic class I believe) marathon runners from various
    countries, that none of them ever trained at projected marathon pace, but at what I've seen called
    "threshold+" pace (more than 21k but less than 10k pace). They don't get more efficient at running
    at marathon pace, they just get all over quicker.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Since this post, things have turned around somewhat. My legs are back together again, and I've
    had a few really decent workouts.

    Quoted message said:

    Phew!Excellent news. Had me worried there - I hate it when [censored] happens after all that training.
    Hope it was just passing tiredness. Don't go mad trying to catch up on "lost" time (see Noake's
    account of Ron Hill's best races, which all "happened" after he had forced layoffs due to injury
    or illness, which prevented him overdoing things in the final weeks...)

    ---We'll see. Hammys and tiredness stopped anything major yesterday, only 8 easy. Slept 11+ hours
    and stretched well, we'll try some work this weekend. I haven't given up the dream yet, amazing
    things can happen after a good taper. Andy Hass

  5. steve common said:

    OK the logic holds up as far as I can see. I just wonder if you couldn't do faster 10k/21k if you
    tuned your training to those distances. Our late trainer (olympic selection marathoner in 2h11)
    wasn't worth squat (this IS relative of course :-)))) at 10k and 21k coz he trained specifically
    for marathons.

    ---I'm sure that's PART of it...I've been marathon-specific for almost three years now. However, the
    reason for this is that I had such a breakthrough when I started marathoning. I could never find my
    event at the shorter distances and didn't respond to 5K/10K interval training like most runners.
    When I added some 10K-specific training this spring on top of a marathon base I did improve well at
    the 10K, but it seems I am destined to be disproportionately better at the marathon no matter what
    training I do. Even when I ran 800/1600/3200 in HS, I stunk at the 800 but could run 4 of them
    together just a few seconds slower for the 3200. guess I'm just a freak! Andy Hass

  6. <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    steve common <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Here is wishing you the best!!! My best marathons occurred when I really had large doses of the
    10-13 mile tempos @ marathon pace. These would hammer me but it was the best workout I could do.

    Quoted message said:

    ---We'll see. Hammys and tiredness stopped anything major yesterday,


    only 8

    Quoted message said:

    easy. Slept 11+ hours and stretched well, we'll try some work this


    weekend.

    Quoted message said:

    I haven't given up the dream yet, amazing things can happen after a


    good

    Quoted message said:

    taper. Andy Hass

  7. Quoted message said:
    Scott Williams said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ---Just hammering my few remaining workouts, shortening my taper a bit, and hoping for the best
    😉 Andy Hass

    Quoted message said:

    Go get 'em, Andy.

    Quoted message said:

    Could that have been you I saw heading up Main, 8 am-ish in the morning a couple weeks ago? I was
    driving my son to school and noticed someone looking a bit like you heading out HRD-way.

    Quoted message said:

    Scott

    Hey Scott, Nope, wasn't me. People used to see me all the time running my Miller/
    Maple/Stadium/Oackard or Washtenaw route, but I no longer live in Ann Arbor. I moved to Belleville
    the start of August. I still train in town a day or two a week (Gallup Park repeats on Tuesday
    last) since I work in the cancer center. Traffic sucks! Andy Hass

    Yes, traffic has far exceeded the road capacity in this area. Gawdawful.

  8. Quoted message said:

    it seems I am destined to be disproportionately better at the marathon no matter what
    training I do.

    Sounds like your proportion of slow and fast twitch muscles, etc., have you destined to run
    distances longer than the marathon. 🙂

    --
    Doug Freese [email hidden]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.