Kristin on Oprah

[[email protected]]

Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining session.
But don't hold your breath.

There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots about
some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.
psycholist wrote:
> Just caught a promo for Oprah. Tomorrow (Tuesday) Oprah's guest is Lance's
> ex Kristin who is supposed to "tell all" according to Oprah.
>
> Set your Tivos and VCRs.
>
> --
> Bob C.
>
> "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
> T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

 

[B. Lafferty]

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining session.
> But don't hold your breath.
>
> There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots about
> some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.

My prediction; there will be none of that. It's going to be about not
losing your identity in a marrage.


> psycholist wrote:
>> Just caught a promo for Oprah. Tomorrow (Tuesday) Oprah's guest is
>> Lance's
>> ex Kristin who is supposed to "tell all" according to Oprah.
>>
>> Set your Tivos and VCRs.
>>
>> --
>> Bob C.
>>
>> "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
>> T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)
>

 

[Allez1]

"Joe Cipale" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I have been watchign it while preparing to go race:
> So far, it is a pretty good watch. Nothing about Lance that I have seen.
> A lot about how she lost her identity as Kristen to become Mrs Armstrong.
>
> Joe

As O said, to which K agreed, this is not about bashing Lance at all.


>
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining session.
>>>But don't hold your breath.
>>>
>>>There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots about
>>>some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.
>>
>>
>> My prediction; there will be none of that. It's going to be about not
>> losing your identity in a marrage.
>>
>>
>>
>>>psycholist wrote:
>>>
>>>>Just caught a promo for Oprah. Tomorrow (Tuesday) Oprah's guest is
>>>>Lance's
>>>>ex Kristin who is supposed to "tell all" according to Oprah.
>>>>
>>>>Set your Tivos and VCRs.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Bob C.
>>>>
>>>>"Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
>>>>T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)
>>>
>>
>>
>



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

[RicodJour]

B. Lafferty wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> > Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining session.
> > But don't hold your breath.
> >
> > There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots about
> > some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.
>
> My prediction; there will be none of that. It's going to be about not
> losing your identity in a marrage.

You misspelled mirage.

She's angling to get back together with him. The odds are 2-1 that'll
work. She's gone national and said nothing bad at all about him, feeds
into the trust issues. He's had his fling(s), but still wants to put
family first. Plus make-up sex is the best.

R

 

[bob sullivan]

RicodJour wrote:
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining session.
>>>But don't hold your breath.
>>>
>>>There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots about
>>>some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.
>>
>>My prediction; there will be none of that. It's going to be about not
>>losing your identity in a marrage.
>
> You misspelled mirage.
>
> She's angling to get back together with him. The odds are 2-1 that'll
> work. She's gone national and said nothing bad at all about him, feeds
> into the trust issues. He's had his fling(s), but still wants to put
> family first. Plus make-up sex is the best.
>
> R

And...She's totally hot.

~bob

 

[B. Lafferty]

"bob sullivan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> RicodJour wrote:
>> B. Lafferty wrote:
>>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining session.
>>>>But don't hold your breath.
>>>>
>>>>There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots about
>>>>some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.
>>>
>>>My prediction; there will be none of that. It's going to be about not
>>>losing your identity in a marrage.
>>
>> You misspelled mirage.
>>
>> She's angling to get back together with him. The odds are 2-1 that'll
>> work. She's gone national and said nothing bad at all about him, feeds
>> into the trust issues. He's had his fling(s), but still wants to put
>> family first. Plus make-up sex is the best.
>>
>> R
>
> And...She's totally hot.
>
> ~bob

And apparently saving herself for him.

 

[Tim Lines]

B. Lafferty wrote:
> "bob sullivan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>RicodJour wrote:
>>
>>>B. Lafferty wrote:
>>>
>>>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>>Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining session.
>>>>>But don't hold your breath.
>>>>>
>>>>>There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots about
>>>>>some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.
>>>>
>>>>My prediction; there will be none of that. It's going to be about not
>>>>losing your identity in a marrage.
>>>
>>>You misspelled mirage.
>>>
>>>She's angling to get back together with him. The odds are 2-1 that'll
>>>work. She's gone national and said nothing bad at all about him, feeds
>>>into the trust issues. He's had his fling(s), but still wants to put
>>>family first. Plus make-up sex is the best.
>>>
>>>R
>>
>>And...She's totally hot.
>>
>>~bob
>
>
> And apparently saving herself for him.
>
>

Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."

