Road Cycling · Public discussion

John Kerry

Started by trg · · Last activity · 118 posts · 5,124 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 July 2005
Last activity
27 July 2005
Original author
trg
Posts
118
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
5,124
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 101–118 of 118
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:

    stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    ill- or mis-informed,
    a religious activist.

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall

    Conservative dictionary:
    Judicial Activist: n. A judge who tends to rule against your wishes.

  2. RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:

    stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    ill- or mis-informed,
    a religious activist.

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall

    Conservative dictionary:
    Judicial Activist: n. A judge who tends to rule against your wishes.

  3. RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:

    stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    ill- or mis-informed,
    a religious activist.

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall

    Conservative dictionary:
    Judicial Activist: n. A judge who tends to rule against your wishes.

  4. RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:

    stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    ill- or mis-informed,
    a religious activist.

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall

    Conservative dictionary:
    Judicial Activist: n. A judge who tends to rule against your wishes.

  5. RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:

    stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    ill- or mis-informed,
    a religious activist.

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall

    Conservative dictionary:
    Judicial Activist: n. A judge who tends to rule against your wishes.

  6. RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:

    stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    ill- or mis-informed,
    a religious activist.

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall

    Conservative dictionary:
    Judicial Activist: n. A judge who tends to rule against your wishes.

  7. RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:

    stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    ill- or mis-informed,
    a religious activist.

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall

    Conservative dictionary:
    Judicial Activist: n. A judge who tends to rule against your wishes.

  8. RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:

    stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    ill- or mis-informed,
    a religious activist.

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    --
    --
    Lynn Wallace http://www.xmission.com/~lawall

    Conservative dictionary:
    Judicial Activist: n. A judge who tends to rule against your wishes.

  9. Hey -- he's cool -- he bikes.

    Better than bench pressing and tipping cows.

  10. Hey -- he's cool -- he bikes.

    Better than bench pressing and tipping cows.

  11. Hey -- he's cool -- he bikes.

    Better than bench pressing and tipping cows.

  12. Raptor said:
    RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    >Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    >exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
    >
    >stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    >ill- or mis-informed,
    >a religious activist.
    >

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    The Dems have some real structural problems as a national party, and to be
    honest I'd love to see them worked out.

    Don't think it'll happen until a few things change. But we'll see.

    Ron

  13. Raptor said:
    RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    >Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    >exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
    >
    >stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    >ill- or mis-informed,
    >a religious activist.
    >

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    The Dems have some real structural problems as a national party, and to be
    honest I'd love to see them worked out.

    Don't think it'll happen until a few things change. But we'll see.

    Ron

  14. Raptor said:
    RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    >Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    >exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
    >
    >stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    >ill- or mis-informed,
    >a religious activist.
    >

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    The Dems have some real structural problems as a national party, and to be
    honest I'd love to see them worked out.

    Don't think it'll happen until a few things change. But we'll see.

    Ron

  15. Raptor said:
    RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    >Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    >exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
    >
    >stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    >ill- or mis-informed,
    >a religious activist.
    >

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    The Dems have some real structural problems as a national party, and to be
    honest I'd love to see them worked out.

    Don't think it'll happen until a few things change. But we'll see.

    Ron

  16. Raptor said:
    RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    >Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    >exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
    >
    >stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    >ill- or mis-informed,
    >a religious activist.
    >

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    The Dems have some real structural problems as a national party, and to be
    honest I'd love to see them worked out.

    Don't think it'll happen until a few things change. But we'll see.

    Ron

  17. Raptor said:
    RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    >Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    >exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
    >
    >stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    >ill- or mis-informed,
    >a religious activist.
    >

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    The Dems have some real structural problems as a national party, and to be
    honest I'd love to see them worked out.

    Don't think it'll happen until a few things change. But we'll see.

    Ron

  18. Raptor said:
    RonSonic said:
    C.M. Burns said:

    On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
    >Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
    >exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
    >
    >stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
    >ill- or mis-informed,
    >a religious activist.
    >

    It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
    success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
    Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.

    Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
    Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".

    Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>

    Ron

    Interesting how fast the subject changes from the president. The
    embarrassment seems to be sinking in even on that side of politics.

    (Democrats ARE kicking ass fairly well on the local/county level. It
    remains to be seen whether they/we can leverage any of that upward. But
    Shrub has three years left to help us out.)

    The Dems have some real structural problems as a national party, and to be
    honest I'd love to see them worked out.

    Don't think it'll happen until a few things change. But we'll see.

    Ron

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.