Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

lacing patterns puzzle

Started by Squat'n Dive · · Last activity · 26 posts · 1,950 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 January 2008
Last activity
5 January 2008
Original author
Squat'n Dive
Posts
26
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,950
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–26 of 26
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Chalo quips

    Quoted message said:

    I guess "virtually" to you must mean "in the case
    of a 26 inch or larger rim, a low-flanged hub,
    and 32 or 36 spokes".

    Since you are clearly unable and/or willing to follow direction: The
    word VIRTUALLY is defined as - In effect; For all practical purposes;
    Not fact.

    And "cross 3 for everything" are your words not mine.

    So let's see how you miss quote me and twist my words out of context
    now.

    There's an old saying Chalo that goes, "When you find yourself in a
    hole, stop digging!" With that, the sand box is all yours.

    Best Regards - Mike Baldwin

  2. M-gineering aka Marten Gerritsen said:
    Chalo said:
    Michael Baldwin said:

    SnD asks -
    > what is more bombproof for the rear wheel : a
    > cross 2, cross 3, anything else?
    ..I'm a KISS proponent...quality materials, workmanship and a cross 3
    pattern will suffice for virtually every condition/situation PERIOD!...

    If that's how you "keep it simple", then I recommend that you try to
    lace a 20" rim to a Rohloff Speedhub using a cross-3 pattern. Your
    outlook will develop some complexity!

    Chalo


    Nah, 16 spoked wheel laced 4X ! That will teach him 😉


    How about this wheel by former rec.bicycles.tech regular Benjamin Lewis:
    <http://sheldonbrown.com/mismatch/wheel3b.jpg>?

    Blue hair is optional: <http://sheldonbrown.com/mismatch/index.htm>.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    POST FREE OR DIE!

  3. Zog The Undeniable said:
    Squat'n Dive said:

    On Jan 2, 5:31 pm, daveornee <daveornee.32l...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    Squat'n Dive Wrote:> what is more bombproof for the rear wheel : a
    cross 2, cross 3,
    > anything else?
    How many spokes, what ERD Rim, and what diameter hub?


    36, thinking of cxp-32 and an ultegra 6600 hub

    3-cross is normal for that spoke count. Don't build 4-cross with 36
    spokes (as recommended by the legendary Eugene Sloane) - it can be done,
    but the rim/spoke angle is painful.

    The rim/spoke angle is also "painful" on smaller diameter 3-cross
    wheels, even with small flange hubs.

    Quoted message said:

    Likewise, save 2-cross for large
    flange hubs and/or spoke counts of 28 and below.

    Or small diameter wheels.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    POST FREE OR DIE!

  4. Andrew Muzi said:
    Zog The Undeniable said:
    Squat'n Dive said:

    On Jan 4, 6:41 am, Zog The Undeniable <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > Tom Sherman wrote:
    >> Squat'n Dive wrote:
    >>> what is more bombproof for the rear wheel : a cross 2, cross 3,
    >>> anything else?
    >> A solid disc machined from an aluminium alloy billet.
    Is that what is typically seen on TT bikes? i assume the cost is the
    major drawback?
    what are the others?

    The discs you see in TTs are generally carbon fibre. They're still
    not *that* light, but there are aerodynamic advantages, and when you
    can "buy" 40 seconds' advantage for $1000, what's the point of
    training? ;-)

    One oddity was the Tioga Tension-Disk that John Tomac used to use for
    MTB, although there was a road version too. That seemed to work as a
    solid disc but didn't; it was similar to a spoked wheel in principle,
    with the hub being laced to the rim using a long thread of kevlar.
    This were embedded in a thin non-structural disc for protection,
    aerodynamics, looks, whatever. Apparently they weren't hugely
    reliable, but they occasionally show up on *bay, so at least some have
    survived.

    Sugino T-Disc were quite reliable, replacing 32 stainless spokes with
    256 Kevlar spokes in a clear plastic matrix. It elegantly solved the
    typical disc problem, lack of tension, in a format lighter even than 32
    SS spokes.

    I knew someone who simply covered his spokes with clear packing tape to
    make wheel discs.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    POST FREE OR DIE!

  5. On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:19:52 -0800 (PST), "Squat'n Dive"

    may have said:

    what is more bombproof for the rear wheel : a cross 2, cross 3,
    anything else?

    Bomproofing is more of a matter of component selection and spoke count
    than lacing pattern, as long as you avoid radial or 1X on the drive
    side. Hubs with crappy thin soft CNC flanges will fail before hubs
    with decent forged flanges. Choose your parts with care; they must
    get you home.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via e-mail.
    Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  6. Tom Sherman said:

    I knew someone who simply covered his spokes with clear packing tape to
    make wheel discs.


    That works reasonably well, although it's not allowed in some TTs as it
    constitutes a "fairing".

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.