Kristin on Oprah



In article <[email protected]>,
"Allez1" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Tim Lines" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > B. Lafferty wrote:
> >> "bob sullivan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >>>RicodJour wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>B. Lafferty wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>><[email protected]> wrote in message
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining
> >>>>>>session.
> >>>>>>But don't hold your breath.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots
> >>>>>>about
> >>>>>>some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>My prediction; there will be none of that. It's going to be about not
> >>>>>losing your identity in a marrage.
> >>>>
> >>>>You misspelled mirage.
> >>>>
> >>>>She's angling to get back together with him. The odds are 2-1 that'll
> >>>>work. She's gone national and said nothing bad at all about him, feeds
> >>>>into the trust issues. He's had his fling(s), but still wants to put
> >>>>family first. Plus make-up sex is the best. ;)
> >>>>
> >>>>R
> >>>
> >>>And...She's totally hot. :)
> >>>
> >>>~bob
> >>
> >>
> >> And apparently saving herself for him. :)

> >
> > Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
> > that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
> > called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."

>
> That's possible. It's also not in her interests to rock his boat while she
> has three young children and needs to deal with him over the coming 18-20
> years.


So far as I know, and that is not very, Lance Armstrong
does not talk about Kristin Armstrong in public.

--
Michael Press
 
In article
<[email protected]>,
[email protected] wrote:

> Tim Lines wrote:
> > Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
> > that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
> > called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."

>
> A quote from her sex&love column in "Glamour" tells you all you need to
> know:
>
> "I quit my job, rented out my house, gave my dog to an old boyfriend,
> sold my car and moved to France so Lance could reenter the world of
> professional cycling."
>
> Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.


Only have the one statement.

We have taken in a dog from someone else. They and the dog
had been frequent visitors. We loved the dog, the
transition was simple, and the owner continued to visit,
though from further away.

--
Michael Press
 
B. Lafferty wrote:

> "Wayne Pein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>[email protected] wrote:


>>>
>>>Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.
>>>

>>
>>Pffft. Many people are too classless to own a dog, failing to well train
>>it or responsibly tend to it. This results in annoyed neighbors who suffer
>>with barking and dog mess on their property. And of course bicyclists are
>>sometimes harassed by untrained animals. Frankly, people ought to be
>>required to take a dog training class prior to ownership.
>>
>>Wayne
>>

>
> Different issues. But you knew that.
>


Not necessarily. Perhaps her giving the dog away made her neighbors
happy. Thus it was an inadvertant act of class. Further, it's moronic to
make the statement, or unconditionally agree with it, that giving a dog
away is classless. But you knew that; or maybe you didn't.

Wayne
 
"Wayne Pein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>
>> "Wayne Pein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>[email protected] wrote:

>
>>>>
>>>>Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Pffft. Many people are too classless to own a dog, failing to well train
>>>it or responsibly tend to it. This results in annoyed neighbors who
>>>suffer with barking and dog mess on their property. And of course
>>>bicyclists are sometimes harassed by untrained animals. Frankly, people
>>>ought to be required to take a dog training class prior to ownership.
>>>
>>>Wayne
>>>

>>
>> Different issues. But you knew that.

>
> Not necessarily. Perhaps her giving the dog away made her neighbors happy.
> Thus it was an inadvertant act of class. Further, it's moronic to make the
> statement, or unconditionally agree with it, that giving a dog away is
> classless. But you knew that; or maybe you didn't.
>
> Wayne

Giving a dog away for the reason she gave is classless. You may choose to
disagree. Not all dog (or other animals) giving away is classless. I have
a friend here in town who's son (7 years old) was just diagnosed with
cancer. His treatment lasts three years. ALL pets had to go and his
siblings had to be pulled from school because they will expose his to bugs
that could kill him in his weakened state. A difficult decision, but not
classless. Giving your dog away to follow a significant other is classless
 
