Power meters · Public discussion

Is WKO+ worth the cost?

Started by azdroptop · · Last activity · 20 posts · 4,834 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
18 May 2009
Last activity
21 May 2009
Original author
azdroptop
Posts
20
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,834
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 20
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just wondering? Worth it to upgrade from poweragent?

  2. azdroptop said:

    Just wondering? Worth it to upgrade from poweragent?

    Yes!

    The PMC alone makes WKO+ worth the cost but it's also much easier to present custom graphs and charts the way you want to see them and I find it much easier to review a ride file in WKO+.

    I've used Poweragent in it's various releases as a way to upload data onto my laptop while on the road and didn't really appreciate how much better WKO+ was until a friend wth a non-Intel Mac went first to Golden Cheetah and then to Poweragent. I was trying to help him review ride files and create the kind of custom charts I have in WKO+, it just doesn't compare. When I got a new laptop I spent the cash for a second WKO+ license just to have full featured power file review and my PMC charts on extended trips. It was easily worth it.

    -Dave

  3. Shill. 😄

    daveryanwyoming said:

    Yes!

    The PMC alone makes WKO+ worth the cost but it's also much easier to present custom graphs and charts the way you want to see them and I find it much easier to review a ride file in WKO+.

    I've used Poweragent in it's various releases as a way to upload data onto my laptop while on the road and didn't really appreciate how much better WKO+ was until a friend wth a non-Intel Mac went first to Golden Cheetah and then to Poweragent. I was trying to help him review ride files and create the kind of custom charts I have in WKO+, it just doesn't compare. When I got a new laptop I spent the cash for a second WKO+ license just to have full featured power file review and my PMC charts on extended trips. It was easily worth it.

    -Dave

  4. Meek One said:

    Shill. 😄

    Too true, but doesn't a shill get a cut of the take?

    I knock plenty of products (and have had my go at some WKO+ features with Hunter) but it's nice when something really does what it's supposed to.

    -Dave

  5. azdroptop said:

    Just wondering? Worth it to upgrade from poweragent?

    [font=Arial Black]YES[/font]

  6. I forgot to mention I'm a MAC User. Compatible?

    Jono L said:

    [font=Arial Black]YES[/font]

  7. azdroptop said:

    I forgot to mention I'm a MAC User. Compatible?

    Not natively. I believe there are ways to use the windows emulation software (VMWare, Parallels) on a Mac to make it doable. There are a few threads on this.

  8. Time to pay the man from Wyoming. :p

    daveryanwyoming said:

    Too true, but doesn't a shill get a cut of the take?

    I knock plenty of products (and have had my go at some WKO+ features with Hunter) but it's nice when something really does what it's supposed to.

    -Dave

  9. I'm bummed to hear it isn't Mac compatible. Oh well, I can fire up the older Lap top. 🙂 Thanks all.

    Meek One said:

    Time to pay the man from Wyoming. :p

  10. azdroptop said:

    I'm bummed to hear it isn't Mac compatible. Oh well, I can fire up the older Lap top. 🙂 Thanks all.

    I'm sorry that Coggan and Hunter haven't paid Dave yet... :p

  11. azdroptop said:

    I'm bummed to hear it isn't Mac compatible. Oh well, I can fire up the older Lap top. 🙂 Thanks all.

    Still worth the extra effort.. hell I bought a cheap laptop so I could download files at camps and races.🙂

  12. Meek One said:

    I'm sorry that Coggan and Hunter haven't paid Dave yet... :p

    Don't look at me - I'm not a principal in, or an employee of, the company that markets WKO+. 🙂

  13. I bought a copy on Monday and have spent a little while porting over all the sessions stored in PowerAgent and getting all the little details correct...

    Now I gotta learn all the Performance Manager stuff - TSS, CTL etc etc... and learn what they are and why they're important. It's like a foreign language.

