"higb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Hi all, I've been riding a lot of hardtails in the $1200 to $1500 range and the one that felt best
(right away, as soon as it started moving) was the klein attitude. It's at the low end of my range
(about $1000) and heavier than I'd like (at least 26 pounds) so I wonder, should I just ride it as
is (and save some money) or upgrade it before it leaves the shop?
The fork, a Duke XC, seemed like the logical place to start, but it got real confusing reading
MtbREVIEW pages. It seemed like there were people with something bad to say about every 3 pound
(or less) fork. Are the light forks giving up too much, or is there something that will work well
for a 150 pound recreational xc rider?
Maybe the Duke XC is a good trade-off(?).
BTW, if you'd like to look over the attitude's equipment list and comment, it's here. I'm not
really sure if the "extra" weight is centered in a few things, or spread out in all the
components:
kleinbikes.combikes.aspOpen ↗
Thanks.
That bike is spec'd almost exactly the same as my '02 Sugar 3, thanks to the Trek marketing scheme.
To lighten up, I'd get IRC Serac 1.9 tires (which I think are the best XC tire in anything but total
flood conditions), any top level crank/bb (I recommenend anything RaceFace, though for you, the
TruVativ Stylo Team may be a bit better...it's lighter than some of the more affordable RF stuff,
and at 150 lbs. I doubt you'll miss the RF immortality), and high end Avid brakes/levers like SD Ti.
If the shop works with you, or if you shrewdly shop online, you can do all that for probably around
$400. Just for fun, I went to Cambria and put in the cart a Next LP square taper, RaceFace taperlock
bb, Avid SD Ti brakes and SD Mag levers, and a pair of Serac 1.9s. The total was $442, and the tires
and Avid stuff are probably cheaper at PricePoint. Sooooo...if the Klein was on the low end of your
price range, whch had $500 in wiggle room, you're now at the high-end, but the bike has some amazing
parts on it and is probably, give or take, a pound-plus lighter.
Also, weight could be saved and ride bettered in the seatpost/bar/stem areas - after a season on the
stock Sugar 3, I knew I wanted all the Bontrager stuff gone.
Regarding the fork...if you have bad luck, RockShox forks will leak, botom out, crack, and ruin your
ride fairly often. If you have good luck, they'll flex a bit and need a little more maintenance than
Manitou, Fox, or Marzocchi. You're being 150 lbs. helps. So, for pure weight savings, I'd let the
fork go - for now. For the best handling/performing bike, I'd get it the hell off of there.
I'd get rid of the Deore shifters and FD too...
Chris