"Michael Press" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Allez1" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> "Tim Lines" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > B. Lafferty wrote:
>> >> "bob sullivan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[email protected]...
>> >>
>> >>>RicodJour wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>B. Lafferty wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining
>> >>>>>>session.
>> >>>>>>But don't hold your breath.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots
>> >>>>>>about
>> >>>>>>some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>My prediction; there will be none of that. It's going to be about
>> >>>>>not
>> >>>>>losing your identity in a marrage.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>You misspelled mirage.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>She's angling to get back together with him. The odds are 2-1
>> >>>>that'll
>> >>>>work. She's gone national and said nothing bad at all about him,
>> >>>>feeds
>> >>>>into the trust issues. He's had his fling(s), but still wants to put
>> >>>>family first. Plus make-up sex is the best. ;)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>R
>> >>>
>> >>>And...She's totally hot. :)
>> >>>
>> >>>~bob
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> And apparently saving herself for him. :)
>> >
>> > Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
>> > that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
>> > called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."

>>
>> That's possible. It's also not in her interests to rock his boat while
>> she
>> has three young children and needs to deal with him over the coming 18-20
>> years.

>
> So far as I know, and that is not very, Lance Armstrong
> does not talk about Kristin Armstrong in public.
>
> --
> Michael Press


Actually he has--all complimentary.
 
B. Lafferty wrote:

>
> Giving a dog away for the reason she gave is classless. You may choose to
> disagree. Not all dog (or other animals) giving away is classless. I have
> a friend here in town who's son (7 years old) was just diagnosed with
> cancer. His treatment lasts three years. ALL pets had to go and his
> siblings had to be pulled from school because they will expose his to bugs
> that could kill him in his weakened state. A difficult decision, but not
> classless. Giving your dog away to follow a significant other is classless



As much as people want to humanize pets, dogs are not people with four
legs. This is a typical fundamental problem with many dog owners who do
not understand this. The dog doesn't particularly care who takes care of
it. It lives in the now. So, giving a dog away to be with a person is
not classless. If a choice has to be made between a human significant
other and a dog, only classless people would keep the dog.

Wayne
 
B. Lafferty wrote:
> Giving your dog away to follow a significant other is classless


black-white-black-white...nope, grey.

Depends on how the dog is given away and why. If the dog is given away
to a loving home because the owner realizes that taking the dog would
do the dog more harm than good, that's not classless. That's selfless.
Some countries have strict quarantine regulations. The dog may very
well have spent half a year (what's that in dog years?) confined until
quarantine period was over. Is that a classy thing to subject the dog
to? Methinks not.

R
 
"Wayne Pein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>
>>
>> Giving a dog away for the reason she gave is classless. You may choose
>> to disagree. Not all dog (or other animals) giving away is classless. I
>> have a friend here in town who's son (7 years old) was just diagnosed
>> with cancer. His treatment lasts three years. ALL pets had to go and
>> his siblings had to be pulled from school because they will expose his to
>> bugs that could kill him in his weakened state. A difficult decision,
>> but not classless. Giving your dog away to follow a significant other is
>> classless

>
>
> As much as people want to humanize pets, dogs are not people with four
> legs. This is a typical fundamental problem with many dog owners who do
> not understand this. The dog doesn't particularly care who takes care of
> it. It lives in the now. So, giving a dog away to be with a person is not
> classless. If a choice has to be made between a human significant other
> and a dog, only classless people would keep the dog.
>
> Wayne
>

We have nothing to discuss.
 
"RicodJour" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>> Giving your dog away to follow a significant other is classless

>
> black-white-black-white...nope, grey.
>
> Depends on how the dog is given away and why. If the dog is given away
> to a loving home because the owner realizes that taking the dog would
> do the dog more harm than good, that's not classless. That's selfless.
> Some countries have strict quarantine regulations. The dog may very
> well have spent half a year (what's that in dog years?) confined until
> quarantine period was over. Is that a classy thing to subject the dog
> to? Methinks not.
>
> R


Not a problem re France. I have a friend who took his dog with him to Paris
for a year. All you need is the proper paperwork.

>
 
B. Lafferty wrote:
>
> Not a problem re France. I have a friend who took his dog with him to
> Paris for a year. All you need is the proper paperwork.


????

In France, no one teaches their dog to go on the paper. They're all
trained to go on the sidewalk.
 
"Robert Chung" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>>
>> Not a problem re France. I have a friend who took his dog with him to
>> Paris for a year. All you need is the proper paperwork.