    I wonder if Rossetta Stone has a DVD available to help me translate into English. :p

  14. swampy1970 said:

    Now I gotta learn all the Performance Manager stuff - TSS, CTL etc etc... and learn what they are and why they're important. It's like a foreign language.

    I wonder if Rossetta Stone has a DVD available to help me translate into English. :p

    Here's the secret decoder ring....but don't tell anybody.

    home.trainingpeaks.comwhat is the performance management chart.aspx
    home.trainingpeaks.comcreating a performance management chart.aspx
    home.trainingpeaks.comthe science of the performance manager.aspx

    And so you don't get caught up in the "how much CTL do I need?" sort of thinking here's some thoughts I posted a while back on CTL concepts:

    Quoted post said:


    • There's no fixed CTL level that you need to achieve to ride
      competitively, but I certainly feel like my base is awfully shallow
      when my CTL is below 70 and personally have trouble maintaining more
      than 110. I've raced sucessfully between those extremes with 90-100 being pretty typical during race season when I'm spending my base
    • CTL or TSS shouldn't be viewed in isolation without taking into
      account the training mix that led to that overall load. A CTL of 120
      built entirely on six hour L2 rides probably won't get you ready for
      general road racing or crits. A lower CTL with a better mix including
      an appropriate amount of high end work is generally a better bet.
    • Trying to ramp your CTL faster than 5 to 8 points a week is tough
      for most folks and can lead to burnout, illness or deep fatigue. IOW,
      steady and slightly increasing training loads tend to work better than
      trying to pile on a lot of training all at once.
    • When you're building CTL by definition you're a bit fatigued and as
      it sags your workload is relatively easy compared to what you've been
      doing so you're fresher. But sooner or later you spend away too much
      base and have to rebuild. So put plenty "in the bank" during winter
      and preseason training so you have some to "spend" when it counts. You
      still have to pay attention to specific training mix so finding a
      balance that works the right systems for your events and needs and
      still builds "enough" CTL is where training science meets art.
    • You can definitely do one day events that result in a TSS well above
      your current CTL, but the bigger the difference the longer it will
      take to recover and the more likely it is for you to have power fade
      late in the ride. Another way to think about this is that with a CTL
      of 100 a run of the mill crit might be hard from a peak power or
      microburst recovery standpoint but the overall load will be similar to
      your average workload for the last 3 to 4 months and you should
      recover fairly quickly to race or train again. With a CTL of 60 a
      four hour road race ridden at Tempo and above will be several times
      your average training load and will dig a big hole that you'll have to
      recover from. It's not impossible, but hopefully it isn't day one of a
      stage race where you have to get up and do it again the following day.

    Well, that's a start but the list could go a lot further. Bottom line,
    there are no hard and fast numbers for daily workout TSS or overall
    CTL. It's all a balancing act in terms of doing the workouts that
    target the systems that will help you the most, getting enough
    training load on a daily basis but not so much that it hinders future
    training sessions and building your CTL high enough over time so that
    you can handle the types of events you'll do and have some excess for
    tapers but still fits into your available training time. Not an easy
    set of tasks to balance, but that's where a good coach can come in
    handy.

    -Dave

  15. So I'm trying the trial. 🙂

    How do I look at my 'intervals' like you can in Poweragent?

  16. azdroptop said:

    ...How do I look at my 'intervals' like you can in Poweragent?

    Use the mouse to right click on any of your tagged intervals and select "zoom range" to view just the interval itself. To get back to full view just right click the main graph and choose "zoom fit all".

    Use the mouse to select any region that's interesting even if it spans some saved intervals and right click the new selection (shows up as Selection in the left hand menu) and do the same zoom range to view just your selection. You can save the selection as a new range (basically an interval) by making the selection and typing ctrl-r then renaming the new selection as desired. So if you don't use your interval buttons on the PT CPU you can still tag intervals after the fact by noting when power rises or drops and saving a mouse selection of that region.

