rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

KH "dual hole" cranks!?

Started by Tjorning · · Last activity · 24 posts · 482 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
30 March 2008
Last activity
1 April 2008
Original author
Tjorning
Posts
24
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
482
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 24
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. has anyone got their hands on these yet?
    they look pretty weird/good idea. poor man's gear shift!
    [image:
    http://www.unicycle.com/images/catalog/hardware/crankarmsplined/tn_kh_dualcranks8537.jpg]

    --
    Tjorning
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tjorning's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/16789
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  2. Tjorning said:

    has anyone got their hands on these yet?
    they look pretty weird/good idea. poor man's gear shift!
    [image:
    http://www.unicycle.com/images/catalog/hardware/crankarmsplined/tn_kh_dualcranks8537.jpg]

    You'll be spinning the exact same amount of rotations no matter what
    size cranks you have, and on the shorter crank holes you'll have less
    torque/leverage, and be making smaller circles as you pedal.

    Imo, the main advantage with this setup is less leg movement, less
    saddle soreness. And making smaller circles in your pedaling usually
    also results in less wheel wobble and more efficient, smooth spinning,
    which in effect, can increase your speed.

    Switching to the shorter hole obviously is not the same as shifting a
    GUni into high gear, because in that case, as we know, the wheel is
    rotating *faster* than your pedal rotations. But then again, that's
    probably why you called it the "poor man's gear shift.":p

    PS: Having said all that, They do look cool and I want to get a pair
    too! 🙂

    --
    MuniAddict

    'My videos:' (http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  3. Anyone who's bought a KH29 in around the last year has these, as they
    come standard. They're very handy--I swap the pedals around a lot,
    depending on the terrain we're riding. I think they probably have at
    least a little less strength than the regular cranks, when the cranks
    are in the "long" position, but they aren't made for technical
    muni/trials anyway.

    I've been thinking about picking up the 165/137s to try out.

    --
    pkittle

    *==========================
    Peter Kittle * Chico, CA
    "The Revolution is just a t-shirt away."
    --Billy Bragg
    ==========================*
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    pkittle's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12111
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  4. Sure the drive ratio doesn't change but the gain ration does. In 125
    mode you wheel moves 20% more for the distance you feet move.

    I would love to have a set of 114/137 cranks to put on a 36er but alas
    nobody makes them.

    --
    saskatchewanian
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    saskatchewanian's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14180
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  5. saskatchewanian said:

    Sure the drive ratio doesn't change but the gain ration does. In 125
    mode you wheel moves 20% more for the distance you feet move.

    I would love to have a set of 114/137 cranks to put on a 36er but alas
    nobody makes them.

    I have the staight (zero q) alum qu-ax 114's. I wonder if they make them
    in 137mm-140mm. I'd like to have a pair of those with dual 114/140

    --
    MuniAddict

    'My videos:' (http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=ttt8699)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MuniAddict's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12920
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  6. I use those cranks on my newly Schlumphed KH29 guni. The 150 holes are
    great for offroad, and the 125 work great on the road.

    saskatchewanian said:

    I would love to have a set of 114/137 cranks to put on a 36er but alas
    nobody makes them.

    I brought that up as something I'd like to try on my KH-Schlumpf hub,
    but everyone seemed to think 125s are as short as you'd want to go in
    geared up mode. I went ahead and bought some ISIS 114s just to try
    anyway. One of these days...

    --
    phlegm
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    phlegm's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8382
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  7. MuniAddict said:

    You'll be spinning the exact same amount of rotations no matter what
    size cranks you have, and on the shorter crank holes you'll have less
    torque/leverage, and be making smaller circles as you pedal.

    Switching to the shorter hole obviously is not the same as shifting a
    GUni into high gear, because in that case, as we know, the wheel is
    rotating *faster* than your pedal rotations. But then again, that's
    probably why you called it the "poor man's gear shift.":p

    I was thinking a change in torque/leverage , not increased speed.

