?
Quoted message said:
I was in no way trying to imply what Frank was feeling. I was pointing
out that passing a vehicle whose actions are curious is a bad really
idea.
INDEED. I would go as far that passing anything (man or animal)
walking/riding/standing wich behaves erratic should be taken with
caution.
A few years ago I barely missed a child walking with her parents. I had
seen the kid, but still overtook them like I would normally pass
people. The kid swerved 1-2 yards (really not that much) and that was
just enough to be uncomfortably close. The kid stopped in time. I
should have anticipated better and given more room. I also didn't have
full situational awareness (hadn't really checked for othert trafic,
wich wasn't there thank god).
The result were upset parents and my heartrate going thru the roof. And
yes, the parents were right, I could have avoided the situation easily.
And no, I do not think that the parents realistically could have
avoided it, unless we go about leashing children 24/7.
Quoted message said:We already have had one poster here permanently injured in a somewhat
similar crash. I don't know if either case could have been prevented by
closer attention and care but it is possiblity.
Yep, caution is usually a good advice.
Quoted message said:Every time I attend Centuries these days I see a large and increasing
number of whacko riders who pass within scant inches of my bar ends.
While I'm generally going to look before I change my course, there's
always the possibility that I'll hit something and be thrown over
enough to touch. So from the very start, pretending that you're in a
paceline with people whom you don't know is a bad idea but doing it
around people whose skill levels are questionable is even dumber.
What does it take for people to use common sense when they're on the
road. Bicycle accidents are rare enough but let's make them unusual.
A very very good and lucid post