    -Dave

  17. Thanks Dave!

  18. Problem is I don't see any Tagged intervals. ON the graph I always get a Grey section that I have no idea what it is. Alwo what the deal with the Powertap 1, Powertap 2 etc? Nevermind. Those must be the intervals.
    Sorry for being retarded...

    daveryanwyoming said:

    Use the mouse to right click on any of your tagged intervals and select "zoom range" to view just the interval itself. To get back to full view just right click the main graph and choose "zoom fit all".

    Use the mouse to select any region that's interesting even if it spans some saved intervals and right click the new selection (shows up as Selection in the left hand menu) and do the same zoom range to view just your selection. You can save the selection as a new range (basically an interval) by making the selection and typing ctrl-r then renaming the new selection as desired. So if you don't use your interval buttons on the PT CPU you can still tag intervals after the fact by noting when power rises or drops and saving a mouse selection of that region.

    -Dave

  19. azdroptop said:

    ...ON the graph I always get a Grey section that I have no idea what it is. ...

    Sounds like you figured out the intervals, WKO+ calls 'em ranges but you get the idea. And of course the PT CPU doesn't "stop" an interval it just launches a new interval. So if you do a set of training repeats you get "on" intervals followed by "rest" intervals and that's the way they show up in WKO+ so it's typical that my even numbered intervals are simply rest and the odd intervals are actually of interest. That's not really a WKO+ thing, but worth remembering.

    Regions of the graph are gray and sometimes hard to view unless you click the visibility (eyeball icon) on the ranges menu. Then the background for that section of the graph turns black and the individual curves are much easier to see. Again you can select with the mouse and save a new range then click the visibility for that entire range or for that matter the entire ride if you want the entire background black.

    The visibility toggle is really nice when you do a set of intervals or hill repeats and just want to do a quick visual comparison of average power, speed or pacing across the set of intervals. Just click the eyeball icons on for the intervals of interest and leave the "entire ride" and other ranges so that that their eyeball icons aren't clicked. Then the ranges of interest will show up black and you can zoom so that they all fit the screen and quickly compare pacing/power fade across the set of repeats.

    The visibilty icon is also handy when you want to quickly figure out when a particular high point occurred during a ride or race. If you view the entire ride and click the visibility on for say your peak 5 second or peak 1 minute range it will light up black and be easy to see. I've surprised myself a few times by hitting peak 5 second efforts attacking or covering an attack midway through a race and not necessarily in the sprint.

    -Dave

  20. Master, I thank you again. That really helps a bunch. 🙂

    Rick

    daveryanwyoming said:

    Sounds like you figured out the intervals, WKO+ calls 'em ranges but you get the idea. And of course the PT CPU doesn't "stop" an interval it just launches a new interval. So if you do a set of training repeats you get "on" intervals followed by "rest" intervals and that's the way they show up in WKO+ so it's typical that my even numbered intervals are simply rest and the odd intervals are actually of interest. That's not really a WKO+ thing, but worth remembering.

    Regions of the graph are gray and sometimes hard to view unless you click the visibility (eyeball icon) on the ranges menu. Then the background for that section of the graph turns black and the individual curves are much easier to see. Again you can select with the mouse and save a new range then click the visibility for that entire range or for that matter the entire ride if you want the entire background black.

    The visibility toggle is really nice when you do a set of intervals or hill repeats and just want to do a quick visual comparison of average power, speed or pacing across the set of intervals. Just click the eyeball icons on for the intervals of interest and leave the "entire ride" and other ranges so that that their eyeball icons aren't clicked. Then the ranges of interest will show up black and you can zoom so that they all fit the screen and quickly compare pacing/power fade across the set of repeats.

    The visibilty icon is also handy when you want to quickly figure out when a particular high point occurred during a ride or race. If you view the entire ride and click the visibility on for say your peak 5 second or peak 1 minute range it will light up black and be easy to see. I've surprised myself a few times by hitting peak 5 second efforts attacking or covering an attack midway through a race and not necessarily in the sprint.

    -Dave

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.