    --
    Tjorning
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tjorning's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/16789
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  8. I think someone should put 4 thin pedals on (one for each hole) and
    video tape it. It would look really funny😄 :p

    --
    surfer1024

    *)--SmallSpin-'O,* 1st Place)---hickflip-'O,
    Latest Vid: My flips
    http://tinyurl.com/2bw3n8
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    surfer1024's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/13733
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  9. I wonder if, when the pedal is in the short crank position, it is
    possible for the left over crank nub to lever a foot off the pedal on
    the upstroke. Like if the foot was a bit to far inside.

    --
    feel the light
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    feel the light's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14551
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  10. feel the light said:

    I wonder if, when the pedal is in the short crank position, it is
    possible for the left over crank nub to lever a foot off the pedal on
    the upstroke. Like if the foot was a bit to far inside.

    only to the same extent that you can accidentally stand on the main
    body of the crank during the downstroke, which for me happens pretty
    infrequently.

    --
    kington99

    Dave

    - what a thoroughly post-modern subversion of the cycling genre -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    kington99's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9417
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  11. they should make 36ers isis so u can use them. Or just make cotterless
    dual-holes cranks. I think that a 36er would benefit the most from
    these

    --
    unikid132

    ~stairs are a hill with bumps~🙄
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    unikid132's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/16475
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  12. unikid132 said:

    they should make 36ers isis so u can use them. Or just make cotterless
    dual-holes cranks. I think that a 36er would benefit the most from
    these

    Qu-Ax already make ISIS 36ers. Plus, if you're building your own
    wheel, then you can pick and choose any* hub you want. However, the
    main advantages of ISIS hubs and cranks is their strength - something
    that isn't a big concern for 99% of big wheel riders.

    But dual hole square taper cranks would be a fantastic upgrade for many
    riders.

    STM

    * any 36 hole hub, of course. Unless you've managed to get Qu-Ax to
    sell you one of their 48 hole rims on its own!

    --
    semach.the.monkey
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    semach.the.monkey's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12078
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  13. semach.the.monkey said:

    However, the main advantages of ISIS hubs and cranks is their strength -
    something that isn't a big concern for 99% of big wheel riders.

    And the main disadvantage of using an ISIS hub is that they're not as
    wide as the coker hubs so sacrifice wheel strength, something which is
    important to many riders. Unfortunately they don't make stock ISIS
    bottom axles, from which unicycle hubs are made, in lengths suitable to
    build a wide hub around.

    --
    kington99

    Dave

    - what a thoroughly post-modern subversion of the cycling genre -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    kington99's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9417
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  14. kington99 said:

    And the main disadvantage of using an ISIS hub is that they're not as
    wide as the coker hubs so sacrifice wheel strength, something which is
    important to many riders. Unfortunately they don't make stock ISIS
    bottom axles, from which unicycle hubs are made, in lengths suitable to
    build a wide hub around.

    The ISIS KH geared muni hub works quite wheel in a Nimbus 36"er
    (modified) frame. It is wide enough to avoid flex.

    http://tinyurl.com/yp7a7j

    [image:
    http://lh4.google.com/corbin.dunn/R_D_Tq79l0I/AAAAAAAACV4/XAGJd-2vPXA/s144/IMG_8276.jpg]

    --
    corbin

    http://www.corbinstreehouse.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    corbin's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7561
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  15. corbin said:

    The ISIS KH geared muni hub works quite wheel in a Nimbus 36"er
    (modified) frame. It is wide enough to avoid flex.

    http://tinyurl.com/yp7a7j

    [image:
    http://lh4.google.com/corbin.dunn/R_D_Tq79l0I/AAAAAAAACV4/XAGJd-2vPXA/s144/IMG_8276.jpg]

    Yes, of course it isn't in the least bit standard and very expensive.
    The point was that to keep prices down uni hubs are made from standard
    bike axles, and they aren't available long enough. Perhaps it would be
    worth someone making custom wide ISIS axles for uni hubs. I've ridden a
    36 with the original schlump ST hub, the wheel stiffness isn't bad but
    not as good as with a wide coker hub. Of course with the schlump the
    flange diametre is much larger which will help to some degree.

