"Steven M. Scharf" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:[email hidden] (Frank Krygowski) wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:MR-11 lamps are actually designed for showing off artwork in ritzy homes, not for lighting roads.
The light is only vaguely concentrated, and nowhere near the most-efficient rectangular beam that
all other headlights use.You need to do some more research into the MR11 lamps. They come in a wide variety of beam
patterns, from wide angle flood to spot beams. They are as concentrated as you desire, or as
spread as you want. You must have seen an MR11 lamp in the wide flood beam pattern and
extrapolated that all MR11 lamps provide the same pattern.
Bad guess. I _know_ that even the spot beams are not "as concentrated as I desire." I have a
rechargeable headlight based on a spot MR-11 beam (rarely used, because of its inefficiencies), and
I've ridden quite a bit with other folks who used them. Also, as mentioned, I've run several "night
lighting workshops" for my club, where we compared lights. At one of those, we took the lights
indoors and shined them on a wall to compare beam patterns. It was there that we found that an MR-11
spot (12 watts, IIRC) was not as bright as a 6 watt Vistalight 400-series.
Quoted message said:The best generator light is the 12 volt 6W oval Lumotec lamp made by Busch and Muller, made for
use with the Dymotec S12 dynamo. A lighting system with this dynamo, the headlight, and the tail
light would cost over $300. ... Not everyone can afford the luxury of a high end dynamo system.
One of the major points I'm trying to make is that you don't _need_ to spend $300 to ride safely at
night! As long as it's got a halogen bulb, any ordinary 3-watt generator will give most people
plenty of light for normal road riding. Some generators are better than others (mostly in terms of
efficiency) but the great majority of them meet the rather stringent German standards. They work
fine. I know people that have spent no more than $25, brand new, and gotten a generator system
they're perfectly content with.
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:It continues to amaze me that high-zoot cyclists, the type who drill holes in their spokes for
lightness ;-) are willing to haul extra battery weight around to make up for this waste, rather
than demanding simple lenses on their headlights!You can't get much lighter or simpler than the MR11 and MR16 lamps with their high efficiency
reflectors.
<sigh> If you put a decent lens in front of the bulb, concentrating the light into a beam that
shined on the road (not the trees) you could use half the bulb wattage. For the same run time, you
could have half the battery weight.
Again, MR-11s are designed for spotlighting artwork, not for lighting roads. Apparently, you've
never shined your MR-11 "spot" beam at a blank wall, and compared its beam shape and efficiency with
that of even a $20 bike light. If you'd do this, I think you'd understand the point.
Until you take the time to examine beam shapes of true road lights - auto lights, motorcycle lights,
and efficient bike headlights - versus fuzzy-shaped MR-11 beams, we'll never progress in this
discussion. Therefore, I'm going to step out of it.
- Frank Krygowski