>
> ????
>
> In France, no one teaches their dog to go on the paper. They're all
> trained to go on the sidewalk.
>
>

:)



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
 
Wayne Pein wrote:

>The dog doesn't particularly care who takes care of
> it. It lives in the now.


dogs aren't humans, but they are pack animals and they often do care
about the people and other animals they live with and where they live.
it's also true that they can become happy with a new owner. heck, i've
been left behind by boys i loved and now i am happy without them, but
adaptable doesn't mean the same as not particularly caring.


h
 
"Robert Chung" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>>
>> Not a problem re France. I have a friend who took his dog with him to
>> Paris for a year. All you need is the proper paperwork.

>
> ????
>
> In France, no one teaches their dog to go on the paper. They're all
> trained to go on the sidewalk.
>
>

lol
 
B. Lafferty wrote:
> "Robert Chung" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > B. Lafferty wrote:
> >>
> >> Not a problem re France. I have a friend who took his dog with him to
> >> Paris for a year. All you need is the proper paperwork.

> >
> > ????
> >
> > In France, no one teaches their dog to go on the paper. They're all
> > trained to go on the sidewalk.
> >
> >

> lol


But I thought they moved to Spain, not France. What are the Spanish
laws? Do they have quarantines? I know Britain used to, and maybe
still does.
 
On 05/10/2006 04:09 PM, in article
[email protected], "B. Lafferty"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Wayne Pein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> B. Lafferty wrote:
>>
>>> "Wayne Pein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>> [email protected] wrote:

>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pffft. Many people are too classless to own a dog, failing to well train
>>>> it or responsibly tend to it. This results in annoyed neighbors who
>>>> suffer with barking and dog mess on their property. And of course
>>>> bicyclists are sometimes harassed by untrained animals. Frankly, people
>>>> ought to be required to take a dog training class prior to ownership.
>>>>
>>>> Wayne
>>>>
>>>
>>> Different issues. But you knew that.

>>
>> Not necessarily. Perhaps her giving the dog away made her neighbors happy.
>> Thus it was an inadvertant act of class. Further, it's moronic to make the
>> statement, or unconditionally agree with it, that giving a dog away is
>> classless. But you knew that; or maybe you didn't.
>>
>> Wayne

> Giving a dog away for the reason she gave is classless. You may choose to
> disagree. Not all dog (or other animals) giving away is classless. I have
> a friend here in town who's son (7 years old) was just diagnosed with
> cancer. His treatment lasts three years. ALL pets had to go and his
> siblings had to be pulled from school because they will expose his to bugs
> that could kill him in his weakened state. A difficult decision, but not
> classless. Giving your dog away to follow a significant other is classless



And putting the dog into quarantine (which is required on initial entry into
many European nations) for 6 months, just so you can keep the dog is what?

If she acquired the dog with the previous significant other, but kept it
after the split, then giving it back to move to Europe is certainly better
than putting the dog down, sending it to the pound, or leaving it in
quarantine under the care of strangers for 6 months.


--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot flahute dot com [foreword] slash
 
MyPostingID wrote:

> B. Lafferty wrote:


> But I thought they moved to Spain, not France. What are the Spanish
> laws? Do they have quarantines? I know Britain used to, and maybe
> still does.


i don't think those quarantines exist in britain to such a degree anymore-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pet_passport

however, before 2001-2003, i don't know if dogs traveling from the usa
to mainland europe needed to be quarantined for 6 months.

heather
 
Please take this dog conversation to rec.bicycles.dogs
"Robert Chung" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> B. Lafferty wrote:
> >
> > Not a problem re France. I have a friend who took his dog with him to
> > Paris for a year. All you need is the proper paperwork.

>
> ????
>
> In France, no one teaches their dog to go on the paper. They're all
> trained to go on the sidewalk.
>
>
 
riggodeezil wrote:
> Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.


Perhaps she gave the dog to Tyler.
 
psycholist wrote:
>> That sure is one heck of a set of teeth she's got.


Allez1 wrote:
> Amen, Brother Bob.


Better hope she doesn't bite during moments of passion though.