    --
    kington99

    Dave

    - what a thoroughly post-modern subversion of the cycling genre -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    kington99's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9417
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  16. kington99 said:

    Yes, of course it isn't in the least bit standard and very expensive.
    The point was that to keep prices down uni hubs are made from standard
    bike axles, and they aren't available long enough. Perhaps it would be
    worth someone making custom wide ISIS axles for uni hubs. I've ridden a
    36 with the original schlump ST hub, the wheel stiffness isn't bad but
    not as good as with a wide coker hub. Of course with the schlump the
    flange diametre is much larger which will help to some degree.

    I thought the point of ISIS was to use a standard, instead of the
    current problem that's developed: My old steel KH 24's cranks aren't
    compatible with the Onza hub one's, which aren't compatible with the
    newest ISIS ones. Yes, the KH schlumpf is expensive, but i think it is
    the future of unicycling. The hub is definitely wide enough. I've put
    it through it's paces, and it has worked quite well for me. I think the
    Nimbus frame has some flex, which also occurred for me with the extra
    wide hub, and forced me to stop using a magura brake.

    corbin

    --
    corbin

    http://www.corbinstreehouse.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    corbin's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7561
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  17. corbin said:

    I thought the point of ISIS was to use a standard, instead of the
    current problem that's developed: My old steel KH 24's cranks aren't
    compatible with the Onza hub one's, which aren't compatible with the
    newest ISIS ones. Yes, the KH schlumpf is expensive, but i think it is
    the future of unicycling. The hub is definitely wide enough. I've put
    it through it's paces, and it has worked quite well for me. I think the
    Nimbus frame has some flex, which also occurred for me with the extra
    wide hub, and forced me to stop using a magura brake.

    corbin

    a longer axle would still fit ISIS cranks, it would just give a wider
    flange and bearing spacing. Don't get me wrong, I absoloutely love the
    KH/Schlumpf hub and it is no doubt the future, but I can't afford one
    right now, and no-one deals them in the UK.

    --
    kington99

    Dave

    - what a thoroughly post-modern subversion of the cycling genre -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    kington99's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9417
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  18. kington99 said:

    I absoloutely love the KH/Schlumpf hub and it is no doubt the future,
    but I can't afford one right now, and no-one deals them in the UK.

    Except for UDC, of course;
    http://tinyurl.com/32ydko

    STM

    --
    semach.the.monkey
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    semach.the.monkey's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12078
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  19. kington99 said:

    Yes, of course it isn't in the least bit standard and very expensive.
    The point was that to keep prices down uni hubs are made from standard
    bike axles, and they aren't available long enough. Perhaps it would be
    worth someone making custom wide ISIS axles for uni hubs. I've ridden a
    36 with the original schlump ST hub, the wheel stiffness isn't bad but
    not as good as with a wide coker hub. Of course with the schlump the
    flange diametre is much larger which will help to some degree.
    ...
    and no-one deals them in the UK

    It is available in the uk
    http://tinyurl.com/393rlw

    In terms of stiffness, I don't think comparing the old schlumpf
    unicycle to a non geared wide hub unicycle has any point, as the old
    schlumpf hub had some side to side wobble in the internal hub bits
    which was really noticeable, and then was typically put in an ultra
    flexy schlumpf frame. Any wheel flex that you may get would be way less
    than the frame flex and hub wobble on an old schlumpf 36.

    Joe

    --
    joemarshall

    my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albuq44
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  20. semach.the.monkey said:

    Except for UDC, of course;
    http://tinyurl.com/32ydko

    STM

    oh damn i was looking for a built uni with the hub. So I'd have to buy
    a KH 29 then get the hub and some new spokes?

    --
    kington99

    Dave

    - what a thoroughly post-modern subversion of the cycling genre -
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    kington99's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9417
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/68790

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.