 

[Allez1]

"Tim Lines" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>> "bob sullivan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>RicodJour wrote:
>>>
>>>>B. Lafferty wrote:
>>>>
>>>>><[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>>Let's just hope the interview does not turn into a big whining
>>>>>>session.
>>>>>>But don't hold your breath.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There is always the possiblity that we could see some cheap shots
>>>>>>about
>>>>>>some youn girls Lnace has been dating recently.
>>>>>
>>>>>My prediction; there will be none of that. It's going to be about not
>>>>>losing your identity in a marrage.
>>>>
>>>>You misspelled mirage.
>>>>
>>>>She's angling to get back together with him. The odds are 2-1 that'll
>>>>work. She's gone national and said nothing bad at all about him, feeds
>>>>into the trust issues. He's had his fling(s), but still wants to put
>>>>family first. Plus make-up sex is the best.
>>>>
>>>>R
>>>
>>>And...She's totally hot.
>>>
>>>~bob
>>
>>
>> And apparently saving herself for him.
>
> Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
> that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
> called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."

That's possible. It's also not in her interests to rock his boat while she
has three young children and needs to deal with him over the coming 18-20
years.

 

[[email protected]]

<I>That's possible. It's also not in her interests to rock his boat
while she
has three young children and needs to deal with him over the coming
18-20
years. </I>

When has that factored into a divorce? That's cooky talk!

 

[B. Lafferty]

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> <I>That's possible. It's also not in her interests to rock his boat
> while she
> has three young children and needs to deal with him over the coming
> 18-20
> years. </I>
>
> When has that factored into a divorce?
More than you might think.

>That's cooky talk!
>

 

[psycholist]

I think she showed a lot of class. She is kinda hot, too. That sure is one
heck of a set of teeth she's got.

--
Bob C.

"Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)
"B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> <I>That's possible. It's also not in her interests to rock his boat
>> while she
>> has three young children and needs to deal with him over the coming
>> 18-20
>> years. </I>
>>
>> When has that factored into a divorce?
> More than you might think.
>
>>That's cooky talk!
>>
>
>

 

[Allez1]

"psycholist" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I think she showed a lot of class.

Class and protecting ones interests and those of ones children are not
mutually exclusive.

> She is kinda hot, too.

Except for the giant crucifix around her neck. Although, that may be a turn
on for some.

> That sure is one heck of a set of teeth she's got.

Amen, Brother Bob.



>
> --
> Bob C.
>
> "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
> T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)
> "B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> <I>That's possible. It's also not in her interests to rock his boat
>>> while she
>>> has three young children and needs to deal with him over the coming
>>> 18-20
>>> years. </I>
>>>
>>> When has that factored into a divorce?
>> More than you might think.
>>
>>>That's cooky talk!
>>>
>>
>>
>
>




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

 

[[email protected]]

Tim Lines wrote:
> Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
> that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
> called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."

A quote from her sex&love column in "Glamour" tells you all you need to
know:

"I quit my job, rented out my house, gave my dog to an old boyfriend,
sold my car and moved to France so Lance could reenter the world of
professional cycling."

Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.

 

[B. Lafferty]

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Tim Lines wrote:
>> Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
>> that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
>> called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."
>
> A quote from her sex&love column in "Glamour" tells you all you need to
> know:
>
> "I quit my job, rented out my house, gave my dog to an old boyfriend,
> sold my car and moved to France so Lance could reenter the world of
> professional cycling."
>
> Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.
>

Good point. One of our two dogs was given up at the MSPCA shelter because
the owner was moving in with a guy who was "allergic." Wonderful dog--too
good for her.

 

[Joe Cipale]

Wayne Pein wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Tim Lines wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
>>> that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
>>> called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."
>>
>>
>>
>> A quote from her sex&love column in "Glamour" tells you all you need to
>> know:
>>
>> "I quit my job, rented out my house, gave my dog to an old boyfriend,
>> sold my car and moved to France so Lance could reenter the world of
>> professional cycling."
>>
>> Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.
>>
>
> Pffft. Many people are too classless to own a dog, failing to well train
> it or responsibly tend to it. This results in annoyed neighbors who
> suffer with barking and dog mess on their property. And of course
> bicyclists are sometimes harassed by untrained animals. Frankly, people
> ought to be required to take a dog training class prior to ownership.
>
> Wayne
>

