nath1 said:Hi and thanks for your reply 531Aussie. I generaly favour the outside of my feet when I walk and my shoes always wear out on the out rear edge on the heal so I think that is pronation, am I right ? Did you feel a dramatic difference on installation? The kit here costs 29.99 which is better than the 200 pounds that the specialist charges for fitting them, ouch! Did you feel a difference on instalation? nath
firstly, I'm no physiotherpaist, so.......🙂..take all this "advice" for what it 'might' be "worth".
I did initially notice a big difference, because I started with 4mm, mostly as an experiment. This felt a bit weird, so I immediately went to 3mm, then down to 2mm a few weeks later. I didn't have big problems to start with ( just some medial knee pain, most likely caused by very long cranks), but I, like you, walk with my feet slightly out, so I've left the 2mm rise for the last 2 years.
If you walk with your feet slightly out, this means you're not a pronator, but either 'normal' or a supinator, depending how big the angle is. This wet footprint test will give you an idea. Obviously, the big pronator has the full footprint, the opposite for the supinator, and the normal dude is number 3.
[img]watfxc.comshin s2.jpgOpen ↗[/img]
The potential problem with cycling is that the pedals are dead flat (some eventually bend a bit), and the shoe soles are pretty much dead flat, so your foot will be forced to turn in a bit; going against your natural 'step'. Like this:
[img]kurobishi.cocolog-nifty.comlemond fitness lewedge.jpgOpen ↗[/img]
Generally, problems with forced pronation, when someone is not a natural pronator, manifest as issues on the inside of the leg (knee, ankle or shin).
Does that make sense? 🙂