The same can be said about kids as well... :^)

 

[Joe Cipale]

B. Lafferty wrote:
> "Wayne Pein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>B. Lafferty wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Wayne Pein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>
>>>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>>>>Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Pffft. Many people are too classless to own a dog, failing to well train
>>>>it or responsibly tend to it. This results in annoyed neighbors who
>>>>suffer with barking and dog mess on their property. And of course
>>>>bicyclists are sometimes harassed by untrained animals. Frankly, people
>>>>ought to be required to take a dog training class prior to ownership.
>>>>
>>>>Wayne
>>>>
>>>
>>>Different issues. But you knew that.
>>
>>Not necessarily. Perhaps her giving the dog away made her neighbors happy.
>>Thus it was an inadvertant act of class. Further, it's moronic to make the
>>statement, or unconditionally agree with it, that giving a dog away is
>>classless. But you knew that; or maybe you didn't.
>>
>>Wayne
>
> Giving a dog away for the reason she gave is classless. You may choose to
> disagree. Not all dog (or other animals) giving away is classless. I have
> a friend here in town who's son (7 years old) was just diagnosed with
> cancer. His treatment lasts three years. ALL pets had to go and his
> siblings had to be pulled from school because they will expose his to bugs
> that could kill him in his weakened state. A difficult decision, but not
> classless. Giving your dog away to follow a significant other is classless
>
>

And sadly reflects on the class of both parties.

 

[Joe Cipale]

Wayne Pein wrote:
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>
>>
>> Giving a dog away for the reason she gave is classless. You may
>> choose to disagree. Not all dog (or other animals) giving away is
>> classless. I have a friend here in town who's son (7 years old) was
>> just diagnosed with cancer. His treatment lasts three years. ALL
>> pets had to go and his siblings had to be pulled from school because
>> they will expose his to bugs that could kill him in his weakened
>> state. A difficult decision, but not classless. Giving your dog away
>> to follow a significant other is classless
>
>
>
> As much as people want to humanize pets, dogs are not people with four
> legs. This is a typical fundamental problem with many dog owners who do
> not understand this. The dog doesn't particularly care who takes care of
> it. It lives in the now. So, giving a dog away to be with a person is
> not classless. If a choice has to be made between a human significant
> other and a dog, only classless people would keep the dog.
>
> Wayne
>

I have kept many a dog over a selfish *****. Regardlerss of how great
the sex was.

 

[Wayne Pein]

[email protected] wrote:

> Tim Lines wrote:
>
>>Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
>>that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
>>called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."
>
>
> A quote from her sex&love column in "Glamour" tells you all you need to
> know:
>
> "I quit my job, rented out my house, gave my dog to an old boyfriend,
> sold my car and moved to France so Lance could reenter the world of
> professional cycling."
>
> Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.
>

Pffft. Many people are too classless to own a dog, failing to well train
it or responsibly tend to it. This results in annoyed neighbors who
suffer with barking and dog mess on their property. And of course
bicyclists are sometimes harassed by untrained animals. Frankly, people
ought to be required to take a dog training class prior to ownership.

Wayne

 

[B. Lafferty]

"Wayne Pein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Tim Lines wrote:
>>
>>>Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
>>>that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
>>>called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."
>>
>>
>> A quote from her sex&love column in "Glamour" tells you all you need to
>> know:
>>
>> "I quit my job, rented out my house, gave my dog to an old boyfriend,
>> sold my car and moved to France so Lance could reenter the world of
>> professional cycling."
>>
>> Anybody that gives away their dog cannot have a surplus of class.
>>
>
> Pffft. Many people are too classless to own a dog, failing to well train
> it or responsibly tend to it. This results in annoyed neighbors who suffer
> with barking and dog mess on their property. And of course bicyclists are
> sometimes harassed by untrained animals. Frankly, people ought to be
> required to take a dog training class prior to ownership.
>
> Wayne
>
Different issues. But you knew that.

 

[Michael Press]

In article
<[email protected]>,
Tim Lines <[email protected]> wrote:

> Maybe, just possibly, she isn't smearing him in public because she has
> that thing that went out of style 30 or 35 years ago ... what was that
> called? Oh yeah! We used to call it "class."

I agree that Kristin is classy. Class never goes out of
style. It is as frequent as ever. Typically it does not
make good copy or gossip.

--
Michael Press